Who Is To Blame?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: belcrosse @ 12/10/2008 11:47:48 PM

    I can't believe you (NewsWeek) actually discussed what happened in "banking" with YB without taking an active common sense perspective and addressing the inherent behavior of man to act in his own selfish best interest to the known detriment of all cloaked in "Objectivism". What happened was GREED! When individuals ("professionals" ???WTF) are allowed to make exceptionally risky loans, using others people's deposits, in such incredible ratios against those deposits; then launder the debt, and spread the debt, and insure the deals essentially either by actually AIG'ing the deals or shifting the loss to society by holding the banking system, that we all depend on, hostage is called calculated greed!!! How is it possible for executives and mortgage brokers to make a bonus for deals completed, year-to-year, when 2 - 5 years later the deals and the projected profit from become a losses? Their should be a maturity date/or vesting date...to bonuses that limit the lottery style bonus structure currently operating on Wall Street this way the bonuses are tied more closely to performance over the run of the loan not just the initiation of it.

  • Posted By: robits @ 12/10/2008 11:20:34 PM

    The standards of logical thinking in the comments speak for themselves - appalling. If you are bothering to comment perhaps you should have the decency to back up mindless assertions.

    Yaron Brook states his position and backs it up with a logical mechanistic argument.

    The number of regulations on the US economy has been increasing exponentially.
    In addition Capitalism clearly does not exist as pointed out by Brook. Capitalism means full property rights and protection for voluntary trade. The US government does not provide these protections as they should. The economy is mixed and highly controlled and regulated. There is no separation of economy and state.

  • Posted By: jay_worley @ 12/10/2008 10:38:37 PM

    @Vikas

    Mankind and countries are by nature competitive. The slavery you speak of is every bit as prevalent in socialism as it is in capitalism. And as for 6 billion people, well we're probably screwed either way. And, one can make the argument that capitalism will do a better job of generating the much needed innovation that will required to save mankind from over population. So, don't look hold your breath for that one-world, centrally planned government you seek. And, while you're at it, go ask the really poor people in China how much they like their hybrid free market / centrally planned economy.

    If you're honestly ready to put your money where your mouth is, then you probably need to be the first to give up your Mac, iPod, VW, and well paying job for a life style that's immensely more feudal like. So hurry along and voluntarily throw yourself into the unemployment line. Because ultimately, the root of today's financial chaos is equally weighted between irresponsible wealth redistribution acts like CRA and the greed that takes hold when the right regulations are not in place to control consumer debt. The bottom line is the CRA started this meltdown by pushing lenders into developing exotic loans that eventually spread like wildfire across all levels of credit worthiness. In the end though, it doesn't take a socialist or capitalist to realize that increasingly expensive home values quickly outpace the necessary income gains. In other words, a home isn't an ATM machine.

    • Posted By: DelicateMonster @ 12/10/2008 10:59:10 PM

      Per Joseph Stiglitz who knows a lot more than you about it:
      1) CRA had almost nothing to do with this--that's a joke to bring it up, but a nice 'tell' to indicate you're not much more than a right wing hack parroting the party line. Politically what went down went something along these lines: in exchange for the Republicans granting to continue the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act), Democrats agreed to authorize an almost total deregulation of the financial industry by repealing Glass-Steagall--that's where the damage was--the repeal of the regulatory apparatus. CRA as an effort to enable minorities to own homes had little or nothing to do with greedy lenders inventing products to sell, then creating CDS to insure against their losses and betting out on those. The lenders created a ponzi scheme on the back of poor loan products. If it had simply been poor loan products -- screwedup 1 to 1 arms, balloon mortgages, etc.,--ALONE-- we wouldn't be anywhere near a financial meltdown. It was the greed head institutional lenders, ie Investment Banks repackaging those loans into indicipherable products and then betting against them with CDS leveraged at 30 to 1 (and that's probably being generous) that built the huge house of cards you are currently seeing tumble down.

      Of course, when you've got nothing in the way of a defensible argument, I suppose making up nasty comments about minority loan efforts might work. You get to be racists and righteous all at the same time. The perfect Republican mindset.

      Here's Stiglitiz--pay attention, you might learn something:

      The truth is most of the individual mistakes boil down to just one: a belief that markets are self-adjusting and that the role of government should be minimal. Looking back at that belief during hearings this fall on Capitol Hill, Alan Greenspan said out loud, ???I have found a flaw.??? Congressman Henry Waxman pushed him, responding, ???In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right; it was not working.??? ???Absolutely, precisely,??? Greenspan said. The embrace by America???and much of the rest of the world???of this flawed economic philosophy made it inevitable that we would eventually arrive at the place we are today.

  • Posted By: news8111 @ 12/10/2008 10:36:19 PM

    DelicateMonster @ 12/10/2008 10:27:00 PM

    Excellent comments.

    But not B Spears. She's too intelligent.

    Someone like Amy Winehouse perhaps!

  • Posted By: Dolmance @ 12/10/2008 10:34:56 PM

    Many, many thoughtful and intelligent young girls are going to be very sad at Ayn Rand's fall from grace. But she'll have some illustrious company - Ronald Reagan who gave us the "borrowing society," and "Barry Goldwater," who inspired him.

    And all the insects who made Ayn Rand what John Hinckley made out of the Catcher in the Rye can follow them to complete oblivion.

  • Posted By: news8111 @ 12/10/2008 10:34:03 PM

    If Ayn Rand is to blame then maybe we can pin some of the blame on Santa Claus too!

    It is idiots like Ayn Rand and Greenspan who have allowed theory to guide their decision making to the detriment of Americans. BUT!

    But how about the banks and other financial institutions that have highly paid employees specifically to prevent these types of disasters.......

    Where were they?

    Sleeping like Rip Van Winkle!

    Or dreaming like Rand and Greenspan?

  • Posted By: dnendza @ 12/10/2008 10:32:50 PM

    A very interesting article for its highlighting of the Ayn Rand Institute and Greenspan's relation to it. After reading so many comments I couldn't help wonder how difficult it must be for so many individuals to wander around with so much dogmatic baggage on their backs. Wow, so many labels: liberalism, libertarianism, objectivists, capitalism, communism, democrats and republicans. Looks like we all are shoved into a little stereotype box and forbidden to take variety of ideas from multiple sources. I haven't seen any "ism" or system that has all the answers all the time. Listening to one dogma growl at another is, at best, entertaining.

  • Posted By: dnendza @ 12/10/2008 10:32:07 PM

    A very interesting article for its highlighting of the Ayn Rand Institute and Greenspan's relation to it. After reading so many comments I couldn't help wonder how difficult it must be for so many individuals to wander around with so much dogmatic baggage on their backs. Wow, so many labels: liberalism, libertarianism, objectivists, capitalism, communism, democrats and republicans. Looks like we all are shoved into a little stereotype box and forbidden to take variety of ideas from multiple sources. I haven't seen any "ism" or system that has all the answers all the time. Listening to one dogma growl at another is, at best, entertaining.

  • Posted By: DelicateMonster @ 12/10/2008 10:27:00 PM

    This is hilarious. I go to Vanity Fair and find an exquisitely written article by Joseph Stiglitz, world famous economists and nobel prize winner detailing precisely and accurately the causes of this miserable depression.

    Among them plainly was the firing of Paul Volcker and the hiring of Rand hack Alan Greenspan:

    "Volcker also understood that financial markets need to be regulated. Reagan wanted someone who did not believe any such thing, and he found him in a devotee of the objectivist philosopher and free-market zealot Ayn Rand. " That would be 'bubbles' Greenspan.

    Stiglitz knows more in his little pinky than Yaron Brooks--or any so called Objectivists-- could learn in five life times. Why not interview Brittany Spears on the economy if you're going to go the hackneyed route? It will have as much credibility and --if you splash a big photo of her on your cover announcing something like 'Spears tells you whats wrong" in close proximity to her breasts, you'll sell far more magazines--apparently the only thing you guys are interested in anymore.

    It certainly isn't informing your readers.



  • Posted By: MikeWAll @ 12/10/2008 10:03:23 PM

    It is hilarious to me that the idiots (see Big Wes below for a great example) continue to whine about regualtion! Sure let's go back to the days of feudalism and lords of the manor and slalvery etc.! We are supposedly in an enlighetend age known as "civilization" now - a time of things called "laws" and "regualation" Of course the idiots who want to rule the rest of us want things as they always were - when they were free to trample on the rights of the rest of mankind! unfortunately - the rest of mankind has a slight objection to that! So screw you - deal with it - get over yourselves you fascist nazi right wing republican pigs! Come the revolution maybe all of you will die this time - no one will miss you!

  • Posted By: Big Wes @ 12/10/2008 9:41:31 PM

    What an amazing thing to see- truth in the media! I think it's so hilarious when armchair economists blame everything on "the market" without really understanding the historical perspective of what brought us here. Thinking that executives who manage trillions of dollars of our economy and create most of the living standards for our country are overpaid is very immature when basketball players right out of high school make far more, for hardly any contribution to the country at all.
    When will people recognize that all these regulations stop out industry? Thats why jobs are leaving, Taxes and Regulations!
    Anyone who thinks differently, obviously has never owned a business or managed any real amount of money.

  • Posted By: nails @ 12/10/2008 9:40:45 PM

    these business man are like unattended children. when the little miscreant tykes (aren't they precious?) misbehave government must exercise it's role as mommy and daddy and make them behave. to say we don't have to regulate is to allow these greedy little monsters to run riot. does not government regulate how we can drive? why is that? because if they don't we'll be naughty. ever notice how everyone slows down when a cop car is on the highway. good little boys and girls. imagine what we would happen if we didn't have any rules to follow or any cops to get in our way. what fun!

  • Posted By: JGalt @ 12/10/2008 9:40:38 PM

    "Posted By: Vikas @ 12/10/2008 8:29:38 PMThis guy is silly. Objectivists will continue to support the free market despite all the evidence that an unabated free market will allow wealth to collect into the saavy hands at the controls while the majority of the population is subjugated and is tied together into lines of economic slavery by those very same saavy hands."

    First off, Fidel, I don't think the communist lifestyle has done the world much good. Capitalism in a pure form is excellent. It is nature's monetary food chain. The capable will rise, while the incapable will fall. Blaming the current problem on capitalism is like blaming infidelity on your sexual organs.

    When you flood the market with houses, consumers and cash at the same time it is not going to end well. There has to be a major up-turn in building to match the demand that is built up by supplying so many people with such easily available loans. Once those poorly based loans come due it is just a matter of time until the whole thing start to unravel along with a soaring inflation rate caused by all of the extra money that was plowed into the economy.

    Also, who are these morons with "MBAs" and such that so worthless they can run into the ground a long-running corporation? How did it get to become that these people now get $10M+ in bonuses, but all they do is talk about what cars they drive while out playing golf? I'd be willing to bet these same people are most likely just as useless in any other position. The only problem is nobody is ever really tested nowadays.

    Don't forget.. when the government turns towards individual interests and the greater majority are getting unfairly treated, there will be those that strike back.

    "People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."

    John Galt asks, "Who is Guy Fawkes?"

  • Posted By: danh002 @ 12/10/2008 9:29:05 PM

    Interesting that the John Kenneth Galbraith quote is easily found but the "James Louis LaSalle" quote seems fabricated...

  • Posted By: David W. Dobert @ 12/10/2008 9:26:46 PM

    It would appear that the folks who have posted comments so far prefer to have someone else manage their affairs rather than do so themselves using common sense and objectivity.
    ..btw - Yes I have read "Alas Shrugged' several times and found the message inspirational. We are who we are but we can always do better. I suggest that some of the posters think someone else can do better for them.

  • Posted By: GregSouliotis @ 12/10/2008 9:10:37 PM

    What a misleading and dangerous article! The financial collapse of 2008 would not have happened if Congress had simply passed legislation years ago that would disallow teaser rate A.R.M. mortgages (= mortgage defaults = source of the crisis), outlawed collateralized debt obligations of sub-prime mortgages (the unregulated selling of immense $ packages of sub-prime mortgages),and strictly regulated Credit Default Swaps (a largely unregulated, and wildly speculative form of insurance for these "financial weapons of mass destruction" (quote from that old Socialist Warren Buffett). It was not the availablility of easy credit that caused these problems; it was the irresponsible behavior of the grossly overpaid executive management and CDO/CDS managers of Lehman Brothers (& sisters like WaMu) and the government's lack of regulations (i.e. vision, backbone, and realism) to prevent these excesses from happening. Now we're all paying a horrific price while a few thousand men who made hundreds of billions of $ from this debable will live in incredible luxury for the rest of their lives (financed by shareholder, stakeholder, vendor, and taxpayer losses).

  • Posted By: donkeykong @ 12/10/2008 9:06:24 PM

    'A hands off' approach to the economy started with Ayn Rand? Ummm...i think it started before her dude. Like the colonial British during the 1870 famines in India(and, au contraire mon frere, the term laissez faire is French )
    Ayn Rand was crazy,. but she wasn't secretary of the treasury, chairman of the federal reserve, Phil Gramm, or
    a POTUS.
    Here, read a good article by Joseph Stiglitz about the historical roots of the current crisis:
    http://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/2009/01/stiglitz200901

    Also read 'Bad Money' by Kevin Philips:
    http://www.amazon.com/Bad-Money-Reckless-Politics-Capitalism/dp/0670019070/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1228961076&sr=8-1
    And the 'War for Wealth' by Gabor Steingart
    http://www.amazon.com/War-Wealth-Story-Globalization-Broken/dp/0071545964/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1228961136&sr=8-1

  • Posted By: ItsConstantinople @ 12/10/2008 9:04:17 PM

    "The modern liberal is engaged in man's oldest exercises in immoral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for doing nothing and having those that actually work, pay you for doing nothing."

    James Louis LaSalle

  • Posted By: TheLunatic @ 12/10/2008 8:43:26 PM

    Debt is the root cause of our current problem. Personal debt, corporate debt, and especially government debt. Real estate goes incycles, everyone knows that - and when the real estate values turned down, all the 90% and higher loan to value mortgages went underwater. Unfortunately, banks operate on very small margins, so one mortgage default wipes out the profits for hundreds of "good" mortgages. This is what put the banks in trouble, nothing else - but now we're in the dreaded 'downward spiral" where everything is contracting. Horrible mess, but don't blame Greenspan and don't blame Ann Raynd. Blame our overly large and debt laden government.

  • Posted By: fixitup @ 12/10/2008 8:42:56 PM

    Give us a break, Doc ! You're blaming the Regulators? You do mean the Regulators who weren't allowed to do their jobs because of intercessions by people in political power and their lackey Lobbyists who stopped any threats to the NEEDED Oversight which may have stopped this mess we're in, before it started?

    The American People are demanding a change from " Business as usual " on Wall Street, without someone watching these thieves very closely from now on.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse