BUSINESS

Southern Comfort

Less than two decades ago, Detroit's Big Three were the U.S. auto industry. But now there's a second auto industry: one that is nonunion, foreign-owned and Dixie-based. That's why Southern senators worked so hard to block the bailout.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: apurnell @ 04/11/2009 4:19:23 PM

    Hear, Hear good sir. I completely agree. Imagine a country that has over twice the population of the U.S., twice the density, and twice the degree of transportation and communications network integration, with end-to-end rapid rail networks, a more diverse and globally successful auto-racing culture and infrastructure, and entire cities connected by wi-fi technology.

    That country is the EU.

    Naturally, they have the adaptability, and R&D potential to produce more innovative cars, and for the time being, the market is going to have to adjust to their comparative advantage.

    The Big Three will not go under completely, but this severe contraction is simply due to the fact that the Cold-War American idea of striving to be the biggest, strongest, and most powerful in everything we do...and in the cars we make...is simply NOT MARKETABLE to the rest of the world, which seems to have its priorities in order.

    GM Ford and Chrysler need to do some soul searching, and I wouldn't be angry if we simply convert the interstate highway into emergency air landing space, and replaced it with a maglev network. I know I'm being ridiculous, but for the time-being, the bailouts of the Big Three should not come without the requirement that they significantly rearrange their business model and their external contributions to society. That's not to say that they haven't already given so much. That said, however, I want to see Ford, GM, and Chrysler at the forefront of Hydrogen fuel-cell research and technology. Until that happens, my first car will PROBABLY NOT BE AMERICAN. Sorry.

    We should lead by example, not force.

  • Posted By: WidernessVoice @ 12/17/2008 12:35:39 PM

    GM's problem is poor quality, non-innovative cars. They know how to make trucks with huge horsepower for city folks to drive on the freeway, but not how to move to new ideas. The root problem is not labor costs or management costs or dealer costs. The root cause is a business model/bureaucracy that is so moribund that it cannot change.

    • Posted By: apurnell @ 04/11/2009 4:18:23 PM

      Hear, Hear good sir. I completely agree. Imagine a country that has over twice the population of the U.S., twice the density, and twice the degree of transportation and communications network integration, with end-to-end rapid rail networks, a more diverse and globally successful auto-racing culture and infrastructure, and entire cities connected by wi-fi technology.

      That country is the EU.

      Naturally, they have the adaptability, and R&D potential to produce more innovative cars, and for the time being, the market is going to have to adjust to their comparative advantage.

      The Big Three will not go under completely, but this severe contraction is simply due to the fact that the Cold-War American idea of striving to be the biggest, strongest, and most powerful in everything we do...and in the cars we make...is simply NOT MARKETABLE to the rest of the world, which seems to have its priorities in order.

      GM Ford and Chrysler need to do some soul searching, and I wouldn't be angry if we simply convert the interstate highway into emergency air landing space, and replaced it with a maglev network. I know I'm being ridiculous, but for the time-being, the bailouts of the Big Three should not come without the requirement that they significantly rearrange their business model and their external contributions to society. That's not to say that they haven't already given so much. That said, however, I want to see Ford, GM, and Chrysler at the forefront of Hydrogen fuel-cell research and technology. Until that happens, my first car will PROBABLY NOT BE AMERICAN. Sorry.

      We should lead by example, not force.

  • Posted By: allfor111111 @ 01/17/2009 6:42:16 PM

    Was GM not looking into buying out Chrysler just before the house of cards fell in on the criminal banking industry. If they were SO cash strapped who would even think of such a venture. The key word is IF!!!!!!! America and the rest of the so called FREE MARKET world, should be focusing on the SMOKE AND MIRRORS ACCOUNTING that most big buisness is ALLOWED to use. Soon chapter 11 will be the main stay of any plant that has a strong union. By using this or threatening it, people will be forced to take much less while the leaders get more. The easiest way for corporate leaders to get a highier performance bonus is to LOWER wages of his employees or move production off shore. Those of you that work in the public sector must remember that if wages fall in the private sector there will be no tax base to pay you so downward we ALL GO. The South auto employees remember if the big three go chapter 11 and come out with lets say paying 15hr no benifits and Detroit says hey Toyota, Honda etc. we will give you millions to move here and we have lower wages, they will say to you take 10hr or where gone ...GET IT. I gave 19 years to one company and they were my best years ( MY YOUTH) and they closed us. Then the next 8 years to another company only to see it close even though they were all hyped telling us about the china market ( THATS WHERE THEY BUILT A PLANT). The three plants where I was offered full time work have now closed their doors, so if I stayed at any one of these I would be in the same boat. Between my wife and I we have lived through 4 JOB LOSSES and are on the brink of our 5th My answer to this is, as a nation BUY your products from companies that employ your own people. If we ALL did this then manufacturing would have to stay in country even though proffits would be less for the BIG INVESTORS we would have JOBS staying here. People of the world economy can say that the only way to get cheap products and HIGH PROFITS is by doing buisness with china or 3rd world nations that will pimp out their people for less and less. But in the end they shoot themselves in the foot because once they have brought us down to a level where we cannot or will not spend on these products they will move on to the next best thing and leave us fighting for scraps. WE HAVE THE POWER TO STOP THIS but we need to come together NOW!!!!!! I would love for someone to tell me that I'm wrong and the path we are on is the best way to make the majority of the population ( THE MIDDLE / LOWER CLASS) standard of living better but so far I don't see it.

  • Posted By: Galasso @ 12/13/2008 6:48:51 PM

    The operative word is nonunion. After looking at the cost breakdown on an automobile made by the big three, consumers now know that a huge chunk of the price of the automobile goes to pay the retirements and health care benefits of retired workers and also funds the salaries of the leadership and operating expenses of the unions - who then use a substantial amount of that money to fund the union's favorite political candidates - all liberal Democrats. Given all of this information and the fact that the big three vehicles have been substandard compared to Toyota, Honda, et al - largely due to the parasitic unions - what is the incentive to buy a car from GM, Ford or Chrysler?

    • Posted By: analog4ndy @ 01/13/2009 4:11:41 PM

      Can I be your run running mate? Couldn't be more accurate.

    • Posted By: boonies @ 12/16/2008 3:37:44 PM

      This reminds me of when the City of Buffalo NY made the news wires last year by becoming (if i recall correctly) the first large Metro area to spend more on health care costs for RETIRED school employees than those currently employed... this is unsustainable.
      And if Gm and Friends cant afford the gold-plated med coverages for a comparative handful of workers both past and present....how is extending similar crushing costs to 300+ million Americans under some universal healthcare scheme going to be any more affordable for the rest of us?

    • Posted By: zeth006 @ 12/15/2008 8:50:35 AM

      None. Absolutely none. If the the personal preference is political, then I'm learning toward buying from an Asian car brand as long as the car has a reputation on Consumer Reports for reliability, at least moderately high MPG, and safety. It's hard to get everything you want, but I think all here will agree I'm just being financially--and environmentally--pragmatic.

  • Posted By: allfor111111 @ 01/11/2009 4:38:02 PM

    I'm in shock at how people are fighting to lower their standard of living. Yes the auto industry makes good money for hard stressful work ( don't judge till you walk in their shoes) and they buy products that keep others working. So we want or demand they make less, so they stop buying and then those who depended on that money coming in will have to lay off or pay less, get the picture. The south car plant workers owe their wage and working conditions to unions because if it were not for the threat of unions these companies would give very little and take total advantage of their work force ( its starting to happen again). We tend to look in others back yard and complain they are the problem, soon they will look at yours, so lets just for a minute look UP to see how things are being run. Stop the GREED (control) up top and the rest will equal itself out. The elite love how they have us fighting with each other instead of holding their feet to the fire. We are their pupets on a banking string ...STAND TOGETHER (because as they want us) DIVIDED WE FALL!! BUY AMERICAN made products, you pay more but its helping your country and in the end YOU. I'm Canadian and feel the same in my country. You are a great nation but will wilt away under the control of these so called leaders. It is up to you to stand up and regain control of your democracy. REMEMBER.....FOR THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE

  • Posted By: justpicky @ 12/29/2008 2:46:19 PM

    CEO'S ARE THE BLAME FOR EVERYTHING , EXPECTING THERE "GOLDEN PARACHUTES ".
    YOU THINK YOU CAN LIVE OFF THE LESS INCOME , YOU'VE A RUDE AWAKENING , NOT TRUE.
    OVER 10 MILLION PEOPLE ARE LAID OFF FOR MONTHS NOW , BIG 3 DOESNT GET HELP ADD ANOTHER
    7 MILLION TO THAT , NOT COUNTING MILLIONS OTHERS . 20 - 30 MILLION PEOPLE WILL BE LAID OFF
    TELL ME , WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO FOUND A JOB ??????? MIDDLE CLASS CITIZENS ARE THE
    ONES WHO NEEDS THE HELP , WHY , BECAUSE THEY'RE THE ONES WHO WORKS THE HARDEST .
    PLAIN AND SIMPLE ............IF OBAMA WANTS TO HELP , HE COULD GIVE ALL CITIZENS 21 YEARS OLDER
    A STIMULUS PACKAGE FOR $500,000 , BELIEVE ME THAT WILL HELP , THAT WOULD PAY OFF , MORTGAGES,
    CAR PAYMENTS , COLLEGES PAYMENTS , OR STAY FOR COLLEGE , IT WOULD HELP THE ECONOMY FASTER
    AND EVERY CITIZEN WOULD APPRECIATE IT . PLUS THEY WILL HAVE TO PAY TAXES ON THAT AMOUNT
    BUT AT LEAST THEY WOULD BE HELPED............

  • Posted By: justpicky @ 12/29/2008 2:38:48 PM

    United States Citzens are being sold out by FOREIGNERS , the blame too should be against ALL COMPANIES
    WHO WENT GLOBAL , NAFTA WAS A HUGE MISTAKEN , NOW LOOK WHAT WE'RE IN A HUGE MESS .
    LOWER WAGES ( HOW ARE YOU GOING TO SURVIVE ON LOW WAGES???)
    LOW WAGES YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BUY CARS , OR ANYTHING ELSE .
    YOUR COLLEGE EDUCATION , DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING , WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY .

  • Posted By: tripcag1967 @ 12/17/2008 9:25:52 PM

    The Detroit "Big Three" needs to file for Chapter 11 protection. They can still keep going on about their business while they are RESTRUCTURING. This means no unions! Look at the "second auto industry" and use them as a model for business. They pay their according to PERFORMANCE, not cow-towing to the union's demands. Sure, everyone is not having a banner year, but you don't hear of the NON-UNION Dixie-based people demanding a lousy bailout. Now riddle me this...Does it really take possessing a degree in rocket-fuel science to figure that one out? Sheesh!!!

    • Posted By: jajuan323 @ 12/27/2008 10:47:58 PM

      Sales are dropping because no on has extra money for luxury purchases, and those that do aren't buying anything for fear that not many of ANY company will be left standing to honor a product warranty. Or do those of you who want to keep blaming unions and thus average workers for the bosses dumb mistakes wish to continue to gloss over that foreign automakers pay less in benefits and despite that even they are feeling the crunch? Or is attacking the unions for getting their members what every American worker wishes to have decent pay PLUS benefits more important than noting that even Toyota posted a 34% DECREASE in sales over last year? We sit back and speak so much about wanting the American Dream, being in the middle class with good pay and benefits, yet the first chance available everyone wants to jump on the auto unions and other unions for helping workers get just that with bogus claims of those workers being so overpaid when part of that pay goes to health and retirement benefits that the Japanese automakers do not pay its workers in their homebase. Stop talking out of both sides of your mouths people and try remember such benefits as the standard 40 hour workweek started with the early day efforts of the labor movement. Are we hearing cries and pushes for the idiot CEOs who created the mess to take a big cut in their standard of living? Hell no, but everyone wants to jump on the bandwagon that reform come on the backs of the workers trying to make a living and support their families. I'm also not hearing as big an outcry about the big banks perpetuating the economic mess by using the bailout to pay out dividends, stock options, and CEO bonuses instead of opening up the credit markets as the money was intended. Give me a break people. Before the banks get another dime from the second bailout installment is approved these clowns should be taken through the same wringer as the Big Three. Less see the CEOs from the banks and the Big Three take cuts in pay especially considering their stupid decisions and in the banks case greed contributed to the economic meltdown instead of this nonsense the Big Three's issues are their workers' fault and the banks issues coming from too much regulation when the regulators were asleep at the wheel when warned that all those risky mortgages who couldn't afford them would cause a huge economic problem for the country. The real problem is CEOs who made stupid decisions in hindsight and in some cases have the gall to think they deserved their huge bonuses while evryone else is hurting from those idiotic mistakes.

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 12/18/2008 6:58:36 PM

      Yes, it is now or never. Now they will be able to function under Chapter 11, because then even Republicans would agree for loan. Once they received load and fail again - no more bailouts, no more money even for true restructuring, and they will crash and burn. Whoever defends this bailout - makes big disservice ro the companies, theur workers and even UAW.

  • Posted By: RayG01 @ 12/27/2008 2:56:11 PM

    I see the point trying to be made about price, but that's not entirely accurate.

    Price is nothing more than information. You see 2 pens in a store; 1 pen is $40, the other is $15. Without any further investigation, we know that the more expensive pen has something extra that the seller deems to be of added value. Over the course of time if this pen is able to stay on the market, then this means that others considered this extra value to be present in the $40 pen as well.

    As it is right now, American cars are not capable of being sold for a high enough price to pay to warrant a profit. Period.

    They're selling for roughly the same price as their equivalent foreign competition. But the foreign cars are better. If Detroit could sell their avg sedan for substantially less than the foreign competition, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Or, if they could make a better car, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

    But both scenarios hinge on price. If the laborers were getting paid what their skills are actually worth in the market place, they could sell their cars for less. If the companies weren't paying such astronomically high costs for retirement bennies, they could sell their cars for less. If they made better cars, they could sell for the same price but for a profit.

  • Posted By: xTremeRacer @ 12/27/2008 11:40:19 AM

    What all of these union wage bashing stories miss is that the union wages are not the real problem. If it were then American car manufacturers would be out of the market based solely on price. The following article shows that is simply not true:

    http://cars.about.com/od/helpforcarbuyers/tp/10_cheapest.01.htm

    The problem has been lack of quality, innovation and product development. These problems are the result of poor management. One of the suggestions I read was that management take a 50% pay cut (including stock and other non-salary benefits) along with the union workers wage cuts. And that management's pay be directly tied to company performance. Anything less simply penalizes the 'easy target' without really trying to solve the problem.

    If the companies keep the same leadership doing the same thing, why would we expect a bailout to yield different results?

  • Posted By: chris s. @ 12/15/2008 1:43:04 PM

    If I've got this right, we should bring the nothern workers down to the wage level of the southern workers. Why not the other way around? Do you realize that it's the threat of going union that keeps the non-union employers on their toes. Otherwise we would have child labor, no pay for overtime, no benefits at all. etc. Sure, just trust your bosses to do the right thing. [ may as well work at Walmart] Just give the money to the companies and let them decide how to distribute it. I'm certain they'll be very fair.

    Why is it when it's wall street in trouble, it's the company that's in trouble; when it's the auto workers, the employees are at fault.

    Does anybody think you can support a family on $30.00 an hour in this economy. I wouldn't want to try it!. This is union busting, clearly.

    • Posted By: xTremeRacer @ 12/27/2008 11:14:00 AM

      chris s rposted:
      >Does anybody think you can support a family on $30.00 an hour in this economy. I wouldn't want to try it!. This
      >is union busting, clearly.

      Wow...can someone be that out of touch with reality? There are MANY people in the south that would feel like $30/hr would be a dream wage! Many currently support a family on FAR less than that. I teach college classes to people hoping to get better paying jobs and improve their lives and most of them would gladly accept jobs for $20/hr after graduation! And even then a big chunk of that $40k/yr will be spent on healthcare expenses.

      It all gets back to that sense of entitlement... that somehow working for 'only' $60,000/year is below you. Try working outside of the auto industry for a while. If nothing else it will teach you that you too can learn to live on far less than $60k/yr.

    • Posted By: xTremeRacer @ 12/27/2008 11:13:26 AM

      chris s rposted:
      >Does anybody think you can support a family on $30.00 an hour in this economy. I wouldn't want to try it!. This
      >is union busting, clearly.

      Wow...can someone be that out of touch with reality? There are MANY people in the south that would feel like $30/hr would be a dream wage! Many currently support a family on FAR less than that. I teach college classes to people hoping to get better paying jobs and improve their lives and most of them would gladly accept jobs for $20/hr after graduation! And even then a big chunk of that $40k/yr will be spent on healthcare expenses.

      It all gets back to that sense of entitlement... that somehow working for 'only' $60,000/year is below you. Try working outside of the auto industry for a while. If nothing else it will teach you that you too can learn to live on far less than $60k/yr.

  • Posted By: RayG01 @ 12/27/2008 3:05:11 AM

    Discernment, you mean with the Big 3 gone, foreign auto makers would raise the price of a car past what we could reasonably afford to buy? How would they stay in business themselves?

  • Posted By: ttmich @ 12/23/2008 10:38:35 PM

    It is understanding that politicians try to promote their home states so that they will be able to keep their jobs in the next elections.
    However, to secure their own jobs by destroying the nation???s critical Detroit based auto manufacturing industry that would cause the collapsing of the national economy and creating millions of jobless is a CRIME.
    The arrogant and selfish southern Republican politicians blocked the loans claiming to protect taxpayers are shamelessly lying: Their own states have subsidized the foreign companies by using the taxpayers??? money.
    A lot of dumb people are unable to recognize the selfishness of their Republican politicians.

    • Posted By: Discernment @ 12/27/2008 1:18:09 AM

      Amen TTMICH. But it would be far worst than you stated. If Detroit's Big-3 disappears, the foreign auto-manufacturers would loosen their belts, take control of auto supplies, and raise car prices to the point where U.S. car ownership drops from the worlds highest per capita, to something brutally painful where the price of a brand new car is 2-to-4 time the current rate.

  • Posted By: jt1027 @ 12/25/2008 10:33:39 PM

    The time has come. We saw it coming but turned our backs and thought it will be ok. The UAW and their fat cat CEO's are history. US auto has created for themselves a double slam. No one will buy products from a company that is going to go belly up, Who is going to honor thier warranties? The government (read taxpayers)will have to shell out more billions. Pull the plug now and get it over.

    • Posted By: Discernment @ 12/27/2008 12:54:28 AM

      . . . And with Detroit's Big-3 gone, expect their competing foreign auto-manufacturers to loosen their belts, control auto supplies, and raise prices to the point where U.S. car ownership drops from the worlds highest per capita (over 251-million total) to something brutally painful where the price of a brand new car is 2-to-4 time the current rate. We may not reach the lows of Cuba where only 1% of the population owns a car, but middle-class Joe will definitely feel it.

      Have you thought about that 'JT1027' ?

  • Posted By: Discernment @ 12/27/2008 12:22:37 AM

    VERY GOOD ARTICLE MR. DANIEL GROSS . . . HOWEVER . . .

    However, I stand by my decision to support the American Big-3 auto-manufacturers. Not because I'm blind to Big-3's gargantuan short-comings, but because I know the outcome if Detroit's Big-3 goes out of business. And it is far, far worst.

    The outcome of Big-3's disappearance is best illustrated with the nation's current oil addiction from foreign oil producing nations like Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and OPEC nations. Once the Big-3 disappears, the foreign auto-manufacturers will control supplies and raise prices at will - - very much like OPEC and foreign oil producing nations do today. The U.S. 251-million auto drivers will cry foul when foreign auto-manufacturers have their way with a nation that has the most car owners per capita. When the price of car ownership suddenly jumps 2-to-4 times the current rate, it will be too late to rejuvenate the Big-3. With foreign auto-manufacturers owning the car market and Big-3 gone, obtaining a new automobile will be as tough as obtaining a suitable brand new home. That means most middle-class workers will be buying 20-year-old clunkers for their first car when they are in their 30's. No more getting brand new cars when you are 16, because the foreign manufacturers will have hiked the prices out of reach for the average Joe, because the Big-3 competitors are gone. U.S. car ownership may not be as bad as Cuba where only 1% of the population owns their own vehicle, but U.S. citizens will definitely feel it when foreign auto-manufacturers own America's auto sales market.

  • Posted By: GALLERY84.COM @ 12/26/2008 9:05:55 AM

    IDK I AM ON THE FENCE WHEN YOU SEE TOYOTA HAVING ISSUES ALSO , IT WOULD SEEM ITS NOT ALL GMS FAULT SO NOW WHAT , EVERYONE DOES NEED HELP IN THIS CURRENT CRISIS , WHATS NEXT MALL OPERATORS ? GAP ? CIRCIUT CITY ? SO HARD TO CHOOSE

  • Posted By: bobbogosian @ 12/26/2008 7:29:21 AM

    These foreign companies are also being hit by the economy, and pitting southern states against northern states started two centuries before they arrived. The real problem is how the government set up the American auto makers, allowing them to sell outmoded unsafe technology through lax rules for SUVs and pickup trucks. This kind of government interference in the market is no different than what the Soviets did and the results are the same: inventory that people won't buy. Once we stop this interference we get a level playing field and American companies (whose quality control is better these days and whose value proposition is excellent) can address the demand side of the equation. In the short term, we need to get those cars off of the lots and pay auto workers so that the economy does not get even worse. The new administration should figure this out and get going on it.

  • Posted By: jt1027 @ 12/25/2008 10:43:39 PM

    We are all so blind to what has been happening over the last 20 or so years. While the foreign automakers have been being smart, the US automakers have been getting fat and happy at our expense. The UAW has to go and their CEO's should go to jail with all the other thiefs that have created this mess. The general public wanted gas guzzling trucks and SUV's in their infinite vanity.Now we must pay the price. Pull the plug and reboot. And oh by the way, where were your fine politicians? They should have fought harder to bring them to Detroit and the other northern industrial areas. Too much pressure? Too late to wake up, the bus has left.

  • Posted By: ttmich @ 12/23/2008 10:12:10 PM

    Posted By: Kuni_Leml @ 12/17/2008 9:14:38 PM

    Let???s end the handouts these moocher Red States keep getting.

    I notice that Alabama gets $1.66 from the federal government for every $1.00 it contributes; while Michigan contributes more than it gets back.

    Yet the senator from Alabama has the gall to tell the auto industry to go screw itself when it asks for help in dealing with the fallout from Bush???s failed rightwing economic polices that the senator from Alabama helped enable.

    We should take all the money we send to these mooches in states like Alabama that have a long history of getting more than they contribute and send it to Detroit instead.

    And tell these mooches that they need to restructure their states before they see any extra $. Maybe if their citizens had Unions and made a decent wage they wouldn???t need to mooch.


    Call Roger Kerson ??? PR Dir. UAW @ (313) 926-5000 and point out the above and tell the UAW it needs to get on the offensive regarding this issue.

  • Posted By: coolbear3 @ 12/21/2008 11:15:38 PM

    Have you taken a look at GM's balance sheet? It is a cadaver. The terms of essentially wiping out the shareholders and swapping the debt for new equity, and making the UAW related costs come into line with the transplants is the recipe required. If this course isn't taken, then these fools are going to see the worst happen and we will have messy liquidations. There is such huge upside for everyone if the right things happen, but no one is that lucky.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse