Detroit's Delusion

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Iconoblaster @ 12/04/2008 1:22:02 PM

    It will be hard to convince me that the big unions in the auto industry DIDN'T price themselves and their whole domestic industry out of work. If Chevy is carrying the burden of $75 per worker hour in wages and benefits (plus legacy costs, and lets not even talk about the "job bank" boondoggle), they are probably telling the straight truth about labor piling an extra $1,500 on the cost of every American new car, relative to those built by foreign companies. It was never JUST executives pillaging THIS golden goose (though they did it too)... and both sides continue to blame the other. Greed ISN'T good. And now the American taxpayer is supposed to bail them out? And with money we don't even have. How much of this can the American dollar really stand, before it collapses into a flood of confetti?

    • Posted By: paintedpony @ 12/04/2008 5:53:01 PM

      the $75 an hour already includes legacy costs, but once again people repeat what they hear, not what they know

  • Posted By: Attorney @ 12/04/2008 10:48:38 AM

    If you want a good product then buy foreign. They care about their products because it reflects on THEM!!! That is the problem here in America. The automakers, dealers, and sales personnel have no pride in what they make, nor sell. American has LOST its sense of pride and respect in its products. It's all about the money now!! As long as someone gets a "paycheck" by selling or producing the product, then it doesn't matter about how it's made.

    Oh yeah! If you go to Germany, you can buy the highest price BMW for less than $30,000.00. You can have it shipped into Canada and then you can pick it up there and still pay less for all of that compared to what you would pay here in the USA. Also, Germany has more diesel vehicles, more vehicles you have never even seen here in the USA that gets more than 40 miles per gallon, and cost about half of what you would buy a similar vehicle over here.

    A brand new AUDI and Mercedes over there lists for less than $30,000.00. Even the maids
    and house cleaners drive BMWs and all the expensive cars over there because they are so "cheap." How do I know this? I have been over there 5 times all over Europe and everywhere you rent a vehicle you get all the high dollar vehicles at the same price as the cheap rentals over here.

    • Posted By: McLovinB @ 12/04/2008 5:32:27 PM

      That huge price difference you are referring to is taxes and tariffs.
      They highlight the fact that US cars are being made and sold in a protected market. The plain truth is that Detroit has not been competing on a level playing field for decades. Detroit cannot sell cars abroad because they don't have better quality OR lower cost. They do not even make products that people in countries with higher gas prices want to buy. Rather than produce cars that burn gas cleanly and efficiently, they lobby Washington to loosen the standards and change the yardsticks.
      Why do foreign cars cost more? Not because they are produced inefficiently. They cost more in America because Detroit wants it that way.

      Detroit has not failed because of competition. Detroit has failed because it will not compete.

  • Posted By: paintedpony @ 12/04/2008 5:22:54 PM

    Once again the media has it wrong. Laid off worker don not receive 95% of their pay. The formula is: 95% of net pay based on 40 hours minus $30 for costs not incurred due to not working, then taxes based on the number of people covered under health insurance. For a single person with no dependents it amounts to 67%, yes that is better than unemployment alone, but afar cry from 95%. Plus the difference comes from the SUB (Supplemental Unemployment Fund) which is funded by EMPLYEES with a diversion from wage to the fund. let's see the truth published for once.(supplementanemployment Fund)

  • Posted By: UH2L @ 12/04/2008 4:32:18 PM

    I have summarized all my thoughts on why we must provide loans to the Detroit 3 here...

    http://uh2l.blogs.com/things_ive_noticed/2008/11/weve-heard-a-lot-of-news-from-the-press-lately-about-the--dire-situation-the-american-automobile-industry-is-in-in-pa.html

  • Posted By: Glenn in Az @ 12/04/2008 12:36:45 PM

    PEOPLE...GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT!!! I am not excited about giving the big 3 money either.. buy people's comments just aren't correct. We bailed out wall street... perhaps a short term loan is ok... here is why:

    Perception hasn't caught up with reality!! The reality is that the big 3, especially Ford, have caught up to the imports on quality and fuel economy!!! Ford ranks dead even with Toyota and Honda in quality, and better than all the other imports. Both Ford and Gm have more (a larger #) cars with better fuel ecomony than Toyota. Ford has more cars than any manf. that scored 5 star or first place in saftey ratings..... But no one ever reports this, and when it is reported, poeple ingnore the facts and just remember the past.

    It's true the detroit's business model is broken. They were forced to play the union game decades ago, and when the imports came to our shores, they were able to see the problem with the unions and moved in to "right to work" states, and threatened to close their plants if unions came to organize. The unions had their place and time, and in their time they added to the wealth and stability and of our country.

    However, last year, union contracts were re-negotiated... and put the domestics costs within a few dollars of the imports (on a per car basis). The problem is that these negotiated changes don't take effect till 2010. The Big 3 are a year away from realizing all these cost savings. Ford and GM have some unbelievable vehicles that are in the pipeline... better quality and technology than the imports.. but they are also approx a year away!!!

    Then came mid 2008, the housing crash, the credit crunch, the bank bail outs... The auto industry went from selling 18 million vehiles a year, to 11 million. Everyone including Honda and Toyota are hurting right now... The big 3 already restructured to be profitable at a normal market (14 - 15 million vehicle sales per year).. but no one is making $$ right now. NOT EVEN HONDA AND TOYOTA!!!
    If we don't help the big 3 make it through 2009, unitll their cost custs, and new vehicles arrive... they will be gone. When they are gone, the United States loses an incredible amount of manufacturing capacity (the foreign plants operating here...aren't ours) If one company goes down... it will have a ripple effect and cause the other 2 to go down, and severly hurt the imports... the suppliers who supply all companies will fail. This will cause the umemployment of close to 3 million people, and surely send us into a depression.

    The Government just GAVE AIG 50 billion... I think it is worth LOANING the big 3 half that much

    • Posted By: Justin9976 @ 12/04/2008 2:13:34 PM

      I'm curious where you got the information that Ford was equal with Toyota and Honda on quality. I have an Accord with 180,000 miles on it that has had nothing other then basic maintenance, a new clutch and brakes. My girlfriend has an Explorer which was a decent car until about 80,000 miles and then has proceeded to fall apart.

  • Posted By: feralpigeon @ 12/04/2008 2:12:42 PM

    How about this? There are two small trucks in the mall parking lot. Both are 10 years old, both are silver and both have 110K miles. Neither truck has ever carried a load or been off road. One of them looks and runs fine - no issues at all, and no major repairs done in the past - it appears it could go another 110K miles. The other truck has pealing paint - a rusty bumper, doors that don't shut right, a rebuilt transmission, a new valve cover gaskets that still leaks, a loose front end, squeaky breaks, and some strange wires that dangle from a loose and rattling dash board. Which truck is the Toyota Tacoma and which is Ford Ranger? Which one sounds the most like it could be a Chevy S10?

  • Posted By: mandomarc @ 12/04/2008 1:59:37 PM

    What is hard to understand is why are we bailing out the financials and NOT a strategically vital industry which actually makes "something." These companies would not be having this problem IF the finincials didn't screw up the markets.... people would have jobs and buying needed cars with loans made (as before) by the banking industry.
    Did the Financials need to explain to Congress why they need the money? uuuuuh no, but they get billions as a bail out. My understanding is that Detriot is NOT asking for a bailout, but a loan. Did AIG ask for a loan? CITI-Bank?
    Makes ya wonder.

  • Posted By: feralpigeon @ 12/04/2008 1:32:36 PM

    Consumer Reports ranks almost all of the American autos much lower than they rank almost everything from Honda, Toyota, and Subaru. Resale value also is lower on American cars. Picture two 10 year old sedans parked in a parking lot at the mall. They are both red, and they both have 130K miles. Lets say one of the red cars looks and runs fine. Now lets say that one of is leaking oil and antifreeze. Its paint is pealing and it smokes and rattles. Which car is the Honda and which is the Chevy?

  • Posted By: Repubssuck @ 12/04/2008 9:56:21 AM

    I drive a 2005 Toyota Tundra limited addition double cab. I just did the 85K maintenance on it yesterday. It has never been in for anything other than scheduled maintenance. It looks like new. My wifes caddy is 2 years old with 10K on it. it has been in the shop for brakes and 2 recall changes. the tires have been replaced because of wear. Here's the bottom line. GM makes a crappy car. They also make several versions of the same car. the only differences are the grill and name. Why don't they scrap all excapt one model of each? The paint jobs are inferior to foriegn cars. The only people who are buying them are limited to buying the cheapest car. How many GM cars last beyond 50K and what do they look like if they do? Is there a GM car with high milage that isn't a maintence nightmare? I doubt it. It's time to upgrade their product, limit their models, reducet the wages and benefits for the assembly line and the management to ensure profit and make a competive car of good quality and reliability. If they do, I'll buy one. Please don't expect me to buy an inferior car. I don't have too and I won't!

    • Posted By: maxincleveland @ 12/04/2008 12:52:21 PM

      Look people, I've owned nothing but Ameican cars all my life. I can tell you right now American cars are excellent. My '97 Buick is the best car I have ever owned, and my '03 Dodge Carravan is second to none. If we don't give the automakers a loan you have no idea the ramifications. If you want to see your future come to Detroit or Cleveland. We're as close to a depression as you can get. Don't give them a loan ... see up in the bread line.

  • Posted By: David in Dallas @ 12/04/2008 12:48:58 PM

    It's not just that their business model is broken. They've done little to nothing to prepare for the future and have, in fact, done everything possible to derail projects that meet the public's desire for energy efficient alternatives to the archaic gas guzzlers that Detroit tells us we want.

    Let them burn in the hell that they have created. (Is there any way we can demand a refund on those CEO salaries, and the unions pay for no work rules that were designed in Fantasyland?)

  • Posted By: krigden @ 12/04/2008 12:10:42 PM

    It really is time for us to put our money where our mouth is. If capatalism is our way, the the market must decide a company's fate. Detroit has blown it, they should suffer the consequences. Yes, this would ripple throughout the land, but that's only because this nation has been complicit. We did not demand fuel (and cost) efficient vehicles. We have repeatedly "bailed out" these companies. We have let the money grubbing union executives pull the wool over our eyes with the guilt trip of job loss. If they were truly skilled, valued workers, they could ply their trade anywhere. Companies fail and people loose jobs everyday; what makes these employees any less deserving of their fate. There is a large, bitter pill to swallow. We'd best get started cramming it down our throats so we can let this medicine begin its healing.

  • Posted By: niceguy2931 @ 12/04/2008 12:06:26 PM

    GM,s Buick has the second highest volume of sales in China. GM should be obligated to sell off their interests to pay for US needs.

  • Posted By: Justin9976 @ 12/04/2008 11:42:39 AM

    The simple fact is that one of these companies needs to fail. There is simply not enough demand to support the big three. It looks like Ford will be in the best position to weather the storm, but one of the other two simpy has to go. How delusional are these union workers? The companies are bleeding literally billions of dollars a year and they're still holding on to the idea they're owed something which quite simply isn't there. I wouldn't approve of any bailout unless the unions were completely disbanded. Really, how often do you here someone talk about wanting to buy an automobile from one of these companies? People are excited about getting a honda or a bmw or pretty much any car other then one from these companies, and that's in the U.S.. Go to Europe or Japan and you won't see many Chevys. Their product simply isn't as good as the competition and unless they are allowed to fail there will be no changes made in their production techniques. People aren't interested in gas guzzling cars with no resale value that have high maintenance costs. There is some sentiment that there will be this huge ripple effect if these companies fail and I just don't see it. Propping up an obsolete company so some people can have jobs in the short run is a terrible idea. We're just continuing to create massive bills for our children. While were at it we should have the taxpayers foot the bill for some telegraph companies and maybe some steam engine producers.

  • Posted By: HoosierCoach @ 12/04/2008 11:18:49 AM

    Loan or no loan let's face the fact that USA is not very united. The gap between rich and poor is getting bigger. Salaries of CEO's in all industries, Doctors, Professional Athletes etc are obsurd. This country is all about ME. If Obama goes ahead with the Govt programs to increase jobs and the economy by re-building our infrastructure there will be firms screwing the govt on price and more CEO's becoming filthy rich off the tax payers. I work in one of the many sub-sets of the auto industry and if everything goes belly up we will all be in bankruptcy court anyway. As far as management and unions, my experience shows when workers are treated fairly there is no use for a union. When management is corrupt and unsafe, you do need a union. As far as the UAW, I have been in many GM, Ford, Chrysler plants from transmissions, to stamping to assembly. Many workers are legit. But I have seen my share of sleeping, reading and otherwise wasteful use of time. Alot of you all are like teenagers now days and you do feel that your entitled. Entitlement is imbedded in the UAW autoworker.

    Everyone must consider the ramifications if our largest industry goes away. Millions of us linked to the industry directly will effect tens of millions who are not directly related. If I can only make my house payment and my used car payments, there is nothing left for cell phones, cable, small mom and pop eateries, fewer haircuts, no more downloads, fewer Dr visits and hospital tests. I won't be putting in replacement windows or buying a new computer.

    We are already in the endless circle of cause and effect. We spend more than we make, our debt is disgracefull, investbanks have screwed us all, US auto industry is really screwed up. Unions and Executives and Politicians are out of control. There is no work for the legit unions who protect us through their work, eg electrical, masonry, plumbing, construction-workers, etc.

    An honest days pay for an honest days work. It's gonna be a long couple of years.

  • Posted By: bobkat810 @ 12/04/2008 11:01:40 AM

    Bailout money is nothing more than welfare for business's that rewards greed and corruption. The UAW members still have to vote to accept any contract modifications put on the table. I believe they will vote it down as they would rather loose their jobs than give GM a break.

  • Posted By: sieg6529 @ 12/04/2008 11:00:32 AM

    My wife and I have both driven foreign cars for the last few years, and neither has required anything more than routine maintenance. I briefly owned a Chevy S10, and that cursed thing required so many major repairs within just 2 years...buy Honda, Hyundai, or Toyota if you want a reliable vehicle.

  • Posted By: Attorney @ 12/04/2008 10:33:29 AM

    I used to drive GM products back in the 60's and 70's. They are just a bunch of crap made vehicles now. Look at all the recalls. I don't want to buy a GM product that is just thrown together and then have almost $2000.00 extra tacked on the end of my purchase contract to pay for some laid off workers 95% percent guaranteed pay check while I struggle to make a new vehicle payment and hope that I will be able to keep my job which has no "guaranteed" 95% paycheck.

    I drive a Dodge pickup and that is all I will buy. We have five of them from a 95 on up to a 2003 and we have "knock on wood" nothing go substantially wrong with any of them. They are used hard too. Three in construction clean-up work and two for working around our ranch. They are "Ram Tough" and they hold together.

    We had to give up on GM and Ford pickups, as they were always being recalled or just are not made strong enough to stand up for what they were designed for. Whose fault is that? The workers and designers for both those companies. The workers don't care about their work, they know they are going to get those BIG OLE UNION SEE TO IT PAYCHECKS! So, why take pride in your work. The CEOs they know they are super wealthy and phooey with the little guy.

    Have you ever had to take a GM product back in for something wrong with it? Well, that is an experience in itself. They will accuse you of doing everything in your power to have done something to their "fine product."

  • Posted By: nate31 @ 12/04/2008 10:20:26 AM

    I have to say sadly I too am for not bailing out the industry. It is a black day for America and possibly millions of families, however it is clear that the Big Three are a complete failure. The failure is a question of greed and poor management. Since World War II the American industry only focused on the almighty dollar not the quality of their product. The Japanese products have had a reputation for quality far superior to their American counterparts. In turn today you get a product that will probably last longer with less maintanence and will resale for thousands more than any American competitor. For most people it is a no brainer; save thousands or buy American. Everyone, except for the UAW members, know they make way too much money for non-skilled labor and this in turn only contributes to American inferiority in the market. Hell, even the CEO of Toyota makes $1 million dollars compared to salaries as high as $22 million for our CEOs.

    If the government and the Big Three are serious about American tax payers bailing them out; one make a better product, and two give the American people an incentive to buy your product, i.e. tax break, or lower sticker prices. Make the overall decision alot tougher for us when we are considering what car to buy!

  • Posted By: Attorney @ 12/04/2008 10:19:58 AM

    What about us homeowners that are facing foreclosures? Who cares about a new vehicle when we may lose our homes. Are we the American people stupid enough to want to buy a vehicle, any vehicle right now when we are losing our jobs, homes, retirement funds, savings, etc. You get the picture! The Big 3 need to go bust. The UAW needs to go completely away and the people receiving the big paychecks for being laid off need to realize the real way of life as it is now.

    I and others like me do not care if the Big Three crash and burn. We care about our families, being able to have a job, and trying to take care of the vehicles we have and pay for them. A "new car" does not make you. If you can't afford to buy it, drive it, nor pay insurance on it, then guess what? You don't need it!

    We the people of the USA needs Congress to help us keep our homes and be able to buy groceries, buy helping us keep and have jobs. Not help a bunch of "rich cats" keep their auto dealerships and their big salaries.

    The next step Congress needs to do is abolish the unions. That would be the first big step in getting the economy back on track.

  • Posted By: drwhiplash @ 12/04/2008 9:57:05 AM

    I do think bankrupcy IS an option: the only option, in fact, for an industry that has been ailing for over 15 years now. Fifteen years ago, management of botht eh companies and the unions steadfastly refused to start "saving" their livelihoods...why should the taxpayers now take on that responsibility? Not to mention that, as of their last SEC filing, GM is 60 Billion in the RED. Thats not opinion or conjecture: its fact! Why should anyone loan money to anyone with NO colateral? C'mon, CONgress!!

    • Posted By: Repubssuck @ 12/04/2008 10:19:00 AM

      Go bankrupt and then go out of business. If the only plan is to cut cost without addressing the fact that our Vehicles are inferior and that no one wants one, then the end is near.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse