Not Your Dad's Divorce

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: debswahl @ 12/15/2008 6:53:05 PM

    I could write a book on being a non-custodial parent 20 years ago. My ex-husband ended-up having physical custody of our 3 kids due to his parents paying for the divorce, the house he still lives-in (& raised the kids in), and providing him with a safety net when food, money & babysitters got scarce. I lived within 10 miles for the first 4 years of our divorce and within 2 miles for the last 13 years. It was a long time to have to stay friendly with my ex-husband and not be critical to our children about him. I felt that I was a loner as the majority of divorced mothers had custody of their children and were getting paid child support. I didn't have these things because I had no money except what I earned after our divorce. I paid rent on a small 1-bedroom apartment so I could be close to my kids. Their overnights consisted of sleeping bags on my living room floor or the couch. Yet, in retrospect, my 3 are now 20-something adults (one just got married and another is getting married next June) and they are the light of my life and I am so glad and so proud they are the people they are.

    • Posted By: roadkill1965 @ 12/15/2008 10:13:49 PM

      Unfortunately, it sounds like you got the typical "dad treatment."

  • Posted By: Lillylee @ 12/15/2008 10:11:26 PM

    All marriages have thier problems. It helps to be married to someone who doesn't htink the grass is always greener no matter what. I know folks who whine 20 years later that "you are not the girl I married". My first marriage was that experience. He was immature and needed a mom. My second marriage is at 30 years and even at our wedding most didn't think it would last. Those naysayers are the ones who divorced. What works? Don't know. Just that I really like my husband then as a person and I still do. He is a diffficult person at times but is always sweet to me. So who knows. Just lucky is all. Maybe it is better if your parents arrange marriages. Seems more practical at times as love is difficult to make last as they years go by and you change. I don't have any marriage advice, just I wish everyone luck!

  • Posted By: envirogrrl @ 12/15/2008 5:22:54 PM

    Presumably everyone is living in one house at the time Mom and Dad decide to call it quits. Why not inconvenience themselves and arrange it so they are the ones that move back and forth? Let the kids stay in one place. After all, it's the parents who want the swinging single life - let them get the one bedroom apartment and live out of suitcases. Utilities and mortgage could be split on a pro-rated basis according to the relative incomes of each parent. I think if this is what parents were required to do by the courts in a divorce proceeding, there would be at least a few couples deciding that maybe the split isn't quite what they had in mind...

    • Posted By: roadkill1965 @ 12/15/2008 10:03:13 PM

      I've actually heard of people doing that, but it sure would be a bear to maintain. I'm a firm believer that the relationships with the parents are far more important than having a single residence. Kids are pretty adjustible to living arrangements as long as the people in their lives are consistent.

  • Posted By: bdick @ 12/15/2008 9:58:21 PM

    I dont think the guys are getting away like OJ or taking revenge on the system in multitudes for the years of not having the satisfaction allowed of paternity when relations desolved. Unfortunatley for the total femme types that are always right and never wrong, it became almost cult like amongst a percenntage of women that they were automatically going to get the kids even if they sucked at parenting. Not that most women are not good moms because they are but some are not the best lights on the porch just like some dads are not. Many men in the wake of what is now paid dearly for the equal opportunity to love their kids after a realtioinship or marraige parted. It was always the moms will for hell or high water and unfortunatley for you gals who thought that was cute -some blew it by abusing the power of paternity far beyond what has been written in the good word. You cant do it without us, yet anyways. Most dads do love there kids as good mothers already know. For what its worth, you do stay for the kids. Whatever *** bags came up any excuse to get out died only knowing selfishness.

  • Posted By: NotLikingThePeopleOfTodaysWorld @ 12/15/2008 9:57:51 PM

    Much of the research on the subject shows that a majority of kids who have grown up in joint physical custody arrangements report that they are satisfied with the way it worked, while kids who grew up in an "every other weekend arrangement" were more likely to be dissatisfied and want more contact with their fathers.""

    Where do people get these BS stats from? The national average for divorce may hover somewhere around 50%, but where I live / grew up it was rare to find a kid who had married parents, or at least married parents who saw each other more than once a year. I've know kids of this "joint custody" crap, as early as 1988 in fact. And everyone one of them hates it.

    Sure, no one is saying kids don't miss their dads (if they live with mom). But they really hate being traded back and fourth every couple of days like a toy. Especially old (12 years and up) kids because their friends can't keep track of the schedule, they have no place they feel they can call home, it's either Mom's house or Dad's. And for the majority of them the parents don't live just a few blocks away (we're talking rural towns here, which is mainly what this country is made of).

    Anyone who thinks this split equally down the middle for the sake of the parents crap is good, then get the heck out of LA and NY and talk to the actual majority of the country, in the rural areas, where kids hate being a pawn.

    Also, why don't you ask those who said they LOVE spending 50% of their time AT DAD'S HOUSE, not necessarily with dad, why it is they really like it.

    I'm helping to raise my niece who had to go through this for three years with her parents. Yeah daddy had joint custody, but daddy was always away on business while other family picked up his slack. And even when he was around, my niece hated she was always so confused; "Auntie, where am I living tonight?"

  • Posted By: daad @ 12/15/2008 9:57:10 PM

    i've had my son for 8 years and she pays nothing for support and she hasn't seen him in 7 years. now he's about to go to college and she wont answer the letter's for back support. the court won't do anything. but when i owed they came at me full barrell and took my pay check to pay it.

  • Posted By: Gimli's Girl @ 12/15/2008 2:33:23 PM

    I have a niece and three nephews whose time is with each parent is divided by equal time with each parent. One week with their mother, the next with their dad. What bothers me about this arrangement is how the children refer to this arrangement. They never use the term "home." In conversations they always say, "mom's house," or "dad's house." Sometimes I wonder if they have the security that comes with having a "home."

    • Posted By: roadkill1965 @ 12/15/2008 9:56:29 PM

      I think the security of having a "mom" and a "dad" far outweighs the security of having a "home." What about military kids who move every few years? They don't have the security of a "home" either. Not having a single residence may not be the ideal, but it's far better than losing a parent.

  • Posted By: sieg6529 @ 12/15/2008 12:13:15 PM

    As a married man with no children (and the product of a still-married couple), I am glad to see that men are now being granted more equality in custody hearings. There should be no bias as to who is the better parent. Plenty of mothers are worthless deadbeats who should never be near any children, much less their own, and plenty of fathers adore their children and would do anything for them. Of course, the first and best choice would be to try and fix a flailing marriage, but that would be too difficult for most people.

    • Posted By: findlayoh @ 12/15/2008 9:49:14 PM

      We should be worried about FAMILIES! You don't like dealing with custody laws??? Fix the broken family.

  • Posted By: DOUBTFUL @ 12/15/2008 9:48:22 PM

    my son inlaw is in the middle of a terrible divorce with his ex. She has a high paying job but says she can't afford to buy the kids winter coats even. She is always dressed to the nines. She kept the house and all the furniture. My son in law couldn't even afford heat for his place but had to pay her mortgage and the credit cards she ran up to the limit when they split. My son inlaw pays for all the kids school supplies, clothing, extra curricular activites (which his ex refuses to take them to, although she agreed to it in mediation). He also had to fully furnish his place and prove that he had a place that the kids could feel at home when he was able to get them. Even though ordered by the judge, his ex still takes off with the kids on his days to keep them away from him. He has spent over thirty thousand in court and lawyer cost and still doesn't seem very much further. Who says the women don't always get their way?

  • Posted By: workingmomsaregoodmoms @ 12/15/2008 1:30:43 PM

    If you are going to put this much work and effort into doing "what's best for the kids," why not just put that same work and effort into your marriage and not get divorced? Either way it's a huge committment. But if you stay married, it's probably better for everyone.

    • Posted By: arcsc @ 12/15/2008 2:30:44 PM

      Have to agree with you. I have watched too many couples get divorced because marriage "is not fun anymore" or "we just don't love each other anymore" and their kids suffer as a result thereof (and the joint custody kids are uprooted so frequently it just breaks your heart). So long as there is not cruelty or violence, heck I will give you adulltery, be adults and follow through on your commitments.

      • Posted By: mimeagan78 @ 12/15/2008 5:20:41 PM

        Really...so long as there is not abuse? So as long as my husband doesn't beat me, then we should stay married no matter how unhappy we both are? You should see how unhappy our son is when we can't seem to stop fighting in front of him. Yes we're adults and should be able to control ourselves and we do our best. But overall we want our son to be as happy as he can be and being with a Mom and Dad who are so unhappy being together does nothing to achieve that goal. I wish life was all roses and we could just fix everything or get past everything, but that is just not realistic. We want our son to learn the value of committment but not believe that committment means unchanging or to be imprisoned.

        • Posted By: findlayoh @ 12/15/2008 9:48:14 PM

          No....you need to find out WHY you married in the first place and get that back. BE HAPPY!!! Marriages have tough times. You SHOULD live through them. If you don't realize that now, you'll never make it in marriage...and of course your children have suffered. Selfish.

    • Posted By: HappyFatherHusband @ 12/15/2008 9:17:31 PM

      I am the product of a "lets stay married for the children," marriage. My parents were miserable and we could tell. My mother spent her life trying to please my father. Constantly changing her hair, weight levels, cooking styles you named. If a marriage support magazine or book recommended it, my mother tried it and for what? For my sisters to grow up thinking that this was how marriage worked and that it was their job to keep their husbands happy. I on the other hand, did not realize that it was not the right way to treat your wife. Everyone gave my poor mother the same speech, "do it for your children," "make him happy and you'll be happy," "it is not as if he is cheating on you," "if you divorce him, you'll be poor," "he is not hitting you, " and other brilliant advice. My mother died not knowing the pleasure of real love and affection, I never remembered them kissing or holding hands, I grew up thinking that it was inappropriate for married couples to show affection to each other in front of their children, an excuse my mother made any time we asked my dad never kissed her or us. I made a disaster of my first marriage, my first wife and our daughter paid the price for my upbringing, and although I don't know the validity of your statistics, I am a happy second marriage, and so is my ex-wife, whom I will always be thankful for not "sticiking it out," and instead setting us free. For her it was listening to our daughter then five years of age, tell a friend that she had a sad mommy and an angry dad all the time. Like my father, although I did not raise my voice, her mother's cries for my attention, were dismissed as "nagging," and "whinning," just as my father described my mother. I have been happily married 15 years and have to thank years of therapy to undue all the "learnings" about marriage, that I acquired while growing up. Please do not generalize, some of us, much have rather been in a single home, than watching two people waste away in misery while setting the wrong example about marriage.

    • Posted By: HappyFatherHusband @ 12/15/2008 9:16:18 PM

      I am the product of a "lets stay married for the children," marriage. My parents were miserable and we could tell. My mother spent her life trying to please my father. Constantly changing her hair, weight levels, cooking styles you named. If a marriage support magazine or book recommended it, my mother tried it and for what? For my sisters to grow up thinking that this was how marriage worked and that it was their job to keep their husbands happy. I on the other hand, did not realize that it was not the right way to treat your wife. Everyone gave my poor mother the same speech, "do it for your children," "make him happy and you'll be happy," "it is not as if he is cheating on you," "if you divorce him, you'll be poor," "he is not hitting you, " and other brilliant advice. My mother died not knowing the pleasure of real love and affection, I never remembered them kissing or holding hands, I grew up thinking that it was inappropriate for married couples to show affection to each other in front of their children, an excuse my mother made any time we asked my dad never kissed her or us. I made a disaster of my first marriage, my first wife and our daughter paid the price for my upbringing, and although I don't know the validity of your statistics, I am a happy second marriage, and so is my ex-wife, whom I will always be thankful for not "sticiking it out," and instead setting us free. For her it was listening to our daughter then five years of age, tell a friend that she had a sad mommy and an angry dad all the time. Like my father, although I did not raise my voice, her mother's cries for my attention, were dismissed as "nagging," and "whinning," just as my father described my mother. I have been happily married 15 years and have to thank years of therapy to undue all the "learnings" about marriage, that I acquired while growing up. Please do not generalize, some of us, much have rather been in a single home, than watching two people waste away in misery while setting the wrong example about marriage.

    • Posted By: HyeAghcheg @ 12/15/2008 9:04:31 PM

      That sounds great in a perfect world, but not all divorces are due to folks easily throwing the towel in. In cases of chronic adultery, domestic abuse, alcoholism, substance abuse, emotional abuse, etc., divorce becomes a necessity. Unless you've lived it, please do not rush to judge others. I was divorced at a very young age. I was his second wife and he went on to marry three more. He died after his fifth divorce. If he hadn't, he'd probably have married more. He had four children from four different women (I remained childless) and failed to adequately support any of them. Sometimes, people have issues. Trying to work out viable solutions with problematic people is a nightmare

  • Posted By: roni1073 @ 12/15/2008 9:20:56 PM

    My husband and I are going though a huge custody battle. Right now all of teh evidence is on our side. She has an attorney which really bothers me because I know that the money we pay in child support does not go to the children(there are 2). She constantly says she can not complete her court ordered evals and parenting classes because my husband has not paid his child support. If she only knew that we keep a reciept of everything we pay and buy for the children and send home with them. We have proved her a liar more than once in court. Just recently she "bargained" her restraining order that she falsely was given by the judge because she needed more time to get her court order counseling done. My husband and I completed ours within 3 weeks of being ordered. We have spend over $12,000 on this custody battle, between attoney's fees, counseling classes and the 730 eval which in the state of ca is mandatory if there is any question of changing custody. Come feb 2009 I pray that my children( because they are and I love them dearly) will come home with us. IF they do I know they will have proper schooling, dental care and all around alot of love! Oh and by the way what person who gets a domestic violence restraining order (my husband was not served with the ex-parte notice and was not present in court this is the only reason she got it and the judge has since found out that she did not complete the proper serve) bargains it for a postponement of a court date? She is an idiot and I can not wait for our attorney to kill her on the stand!!

    • Posted By: jetgunmom @ 12/15/2008 9:46:12 PM

      I was in you shoes 11 years ago. My husband and I got custody. She couldn't provide adequate meals, dental care, child care, etc even with child support. But you know what? If you can provide these things, no matter who is legally bound, do it. Saying you can not wait for your attorney to "kill her on the stand" is wrong. Trust me, I learned the hard way. No matter how bad a mother she is, she is still their Mom and they will always love her. You sound like you are too caught up in all the details and how terrible she is. Just keep doing for the children what she can't or won't. You are better off putting your energy into the children that into proving her wrong. One day the children will know who cared and put them first.

  • Posted By: geekbyknight @ 12/15/2008 3:58:36 PM

    Step parent in a joint physical custody situation here. I won't comment on all the other points that were brought up in this article and just mention one thing that wasn't discussed. It is EXTREMELY difficult for a child when they have to bounce back and forth between two homes as no one home feels like "home". They end up feeling like visitors at both places. Additionally, it is nearly impossible to provide consistant parenting (rules, morals, expectations) when you have the child for 2 days then farm him/her off to their father's house for 2 days (where he tries to instill his rules) then back to your house. I'm not saying that mothers should always have sole custody, rather, that one parent, the one that is the better parent, should have sole custody. Solomon's law here folks - cut the baby in half just so neither parent gets their feelings hurt?

  • Posted By: Joda @ 12/15/2008 5:07:21 PM

    1) Parental alienation is junk science, used primarily against women. It's also called "abuse excuse" because abusive men can turn the tables on women that allege abuse.

    2) Abuse, sorry to drop the bomb, DOES occur often in American homes. Unfortunately, judges don't believe women when they allege abuse in famil ycourt. Now, with these fathers righters, women can be punished (fines, jail time or loss of custody) if they can't prove abuse. Edvidence and witnesses can be difficult to come by. It's much easier for courts to deny allegations of abuse.

    3) This article was written from the perspective of the FAthers Rights groups. I challenge anyone to take a gander at their sites - many of them are outrageously misogynist.

    4) There is a Battered Mothers Custody Conference next month. The Leadership Council on Child Abuse estimates that 58,000 children are placed in the hands of abusive parents every year. Battered women OFTEN lose custody. This is a national disgrace.

    • Posted By: fatherofvier @ 12/15/2008 8:05:36 PM

      Use the abuse button, its there for you...he he he

      • Posted By: findlayoh @ 12/15/2008 9:43:49 PM

        My daughter would come home crying asking me to tell her father to stop touching her private parts. I put her in play therapy. I was reprimanded by the courts that if the play therapy center made any more reports to childrens services I could loose custody. I wasn't even in the sessions...I don't know what was said. I don't know what reports were made. I removed her from therapy. We delt with the touching for another 6 months silently so I wouldn't lose custody. I think it's stopped now...I hope it has....

    • Posted By: fatherofvier @ 12/15/2008 8:04:48 PM

      Oh, yes, we know know, woman are not abusers of any sort. Not to men, not to children....Their just victims, just like you, right?......................Whatever.....Get over him, and get a life.

  • Posted By: lrmedic @ 12/15/2008 8:45:06 PM

    If I am reading this post by shebun20039 correctly, it says fathers do not deserve the right to get custody of their children. I am curious as to why I do not have the right.
    In 1998 I was divorced and we had 1 daughter that was a year old at that time. I paid my child support as ordered, and I exercised my visitation rights, and even asked for more time. I still helped support her other daughter even though I was not legally obligated to.
    In 2000 custody was modified and I was awarded custody. Since that time we have been to court 3 times for my ex-wife's failure to pay child support. She does not exercise her full visitation rights, has been to only a couple of her school functions, and has never been to a parent teacher conference.
    I have been told by Child Support Enforcement that if the situation was reversed, they would have already arrested me, but they will not do anything to her. I was lucky enough this last time we were in court though. The Judge told her that if she did not start paying what she is supposed to, she would go to jail.
    I guess my question for shebun is: What makes me less deserving than my ex-wife? I know a lot of men that have custody of their kids, and the mothers are the deadbeats. It is time for people to realize that gender has nothing to do with parenting skills.

    • Posted By: Nebraska @ 12/15/2008 9:41:23 PM

      That Special Bond with mothers, that Some point to, only lasts as long as the Prolactin is flowing???then it???s Biologically ???Even-Steven??? between parents..

      I'm with lrmedic--nothing will change until more Judges were / are happily raised by their Fathers. No Law, policy, or training will change this.
      My kids have no relationship anymore with their Mom....couldn't get the Court to see how abusive she was / is...When they got old enough--they split. They didn???t even bother to listen to the Adults / Courts / therapists anymore???it got pretty bad. I got /get no child Support. No College. No Nothing. Everyone openly admits it???s a crime???but she skates free.
      Meanwhile, I???m in therapy sessions with the kids???explaining ???Life ain???t fair???..over and over.

      If more judges were raised by a Man--men might have a chance at 50-50 ....til then, Men are just screwed. I sound just like a feminist form the 60???s..!!
      Yet, No Fathers raising kids???equals--thus , no change in attitude--a Royal Catch-22 !!
      I need another ???Law??? that is ignored??? like a fish needs another bicycle ! ( I hope this indeed sounds familiar???)

      Oh, and I'm a Lawyer...it comes no easier...knowing what is supposed to happen ( Law and behaviors) vs. what actually does happen.(untasteful reality)
      The Law is truly Blind???to it???s own biases. Teachers come a close second???atleast in Omaha. MD???s are up there, too !

      The kids lose. Stability is the casualty.

      I know several Judges who have completely ???flip-flopped??? their views --when it was their own Son???mired in one of these ???Bad-Mommy??? Dramas. Duuuh,???Suddenly they got rapidly closer to 50-50 , Joint Custody, (with teeth in it) and are more willing to change custody when they should???.but they are few and far between. ???Forum Shopping??? away from them by Women ??? You better believe it. !!

      Do you need Another ???Bicycle?????? Men ?? I don???t ???-the one I got, .. rusted away from non-use. Glass ceilings, indeed. !

      I know too many men who are just shown the door, and don???t fight for their kids future. I???m glad I didn???t quit???albeit, I questioned why???on many nights.

      It is easier to walk away???per the current system. That is probably why I fought to stay..
      I thought of my sons and what they would go thru ???if they Divorced with kids, and why I didn???t fight for them.

    • Posted By: cabmanbxr @ 12/15/2008 9:37:13 PM

      You aren't from South Dakota, are you? I'm not surprised that those jackbooted feminazis at CSE told you they wouldn't arrest your ex-wife. There are definitely two sets of laws, and if you're male, your ass is grass. They will chase you to the ends of the earth and take up to 50% of your pay, but a woman gets away with murder. Get a second job and they'll snatch most of that as well. Don't look for fairness in a divorce, especially here. The highly biased courts in this state will nail your hide(If you're a male) to the barn door and laugh in your face. I spent years in Child Support Hell, and I'm glad I'm finally out of it. CSE workers are PARASITES.of the lowest order.

    • Posted By: Nebraska @ 12/15/2008 9:04:29 PM

      I'm with medic--nothing will change until Judges were happily raised by Fathers. No Law, policy, or training will change this.
      My kids have no relationship anymore with their Mom....couldn't get the Court to see how abusive she was / is...When they got old enough--they split. I got /get no child Support.
      If judged were raised by a Man--we might have a chance...til then Men are just screwed. Yet, No Fathers raising kids--no change in attitude--a Royal Catch-22 !!
      Oh and I'm a Lawyer...it comes no easier...knowing what supposed to happen versus what actually does happen.

  • Posted By: stephi25 @ 12/15/2008 9:39:20 PM

    I right now am in the middle of a "custody battle". My ex left to be with different people, he tells his friends we married because i was pregnant (even though we were together for years before then). He never pays for anything for our son, he doesn't even have a bed for him or clothes because he left them here and expects 50 50. He will sometimes ask when he can see our son and when I tell him he can see you son for at max 2 days a week he says no and says that he deserves more than that. The main reason why I am afraid for my son to be over there is the loads of beer/liquor bottles and cigarettes-our son has allergy induced asthma. But seriously...I am expected to give him 50 50 custody? I would love for him to be with our son but not at the risk of our son's health.

  • Posted By: awarriorsmom @ 12/15/2008 6:58:41 PM

    There are many instances when the father only requests custody to get out of paying child support. I waited 8 years before I requested child support from my son's father. During those 8 years, he never expressed a desire to share custody. As soon as I filed, he requested shared custody. I hope the courts look deeper into situations like this. We all want whats in the best interest of the child. If the child is suddenly "forced" to spend time with the absent parent, who never really cared, but now all of a sudden does (due to child support), is that really in the best interest of the child?

    • Posted By: findlayoh @ 12/15/2008 9:36:50 PM

      Many fathers think by paying child support they are "buying" their time with their child. And if their "property" is not quickly and on their demands turned over as desired for the payment they spent on said property, straight into custody court. Best dad in the world! So wronged in the past! Wah Wah Wah.

  • Posted By: RealNewsNow @ 12/15/2008 9:34:58 AM

    For the reality of family court, see www.FamilyLawCourts.com.

    The business of government is business. Judges act more like marketing reps for all comers. Therapists, child custody "evaluators," supervised visitation, and do Not address crimes against children as crimes. It's now 'crime-lite' and called "abuse." Anger management programs are ordered. Domestic violence is a Huge business.

    See www.FamilyLawCourts.com/domestic.html

    • Posted By: WSMNC @ 12/15/2008 9:32:23 PM

      As a daughter of parents who remained married "for the sake of their children", let me warn against remaining in a loveless marriage. The anger, abuse, and tension whitnessed EVERY DAY was scarring. As for this article, it suggests that in some cases Joint Custody may not be the better fit, but that it requires one parent to conceed. What happens to that parent, may I ask? They are forever condemned as the "Deadbeat" (mother or father) that did not want their children though that could not be further from the truth. They were merely the ones with the forethought to know it was better for the CHILD to sacrifice much of their rights. Yes, perhaps "rights" can be viewed as ownership to ones child, similar to slavery as the boyscout referred. Does not a parent have the right to desire time with their child?? So when said time is sacrificed for the betterment of the child, what happens to that parent? Sure, many people can hide behind the guise that Family Court is all for the well being of the child. That parents should grow up and put the child first. Perhaps more credit needs to go to these parents that are willing to hide in the shadows so that their children can seek the sunshine and grow. Give these alleged Deadbeat parents who do not seek joint custody credit for their values. For what it's worth, I'm a stepmother who has had to whitness her husbands relationship with his son hang in the balance of an unfair, bitter ex. He always does what he feels is best for his son, though it often goes unnoticed or is twisted into a "deadbeat dad" stereotype.

  • Posted By: Marchhow @ 12/15/2008 9:29:41 PM

    Nebraska has a no fault divorce law. The lawyers in this state are so old school and behind the times with mothers always getting custody. It is wrong! I let my kids decide and regret it! Half of my four live with me. The oldest turns 19 in January and I am forced to pay more because he no longer is a minor. I still help him out for college! So now they think I need to pay more to the ex because I have it? The whole system is wrong! I was not the one who walked out on the commitment and was not fired from the job because of sexual actions at the work place she was! What is wrong with this system? Everything! Get the laws out of the dark ages!

  • Posted By: Chuckle8 @ 12/15/2008 9:27:03 PM

    I was married and divorced in Nevada at a time when it had very strict child support laws. The mother got the child, no matter what. The father's visitation rights, AND the grandparent's visitation rights, all hinged on full payment of child support, to the last penny. The fact that my ex-wife and her new husband lied to the court about not knowing my whereabouts (they had my home address, work address and all other contact information, but tols the judge otherwise), I lost all rights, since I didn't even hear about the court dates till months later. They then cancelled all contact between myself and my daughter, including mail, phone calls and Christmas and birthday gifts. They did the same to my parents, actually cancelling a planned vacation with them and my daughter the day they showed up for the trip. My parents died without ever seeing or speaking with their grand-daughter again. And all this was with the blessing of the Nevada court system.

  • Posted By: Harley Pilot 52 @ 12/15/2008 7:27:42 PM

    All of these comments about how the divorced parents handle "post divorce custody" are interesting, but I have a question. If you can be so cordial now with the ex and their families and new spouses, then why wasn't the marriage worth saving? My wife and I have been married 36 years and we have had our share of tough times, but I always reflect and think, why would living with a different woman be any better (and it could be worse). I read these comments and think if you can put this much effort in to making "post divorce custody" work, then why couldn't you put more effort into your "pre-divorce marriage". I have had a lot of people (family and friends) hurt me over the years, but there are very few that I can't find a way to get along with them. I am the owner of a small business with 5 employees that is very much like a family. I have to handle disagreements and personalities. I spend 40 waking hours per week with my employees which is almost as much as I spend with my wife. Somehow we all manage to get along with each other and our customers.

    My comment/question is not intended to insult those of you who victims of spousal abuse, alcohoism, and true child abuse. But for the most part you bailed because it was easier than getting along. I say this from watching to many friends and family get divorces over the years.

    • Posted By: sfttailryder @ 12/15/2008 8:15:00 PM

      Amen Harley Piolet, Totally agree....Why can't we all just get along???

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse