WORLD AFFAIRS

‘It Doesn’t Exist!’

Germany's outspoken finance minister on the hopeless search for 'the Great Rescue Plan.'

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: nomenclaturist @ 01/05/2009 8:50:03 PM

    I think Mr. Steinbrück overestimates the U.S.'s flexibility and dynamism. It may be that we came out of past crises faster but now we are much more over-regulated, and we have taken to bailing out a plethora of mismanaged corporate behemoths that will drag on our economy for decades. With that dead weight expect our recovery to take a lot longer than in the past, and since Germany's policies seem more sensible this time around they may do better faster.

  • Posted By: Fritzfan @ 12/11/2008 2:52:06 PM

    Steinbrück is absolutely right. When the sea is rough, we need navigators like him who keep course instead of flip-flopping with the waves. That is what creates trust in times of crisis. By the way, Steinbrück has the full backing of the most trusted politician in Germany, elder statesman and former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt.

    • Posted By: CaptainVideo @ 12/12/2008 10:59:22 PM

      This is more evidence that the Social Democrats have completely lost touch with their principles and heritage. It has managed to become a right-wing party that no longer represents the interests of working people.

      • Posted By: Steinbrückfan @ 12/16/2008 11:48:06 PM

        He's a social democrat, like me. But one of the right wing part of it, called the "Seeheimer Kreis". I'm also part of it. He has done a lot of very good things, first away from the financed by contributions system to a tax-financed system. And with that to a good and stable financial system, which is the only way keep up a system of social insurrance, which is defintly needed in a society. His criticism on making depts is right. Did everyone, who citizes him, thought about that fact, that it is the poor people, who will have to pay for these depts. Or do you think, that the wealthy people, the people with a lot of influence, will have to pay for it. I don't think so, the state will cut back on the expenses in the future, and the poor people will have to pay for it. So do you think, what he said was consevative, no I don't think so.

  • Posted By: EU-citizen @ 12/15/2008 9:17:10 AM

    How ignorant, populistic and black-and-white can someone still be in the 21st century, hey?!? This is a global, mainly anglo-american originated financial crisis that is now drawing also on the economical stability of reasonable governments like Japan and Germany. Peer Steinbrück has done it very right so far:guaranties and loans (not "money") to the banks had to be granted to stop an eventual financial debacle; a national and EU-wide contengency plan will be soon approved but fortunately not in a hurry. Germany shall definetly not follow UK's and French populistic policy, forcing its tax payers to subsidize brackish US finance and automobile industries and to pay the most into a non-consolidated, poor elaborated british-french EU-bail-out plan. The "slaves of German feudal system" will keep having benefit of a pretty humane, efficient and democratic social, health and political system.

  • Posted By: Alexander Dill @ 12/14/2008 2:37:21 AM

    Why do you blame Peer not to burn money? He offered a total of 300 billion to Hypo Real Estate (30), to Bayerische Landesbank (20), to IKB (6,5) and others for good reasons: There the money gets to his classmates, people who never keep any personal risks and if they fail, the taxpayer has to pay for their "restructering". His Secretary of State Asmussen has been in the board of KfW/IKB and was the one, who suggested IKB to enter in structured finance in 2005.
    Peer only wants to give the money to the right people: First to the state owned banks (that he needs to make new debts) , than to the friends of the big coalition, who asre to distribute the state loans via banks and insurances.
    Of course the rest of the population is not in this portfolio.
    All they have to do is to pay all their income to the state, to social security and of course for rents and interests. They are the slaves in a feudal system of corrupt polititians and their white collar fellows, giving them the feeling to be good neoliberals and understanding what economy really is: a Ponzi scheme, where they are in the first line.

  • Posted By: Fritzfan @ 12/13/2008 6:48:33 AM

    I am seriously doubting anyone's democratic principles who either calls the SPD "right-wing" (which is an insult to all brave social democrats who stood up against the NAZI regime) or who wants to expell someone from the party for not sharing the same opinion. Wake up, this is not a working class but a global crisis! Frankly, I am also sick and tired of all these cheap promises made in France (the state is practically broke!) and GB leading nowhere, but to higher national debts. Who has to pay the rent? The young generation (that includes me)! That is why I keep saying: Go Peer, keep the course!

  • Posted By: rgrenfellhill @ 12/12/2008 5:26:26 AM

    Haiving read this article and heard the press I felt compelled to send the following to Peer:

    FAO: Peer Steinbruck, Finance Minister

    Dear Peer,

    I would like to thank you for your comments in News Week concerning the handling of the UK economy and VAT rates. I feel they are completely accurate and makes a welcome change from the UK press who seem to see Gordon Brown as our and the worlds saviour! The way Germany is dealing with the current economic conditions makes me extremely happy to see a country not going down Gordon's route; hence this e-mail!

    As someone in the private sector who sells wine I am concerned about the next year and what it means for imports of European Wines into the UK. With the pound almost at parity, a lot of work done say on promoting German Wines will be destroyed as we factor in price increases and duty increases at the same time as consumers are expecting price cuts (not exactly ideal selling conditions). I really have no confidence in Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling to sort the mess they created out, and now wish I had studied German at school and university so that I would have the option of living and working in Germany with your sensible solution.

    Kind regards

    Richard

    • Posted By: CaptainVideo @ 12/12/2008 10:57:09 PM

      The really shocking thing is that Steinbrueck is a Social Democrat. That raises the question of what has gone wrong with the German Social Democratic party. Why have they not expelled him? If he was a member of a right-wing party his attitude, which is worthy of Republican U.S. President Herbert Hoover, would be understandable, but for a Social Democrat this is totally out of line with the party's political heritage. There was a time when unemployed workers were a serious concern for them.

  • Posted By: ohiomeister @ 12/12/2008 6:34:03 PM

    2008 Nobel prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman thinks Peer Steinbruck is a moron:



    There???s an extraordinary ??? and extraordinarily depressing ??? interview in Newsweek with Peer Steinbrueck, the Germany finance minister. The world economy is in a terrifying nosedive, visible everywhere. Yet Mr. Steinbrueck is standing firm against any extraordinary fiscal measures, and denounces Gordon Brown for his ???crass Keynesianism.???

    You might ask why we should care. Germany???s economy is the biggest in Europe, but even so it only accounts for about a fifth of EU GDP, and it???s only about a quarter the size of the US economy. So how much does German intransigence matter?

    The answer is that the nature of the crisis, combined with the high degree of European economic integration, gives Germany a special strategic role right now ??? and Mr. Steinbrueck is therefore doing a remarkable amount of damage.

    Here???s the issue: we???re rapidly heading toward a world in which monetary policy has little or no traction: T-bill rates in the US are already zero, and near-zero rate will prevail in the euro zone quite soon. Fiscal policy is all that???s left. But in Europe it???s very hard to do a fiscal expansion unless it???s coordinated.

    The reason is that the European economy is so integrated: European countries on average spend around a quarter of their GDP on imports from each other. Since imports tend to rise or fall faster than GDP during a business cycle, this probably means that something like 40 percent of any change in final demand ???leaks??? across borders within Europe. As a result, the multiplier on fiscal policy within any given European country is much less than the multiplier on a coordinated fiscal expansion. And that in turn means that the tradeoff between deficits and supporting the economy in a time of trouble is much less favorable for any one European country than for Europe as a whole.

    It is, in short, a classic example of the kind of situation in which policy coordination is essential ??? but you won???t get coordination if policymakers in the biggest European economy refuse to go along.

    And if Germany prevents an effective European response, this adds significantly to the severity of the global downturn.

    In short, there???s a huge multiplier effect at work; unfortunately, what it???s doing is multiplying the impact of the current German government???s boneheadedness.

  • Posted By: Harlan Leyside @ 12/11/2008 10:12:00 PM

    Germany produced the deepest philosophers mankind had known since the ancient Greeks. It has largely been a sleeping power on the world stage since WW2, slowly, quietly developing a political economy the like of which has never been seen: the EU.
    Germany IS the EU: it's power, it's guiding light, it's philosphical underpining.
    Let Brown, Sarkosy, and others rant and rage. Merkel, the new iron lady, will be proven correct.

  • Posted By: theaustrianguy @ 12/11/2008 4:21:37 PM

    Steinbrück is currently the only German and for sure one of very few European politician that has the guts to come forward with considerate, courageous and unpopular opinions and to enforce them, too. While such politicians are generally a good-thing for the well-being of the people or a state, you can't win an election with them. Quite a pity, actually.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse