A number of pretty weak comments-makes me wonder why I read this article. Unfortunately, Georgia has a poor choice. Chambliss is slow, not astute, and is a weak legislator. Martin, coincidentally Chambliss frat brother at UGA, has never accomplished anything either. He is a political "hack" of the first order and makes Obama look like Ronald Reagan . He's too liberal to suite me, especially since he doesn't have the intelligence of some of the national liberal (mostly Democratic) leaders. This was a winnable seat for the Dems if they had come up with a better candidate. Several of the Democratic Congressmen could have made a better showing but they would have had to give up relatively safe seats and I guess the reward did not justify the risk. Chambliss will still be vulnerable next time and Isaakson is only a fraction better. As weak as these two are, however, I would place them mid-pack or better in the Senate. That is a sad commentary on the national legislature.









Discuss