SPONSORED BY:
BUSINESS

Southern Comfort

Less than two decades ago, Detroit's Big Three were the U.S. auto industry. But now there's a second auto industry: one that is nonunion, foreign-owned and Dixie-based. That's why Southern senators worked so hard to block the bailout.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The Central Kentucky town of Georgetown, just north of Lexington, used to be known for the state's two main exports: bourbon and horses. Legend holds that in 1789, somewhere nearby, Elijah Craig, a Baptist minister, distilled the first batch of bourbon in charred oak casks. Thoroughbreds graze and trot across fenced fields of trim bluegrass on the horse farms that ring much of the city. But in the past 20 years, a different type of horsepower—the kind generated by Camrys, Avalons and Solaras—has transformed Georgetown from a quiet country town to a booming suburb and export engine. In 1986, Toyota—lured in part by nearly $150 million in tax breaks and other incentives—built a massive manufacturing plant here. And in the years since, the bucolic landscape has been transformed. The 1,300-acre plant, in which Toyota has invested $5.3 billion, produces a car roughly every minute. In the process, Georgetown's population has doubled. In fields where farmers once grew tobacco and raised cattle, McMansions, apartment complexes and condominiums have sprouted. A 150,000-square-foot upscale retail center is rising near the Toyota plant, the better to serve its 7,000 employees. "There is no doubt the state's investment in Toyota has repaid itself many times over," says state Sen. Damon Thayer, a Republican who represents Georgetown in the Kentucky General Assembly. To be sure, the Georgetown plant isn't immune from the problems that have brought America's domestic manufacturers in Detroit to the brink of disaster. It recently furloughed 250 temporary employees and has throttled back production. But Brian Howard, 42, a team leader in painting operations and a 20-year veteran of the plant, is pleased with the way things are going. He enjoys high wages and cheap health insurance—$74 per month for his family. "They've told us for years that they've planned for a rainy day," he said. "Well, it's here and we're still doing well compared to the Big Three."

Time was, the Big Three were the U.S. auto industry. No longer. Over the past two decades, enticed by cheap labor and massive incentives, a second auto industry has emerged: nonunion, Southern-based and foreign-owned. Large plants, with names of Asian and European carmakers emblazoned upon them, now dot the Southern landscape alongside Civil War memorials. By moving aggressively into Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, South Carolina, Georgia and Texas, foreign manufacturers—call them the "Little Eight"—have transformed the economic geography of the nation's auto industry and the political debate surrounding its future.

To hear the rhetoric wafting down from Capitol Hill of late, you'd think that Toyota, Hyundai, BMW and the rest are as all-American as Mom and apple pie. And, in many ways, they now are. Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky made an impassioned plea on the Senate floor for his colleagues to oppose the $15 billion aid package the House of Representatives had approved for General Motors, Ford and Chrysler. "Labor costs need to be brought on par with companies like Nissan, Toyota and Honda—not tomorrow, but immediately," he said. By the weekend, McConnell and fellow antibailout Republicans like Richard Shelby of Alabama and Bob Corker of Tennessee had stopped the bailout bill in the Senate. The Southerners seem to have chosen an especially precipitous time to pick their fight with the Detroit Yankees: without the money, General Motors and Chrysler have warned that they might be forced to file for bankruptcy protection. Harley Shaiken, a labor economist at the University of California, Berkeley, says a Detroit meltdown, on the eve of Christmas and in the midst of the worst job market in modern memory, "would be a devastating antistimulus package."

The antibailout lawmakers are all Republicans possessed of a deep-seated antipathy to organized labor, and angry at the way the government has bungled the financial bailout. But they and many of their counterparts in the Senate have become experts on the labor practices of foreign manufacturers because they've seen them up close. The tussle over the bailout has evinced what at first blush may seem a new kind of provincialism that pits Democrats and a few Republicans (like Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio) from heavy union and Big Three states against Republicans from right-to-work states in the old Confederacy. While McConnell & Co. oppose federal subsidies for the Big Three at the federal level, the states from which they hail have generously extended billions of dollars in subsidies to foreign automakers. But there's a deeper cleavage at work here. Today's Southern solons have watched their local economies blossom thanks to a younger, more-vibrant auto industry unencumbered by the Big Three's legacy costs and union work rules—a sort of anti-Detroit that has the flexibility and ability to turn profits by making the types of cars that Americans actually want to buy.

Of course, the foreign companies are confronting the same difficult market situation as Detroit. Car sales, hammered by a lack of credit and low consumer confidence, are down across the board this year. In November, sales of Toyotas were off 34 percent; today, a financial planner's billboard in Smyrna, Tenn., seeks the business of Nissan employees who are taking the company's buyout offer of up to $125,000. In San Antonio, the Toyota Tundra plant lay idle for three months this fall, though Toyota hasn't laid off anyone. Instead, according to Richard Perez, president and CEO of the Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce, Toyota offered the city "a whole bunch of folks who need to get busy" (San Antonio put them to work on beautification projects). Of course, Toyota has resources to act in a more paternalistic manner—in part because the parent companies aren't saddled with the burdens of providing health care and retirement for workers in home markets.

Despite the downturn, the foreign automakers—and the states in which they operate—are much better situated than Detroit. At a time when the South's core industries, like textiles and apparel, were going offshore, foreign automakers grew to become crucial contributors to the region's economy. Through 2007, Toyota had invested more than $17 billion in 10 U.S. production facilities, which collectively employ more than 36,000 workers. Alabama, which didn't make a single car in 1995, last year produced 800,000, making it the fifth-largest auto-producing state. Tennessee just landed a $1 billion commitment from Volkswagen to set up a huge new plant in Chattanooga. South Carolina's upstate section has been remade from a faded textile territory into a thriving 21st-century industrial powerhouse since the advent of BMW in the 1990s (the German automaker produces the X5 and X6 crossover coupes in the state). "BMW offers the best manufacturing jobs in the region," Republican Rep. Bob Inglis tells NEWSWEEK. "They're just a godsend for upstate South Carolina." One measure of the love Inglis's constituents feel for BMW: on the Greenville Convention & Visitors Bureau Web site, the BMW plant has joined Shoeless Joe Jackson Memorial Park as an attraction.

The arrival of these car companies has had a huge ripple effect. "Every job in auto production supports five other jobs in the economy in steel, tires, rubber, programmers and auto dealers," says Robert Scott, senior international economist at the Washington, D.C.–based Economic Policy Institute. Toyota's Kentucky operations, for one, support 28,000 jobs in the state. In 2007, according to the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, foreign automakers employed 92,700 workers directly and 574,500 indirectly accounting for 33 percent of U.S. auto production. By contrast, the Big Three employ about 240,000 workers.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: apurnell @ 04/11/2009 4:19:23 PM

    Hear, Hear good sir. I completely agree. Imagine a country that has over twice the population of the U.S., twice the density, and twice the degree of transportation and communications network integration, with end-to-end rapid rail networks, a more diverse and globally successful auto-racing culture and infrastructure, and entire cities connected by wi-fi technology.

    That country is the EU.

    Naturally, they have the adaptability, and R&D potential to produce more innovative cars, and for the time being, the market is going to have to adjust to their comparative advantage.

    The Big Three will not go under completely, but this severe contraction is simply due to the fact that the Cold-War American idea of striving to be the biggest, strongest, and most powerful in everything we do...and in the cars we make...is simply NOT MARKETABLE to the rest of the world, which seems to have its priorities in order.

    GM Ford and Chrysler need to do some soul searching, and I wouldn't be angry if we simply convert the interstate highway into emergency air landing space, and replaced it with a maglev network. I know I'm being ridiculous, but for the time-being, the bailouts of the Big Three should not come without the requirement that they significantly rearrange their business model and their external contributions to society. That's not to say that they haven't already given so much. That said, however, I want to see Ford, GM, and Chrysler at the forefront of Hydrogen fuel-cell research and technology. Until that happens, my first car will PROBABLY NOT BE AMERICAN. Sorry.

    We should lead by example, not force.

  • Posted By: apurnell @ 04/11/2009 4:18:23 PM

    Hear, Hear good sir. I completely agree. Imagine a country that has over twice the population of the U.S., twice the density, and twice the degree of transportation and communications network integration, with end-to-end rapid rail networks, a more diverse and globally successful auto-racing culture and infrastructure, and entire cities connected by wi-fi technology.

    That country is the EU.

    Naturally, they have the adaptability, and R&D potential to produce more innovative cars, and for the time being, the market is going to have to adjust to their comparative advantage.

    The Big Three will not go under completely, but this severe contraction is simply due to the fact that the Cold-War American idea of striving to be the biggest, strongest, and most powerful in everything we do...and in the cars we make...is simply NOT MARKETABLE to the rest of the world, which seems to have its priorities in order.

    GM Ford and Chrysler need to do some soul searching, and I wouldn't be angry if we simply convert the interstate highway into emergency air landing space, and replaced it with a maglev network. I know I'm being ridiculous, but for the time-being, the bailouts of the Big Three should not come without the requirement that they significantly rearrange their business model and their external contributions to society. That's not to say that they haven't already given so much. That said, however, I want to see Ford, GM, and Chrysler at the forefront of Hydrogen fuel-cell research and technology. Until that happens, my first car will PROBABLY NOT BE AMERICAN. Sorry.

    We should lead by example, not force.

  • Posted By: allfor111111 @ 01/17/2009 6:42:16 PM

    Was GM not looking into buying out Chrysler just before the house of cards fell in on the criminal banking industry. If they were SO cash strapped who would even think of such a venture. The key word is IF!!!!!!! America and the rest of the so called FREE MARKET world, should be focusing on the SMOKE AND MIRRORS ACCOUNTING that most big buisness is ALLOWED to use. Soon chapter 11 will be the main stay of any plant that has a strong union. By using this or threatening it, people will be forced to take much less while the leaders get more. The easiest way for corporate leaders to get a highier performance bonus is to LOWER wages of his employees or move production off shore. Those of you that work in the public sector must remember that if wages fall in the private sector there will be no tax base to pay you so downward we ALL GO. The South auto employees remember if the big three go chapter 11 and come out with lets say paying 15hr no benifits and Detroit says hey Toyota, Honda etc. we will give you millions to move here and we have lower wages, they will say to you take 10hr or where gone ...GET IT. I gave 19 years to one company and they were my best years ( MY YOUTH) and they closed us. Then the next 8 years to another company only to see it close even though they were all hyped telling us about the china market ( THATS WHERE THEY BUILT A PLANT). The three plants where I was offered full time work have now closed their doors, so if I stayed at any one of these I would be in the same boat. Between my wife and I we have lived through 4 JOB LOSSES and are on the brink of our 5th My answer to this is, as a nation BUY your products from companies that employ your own people. If we ALL did this then manufacturing would have to stay in country even though proffits would be less for the BIG INVESTORS we would have JOBS staying here. People of the world economy can say that the only way to get cheap products and HIGH PROFITS is by doing buisness with china or 3rd world nations that will pimp out their people for less and less. But in the end they shoot themselves in the foot because once they have brought us down to a level where we cannot or will not spend on these products they will move on to the next best thing and leave us fighting for scraps. WE HAVE THE POWER TO STOP THIS but we need to come together NOW!!!!!! I would love for someone to tell me that I'm wrong and the path we are on is the best way to make the majority of the population ( THE MIDDLE / LOWER CLASS) standard of living better but so far I don't see it.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.