Morning In America

Could Barack Obama become the next Ronald Reagan?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Just Pondering @ 01/30/2009 7:34:38 PM

    Sustained gain in stocks? Dow down 1000+ points in Jan. HMMM

  • Posted By: Just Pondering @ 01/30/2009 7:30:55 PM

    Dow down 1000 and change in Jan., Sustained market? Hmm.

  • Posted By: kobmann @ 12/14/2008 1:50:22 PM

    How you can you possibly say that "Reagan is the president that Barack Obama is most closely modeling himself after?" The only thing similar between Obama and Reagan is that Obama inspires secular progressives - a small minority to which you belong - like Ronald Reagan inspired the rest of the nation. As a matter of substance, they are nothing like each at all. You're a smart woman. I have got to believe that you understand that Ronald Reagan's vision of "Morning in America" is diametrically opposed in numerous ways to what you and other progressives hope an Obama presidency will bring to pass.

    But because Americans generally reject secular progressive ideas and values, you attempt to prop up this failure in the marketplace of ideas with poorly constructed appeals to truly great ideas, hoping to borrow from their credibility. Barack Obama is a smart, articulate, and extraordinarily inexperienced President Elect. And your infatuation for the man couldn't be more obvious to anyone who reads you or listens to you. But, please, let him stand on his own two feet, and quit with the comparisons to Reagan. Obama hasn't yet earned comparison with any former president, much less Ronaldus Magnus!

  • Posted By: Dolmance @ 12/09/2008 3:38:31 PM

    Each day, the Republicans look more and more out of touch, out of ideas and frankly are talking a lot like demented people vote after careful consideration of a mix of issues pertaining to dinosaurs and people going to picnics together, a peculiar preoccupation with reproductive issues and a rehash of old Reagan economic bromides that make no sense at all in our current financial straits. With an opposition like that, the Democrats can do whatever they like. Because the Democrats have the People with them. Where else are they going to go?

    • Posted By: standfortheconstitution @ 12/11/2008 1:13:35 AM

      Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. - RR
      Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. - RR
      Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. - RR
      No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth! - RR
      Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. - RR
      Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves. - RR

      So how is Obama like Reagan again? Obama believes that Government is the solution. Reagan AND the founding fathers of the United States / Constitution believed that Government was the problem and set out to protect us from it.

  • Posted By: BobOrr @ 12/04/2008 8:47:39 AM

    Eleanore is as clueless as ever. She has mistaken Obama's "determined calm" with someone who is devoid of any answers to any serious problems his new job brings... and is trying to BS his way through it. Actually, they both are clueless.

    I wonder how long it will take Eleanor and the hypnotized cool-aid drinkers to wake up and realize that the Charlatan's broken promises don't amount to any type of "Change". It was simply a slogan to get a fraud elected.

  • Posted By: neocon @ 12/03/2008 5:00:22 PM

    A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years.
    Great nations rise and fall. The people go from bondage to spiritual truth, to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence, from dependence back again to bondage.

    We as a people are at the apathy to dependence stage.

  • Posted By: neocon @ 12/03/2008 4:47:57 PM

    Let him accomplish something first before comparing him to Reagan, but with his track record in Illinois and the senate I???m not overly hopeful. Honestly, I see more Carter than Reagan.

  • Posted By: karaswart @ 12/03/2008 3:58:16 PM

    Today is December 3rd. On December 3rd, 1971 the Pakistani Army pogrom of innocent Bengali Muslims finally stopped in a land which is now called Bangladesh. Over 3 million Bengali Muslims were killed by the Pakistani Army. Thousands of Muslim women were raped. That is the brave Pakistani Army that the US depends on. A fitting tribute to this genocide is being planned in Dacca, Bangladesh. The world must never forget

  • Posted By: Republican be gone @ 12/01/2008 1:44:54 AM

    Obama the new Reagan? Well, I hope not. I voted for Reagan in 84 over defense issues but the guy was clueless when it came to anything involving science or the environment. With global warming coming on faster than expected (no, rebibs, it's not a fantasy) we can't afford that anymore.

    • Posted By: ok4u @ 12/02/2008 10:24:18 PM

      Global Warming? Snicker. Were you around in the "Global Cooling" days? Same junk science today.

      • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/03/2008 2:59:55 PM



        Didn't Nero fiddle while Rome burned?

        By the way, when Rachel Carson's Silent Spring came out, the great hue and cry was that there was no proven effect on the environment from DDT, all agriculture would fail and the world would starve if they couldn't continue massive, unregulated, use of DDT. Environmentalists were ridiculed as stupid, radical and hysterical.

        And there was 'fear' for what would happen to the chemical industry too.

  • Posted By: karaswart @ 12/03/2008 7:41:56 AM

    December 3rd 1971- the beginning of the end of the genocide of the Bengali Muslims perpetrated by Pakistani Soldiers. Over 3 million Bengalis were murdered. Let not the world forget.

  • Posted By: trogers @ 12/01/2008 10:28:51 PM

    Expectations are very high for Obama to work miracles on a system rife with partisan hatred, but bonded by personal greed. In Washington, government works for those who work the system best. They keep score by the amount of money they can make from a government of insiders, by insiders and for insiders. The President can try to fight the system or he can go along. It really makes no difference in the end because the result will remain the same. The Congress, the lobbiests, and the special interests always prevail. They get the money for themselves and laugh at the voters who think they actually are represented. The only way Obama can change the system is to destroy it. He won't be willing or able to do so. Another administration just means another gravy train for most of the same people. The banklords, the businesslords, the warlords, the farmlords and the landlords will still be in charge. Lord have mercy! Because they do not.

  • Posted By: JoanR @ 12/01/2008 12:35:11 PM

    Well Reagan believed what he believed.Obama believes what the polls tell to believe.with that kind of...ahem...flexibility,he can be anything he wants to be

    • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/01/2008 4:26:47 PM



      Golly, what makes you think that? To my eyes, Obama ran the only consistent campaign while the others kept changing postitions with the wind.

      A 40 year republican

  • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 12/01/2008 2:27:19 AM

    Why do you like to compare and make analogies between them? Obama is still not in office yet. What is the point in making a comparison? The fact is like all previous presidents Obama will eventually let us down because the president is not the real power, it all depends on the lobbyists, campaign donators and other influential parties who will sway the president around.Eleanor, you are just as naive as Sarah Palin.

  • Posted By: Mobi @ 11/29/2008 10:24:54 AM

    I knew Ronald Reagan and. Barak Obama is no Ronald Reagan.

    • Posted By: will50 @ 11/30/2008 9:56:43 PM

      And why would Obama want to be another Reagan>>>it seems to me that Obama has a lot more going for him than Reagan could ever dream of. No...Reagan is no Obama.

  • Posted By: YashBudini @ 11/30/2008 9:24:19 PM

    What a terrible thought the author has, another president that will step in and double the national debt. Reagan and W have both been puppet regimes, who wants or needs another one of those?

  • Posted By: BetsyY @ 11/30/2008 2:22:02 PM

    Obama better not be like Reagan! So far I am not thrilled with his appointments. WAY too conservative, especially that Zionist and free-trade loving Emanuel. If he does anything like condemning so=called welfare queens, then it's the end of my love affair with this agent of "change." I can't take another 4 or 8 years of conservatism. Don't let us down Obama - we did not elect you to be like Reagan! Also, I completely agree with Spamwise in his reponse to noneyas. There's a little thing in the Constitution called "freedom of speech"! If you don't like it, I think YOU (nonyas) should move to China or travel in a time-machine back to pre-1989 Soviet Union, Franco's Spain, or Hitler's Germany. No one wants fascism or dictatorships here!

    • Posted By: noneyas @ 11/30/2008 8:09:17 PM

      BetsyY - you are being hypocritical. You say there's such thing as freedom of speech and yet when I exercised MY freedom of speech, it has you all upset. Gotta love another wacky lib. You people are so entertaining. It's like watching monkeys try to solve a Rubik's cube. They know something's not right but they don't have the common sense or logic to make a correct decision to save their lives.

      • Posted By: jarcher1 @ 11/30/2008 9:07:34 PM

        Freedom of speech doesn't have anything to do with people getting upset, it simply guarantees the government can't prosecute you for what you say within limits. And I see the rest of your post demonstrates that you have the same profound understanding of politics that you do of the first amendment.

  • Posted By: ok4u @ 11/30/2008 7:22:05 PM

    With his appointments of students of Robert Rubin as the team to "fix" the economy, perhaps it will get fixed like Rubin's last leadership position fixed Citigroup. Unless Obama changes some of his ideas, and quits reinstalling the Clinton administration, he more than likely will become the next Jimmy Carter.

    • Posted By: jarcher1 @ 11/30/2008 8:55:13 PM

      Your exactly right, we don't need anymore of Rubin's Monetarist thinking. He and a whole slew of Monetarists are partially responsible for the present mess. They are responsible in the sense that regulatory firewalls put in place after 1933 were largely dismantled at their behest. Now the problem for right wingnuts is that they've been championing the Monetarist position since Ron Reagan's adminstration, so you can't have it both ways: If Rubin practiced bad economics, then Reagan and both Bushes were right in their with him. If Rubin practiced good economics then why the present mess?

      As for his students, maybe they learned some new tricks, or maybe they didn't, but, and a big but here, we don't have all of Obama's appointments known yet. There is still virtually the entire council of economic advisers to fill in, so its a little premature to be criticizing Obama's economic picks. As for the Monetarists cardinal sins, you can bet there will be much greater financial market regulation after Obama's first two years, the public won't stand for anything else.

  • Posted By: diplomat @ 11/30/2008 7:45:52 PM

    "a defeat abroad" How is handing a largely stable country to a democratically elected body of leaders a defeat? Yes, it is taking much too long, and yes, there are problems, but this cannot be called 'defeat'!

  • Posted By: Dr. James @ 11/30/2008 6:42:19 PM

    Reagen is an excellent model for a leader. His party hid behind his love of America. Obama must lead America in a new environment. He understands minorities and the poor. He can open a new world to people who have been left out. America has so much unused resource that can open new markets. All Americans must step up to new leadership. Reagen is a good model but with a new view.

  • Posted By: simmyco @ 11/30/2008 2:02:20 PM

    From blog to blog the disgruntled and misguided who voted for McCain and Palin travel, spewing nothing but cynicism and hatred. There is no longer a need to shield racism under subjects that don't relate to their true feelings; their true feelings were exposed on November 4, 2008, when 54+M chose to vote for ideologies above issues. Now is the time for those in that category, to sit, be quiet, and give intellect, integrity, experience, and peace a chance! Light of the world, shine on US!

    • Posted By: jarcher1 @ 11/30/2008 4:39:23 PM

      Believe me this is nothing new. Remember the seething anger on the Right when Clinton won. The eight years of investigation, lie, and innuendo? The stupidly lurching from trivia to trivia, anything to bring the administration down. Actually, I think these people are a bit more chilled out than the herd was in 92, not any smarter mind you, just not as frustrated. And there seem to be a lot less of them out. It may be they recognized that based on the campaign he ran, McCain should have lost

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 11/30/2008 2:14:16 PM

      Excellent comments!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse