Getty Images
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

Agonizing Dilemma

A psychologist on the complicated reasons couples are reluctant to donate or destroy stored embryos after their fertility treatments end.

 
Sponsored by
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Hundreds of thousands of human embryos are currently sitting in tiny cylinders and suspended in minus-340-degree Fahrenheit liquid-nitrogen tanks. What should happen to them? In the new issue of the journal Fertility and Sterility, researchers who surveyed 1,020 patients at nine American fertility clinics reported that 54 percent of respondents with cryopreserved embryos said they were "very likely" to use them for reproduction and 21 percent were "very likely" to donate them for research.

Only 7 percent of the respondents said they were "very likely" to donate the embryos to another couple trying to conceive and just 6 percent said they were "very likely" to thaw and dispose of the embryos. "They felt like thawing and discarding embryos was wasteful. There was also some sense that that was not respectful," says lead author Dr. Anne Drapkin Lyerly, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Duke University Medical Center's Trent Center for Bioethics, Humanities and History of Medicine. Unfortunately, thawing and discarding is often the only choice for many couples. Only four of nine of the reproduction clinics surveyed offered donation for research.

To find out more about the complex emotional dilemmas that couples face when making choices about stored embryos, NEWSWEEK's Karen Springen spoke with psychologist Sandra Leiblum, director of psychological services at the New Jersey Center for Sexual Wellness and editor of "Infertility: Psychological Issues and Counseling Strategies" (Wiley). Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: Do these results surprise you—the lack of enthusiasm for thawing and discarding the embryos or for giving them to other couples?
Sandra Leiblum: It makes sense. To store and dispose of embryos, which are living genetic material, feels like a wanton disregard for the potential for life. To treat it like some cellular remains that have no genetic significance feels too cavalier and too disrespectful. To donate them [to another couple] is kind of like prenatal adoption. You don't have any choice as to who the embryo would go to. People really feel a huge level of uncertainty about what to do with frozen embryos.

Does donating the embryos for research make sense from a psychological standpoint?
Using [them] for research means you do want something useful to happen as a result of your commitment to going through the misery of infertility treatment. The embryos are precious in a sense in terms of what they represent, materially and financially and psychologically. You want to feel as though something important and significant is happening with them.

Do some people want to keep storing embryos because they're worried that they'll lose a child someday?
If a catastrophe occurs, you always want the possibility of having recourse. People who go through infertility have gone through years of trying to conceive. Years of the woman being on fertility drugs or having sex based on when ovulation occurs, having these huge disappointments of either miscarriage or inability to conceive. The amount of psychological devotion, angst, money, stress, trying to conceive is not trivial. So if you finally succeed in getting embryos, it's too precious to just destroy. There's a sense of you don't want to just let go of them. It's partly insurance against future catastrophe. Or if you have a divorce and remarry and you have a new partner, you may want to have options. Women these days are conceiving in their 40s.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: inlove @ 01/27/2009 3:39:57 PM

    Monkeybeans - I have to wonder if you actually know ayone that has had problems conceiving and whether you understand how heartwrenching it is to be unable to do the one thing that is supposed to be biological and a god given right! My husband and I tried for 6 yrs to conceive our own child both unassisted and with the help of a fertility doctor. We are now expecting our first child in June as the result of IVF via embryo adoption. As far as post-birth adoption goes it is extremely difficult, costly and time consuming. Adopting a caucasion baby in the U.S. can run upwards of 15-20k and can take upwards of 7 yrs. I am guessing that since you have no sympathy for those of us who have to endure torture to get pregnant, you yourself have had no problems obtaining a pregnancy. I am happy that you haven't had to go thru the months and months of pure and utter hell that it takes to get pregnant via IUI, IVF and fertility drugs. I can honestly say that when I was a little girl dreaming of becoming a mother, this isn't how I pictured it happening, but it is the way that it turned out. I am extremely excited about the thought of becoming a mother and can't wait to hold my baby girl for the first time. She will know what her biological parents did for us and how much we appreciate her. I will forever be indebted to the lovely couple that decided to donate their embryo's to a childless couple, rather than toss them to the wayside like garbage.

  • Posted By: lucidpeople @ 01/13/2009 9:44:24 PM

    I'll take that challenge. The word embryo is found in Psalms 139:16 which reads "Your eyes saw even the embryo of me, And in your book all its parts were down in writing, As regards the days when they were formed" This is in reference to the fact that God knows us as an embryo.

  • Posted By: ajkriv @ 01/13/2009 8:40:21 PM

    I cannot think of giving up an embryo to another couple. That is my genetic child and I would want it if it was born. I can conceive of just letting them go, they are cells, they cannot be a "baby " without me or another human incubator. (I did not have left over embryos after my IVF procedure)

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse