I thought this was an excellent article by Mary Carmichael and the criticism about negativity largely unfounded particularly given the comments at the end of the article. This is the way science talks, it is early days and if the Dr did not believe in what she was doing and expect results she would be doing something else. I get parents ask me about banking and about treatment. I am hesitant to recommend trips to China with little published research available. People just want to be well and fail to consider the complexity of cell biology and that what may be acceptable in one country for financial reasons may have negative implications for an individuals future. I understand the concerns about FDA overinvolvement and would welcome transparency on this. I am not sure about the argument that big pharma hates stem cell technology because they could quite easily take it over just like WalMart and major food stores took out the mom and pop places a few years ago. The start up could do all the work and take the heat and the risks and in the end Big Pharma can have its name on the package. I have seen stem cell procedures from both sides with great outcomes and poor ones. On the banking I would propose a 2 tier system public with access to your own cord cells if they are needed and not already taken. I linked to you on one of my blogs at http://empower2go.wordpress.com
Amy Price PhD
Amy Price PhD









Discuss