SPONSORED BY:

The Case for Brainy Power

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

How would this help people?
One of the challenges that the electric grid has is how to provide power on a hot day in the summer: since everybody's using power at that point, we frequently see brownouts and sometimes blackouts. If the grid could be in constant communication with your air conditioner, we could avoid these kinds of problems, and you might get paid in exchange for allowing your air conditioner to be cycled on and off in relatively imperceptible ways. If we had real-time pricing of electricity—that is, pricing for people that reflects different costs throughout the day—you would have a choice: wash and dry your clothes at noon on a hot day, which will cost you x dollars, or wait six to eight hours when it will cost you a quarter of that. Over time, we are going to have smarter appliances and equipment in our homes. But all this is going to take increasing investment in the grid.

What will that investment get us?
For one, we need what are called smart meters. These are meters that record real-time information and can send it over the Internet to utilities, and then get it directly to consumers. You wouldn't expect to go into a grocery store and do your shopping and not know what the prices for anything were and only get a bill at the end of the month. We need to get to a point where people have a lot more sense about what we're paying for energy at any given point, and more choice about where it comes from and how green it is.

Sounds wonderful, but it also sounds like something involving a patchwork of overlapping governments and regulators. Is it likely that we could actually get to the point you ' re describing?
Yes. As I said, one of the critical needs is intelligent meters, and those are beginning to be installed. State utility regulators are encouraging utilities to purchase and install large numbers of them. We're not where countries like Italy are—they've installed smart meters across the entire country—but we're moving in that direction. I also think the economic attractiveness of being able to better monitor and control your own energy use, whether you're a homeowner or a factory operator, is going to motivate people, especially in an era of higher energy prices.

Google uses enormous amounts of energy in its server farms. Wouldn ' t part of the new energy future require you to do better on that front?
Absolutely. The energy work we're doing will also help Google to green up its own operations. It turns out that responding to millions of Google searches uses a fair amount of electricity. We've made some good progress in making those facilities more efficient, and we are looking for greener sources of electricity.

If you are asked to be secretary of energy in the Obama administration, what would be the first thing you ' d do?
I think one of the things we clearly need to do is put a price on carbon emissions to control greenhouse gases. That would send the right price signals to the economy and drive the trillions of dollars of investment that will have to be made both to avert the climate crisis and to rebuild our economy.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: ajka @ 12/14/2008 12:01:54 AM

    Toronto, I mean

  • Posted By: ajka @ 12/14/2008 12:00:57 AM

    This system is already working in Toeonto

  • Posted By: jufemaiz @ 11/25/2008 6:53:07 AM

    @ectreece: I'm sorry but it is not at all "unfair" for those you claim to have no choice. The very fact that you are contributing to a collective usage that drives investment means that there should be a price signal to ensure that the usage during those periods are peak. Further, the notion that 7-10pm would be peak is ludicrous and implies little understanding of the system loads that would be the key driver behind prices.

    @daviddurant: one of the benefits of a grid is that the feeding of electricity comes from more than one source - particularly at the transmission level. While it would be possible to coordinate an attack on multiple towers on multiple feeders a far more effective way to cripple infrastructure would be nodes (large substations) where cleanup costs would be much higher and take far longer than the replacement of overhead lines and towers. Part of the design of the network is to meet contingencies, and while I wouldn't want to speak for the transmission authorities in California I wouldn't be surprised if an n-1 or n-2 scenario was the design criteria.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now