POLITICS

A New Voice Rises In the Red States

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: hanibal @ 04/24/2009 12:09:04 AM

    These are dangerous times. Men and women without jobs, who lost their homes, their healthcare, and hope for the future are formidable foes.
    As the Administration has both the printing presses and the B.S. propaganda machines running 24/7 the working slobs, like me, are getting very Jeffersonian in their view of this government. Forget Bush, he only helped to grease the skids needed for Obama to slide into power. Obama is the symptom, not the disease. The disease is American apathy and ambivalence towards their rights. Remember Martin Nemoller, who said, regarding the Nazi's, "when they came for me there was no one left." Take heed America. First, they will come for the Right Wing Extremists, then the 2nd Amendment Supporters, then the Pro Life Groups, then those who do not condone Gay Rights. Soon, they will get to YOUR group, regardless how benign the gathering. A government with a power agenda has no ethical boundaries, no conscience, nothing but an appetite for more power. So, now that we have to trash the U.S. Constitution and the Ten Commandments, it is up to a small contingent to stand tall and to take the first arrows. I'm ready.

    Sisao Tresed

  • Posted By: greatmidwest @ 11/22/2008 1:00:26 AM


    The GOP needs to find itself. It's a lost and faceless party that is slowly losing its identity and connection with mainstream Americans, mainly the 25-35 y.o. electorate. The GOP has failed to take a close look at ALL of America and build a national grassroots effort like the Obama-Biden campaign did so effectively to win the 2008 presidential election. The GOP did not grow beyond its caucasian base, and failed miserably with connecting with new voters, especially African-Americans, Hispanic Americans , and Arab-Americans. Using the internet effectively can help spread the word of your party, but eventually it is the party's political leader who sets the tone and who takes a losing party into a new defining direction. No Conservative cheerleader like Bay Buchanan, Leslie Sanchez, or right-wing boom box like Rush Limbaugh can re-define a party that's lost its face and sense of direction......Our President-elect Barack Obama will have the daunting task of having to overturn 8 years of US economic and foreign policy decline under Bush 43. Unfortunately, for the GOP, the American people are more unified than ever at fixing what's wrong with Washington DC, than they are at fxing a dysfunctional Republcian party. Maybe there will be an interest in 8 or 10 years, only time will tell......God Bless America

    For now, the political stage awaits our nation's incoming Democratic President Barack Obama and his majority party led Congress, as both America and the World eagerly look on with great anticipation.

  • Posted By: YashBudini @ 11/20/2008 1:16:53 PM

    Dear Red States:

    We've decided we're leaving. We intend to form our own country, and we're taking the other Blue States with us. In case you aren't aware, that includes California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and all the Northeast. We believe this split will be beneficial to the nation, and especially to the people of the new country of New California.

    To sum up briefly: You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the slave states. We get stem cell research and the best beaches. We get the Statue of Liberty. You get Dollywood. We get Intel and Microsoft. You get WorldCom. We get Harvard. You get Ole' Miss. We get 85 percent of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You get Alabama. We get two-thirds of the tax revenue, you get to make the red states pay their fair share.

    Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22 percent lower than the Christian Coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a bunch of single moms. Please be aware that Nuevo California will be pro-choice and anti-war, and we're going to want all our citizens back from Iraq at once. If you need people to fight, ask your evangelicals. They have kids they're apparently willing to send to their deaths for no purpose, and they don't care if you don't show pictures of their children's caskets coming home. We do wish you success in Iraq, and hope that the WMDs turn up, but we're not willing to spend our resources in Bush's Quagmire.

    With the Blue States in hand, we will have firm control of 80 percent of the country's fresh water, more than 90 percent of the pineapple and lettuce, 92 percent of the nation's fresh fruit, 95 percent of America's quality wines (you can serve French wines at state dinners), 90 percent of all cheese, 90 percent of the high tech industry, most of the U.S. low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools plus Stanford, Cal Tech and MIT. With the Red States, on the other hand, you will have to cope with 88 percent of all obese Americans (and their projected health care costs), 92 percent of all U.S. mosquitoes, nearly 100 percent of the tornadoes, 90 percent of the hurricanes, 99 percent of all Southern Baptists, virtually 100 percent of all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh, Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia. We get Hollywood and Yosemite, thank you.

    Additionally, 38 percent of those in the Red states believe Jonah was actually swallowed by a whale, 62 percent believe life is sacred unless we're discussing the death penalty or gun laws, 44 percent say that evolution is only a theory, 53 percent that Saddam was involved in 9/11 and 61 percent of you crazy bastards believe you are people with higher morals then we lefties.

    Finally, we're taking the good pot, too. You can have that dirt weed they grow in Mexico.

    Peace out,

    Blue States

    • Posted By: Republican be gone @ 11/21/2008 1:04:46 AM

      If I ever do anything really stupid like set my hair on fire to see if it feels good, I can log in to red state and feel like a genius in no time.

  • Posted By: freeperexgeeeye @ 11/15/2008 9:30:38 PM

    Something a lot of us out here share with Our Sarah: a defiant disdain for the effete "elite". We hear them, nattering away in their dwindling dinomedia (somebody check NYTs stock, wouldja? kthx), and laugh. We wear their scorn as a badge of honor, and live in some hope that our lives or his show will last long enough for Kieth Olberman to call us, individually and by name, "worst person ever" or whatever; on the other hand, we only occasionally watch that show when we need a good chuckle, so maybe he already did. EAGLES UP!

    • Posted By: ignatov @ 11/18/2008 12:31:39 PM

      "a defiant disdain for the effete "elite" [and] NYTs [and] Kieth (sic) Olberman (sic)"

      And hippies! Don't forget the hippies!

  • Posted By: mc2mc5 @ 11/15/2008 8:54:50 PM

    One thing Redstate does not believe in is free speech. Most any comment or question that doe snot fall into their party line is either edited or deleted, and the writer banned. This is not the expulsion of your average nattering troll, but people trying for some civilized dialog. Not in Redstate. This echo chamber is not going to win over too many voters outside their bunker mentality.

    • Posted By: Kenny Solomon @ 11/15/2008 9:10:24 PM

      In the words of a well know advert, "Not Exactly". Respectful dissent is more than welcome and writers are hopefully treated with respect by all. It's the maniacs who are not welcome and that's on all sides.

      • Posted By: sherrysimpson @ 11/16/2008 5:00:02 AM

        I used to read RedState almost every day just to see what conservatives were talking about--and more importantly, not talking about. I never bothered posting once I saw how much they like pulling their "Blam!" routine, not just on rude interlopers, but on regulars (but not insiders) who did dare to disagree. After I saw Erickson post a thread speculating on whether Obama had been molested by a family friend based on a National Enquirer article, followed by replies speculating on whether Obama then molested his daughters, I was through trying to glean "insights" from this bunch. Erickson claimed it was irony or a joke or something ridiculous. I keep looking for an informative, openminded conservative site, but no luck. I don't read DailyKos because it's too chatty, often rude, and preachy to the choir. But if RedState is the best conservatives can do, then no wonder Republicans are in trouble. It's more fun to check in once in awhile and watch them eat their own young alive.

        • Posted By: Mike_Dugas @ 11/17/2008 5:48:56 PM

          Link to that or you are a liar

          • Posted By: MK_Ball @ 11/17/2008 7:09:16 PM

            Mike, it was actually worse than how Sherry described it. They didn't just speculate that Obama was molested as a child. They assumed that young Barack was a willing participant so it was an "underage, gay affair with a pedophile."
            http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/oct/13/obamas-special-relationship/

        • Posted By: Mike_Dugas @ 11/17/2008 5:51:32 PM

          You should post a link to that...I think you are lying. I've been a member for 3 years and have NEVER seen
          such a post. I could see an article being discussed but there's no way Erik made unsupported suggestions like that.

      • Posted By: mc2mc5 @ 11/16/2008 8:22:34 AM

        Actually, it is EXACTLY as I wrote it. I wrote in "respectfully" asking what was Gov. Palin's appeal, asking for people to discuss the issues, not personality. The Bridge, Troopergate, the wardrobe, etc--the issues that led to 59% of the US electorate saying she was unqualified to be President. That made it online for about 5 minutes before it was totally rewritten, and I was soon "Banned." I am no troll, much less a maniac, and your presuming to know my story and using that epithet without first checking your facts shows little interest in the truth. Respectful dissent? I see little evidence of that there.

    • Posted By: scismj @ 11/15/2008 11:21:11 PM

      B.S.

      • Posted By: mc2mc5 @ 11/16/2008 8:11:30 AM

        How do you know it is BS? It happened to me, and others I know. A post of mine asking exactly what was Gov. Palin's appeal to voters was censored and totally changed under a heading of "This is evil of me." Other posts were not entered, and I could no longer sign in. Why?
        You would think you'd ask me for details before you give such a simple-minded answer. Otherwise, you make my point for me.

  • Posted By: wareagle68 @ 11/17/2008 4:32:24 AM

    The author of this pieces states: "That community network is where Red State's real power lies, and its organizational clout is why Erickson's latest???and most controversial???gambit has at least one faction of the GOP so unsettled."

    Seriously?

    To the author: do some basic research before you make a claim like that - you know, some actual "reporting"?

    First, claiming "organizational clout" would require a site that doesn't give you a "500 Error" with undue frequency.

    That "organizational clout" would also seem to require that they have a "base" of more than somewhere around 50 people. I bet if you actually looked at their traffic statistics, that well over half of their visitors are composed of lurkers who stop by just to marvel at the insanity.

    Did the author even look at the comments to a few of their front page and/or "recommended" posts? They are like the online version of the Phelps clan. The incestuous backslapping and "amens" can be amusing, but it hardly leads to "real power".

    Further RedState's attempts at online fundraising are pathetic to say the least - and completely refute the author's contention of "organizational clout". A place like the DailyKos raises enough money in ONE DAY to fund a front page columnist. Red State couldn't even fund the release of their "new, improved RedState 2.0 (see previous comment about 500 errors) despite weeks of pleas. The pitiful amounts they raise for their candidates certainly don't translate into influence. (Again, another place the author could have done some actual reporting: compare the amounts raised on RedState versus amounts raised on similar sites from the other side. The difference would probably be astounding.)

    Finally the author states that the Operation Leper gambit "has at least one faction of the GOP so unsettled". Which faction is that? If you are going to mention this "faction", at the very least identify them - and a quote in response from this "faction" would probably be appropriate.

    I'm sure Ms. Smalley has a tough assignment, reporting on a political party both out of power and virtually relegated to a regional faction, but she could have done a much better job, and a MUCH more accurate one, when describing this small coterie of wingnuts.

    Addendum: the correct spelling is "RedState" (one word), not as the author kept writing it "Red State" (two words). One more example of shoddy reporting/editing.

  • Posted By: lordmi @ 11/16/2008 8:45:48 AM

    Anyway, Palin is STUPID and as long as GOP will talk about her - NO ONE NORMAL person will trust Reps - too much lies too stupid candidates.

    How did they DARE to put this Moron on the ticket?
    That what did they really mean - "country - first"???
    To - where?
    Shame on McCain forever.

  • Posted By: Against-Ignorance @ 11/15/2008 11:53:04 PM

    This is the representative of the new Republican party? Thank God! Someone so ignorant as to believe a book banner and hard line fundamentalist is the 'live and let live' wing of his party is going to drag said party down to political irrelevance.

    • Posted By: seabeetow @ 11/16/2008 3:18:49 AM

      Against-Ignorance? Someone so ignorant as to believe Palin "banned books" is going to teach us all about how to be irrelevant.
      Oh goody!

    • Posted By: seabeetow @ 11/16/2008 3:16:50 AM

      Against-Ignorance? Someone so ignorant as to believe Palin banned books is going to teach us all about irrelevance.
      Oh goody!

  • Posted By: Franz Prince of Dogness @ 11/15/2008 8:09:11 PM

    Ms. Smalley,
    It's my understanding that when Mr. Erickson was interviewed for your little article that MY name was mentioned and I was discussed. Obviously, that reference to me was edited by some fool at your magazine thingy. I want the name of the person responsible so I can kill them and eat them. Franz The Prince of Dogness

  • Posted By: AlanSrout @ 11/15/2008 6:21:22 PM

    Another great conservative site is Free Republic http://www.freerepublic.com

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse