Discussions have been overly one-sided - shareholders / investors (mainly institutional) demand greater return over a short period of time, and constantly compare that to how well other organisations have performed. Banks which did not perform as well as their (in hindsight, excessive-risk taking) peers were punished and constantly benchmarked against their peers, some of which have collapsed spectacularly. Do shareholders really, genuinely believe that they are entitled to 20% compounded annual growth in their stock values when the cash rate is 5% - ie. 15% more return and not much more risk assumed? It's the relentless pursuit of ever higher returns with blatant disregard of risk by investors that have partly contributed to this. What we are seeing today isn't the doing of a particular group of people (CEO, regulators, politicians, etc), but a concerted global effort by everyone (mainly in the developed nations). At the root of this is, quite simply, greed. Greed, in everyone, from investors in real estate (with the illusion of ever-growing asset value, some even resort to explain why the prices can keep growing forever, using demographic shift to fit into what they observe) to the inland revenue / tax authorities / politicians (who are more than happy to see ever increasing tax revenues and lavish themselves with absurd amount of perks and remuneration), that has resulted in where we are today. I agree, the likes of Dick Fuld, Fred Goodwin and Chuck Prince, are to be blamed. If you were the investors that believed in excessive growth / return over your investment, and demanded it, you are to be blamed too.









Discuss