WORLD AFFAIRS

The Medvedev Doctrine

He wants to build a new security bloc and a gas cartel, and transform Moscow into a financial hub.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: juliacw @ 12/04/2008 2:54:03 PM

    Here is a survey to establish what opinion formers in the EU think about the new President and the measures he should undertake to initiate reform in Russia - http://medvedev.questionpro.com/

  • Posted By: mehmeh @ 12/03/2008 4:23:33 AM

    Newsweek, everything you print about Russia is bitchy and sneering, and positively overflows with hostile rhetoric and bluster. What's your problem? Whatever it is, sort it out please. We expect journalism from Newsweek, not thinly disguised contempt for a nation of 140m struggling people.

  • Posted By: Harvard white guy @ 11/24/2008 10:39:59 PM

    Einstein once proclaimed that the 3rd world war will be fought with sticks and stones. We exploded the first nuclear weapon; through cheating, they caught up. They threatened us by trying to put missiles in Cuba; we stood our ground, in other words they knew Kennedy was going to vaporize them all. They faked Sputnik, we went to the moon, they never recovered from that. Ever since then, we have been 30 years ahead of them. They are still going around killing people with Radioactive tea, threatening sovereign countries who dont want anything to do with their ideologies. Did you say they want to deAmericanize our friends? One thing they should never forget is that America is the only country that has ever used Nukes on it's foes. That was about 63 years ago, never understimate what we are capable of now, we just dont go around bullying others. if we decided to unleash our might, there will be no air left for mankind, the earth would be just another meteorite floating around the solar system. Aliens in another Galaxy would see the flash , a black hole would be created and the fall out would create a billion year dust storm in the solar system. So dont be fooled by the west's indifference to your constant growls :)

    • Posted By: streetwise @ 11/29/2008 6:14:56 PM

      They faked Sputnik, we went to the moon, they never recovered from that. Ever since then, we have been 30 years ahead of them.
      -
      Really ? NASA will soon depend 100 % on the russians' courtesy to send people and stuffs to the ISS, 'cause shuttle will be out of business ina a few years, and then for AT LEAST 5 years will be no US launchers or space vehicle whatsoever available for that service . Go tell the NASA people you are 30 years ahead of the russkies . Those poor cats need to laugh every now and then...

    • Posted By: daniel_steinberg @ 11/25/2008 2:09:04 PM

      A black hole would be created... Well, that tells me something of american education system :) Cool down, Harvard white guy. Go back to Harvard and find a russian professor, who can do a better job in teaching you physics :)

  • Posted By: ducdebrabant @ 11/25/2008 11:04:35 AM

    I see ordinary Russians (if the ability to write pidgen English is an ordinary Russian trait) don't get it either. The world does not, will not, and need not recognize the "right" of Russian to re-create the empire of the Tsars, terrorize its near neighbors, poison opposition politicians in Ukraine, murder inconvenient journalists in their own country, assassinate critics abroad with radioactive isotopes, threaten the world with a return of Cold War aggression, blackmail the world with monopolistic control of raw materials, and otherwise make itself obnoxious in hopes of making itself feared. The greatest enemies of Russia are within its own borders. The corruption, the stagnation, the suppression of political rights and free speech, the brutality, are all perpetrated by Russians themselves, not by foreigners. Re-subjugating the Ukraine won't protect any Russian from being murdered for speaking out againt Putin, won't make any Russian's investments safe in his own country. Russians need to stop being paranoid about other nations and reform their own house. All Medvedev does about that is talk. His only concrete actions are in the field of foreign policy -- threats and interventionism and bellicose gestures. The world is not intimidated.

    • Posted By: streetwise @ 11/29/2008 5:05:16 PM

      Comment: I see ordinary Russians (if the ability to write pidgen English is an ordinary Russian trait) don't get it either. The world does not, will not, and need not recognize the "right" of Russian to re-create the empire

      Strange . When US declare a country (even on the other side of the world) "zone of strategic interest of the US of A" all the world must obey and keep mum . When russian do exactly the same thing (with other words) fr a country just across their borders, the choir starts singing. "Uh ! Oh ! Ah ! Imperialism!!!" . A bit kinda of "double standard", ain't it ? .

    • Posted By: JPHR @ 11/25/2008 1:49:16 PM

      Did you read what ex Nixon conservative Pat Buchanan wrote on the subject or listen to what Kucinich said?. Russia (note that the Sovjet/USSR fell apart in 1991) does not intend to waste its new found wealth on wars of aggression. That kind of folly seems to be the exclusive domain of the US lately. US Neocon policy has proved to be a financial, human and political catastrophe.

  • Posted By: alexis.detocqueville @ 11/24/2008 4:31:27 PM

    Even if I agree totally with this article, there is a reason to be carefull with Russia today is that they are "crazy" - I mean by that they really believe in their own propaganda - and they are ready to make war with Ukraine, Georgia, Kazak, Belarus, Baltic States, Poland, etc. I do believe that we ( Europeans and the West) need to show them that they are our enemies and that we are ready to fight back - meaning that travelling to the West for them will be painfull. Then they will change. Because these Russians know that our strategy is to push them into the arms of our Asian allies - first China.

    • Posted By: streetwise @ 11/29/2008 4:56:46 PM

      Change pusher, honey...you are in a really bad trip :)...

  • Posted By: alexis.detocqueville @ 11/24/2008 4:37:24 PM

    The good thing for the West is to notice that these Russian leaders - mainly trained in KGB schools - are stupid enough to believe to what they think. When you compare the intellectual life in China - the incredible brilliant young leaders that Chinese have today with Russian ones, it is a clear sign where is the furture and who is the main ally of the West in the future: China withot any doubt. Russian leadership is isolated and has pratically no common intellectual basis with the West and the rest of the World communauty. It is really painfull to see at which low level these Russians are today.

    • Posted By: streetwise @ 11/29/2008 4:50:52 PM

      When you compare the intellectual life in China - the incredible brilliant young leaders that Chinese have today with Russian ones, it is a clear sign where is the furture and who is the main ally of the West in the future: China withot any doubt. Russian leadership is isolated and has pratically no common intellectual basis with the West and the rest of the World communauty. It is really painfull to see at which low level these Russians are today.
      -
      Just some remarks about analogies and differences between Russia and China .
      1: Russian internet is unfilterend and free of censorship (you can read foreign and opposition sites, and find any information you want, from Chechnya to inflation to...you name it) . Try to find something about Tibet in a Chinese internet cafe...
      2 The "joung" chinese leaderes are now at least 10 years older than Medvedev .
      3: China will soon undergo a demographic crunch, VERY worse than the actual russian problems on the matter (too many Yangs, to few yins, and elders, elders, elders...)
      4: Russian leaders are LESS common intellectual basis with the west than the Chinese ? Tell it t to the Dalai Lama .(by the way, you READ the ideograms, don't you ?).. ,

  • Posted By: Vitya @ 11/27/2008 6:38:23 AM

    Dear Glenno, I live in Russia. For me it will be better yjy-visa travelling in U.E. Brasil is very far .

  • Posted By: Glenno @ 11/26/2008 8:26:22 PM

    Dear Vitya, America is ranked number 53 in the world in free press. There are no free press left there. Read russiatoday.com for the russian point of view. Because maybe they are not a evil nation and maybe their only goal is to destroy the world.
    BTW, Russians do no longer need visa to travel to Brazil (americans do), interesting progress in russian trade these days.

  • Posted By: jasonphx1 @ 11/25/2008 6:46:32 PM

    I'm confused about something said in the article: Russia had peacekeepers in Georgia when Georgia decided to attack Ossetia. What are the peacekeepers there for? To watch the shelling of civilians? ...and the U.S. "Go in Alone" as it say's because it knew it could not get the Security Counsel to pass a resolution that allowed the US to attack Iraq. Yet, the US still occupies Iraq, sitting on massive oil reserves, but Russia no longer has troops in Georgia. The US and other Western allies wrongly recognized Kosovo, after yet another illegal war campaign...but the article gripes about Russia recognizing independence of territories that never were part of Georgia after the break up of the Soviet Union...

    Why does everyone want to put their spin on things? Including Newsweek?

    • Posted By: JPHR @ 11/26/2008 3:06:23 PM

      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/world/europe/26georgia.html?ref=world

    • Posted By: JPHR @ 11/26/2008 10:18:24 AM

      Dear Jason
      Further confirmation from the Georgian commission investigating this event
      http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE4AO7SL20081125

  • Posted By: Vitya @ 11/26/2008 10:32:32 AM

    I always thought that Russian media is under the government control, but after reading American press, such Newsweek or Washington post, I realized that 'pure American democracy' knows better about Russian imperial ambitious and scorn of international law. But how you can explain me Kosovo and the missile-defense shield ( Iran and North Korea haven't got rockets). As you can see, for the last 8 year U.S dollar lost 30% vs. ruble. In august 1 dollar costs 24.50 ruble, now - 27 ruble. Plus inflation in Russia this year will above 12 %.

  • Posted By: Nonromantic @ 11/26/2008 7:19:59 AM

    To alexis.detocqueville.
    From which mental hospital have you escaped?

  • Posted By: OlegCanada @ 11/26/2008 6:31:36 AM

    The problem is, Western "experts" cannot get even the simplest facts right. Mr. Matthews/Ms Nemtsova write, "the ruble has plunged 25 percent in two months". In fact, the ruble gained 5% vs. the euro and lost 10% vs. the US dollar, as most major currencies did. The movements of the ruble are almost identical to those of the Canadian dollar and are due to the similar nature of the exports of the two countries (oil/metals/wood...). This is really easy to check, isn't it? And then I am supposed to trust the rest of the ???insights??? of these authors?

    First the Western "experts" were dismissing Russia, then started to monger ridiculous fears (so that a number of easily excitable and otherwise challenged posters here started to get ready to fight those Russkies, in their armchairs, of course), now the time is to be dismissive again? How silly!

  • Posted By: Nonromantic @ 11/26/2008 6:08:33 AM

    "Medvedev will soon face the temptation to control and repress Russia's economy???fixing prices, threatening businessmen and directing the flow of capital. He might also be tempted to repeat his military adventure in Georgia to distract public opinion from a worsening domestic situation???perhaps with a scuffle with Ukraine over Crimea. Both would be disastrous.
    Medvedev has little chance of reforming the world in the Kremlin's image"

    Dear authors, what insight! Or did Medvedev whisper in your ears about his intentions?

  • Posted By: Nonromantic @ 11/26/2008 5:46:19 AM

    "Medvedev will soon face the temptation to control and repress Russia's economy???fixing prices, threatening businessmen and directing the flow of capital. He might also be tempted to repeat his military adventure in Georgia to distract public opinion from a worsening domestic situation???perhaps with a scuffle with Ukraine over Crimea. Both would be disastrous.

    Medvedev has little chance of reforming the world in the Kremlin's image"
    Dear authors, what insight! Or did Medvedev whisper in your ears about his intentions? :)

  • Posted By: daniel_steinberg @ 11/25/2008 2:01:52 PM

    Actually, what a wonderful brain washing method!
    Here the author is trying to show Medvedev's contradicting statements. The positive ones:

    "In speech after speech, to audiences at home and abroad, he has talked forcefully of putting an end to Russia's culture of corruption; diversifying Russia's economy beyond the oil and gas industry; integrating Russia into the world economy; instituting the rule of law; and guaranteeing freedom of speech. He has said Russia should be a country where ordinary people take a "more active role in the country's political life."

    And the negative ones:
    "Yet at the same time (RIGHT HERE), he has blasted Washington for destabilizing the world's finances; blamed the United States for provoking the August war with Georgia; laid claim to Russia's "privileged interests" in its neighborhood; and proposed a massive shift in the global "architecture," which would give Russia a more pronounced say in world affairs."

    The author is trying to say, that the first statements contradict the second, which is a lie - they don't andone with at least minimal brain power will understand it. Why is he saying it then? Because he is not appealing to logical thinking of his readers, but to stereotypes: the first statements make Medvedev look like a good guy and the second ones make him look like a "bad guy" to an average american.
    Amazing, Communist propaganda has never been that skillful. Good job, Mr. Matthews.

    • Posted By: JPHR @ 11/25/2008 2:58:51 PM

      Dear Daniel,
      Mr. Matthews is either a victim of neocon White House propaganda or in McCarthian language a crypto neocon himself. But I have to admit he excels at Neocon manipulations techniques: project what you are practicing on your adversary. His language is aimed at creating the image of an aggressive Russia.

      • Posted By: daniel_steinberg @ 11/25/2008 5:20:47 PM

        One thing I can tell you for sure, that most people here in Germany understand very well who the agressor is :)
        I mean think of it - who is carrying out most wars on the planet at the moment? Who is killing more people than any blodiest dictator of today? Who has greater military budget as that of all other countries added together? Who was the only country to use nuclear weapons in a war (and some people boast in that!)? Who has lied to the whole world about WMD in Iraq? Who used this lie to rob Iraq of its oil? Who uses torture in their prisons and dares to talk about human rights in other countries?
        Answer to all the questions above is not Russia or Iran or any other country USA calls dangerous. The answer to all the questions above is: the United States of America.
        And I am very sorry about that as US could have been a great force for good, but if there is an evil empire out there today, I guess most people outside US (and even some inside it) understand where it is.

  • Posted By: DENJO @ 11/24/2008 7:07:43 PM

    A light-wait article in supposed to be heavy-wait magazine. Dim, uninspired columns, phlegmatic clichés and low-brow conclusions one can read in any short-sighted West European news paper. Disappointing that one has to read a kind of rhetorically languishing article which content not a single original line: Medvedev say so, but will he do so, he tries this, but will he do that, he does the talk, but will he walk the walk, the Unforgettable KGB, the Struggling Economy, the Illusive Freedom, The Caribbean Bomb, The Red Kremlin Star, Back to USSR, with Georgia in my mind, , Search and you will find, Talking too loud, Tanks go south, Rockets on the border, Low and Order, Petrol & Gas , The Boom and the Bust, Empire daydreams (with no use), Influence a la Russ, Cultural shooting, Salute a la Mr. Putin??????????????????.
    Even I can make better analyzes and get a job in the magazine (I am available by the way). It seems that nothing better is on offer at the moment. Unfortunately!
    You are lucky to be paid for how you write

    • Posted By: LuigiGG @ 11/24/2008 9:18:18 PM

      First you'll have to learn English, DENJO.

      • Posted By: DENJO @ 11/25/2008 4:49:34 PM

        What is wrong? You did not understand! How bad your education must be! Is your self esteem based only on the fact that you can speak a language of your native country? (I am not sure about your spelling). As you well noticed - English is not my mother language anyway.
        Which language you prefer then - Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Bulgarian - I am fluent in all of them. Making childish remarks about the language instred of the content just show at what level your mind is operating. Comment about my opinion, please ??? not about the grammar and spelling. Newsweek is not English teaching system but an interesting magazine...

  • Posted By: daniel_steinberg @ 11/25/2008 1:28:29 PM

    I mean can you prove that Russia is trying to do any of these.

  • Posted By: daniel_steinberg @ 11/25/2008 1:26:43 PM

    ducdebrabant @ 11/25/2008 11:04:35 AM
    "The world does not, will not, and need not recognize the "right" of Russian to re-create the empire of the Tsars, terrorize its near neighbors, poison opposition politicians in Ukraine, murder inconvenient journalists in their own country, assassinate critics abroad with radioactive isotopes, threaten the world with a return of Cold War aggression, blackmail the world with monopolistic control of raw materials, and otherwise make itself obnoxious in hopes of making itself feared."

    Could you prove any of these statements? Or are these something like WMD in Iraq - you just make a statement and everyone is supposed to believe it?

  • Posted By: JPHR @ 11/25/2008 11:03:41 AM

    This article still perpetuates the Georgia myth. Check wikipedia on Georgia and Ossetia. Georgia was taken over by the Sovjet/USSR in 1921. After the dissolution of the USSR in 1991 the Ossetia-Georgia war started. From 1992 till 2008 a Russia/CIS peacekeeping mission was in control of Osstia. August 2008 Georgia initiated military action. The whole Georgia claim on Ossetia dates from before 1921: nationalistic bogus

  • Posted By: JPHR @ 11/25/2008 10:58:25 AM

    Bush let the ABM treaty lapse in order to install the MDS in Poland. Please note that the ABM treaty kept both sides vulnerable. So the nuclear option implied suicide. Now Bush is creating a first strike capability and check what that means under MAD logic. The callous use of Ossetia incident to clinch the deal with Poland was typical Neocon. Did you notice this:http://top.rbc.ru/english/index.shtml?/news/english/2008/11/24/24160334_bod.shtml

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse