1900 Days And Counting

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: suchismit @ 12/03/2008 2:42:24 PM

    I KNOW THE DRIVE BYS NOT JUST LIKE THE BACK OF MY HAND, BUT MY ENTIRE SKINNY GLORIOUS NAKED BODY.

    All through the Bush years we heard the whole idea of WMD's lampooned and ridiculed. If WMDs did not exist as the Drive Bys claimed, how could they possibly fall into the hands of terrorists ? Now with their boy Hussein in power, WMDs is all we are going to hear about and in no small part to prepare the public for a likely attack that will happen under his watch. The DriveBys are so predictable and so Pathetic. I am glad the Dinosaur media is headed toward extinction. Good riddance, DriveBys !

  • Posted By: deftoniac311 @ 12/03/2008 2:17:43 PM

    Such beautiful propaganda - by the way - how's the independent investigation of the events of 9/11 coming?

  • Posted By: navel @ 12/03/2008 8:39:07 AM

    Our admin. has been so worried about the economy, the Big 3 car makers, wall st, etc. we have all gotten off track and that is when you are vulnerable. Why does govt. waste our money on stupid things like NASA, the UN, and I just saw on the news some new museum in DC that cots billions - who cares about any of this stuff how does it even matter if we all go up in smoke when the nut job terrorists sprinkly some magic dust in our environment - boom dead...Take the money and spend it where it really matters and can ake a difference. Lets face it, the UN is a complete waste, look at all that money spent over the years and no-one pays any attention to any of those ambassadors, I mean the 20K/year salaried traffic cops in NYC have more clout. Why do we have to spend hundreds of thousand of dollars on the WH x-mas decorations, every single year. And look at how much money Hussein raised in his campaign, put that to use in our security, so that maybe we can have a few more years b/f they blow us away...

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 12/03/2008 9:02:46 AM

      So, what's it like to live in constant fear?

      • Posted By: navel @ 12/03/2008 11:47:36 AM

        Hey - Doc Howl - It's not leaving in fear, it's living in reality and in NYC. So take your rose colored glasses off and a dose of the real deal tastes like.

        • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 12/03/2008 11:54:33 AM

          Of course it's living in fear.

          Reality: Over the last 10 years, you had a one in a million chance of being killed by a terrorist, inside the USA. You are far more likely to be hit by a bus. Hell, you're more likely to be hit by lightning.

  • Posted By: Willian C DeMuth @ 12/03/2008 10:51:34 AM

    One additional point I would like to offer to the conversation is that fact that it is now quite feasible to create pathogens that are sub genome specific. In simpler terms diseases that are design to attack certain characteristics or traits within individuals in a group.

    Soon enough I suspect diseases shall be built that will attack only those individuals with certain genetic traits.

    So if one were able to identify genetic makers in a sub section of society that in combination were exclusive, then it would be possible to attack them and only them biologically.

    Imagine a bug designed to kill only left handed lesbian Eskimos. Seems farfetched, but it is in fact quite probable.

    Gonna be a hell of a century!

  • Posted By: Willian C DeMuth @ 12/03/2008 10:34:07 AM

    I am deeply concerned by the lack of knowledge in this area and how it permits people to be manipulated.

    Bio weapons are easy to culture and disseminate with little more than a home beer brewing kit from K Mart and the desire to harm others, but their use as a weapon of limited mass destruction is impractical.

    If the particular agent is localized and not communicable like a toxin, it might be effective as an area denial weapon, but if the agent is both contagious and deadly it would be counterproductive because its primary victims would be those who propagated it. Places with high population density and low medical infrastructure like China or Palestine would be in deep trouble quickly.

    For example, if an enhanced Small Pox, Ebola or any hemorrhagic fever were to erupt in lower Manhattan, before it was even on the news it would be on the ground and spreading all over the world. Without an extensive inoculation program and enormous medical stock piles the society that unleashed it would be just as devastated as the targets. In fact western societies would actually be the best able to endure it, while third world countries would be wiped out.

    The short term threat is and always has been chemical weapons. As Bhopal and Auschwitz have shown us, the most efficient and cost effective means of killing is chemical in nature. Bio weapons are at best a crap shoot, and quite often suicide.

  • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 12/03/2008 9:05:22 AM

    What a bunch of fearmongering crap.

  • Posted By: dm2000 @ 12/02/2008 11:13:31 PM

    No WMDs?

    Google "Yellowcake iraq canada".

    If Sadam didn't have "WMD"s, then he certainly could have set off a very nasty dirty bomb with this size of nuclear material stash. And I don't know why Bush decided to deep six this news release over the July 4th holiday, you would think this would have supported his quest.

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 12/03/2008 8:39:03 AM

      Canada has WMDs now? LOL.

    • Posted By: Skypoint @ 12/02/2008 11:20:02 PM

      dm2000... I was being facetious...

  • Posted By: Jim1348 @ 12/03/2008 8:25:22 AM

    Over 200,000 people die in the world every day. But the news media doesn't make their money reporting it. Until Americans, who are not used to terrorism in their country, get a more realistic grasp on the relative threats of all kinds, we will continue to bankrupt ourselves over it. And that is in addition to getting even more people killed in the resulting military operations than in the original attack. It makes sense only if you earn your livelihood at it.

  • Posted By: roflmao @ 12/03/2008 12:40:08 AM

    LOL are you kidding? Cures for diseases are not a priority ... cures would mean the death of big-pharm's profits. Think of the billions and billions of dollars these chemical producing giants would lose if there were no demand / no marketability for their SYMPTOM treating products. No, I'm afraid that our vulnerability to pathogens and other diseases lies solely on the shoulders of big-pharm ... they are the worst of all.

  • Posted By: dm2000 @ 12/02/2008 11:27:13 PM

    Skypoint...good man!

    But do go out and look up the iraqi yellowcake articles, I've pointed out this news release to the left minded when they get on the "No WMDs in Iraq/ unjustified war rant" and all were rather speechless afterwords.

    • Posted By: Skypoint @ 12/02/2008 11:59:43 PM

      Thanks! I've not seen this. I'll look it up.

  • Posted By: one breath @ 12/02/2008 11:39:43 PM

    I'm more worried about a pandemic flu or other contagious illness. Why don't we have a cure yet for the common cold for starters? Then maybe we'd have some hope for antidotes to the others.

  • Posted By: rackinroll @ 12/02/2008 11:16:59 PM

    I couldn't agree more with the last three posting. Please spend as much time trying to fix our image as you do do filling use with your doom and gloom. Our big daddy complex really drive the rest of the world crazy. Thanks George.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse