Why don't we hedge our bets. Let two of the firms simply fail and then bailout the third.
Two of the firms will get the full-treatment of laissez-faire capitalism. Assets of the firm will be preserved while everything else is thrown by the wayside. Painful, but perhaps useful.
The third firm, hopefully the one with the least incompetent management, will have an injection of government funds, but will not have shed as many obligations and have a far more intrusive government.
The message regarding the penalty of failure remains, while also ensuring the survival of the auto-industry if the free-market does not prove all that generous. Also, by hedging our bets we get a guide as to the right course of action in the future: is it better to prop up a failing auto-company or let it find a way to survive on its own.









Discuss