The Real Security Challenge

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

But how to demonstrate "change" in other areas of U.S. foreign and defense policy? Even the "gimme" gesture of shutting down Guantánamo Bay will, in practice, take months to effect, and will involve tricky negotiations with the nations to whom internees belong. The reality is that the current administration—obeying Churchill's mordant remark that "the United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative"—has, in Bush's second term, zigzagged its demoralized way to a set of centrist policies (a situation due largely to the efforts of an alliance of Gates at Defense, Rice at State and the underrated Stephen Hadley as national-security adviser.)

What would constitute change on U.S. policy toward Iraq? America's withdrawal now has a timetable agreed upon by the Iraqis. North Korea's nukes? Rice, by shrewdly enlisting Beijing's help, has come tantalizingly close to a settlement. Iran? Nothing is possible unless the mullahs can somehow be pressured into contemplating a deal. Israel and the Palestinians? Nothing suggests either side is close to accepting the agonizing compromises necessary for any settlement. Arguably, U.S.-mediated negotiations have become an alibi for evading those decisions.

On the long list of pressing foreign challenges, only Afghanistan would seem to offer Obama a real chance for a fresh approach. But the Mumbai terrorist attack, and its inevitably dire impact on India-Pakistan relations, doubles the challenge of devising a plausibly workable Afghan strategy.

So, what can President Obama do? Announce a series of grand initiatives, perhaps. Nuclear weapons; global warming; the future of energy after oil; perhaps some sort of Euro-Russian security conference—big topics that would generate the necessary international headlines. Susan Rice's nomination as United Nations ambassador certainly points to this. She is well-suited to push "big initiatives," if less equipped for the cut-and-thrust of Security Council bargaining (so she, too, will need an able deputy.)

This strategy would have the value of buying his new national-security team the months they will need to figure out what precisely any such initiatives might actually entail. And that, in turn, would leave President Obama free to focus for his first year on the one truly urgent foreign and security crisis: the economic one.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Combat Goldfish @ 12/12/2008 12:22:45 PM

    And I'm certain you'll complain about the next administration. However, I'm sure you can expect any improvement over bush.

  • Posted By: karaswart @ 12/03/2008 3:55:57 PM

    Today is December 3rd. On December 3rd, 1971 the Pakistani Army pogrom of innocent Bengali Muslims finally stopped in a land which is now called Bangladesh. Over 3 million Bengali Muslims were killed by the Pakistani Army. Thousands of Muslim women were raped. That is the brave Pakistani Army that the US depends on. A fitting tribute to this genocide is being planned in Dacca, Bangladesh. The world must never forget

  • Posted By: Jose52 @ 12/03/2008 3:35:45 PM

    Agreed. HRC is a poor politician as the article mentioned. Obama is risking his presidency over this loose cannon. She is not a diplomat, but will pacify the World with the Clinton mystic. I fear some fumbles more often without many competant handlers.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now