INDIA

The Mayhem in Mumbai

Making sense of India's terrorist attacks

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Richard Kefalos @ 11/28/2008 11:30:33 PM

    As far as I am concerned, the terrorist attack is an internal Indian affair. Contrary to what thomas koovaloor wrote, it was not an attack against the civilized world for the reason that India is not a "civilized" country, but a 3rd world country. In the civilized world we don't wage the pervasive and vicious religious wars that plague the 3rd world. Our religious wars were fought 350 years ago. The fact that Westerners visit India, even that American businesses outsource technical work to Indian software companies, does not change India's status as a 3rd world country. India's internecine religious wars can fully explain the attack in Mumbai - it is an internal affair and a consequence of Indian domestic conditions. It would be a grave mistake to consider the terrorist attack directed against "civilization" (i.e. Western civilization) because in fact it was not. Mumbai is not a part of the West, regardless how expatriate Indians may pretend that it is, or argue that it should be.

    • Posted By: manishyt @ 11/29/2008 11:53:13 AM

      Richard. I am not going to go into your insulting description of India, but i am going to ask you one question. If this was truly a "domestic" incident, as you argue, why did they single out British and American citizens? Why did they search out a Jewish Center and kill all of its staff including a Brooklyn rabbi? Hardly the actions of someone with a domestic grievance. Richard, grow up! People like you who justify terrorism and blame the victim are beyond disgusting. You are dangerous.

      • Posted By: thomas koovalloor @ 12/26/2008 7:17:44 PM

        Hello Mr. Richard Kefalos,
        I think you have to learn something about the Inmdus valley civilization, which was more than 5000 years ago, in BC 3300, that was before jesus Christ. I suggest you to go to google and search the indus valley civilization.

      • Posted By: Richard Kefalos @ 11/29/2008 2:59:02 PM

        It seems to me that there are many more target-rich environments that could have been attacked had the terrorists been intent on harming the West rather than India. Clearly, singling out Westerners was an assault on India's economy that depends so heavily on trade and outsourcing to the West. But only a handful of Westerners were killed, contrasted with a multitude of natives - I read that the terrorists opened fire on "the crowd." I imagine in Mumbai that would consist of mostly Indians. Singling out Jews for murder is usual, customary, and expected wherever Moslems go on the rampage. Surely the murder of a rabbi and his wife in Mumbai, India cannot be considered an "attack on the West?"

        In order to occupy the place in the world that educated Indians seek, you must come to grips with your atavistic and destructive religious practices. You will need to shed the deplorable caste system, for example, end the unthinkable poverty in your country that is shocking to behold. You must provide an environment where *all* children are fed enough to be able to receive an education, not only the children of the select few. India has great potential, evidenced by luminaries such as Chandrasekhar, Ramanujan, and Tagore. The civilized world will just have to wait patiently for you to catch up.

    • Posted By: divinely speaking @ 11/29/2008 12:32:10 AM

      Catholics vs Protestants in Ireland. USA vs Quresh, Waco, Texas. Christians vs Jews, Germany and Southern USA. And have you been to the mid east lately? Enjoy the religious wars, my son. Get your facts straight. Gandhi was once asked,"What do you think of the western civilization?" He answered."I think it is a good idea."

      • Posted By: Richard Kefalos @ 11/29/2008 2:54:27 AM

        Enter Your CommentThe Middle East is not Western either; just look at Turkey's difficulties joining the EU, and they are the closest. "Western" means a set of values shared between certain nations where, for whatever reason, rationalism and science triumphed over religion. Consequently, we invented firearms, penicillin, and air conditioning - popular the world over. Every other culture on earth plays second violin to the West. Every terrorist's firearm and explosive was conceived here. The parents of every sick child in the world who is cured by medicine owes a debt to our science. Why, even the sworn enemies of the West use the World Wide Web to scream their hatred and impotence. We have conquered, thoroughly and thoroughly. All that the others can do is merely destroy, for they cannot create it themselves because of their mental and cultural deficit.

        I can see how the 3rd world can get testy over its backwardness, but I urge you to display a more civilized behavior. For example, refraining from locking people in railway cars and setting them on fire for being of a different religion could be a good start. Another good path to civilization is to avoid killing your wives, sisters, and daughters for "honor crimes." After all, no one holds victims over stone altars anymore to rip out their hearts, do they?

        As for Mr. Gandhi, I am certain that he could have argued splendidly ether side of the "civilization" question, having benefited from a legal education in England. The aggressive ignorance of the cretin who wrote "I have seen people in Greece" is typical of the uneducated.

        • Posted By: sheetfaced @ 11/29/2008 10:22:59 PM

          I'm always amused by the "we" this "we" that of folks like Mr Kefalos who think that they are superior to just about anyone from the "3rd world." What is it about YOU Richard as an individual that makes you better than all those suffering hordes and their not-so-suffering, educated compatriots in the "3rd world"? YOU did not invent jet engines, YOU did not invent gunpowder (China?), YOU did not invent alternating current etc

          • Posted By: Richard Kefalos @ 11/30/2008 12:30:26 AM

            All men are created equal. But like it or not, every single advance in medicine, engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, astrophysics, not to mention the exploration of the fantastic world of microbiology, has emerged in the Western cultural domain (which now includes modern laboratories in the developing world,) and all other cultures enjoy the fruits of these insights. For example, I would imagine that open-heart surgery in India pretty much adheres to the protocols developed in the West, in this case primarily the Soviet Union and the United States. I need not belabor this point, surely. Do you deny that all current technological innovation, so craved by the entire world, has its roots in Western science?

            One could surmise that the societal forces that determine what thoughts are permitted decide the outcomes in a culture. Interestingly, in the Western sphere the shift happened with the most unwilling help of an imperious religious power, the Catholic Church. It grew so centralized and pervasive in its will to rule that it eventually became dethroned by the secular princes. This threw open the gates to all sorts of activities that had previously been rewarded by being burned at the stake, and the horse bolted the stable. As a consequence of the freeing of thought called the Enlightenment, a fertile cultural base was created for the emergence of giants of the intellect. I am part of that base, having grown up rooted in, and nourished by, the intellectual and cultural environment that has taken Man to the moon. While I as an individual may not be superior, in the aggregate, the culture is.

            But don't worry, our cultural superiority might be temporary and is merely a result of having been in the right place at the right time. Besides, the 3rd world is joining as fast as it can so the Western sphere is expanding. Perhaps the time will come when everyone will be equal, culturally. As for developing a unique culture that would rival the West, well, nothing is written in stone :) Maybe it can happen, but surely not where the religious authorities determine outcomes. Who knows, perhaps in 7,000 years your culture will outshine ours? It doesn't now.

            (Our music is better too. Wanna fight about that?)

            • Posted By: raj-k @ 11/30/2008 8:35:00 PM

              Richard- Looks like you are on dole with lots of time to fart. Your civilization is like the stock markets you created....all speculation , no real value....you crash every 10 years sweetie. Eastern civilizations survived for 5000 years and will do so for another 5000 beacause they are built on strong value systems. Meanwhile, you can play your own fiddle.

        • Posted By: emmarcee @ 11/29/2008 7:22:04 AM

          well, sometimes education and being white "western" does not make you a good human. You may be one of those liberals who goes to starbucks and spend evening chasing your own mother. "the West" managed to get rich just by exploiting the rest of the world. That is what they are good at. After world war II "the West" just acted on their own interest in the middle east (each and every problem is west created - Including arming and sending money to Pakistan). What you are sensitive about Greece? They are not that better then Turkey either. Now you may be in USA , just like anyother immigrant american. Shut up. Find your mother at your 4th dad's house.

          • Posted By: Richard Kefalos @ 11/29/2008 10:00:54 AM

            What is so special about Greece in Western civilization? If you don't know that by the time you're able to post on the web there is no point in trying to educate you. Your ignorance is frightening, but typical for such as you who have nothing but mother-curses to reply with, savage.

      • Posted By: emmarcee @ 11/29/2008 12:49:07 AM

        he is just the Paki. i HEARD PAKIS ARE JELAOUS BECAUSE MUMBAI IS GETTING ALL THE MEDIA COVERGAE. NOW THEY WILL SELF TERRORIZE THEMSELVES/

    • Posted By: hemashukla @ 11/29/2008 2:45:58 AM

      Spokenly like a true ignorant westerner who are way to wrapped up in their supremacy. I hope u live long to see how world shapes up in coming years.

    • Posted By: emmarcee @ 11/29/2008 12:11:07 AM

      west? what west? your 3rd world Greece? I have seen people in Greece. Just shut up idiotic racsit. Nobody care about you. Go work in a carshop or a pizza delivery.

  • Posted By: Jatang @ 12/21/2008 3:18:31 AM

    Gen. Jamshed Kayani openly admitted to Pakistani Army excesses in Bangladesh. He even called Gen. Niazi a debauch. A few months after giving this interview he passed away mysteriously. BTW clipping of the Bangladeshi genocide are on you tube.

  • Posted By: Jatang @ 12/21/2008 3:15:37 AM

    The Indian state of Assam is now home to more than 8 million illegal Bangladeshi's. That has changed its demographics entirely. Nobody was willing to give the same political rights to Assam that Kashmir has to keep out outsiders and foreigners. The reason being Assam was previously a Hindu majority state! When I hear the militant Kashmiri's whining about the problems they have created for the civilians, I am left to believe that they actually believe in their own propaganda.

  • Posted By: Jatang @ 12/21/2008 3:01:15 AM

    Today some of the most successful Muslims and certainly the most famous Muslims are from India. It is a pity they are not from Kashmir. Stop ghettoizing and join the mainstream.

  • Posted By: Jatang @ 12/21/2008 2:58:37 AM

    Just for the information of the ignorant, Pakistan massacred 3 million Bengladeshis in what is now Bangladesh in 1971. That is the largest genocide known to humanity.

  • Posted By: Jatang @ 12/21/2008 2:57:05 AM

    India has already proved itself by providing Kashmiris with more rights than any of its other citizens. It has squandered the money of the Indian taxpayer just so that the Kashmiri's can sustain themselves despite of not contributing to the exchequer. Kashmiri's get outright grants from the Central government which they do not have to repay. Other provinces get only loans. On a per capita basis the grants given to them are about 9-10 times of those given to Bihar. Kashmiri politicians and religious heads (Mirwaiz) who benefit from corruption are the main culprits. Kashmir State Assembly ratifies the laws of the Indian parliament before they are applied to Kashmir. This is a power no other provincial assembly has in India. No outsider is allowed to settle in Kashmir, but the Kashmiri's can settle anywhere in India as they have done for centuries. These political rights make Kashmir a unique place in the subcontinent. If Kashmiri's were Pakistani's they would be suffering today and if they were independent they would become a failed state immediately much like some of the Central Asian states. Kashmiris even before independence were always a part of the national mainstream. Its time to do the same today. The lure of jehadism and seperatism might create new Caliphs but I am sure the ordinary Kashmiri would be worse off than now.

  • Posted By: JKLF-R @ 12/18/2008 11:14:49 PM

    The distrust between India and Pakistan which has plagued the subcontinent in the second half of 20th century and impeded the development and progress of more than a billion people has to come to an end.
    India needs to divorce its efforts of trying to gain retreat in the changed perspective after 9/11, in the notion of war against terror to keep physical control of Kashmir and avert the pressure from International community.

    It needs to prove its credentials through action in adhering to the democratic principle which it very proudly exaggerates in front of world community. Its credentials as a democratic country are jeopardized when one witnesses how it has, civilian people under siege with 800 hundred thousand army presence within its streets, villages and hamlets in Kashmir.

    It needs to prove the democratic high morals which its present Prime minister daringly pronounced while addressing the joint congress of United States which I quote??? Democracy is not defined by what is written in the constitution but how it functions on ground???

    It needs to prove that it does not use its acquired military might to unleash terror in the Valley of Kashmir upon civilian people to enforce its will to negate the basic unalienable right of self determination of Kashmiries.

    It needs to prove that colonization of Kashmir is a misconstrued concept and decolonization is as relevant today as it was, when it fought for its own freedom against British rule

    It needs to accept the fact that people of Kashmir are not up against in the name of religion but for an opportunity for a fair democratic verdict to choose their future course of their nation.
    If someone wants to find the reminiscence of 20th century colonial rule, Kashmir is the place to visit.

    He will find how claimant of largest democracy in the world holds civilian people under siege with 800 hundred thousand army presence within its streets, villages and hamlets.
    He will find how claimant of responsible democratic country uses inhuman laws and methods to stifle the voice of freedom

    He will find how under the garb of fighting terrorism it uses its acquired military might to unleash terror in the Valley of Kashmir upon civilian people in order to negate the basic unalienable right to decide their future as guaranteed by international community.

    He will find how will fully it shut its eyes to daily killings of men, women and children as a matter of routine governance in Kashmir


    If democracies commit human rights abuse that are committed in Kashmir by India, then democracies are not defined by moral power of people, but the powerful define democracy, thereby undermining its purpose of governance.

    India has taken sanctuary and advantage in the changed perspective after 9/11. in the notion of ???war against terror??? to keep control of Kashmir and International community at bay.

  • Posted By: AnAJ @ 12/18/2008 4:17:43 PM

    Hey , Khasroo29 we just give a damn wether you have any malice towards the people or not. But the reality is that the Indian Armed Forces and it's intelligence wing RAW sowed the seeds of real cross border terrorism by erecting the horrendous MUKTIBAHINi in East Pakistan.It was such a brutal force that if given time it would have exterminate every non-Bengali from East Pakistan. And yet again with impunity the Indian Armed Forces continued and this time in Sri Lanka by creating the LTTE popularly known as the Tamil Tigers.The Tigers are by far the most cruel insurgents ever known , and the one who invented suicide bombings.

    And when the oppressed Kashmiris deamnd the right of Plebiscite a/c to the UN resolutions the indian Govt. denies them this right , and then blames them if some of them resort to violence.Please mend your ways first and withdraw support to LTTe.Then only can you expect your western neighnbours to withdraw their moral support to the kasmir cause.

  • Posted By: jbz7879 @ 12/07/2008 4:43:22 AM

    pakistan was created while hindus and sikhs killed 4 million muslims in punjab alone ,

    if 60000 pakistani soldiers managed to kill 3 million and the surrender and be returned to pakistamn without war crimes indicting them -then stopl your silly lies
    go to hague and get the army convicted

    you guys are hilarious you do not even know the etiquettes of how to make a false accusation in your absolute desperation in your anti muslim rhetoric

    let me tell you a massacre which was true and not even remembered

    20 MILLION AMERICAN INDIAND KILLED BY EUROPEANS IN NEW WORLD
    please build a monument indeed
    as for pakistani army -they were taken prisoners and it was in bengaL ,
    mukti bahini had started with unpretentious massacres of bihari urdu speaking minority in then east pakistan
    and that was the initiation of the civil war in east pakistan

    MUKTI BAHINI was armed and trained and were indeed the worst terrorists world has seen created by INDIA AND INDIRA GANDHI -THE EVIL DICTATOR FROM INDIA

  • Posted By: khasroo29 @ 12/04/2008 1:04:01 AM

    Indeed Karaswart is very correct, we had to move through the killing of about 3.0 million men, woman and children and raping of unknown number of women to become an independent nation. Unfortunately the killing, raping, arson, etc were justified in the name of the religion by the the then Pakistani autocratic and military rulers. We have no malice towards the common people of that country. Its a pity ,the perpetuators of gausty crime against the humanity was never taken care of by the International bodies. Condoning of these crimes encurages others. It is the sincere hope that this time the Mumbai incident will be investigated and the criminals, their mentors and supporters will be brought to justice.

  • Posted By: karaswart @ 12/03/2008 7:40:05 AM

    December 3rd 1971- the beginning of the end of the genocide of the Bengali Muslims perpetrated by Pakistani Soldiers. Over 3 million Bengalis were murdered. Let not the world forget.

  • Posted By: blueplanet @ 12/03/2008 2:46:53 AM

    It is now in the hands of terrorists to improve india. excellent case in point - http://thinking-feet.blogspot.com/

    • Posted By: Layman @ 12/03/2008 3:33:49 AM

      It may come as a surprise to most..Terrorists HAVE control of most of the nations near India. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma and ofcourse China. We humbly request the Marxist who wrote this article to settle in China. You may be more at home with Chairman Mao. Good bye! Pls do not send us a postcard.

  • Posted By: blueplanet @ 12/03/2008 2:43:57 AM

    Excellent case in point - http://thinking-feet.blogspot.com/

  • Posted By: Richard Kefalos @ 11/30/2008 12:24:50 PM

    An article written by one Martha Nussbaum appeared in the Los Angeles Times this morning. Here are some excerpts from it. The reason I am posting these passages from it is to ask the participants in this blog, many of whom are Indian: are these allegation true?

    "The most bloody recent example of terrorism in India was the slaughter of as many as 2,000 Muslim civilians by Hindu right-wing mobs in the state of Gujarat over several months in 2002. " "Evidence that Gujarat's state government egged-on the perpetrators was also overwhelming and led to the U.S. State Department in 2005 denying a visa to Narendra Modi, Gujarat's chief minister. Recently, the Indian investigative journal Tehelka uncovered even more proof of government complicity in the murderous, anti-Muslim attacks. A Tehelka reporter using a hidden camera interviewed participants in the Gujarat violence, who described how bombs were manufactured in factories owned by members of the Hindu right; how arms were smuggled from other states; how the police were instructed to look the other way.

    One leader of the Bajrang Dal (a paramilitary Hindu right-wing group) described his own role with pride: "There was this pregnant woman, I slit her open. ...They shouldn't even be allowed to breed. I say that even today. Whoever they are, women, children, whoever, nothing to be done with them but cut them down. Thrash them, slash them, burn the bastards. ... The idea is, don't keep them alive at all; after that, everything is ours."

    The revelation that members of the Hindu right have embraced ethno-religious cleansing should amaze nobody. Since the 1930s, their movement has insisted that India is for Hindus, and that both Muslims and Christians are foreigners who should have second-class status in the nation.

    This year, in the eastern state of Orissa, members of the Bajrang Dal have murdered scores of Christians who refused to reconvert to Hinduism. (Most Indian Christians are descendants of converts, often from the lowest Hindu castes.) Peaceful villages have been reduced to ashes; a church-run orphanage was torched; dozens of churches have been destroyed; missionaries and priests have been murdered in cold blood. Thousands have been forced to flee their homes, and at least 30,000 are homeless. The rallying cry: "Kill Christians and destroy their institutions."

    • Posted By: Layman @ 12/02/2008 1:07:01 AM

      Richard Kefalos @ 11/30/2008 12:24:50 PM (Martha Nussbaum - Los Angeles Times)
      "The most bloody recent example of terrorism in India was the slaughter of as many as 2,000 Muslim civilians by Hindu right-wing mobs in the state of Gujarat over several months in 2002. "

      =>Not true. The number is inflated; It was in reaction to another bloody incident earlier.
      ----
      "Evidence that Gujarat's state government egged-on the perpetrators was also overwhelming"
      => Not True. But the perpetrators apparently had lists. This list is public information;
      ----
      "U.S. State Department in 2005 denying a visa to Narendra Modi, Gujarat's chief minister."
      => The Visa was denied because of the influence of Christian Coalition on the Republican Party.
      ----
      "Recently, the Indian investigative journal Tehelka uncovered even more proof of government complicity in the murderous,

      anti-Muslim attacks."
      => Tehlka is unreliable source of information. Its neither investigative nor is it a 'journal'; At best its sensational;
      ----
      "using a hidden camera interviewed participants in the Gujarat violence.."
      => Many of the particiapants change their story in court, under oath.
      ----
      "how arms were smuggled from other states.."
      => By and large, the borders between the states are not manned; Going from state to another is about as difficult as going

      from CT to MA. So the above statement is crafted to show that something is illegal, when in reality its not.
      ----
      "how the police were instructed to look the other way."
      => The Indian Police Force, though effective, is one of the most bureaucratic in the world. So, unless written evidence is

      provided, this charge can be safely dismissed.
      ----

    • Posted By: Layman @ 12/02/2008 12:53:27 AM

      ----
      "One leader of the Bajrang Dal (a paramilitary Hindu right-wing group) described his own role with pride: "There was this pregnant woman, I slit her open. ...They shouldn't even be allowed to breed. I say that even today. Whoever they are, women, children, whoever, nothing to be done with them but cut them down. Thrash them, slash them, burn the bastards. ...

      The idea is, don't keep them alive at all; after that, everything is ours."

      => Yes, we have right wingnuts in India too; Some of them have been known to make wild claims, especially when drunk. By

      and large, in Indian society, criminals are shunned; A man known to cheat on his wife, will be shunned by his male friends

      as well. Its just not macho to cheat on your wife.

      Also, eventually the justice system catches up with the culprit; On one ocassion, a Judge found the Prime Minister guilty.
      This is something that most Indians look on with some justified pride.
      ----
      "The revelation that members of the Hindu right have embraced ethno-religious cleansing should amaze nobody.".
      => Bilge. Both Pakistan and Bangladesh have carried out effective ethnic cleansing. Since 1947, in both nations, Hindus

      have been forcibly coverted or killed. There are no Hindus in either nation today.

      Recently some Pakistanis(Muslims) have taken asylum in India and refused to go back to Pakistan! The number of illegal

      Bangladeshis is estimated to be in millions. They too do not want to go back.
      ----
      "Since the 1930s, .."
      => Since India became independent in 1947, such a claim looks a bit suspect. The British stifled any movement for a free

      nation for Hindus and they were generally successful.
      ----
      ".. and that both Muslims and Christians are foreigners who should have second-class status in the nation.."
      => In India, Muslims and Christians were/are seen as coverts; not foreigners. The Muslim Community enjoys some privileges,

      guaranteed by the Constitution; These are unavailable to the Majority community, who insist that in a poverty-stricken

      nation, such privileges add extra burden on the poor. There has been some talk of removing these privileges and giving

      every citizen exactly the SAME rights. Unfortunately, this is represented as 'second-class' citizenship.
      ----

    • Posted By: Layman @ 12/02/2008 12:49:21 AM

      ----
      "Most Indian Christians are descendants of converts, often from the lowest Hindu castes."
      => Yes the poor and uneducated are known to have been forcibly converted. A good case is that of Graham Staines from

      Australia. Newspaper reports mentioned he used to fire a revolver during a mass conversion ceremony, partly for 'macho' and

      partly to cow down villagers. Unfortunately, he broke two laws in doing so. He was carrying a un-licensed weapon and

      secondly conversion en-masse is forbidden in that state (Orissa).

      I understand that he was repeatedly told to stop this practice, but he refused. Eventually a villager killed him for

      insulting his beliefs.

      This incident has been reported repeatedly in many different ways, with different actors. Something like the falling of the

      Twin Towers on different TV-channels, each time in a different angle, each time with a different commentary.
      ----
      "and at least 30,000 are homeless"
      => Due to poverty, many millions in India ARE homeless. It has nothing to do with their religion. I was born in a poor

      family too, but had the good fortune of hard-working parents.
      ----
      "The rallying cry: "Kill Christians and destroy their institutions."
      => Almost certainly false. I studied in a Christian school. And many of the children of relatives, back in India, also

      study in Christian schools.

      However, some Christian schools/colleges are known to discriminate against the majority community. This is immensely

      disliked and may be eventually stopped.
      ----

    • Posted By: Layman @ 12/01/2008 8:58:37 PM

      Richard,
      Simply because an American has written a story, does not mean its accurate; does mean its correct. Many of your journalists publish what is convenient. Did any journalist question the presence of WMDs in Iraq?

  • Posted By: chef_raviravi @ 12/01/2008 6:05:03 AM

    pakistani maderchodo ko mar dalo, ppl we dont get better reason for a fuul attack over pakistani bastard.in sab logo ki gaand mai boom laga kar uda dene chahiye.Sale hijde

  • Posted By: sw9092 @ 11/30/2008 9:53:23 PM

    I am originally from Mumbai and I completely agree with Prakashms. My muslim friends who are educated and acquired appropriate skills are very successful in their careers. It is not true that Muslims in India are discriminated against on the basis of their religion. Those who don't bother to learn marketable skills will not find jobs irrespective of their religion or ethnic background.

  • Posted By: Prakashms @ 11/30/2008 2:10:24 PM

    Mr. Zakaria surely knows the Ahmediyas and Ismailis who are muslims (though the Sunnis say they are not) who have participated in the economic boon. Sunnis who specialize only in the Koran and who have no marketable skills cannot find jobs not necessarily because they are muslims but unqualified. Surely he knows about Azim Premji??

  • Posted By: raveeshvarma @ 11/30/2008 1:19:03 PM

    PART 2
    Anyway, I digress??? many Hindus now believe that they have endured enough, enough of the ???offer the other cheek??? philosophy offered by Mahatma Gandhi. These are the people who have inherited the tradition of having a language first coded into a formal grammer (Sanskrit, Panini, 4th century BC), discovered the place value of zero (Aryabhatta the Younger), used steel beams to span over Natya Mandirs (the Kalinga school of temples), and enjoyed the golden age of art and literature (the Gupta Period; please see ???The Glory that was India??? by the Welsh Indologist Arthur Llewellyn Basham, or works by German Indologists). This is somewhat unfair, because how does one judge recompense in the present, of grievances perpetrated in the past? But, that is no argument to condone present-day acts of apartheid.
    American proselytizers, WHILE IN INDIA, make no secret of their contempt for classical Hinduism. How would it be if Hindus in the US started to refuse cooked food from Americans saying that it would be against their caste rules to take food from untouchables? If you don???t like the way India is at present, or how 80% of Indians conduct their lives, then get out of the country. India and Indian Hindus have survived 7 centuries of Muslim domination and another century and a half of British colonialization, we have the survival gene inherent to our systems, and in spades. Spare us the temptations of our eternal soul. What temptations? Saudi Muslims condescend to Indian Muslims, because of the taint of conversion. Let me ask you, if a Hindu converted to Christianity, will you consider him a candidate for a matrimonial relation of any variety, or will considerations of skin colour enter into the discussion, even if by a smidgen?
    The same can be said of acts of terrorism. Each time such an atrocity happens, it brings to mind in horrific detail burning, rape and abductions perpetrated upon Hindus over centuries (see ???India, A Wounded Civilization???, Naipaul), all culminating with the Partition of India; a decision which left a million dead, over ten million displaced, and problems besetting the subcontinent to this day! To count on third party help is pointless. Bringing the Kashmir issue to the UNSC in 1948 was one of the most foolish acts perpetrated in independent India, and served only to further complicate an already delicate matter. Let us be clear on this matter, wherever there is a boundary of capitalism/socialism, there is contention, a partition of some variety and bloodshed of the NATIVES, be it Korea, Vietnam, the middle-east and yes, Kashmir. It is very easy to judge things in the present, to assign the roles of victim and antagonist, try to go back a little bit more??? things are more complicated, and it is harder to assign blame.

  • Posted By: raveeshvarma @ 11/30/2008 1:18:28 PM

    PART 1
    The occurrences that you speak of did indeed happen. But, at the same time to claim that these are cause-less will be absurd. Since idea of democratic society/government starting to pervade India in the early part of the twentieth century, it has been accompanied by two equal and opposite paranoias: the first by the Indian Muslim (right now I am alluding to undivided British India) that he will be overwhelmed by Hindu Raj, after centuries of Hindus being lorded it over by a Muslim ruling-class minority; the second by the Indian Hindu that since the course of his Arya Varta/Bharat will now be decided by the populational majority, therefore he finally has the opportunity to rectify centuries of wrong.
    So, what would this ???wrong??? be? Mass slaughters by invaders in the name, IN THE NAME of religion, looting, destruction of temples, slavery, mass rapes and infanticide and mass abductions. There is not more than a handful of temples in the entire Gangetic plain of north India which is more than 300-400 years old. There are no, no major forts or palaces or secular buildings which date back to pre-Muslim days in this, the cradle of Hindu civilization. With the discovery of the sea route to India in 1497, matters did not improve. At first, Europeans were in thrall of having discovered the route to the India of legendary wealth, learning and tradition. But, that soon morphed to inquisitions (by the Portuguese near Goa), apartheid (???dogs and Indians do not enter???), proselytism (Britain up to the Mutiny of 1847, Americans to this very day), and erosion of the country???s resources (over 2 million dead in the great Bengal famine while exports to England did not wane by a kernel, given the continuance of WW2 in Europe). Indian soldiers fought and died in Europe and the middle-east during both the world wars, and yet Indians have nothing to show for any of that. When a British regiment would surrender in the deserts of Mesopotamia during the First World War, the English generals would bargain safe conduct for themselves, while the Sikh troops would die as slaves, parched and tortured by the Turks.

  • Posted By: toneill @ 11/30/2008 12:41:42 PM

    they may have a cause but its sullied by these gross actions.
    no cause deserves attention or uncovering but must suffer the opposite
    so as to discourage such barbaric actions.

    let them know not only have the sacrificed their lives and innocents but their own cause also
    Media please dont raltionaliz and Richard K we cannot even make the connection with the massacres you described.

    sad to say but the cause must go down with the action, unitl memories fade

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse