POLITICS

Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary Of State Nominee

What Clinton thinks about India, Guantanamo Bay and other pivotal foreign policy issues.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: grandmamary @ 01/17/2009 5:35:42 PM

    I hope that she is the right choice. Bill's dealings and contributors to his vast holdings should be put out of business. They certainly will influence her decisions on world policies, should they arise. He will no doubt be putting a bug in her ear if they concern his businesses. He has been dealing with these people for a long time, and she knew everything he was doing all along, and never did anything to stop him, so how is she going to be impartial to all he is doing? I think that the congress should put a stop to all his dealings and then maybe she would be the right choice.

  • Posted By: rcjorgensen @ 01/17/2009 5:06:26 PM

    It seems we are increasing the scope of the war in Afganistan and Mrs. Clinton stresses the poor treatment of women. Can we really afford to liberate Afgan women? We are in serious debt and Russia failed in Afganistan maybe we should focus on strenghtening our economy and let soviegn nations follow their laws. Law and order should be backed up by the US but escaling a conflict needs to have better reasons given the state of our situation.

  • Posted By: Dr Steven @ 01/17/2009 6:50:58 AM

    To: brydges@ 12/24/2008 Sounds if you are just trying to be cute. I don't find your comment neither cute, nor substentive. Read Mrs. Clinton's book, "It Takes as Village and study her mmore than 30 years in various areas of public service. The mess that Bush hasa left us in is no joke, it is time for people that have a brain to solve problems rather than yourself just poking fun at nothing any of us are interested in.

    drsdeere@hotmail.com

  • Posted By: Dr Steven @ 01/17/2009 6:41:37 AM

    My wife and myself both voted for former First Lady & Senator from New York Hillary Clinton. Her vast experience & understanding of world events makes her an ideal candidate for President, or Secretary of State. We are very proud that our Democrats have finally won the House, Senate and the Executive Branch. We feel that President-Elect Obama is a fine choice as well. We didn't really care who won for President, either Barak, or Hillary, as long as both are in the positions they hold. Bush has so destroyed so many things that our daily prayers will go out for both President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

  • Posted By: Monty Varraich @ 01/10/2009 11:22:18 AM

    There is a contradiction when on the one hand you want to promote democracy in the Middle East and and at the same time support the dictatorial regimes in the same region for your strategic interests.

    Posted by mvarraich@hotmail.com

  • Posted By: ajka @ 12/26/2008 2:09:53 AM

    I am surprised how accurate she was in May 2008 regarding Afgan and Pakistan being the centre of terrorism.

  • Posted By: brydges @ 12/24/2008 10:29:40 AM

    I don't think she's the right man for the job

  • Posted By: Jim448_ @ 12/16/2008 5:01:48 PM

    I am terrified where this nation is going.

  • Posted By: hck7082 @ 12/01/2008 5:09:35 PM

    Is Hillary Clinton barred by the Constitution from accepting the post of secretary of state?

    Article One, Section Six of the U.S. Constitution says:

    No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.
    This is not the first time this Article has stood in the way of a cabinet appointment. In 1973, at the height of Watergate, President Richard Nixon nominated William Saxbe (R) to be Attorney General and the issue was raised because Saxbe was in the Senate in 1969 when the Attorney General???s pay was raised.
    In that instance, Congress lowered the pay for the AG, allowing the appointment to proceed. Democratic Senators complained, however, and 10 senators actually voted against the transparent scheme on constitutional grounds. At the time, Sen. Robert C. Byrd deemed it was clearly unconstitutional saying we should not delude the American people into thinking a way can be found around the constitutional obstacle.
    The usual workaround is for Congress to lower the salary of the job back to what it was so that the nominee can take it without receiving the benefit of the pay increase that was approved while the nominee was in Congress. This maneuver, which has come to be known as ???the Saxbe fix,??? addresses the clear intent of the Constitution, to prevent self-dealing.
    But many legal scholars believe it does not cure the Constitutional problem, because the language of Article I is so clearly an absolute prohibition: No senator or representative, period.
    ???The content of the rule here is broader than its purpose,??? said Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, a Constitutional law expert at St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. ???And the rule is the rule; the purpose is not the rule.???
    ???A ???fix??? can rescind the salary,??? he added, ???but it cannot repeal historical events. The emoluments of the office had been increased. The rule specified in the text still controls.???

    However, with the Liberal ???Ostrich??? Press and the Democrats in power in the Legislative and Executive Branches of the U.S. government???it is most likely that the U.S. Constitution will be set aside, again.

    • Posted By: imnxdc @ 12/06/2008 6:08:19 PM

      No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall <b>have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time</b>; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.

      I take this to mean that it is only constitutional had Hillary been senator when the Secretary of State office was created or had she voted for an increase in pay during her period of service. She was a senator when salary for Secretary of State was last increased, so technically this would disqualify her. If the salary is decreased to the previous level as has been done in the past. This move is somewhat controversial, but it has been done before and accepted. She definitely would not be eligible for a post such as Homeland Security.

  • Posted By: The genius @ 12/06/2008 2:37:49 AM

    After the previous bloody lady, Hillary will give all soft toys?

  • Posted By: ok4u @ 12/05/2008 12:41:56 PM

    Hillary, regardless of the questionable reasons for her choice, is a tough lady. She may well be a good Secretary of State. She's not as radical as Obama, and she has something to prove, even to herself.

  • Posted By: ok4u @ 12/05/2008 12:41:21 PM

    Hillary, regardless of the questionable reasons for her choice, is a tough lady. She may well be a good Secretary of State. She's not as radical as Obama, and she has something to prove, even to herself.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 12/02/2008 1:14:52 AM

    "OBAMA "HAS HIS DREAM TEAM""(eddiewhere 2008).. I am surprise that no one has used this term. I am sure I will hear it tomorrow. OBAMA HAS SELECTED HIS DREAM TEAM. THIS TEAM HAS ALL STAR CREDENTIALS. EACH OF THEM ARE HALL OF FAMERS. HILLARY, GATES, RAHM.
    HOPEFULLY, THIS DREAM TEAM WILL KEEP THEIR EYES ON THE REAL THREAT RUSSIA AND CHINA. These two countries have already launched a very successful CYBER WAR against AMERICA. They are able to spy on our networks and steal our technological secrets and our patented software.
    RUSSIA, INDIA AND CHINA ARE THE SUPERPOWERS OF THAT SIDE OF THE WORLD. They are the key to a multinational strategy. Managing these realtionships is like walking a tight rope(eddiewhere 2008). China and India are always at odds and have a delicate relationship to say the least. I know ZaKaria wrote an article on this relationship six months ago. He needs to write another one.
    Another situation that needs to be monitored closely is ORGANIZED CRIME IN EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES, ESPECIALLY when it comes to cyber crime and nuclear weapons. These Eastern European countries are a potential conduit for passing NUKES to terrorists.

    These Terrorists will be based in the Five MUSLIM breakaway REpublics in Central ASIA( Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistanan) . They can potentially form an alliance with China, who has a long history of strained relationships with INDIA. To the MUslims India is an enemy and a traitor. Remeber how Hitler rose to power, a depressed economy in EUROPE. THESE REPUBLICS in Central Asia have all the same elements.. Russia and CHina will form an alliance based on their mutual FRICTION with INDIA(WHO IS CHALLENGING TO BE THEY PREMIER SUPERPOWER IN ASIA).

    LOOSE NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE FORMER SOVIET REPUBLICS IS A BIG PROBLEM BECAUSE ORGANIZED CRIME GROUPS IN EASTERN EUROPE CAN GAIN ACCESS to them and sell them to terrorists.
    THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN THE 5 MUSLIM STATES IN CENTRAL , AND CHINA IS A Big Threat.

    "OBAMA IS NOW THE WORLD"S FIRST PRESIDENT" eddiwhere 2008.. CAN HE SUCCESSFULLY MANAGE RELATIONSHIPS WITH RUSSIA AND CHINA INORDER TO PREVENT THESE FIVE MUSLIM REPUBLICS FROM SLIPPING DEEPER AND DEEPER INTO ECONOMIC DEPRESSION. ONCE AGAIN REMEMBER HOW HITLER ROSE TO POWER A DEPRESSED ECONOMY IN GERMANY WHO WAS TORCHERED ECONOMICALLY AFTER WORLD WAR ONE BY THE ALLIES RUSSIA, FRANCE AND BRITAIN. RUSSIA IS DOING THE SAME TO ITS FORMER REPUBLICS UKRAINE ect.....

    OBAMA IS LIKE THE COACH OF THE DREAM TEAM(BASKETBALL) TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT HE HAS A PLAN TO MAKE JORDON, BIRD AND MAGIC WORK TOGETHER AS ONE FORCE TO THEIR FULL POTENTIAL. OR LEBRON, KOBY AND PAUL PIERCE. I AM SURE HE CAN AND WILL DO JUST FINE AND AMERICA WILL SOON BE THE ENVY OF THE WORLD AGAIN.

    OBAMA HAS HIS DREAM TEAM AND ALL THE TOOLS FOR A MUCH NEEDED GLOBAL STRATEGY.

    P.S. REMEMBER BARAK YOUR BLACKBERRY HAS ALREADY BEEN HACKED.

    • Posted By: bob_hall27 @ 12/02/2008 11:02:55 PM

      you mean his screw the American people team

      • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/04/2008 11:19:16 PM



        A fundamental characteristic and theme of the right wing is paranoia.

        A 40 year republican

  • Posted By: The genius @ 12/04/2008 4:13:52 PM

    Monica seek safety in flight! Hillary goes!

  • Posted By: reinadelaz @ 12/04/2008 3:32:55 AM

    Why does it matter what Hillary Clinton thinks about all of these issues? isn't the secretary of State supposed to promote the President's agenda around the world? The reassembly of the Clinton Administration is not the change Obama sold us and we are already experiencing buyer's remorse. Obama would not have won this election without the support of voters who would NEVER have voted to have another Clinton in power! Jeb Bush for Senate 2010!

  • Posted By: reinadelaz @ 12/04/2008 3:32:15 AM

    Why does it matter what Hillary Clinton thinks about all of these issues? isn't the secretary of State supposed to promote the President's agenda around the world? The reassembly of the Clinton Administration is not the change Obama sold us and we are already experiencing buyer's remorse. Obama would not have won this election without the support of voters who would NEVER have voted to have another Clinton in power! Jeb Bush for Senate 2010!

  • Posted By: Duke Scott @ 12/02/2008 2:28:04 PM

    Wow is this guy for real??!!! Have you stopped to notice that it is against the constitution of the United States for good ole' Barrack to nominate Hillary for Sec. of State?????????????? Now what else do we have to look forward to???

    • Posted By: bob_hall27 @ 12/02/2008 10:50:44 PM

      Oh that's ok Obama wasn't even eligible to run as president to this day he hasn't proved his citizenship so what does he care about the constitution it's kind of like the moron that has the post prior to this that thinks Obama is the president of the world. It's people like that, that will be the downfall of our country their just to full of themselves to see it.

      • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/02/2008 11:34:31 PM



        Still some LIVs and propaganda dupes out there huh? Still reading those 8 month old anonymous smear emails and listening to right wing howl radio? Here's a very old debunk link http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

        It has multiple photos, including of the authenticity certification.

        As you dream on, think about this. Hillary, McC and RNC have had many millions and abundant lawyers. Do you really think they would do nothing if there were any question at all about his citizenship?

        You owe yourself a little information with that propaganda you're still gorging on. Crawl out and see the light of day. It's nice out here.

        A 40 year republican

        • Posted By: bob_hall27 @ 12/02/2008 11:47:55 PM

          Factcheck is a leftwing crock His grandmother said she was there when he was born and she wasn't in Hawaii It was also proven that those documents that factcheck used were faked.

          • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/03/2008 1:32:08 AM



            What acceptable/reliable/credible source (or any source for that matter) do you have that his grandmother was there? Where was it 'proven' that those documents were faked?

            As you dream on, think about this. Hillary, McC and RNC have had many millions and abundant lawyers. Do you really think they would do nothing if there were any question at all about his citizenship?

            So, why is it that with such bountiful and reliable info you have that no one with any 'skin' in the game never did anything about it?

            You are...not thinking....are you? Think about it. Why do you have no answers about the above?

            You embarass all of us thinking republicans. You are what they keep throwing in our faces when we try to convince them that we are the thinking, sensible, nondelusional party.

            A 40 year republican

  • Posted By: advoidleftists @ 12/02/2008 11:56:03 PM

    The clintons did in the 90s was weaken our military and made us look like *** in somalia and guess what clinton you doing cut and run in somalia did what for that country made it world first class pirate adventure. i knew somalia will catch up with clinton. I mean who can trust somone who too busy late at night getting blowed by fat girl name monica its hilary fault she should of been first lady to go on her hands and knees to suck his dick but no she put all of us at risk that was her job she the first lady to suck his *** instead he wastes country time and money on this fat whore monica who breath still smells like fresh seamen. Clinton weaken military what else did they do ummmm nothing. oh yeah bomb iran in 1998 to draw attention from themselfs but when it came to it he didnt have the balls.

  • Posted By: dollface @ 12/01/2008 11:04:28 PM

    This is the biggest mistakes Obama will make during his tenure. Hillary will upstate him at every turn. She looked presidential today and he looked like her lap dog. When will anyone learn that the Clintons are not the Democratic Party and let them leave the building. Can't wait to see the inagural ball, after the Clintons enter the room and Obama realizes, SHE WON THE ELECTION!

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 12/02/2008 1:25:26 PM

      Really? Who will be crapping in the oval office bathroom?

      Oh, yeah. Obama.

      • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/02/2008 6:44:59 PM



        Yer waaaay too funny, Doc!!!!!

  • Posted By: sharkman @ 12/01/2008 10:20:21 PM

    Someone please close the chapter on these Clinton idiots.Who sold out our country.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse