What Sex Workers Want

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: eyeswideshut @ 12/22/2008 8:55:56 AM

    Stop trying to make sin and obvious wrongs, right! There is no place in societ across the world for such. The nerve of even those that want to protest such. What next, a day to go around killing innocent people because murders want to be protected as well? Pleeeeze! Get real! First gays, now this, what is next?

  • Posted By: brydges @ 12/22/2008 8:51:49 AM

    This argument is old tired and pointless. If we decriminalized cocaine and heroin there would be less viloence due to drugs. Taking part in illegal activities increases your chances of being a victim of other crimes. With the slight exception to a few lost souls, this is why the worst individuals in society make up these people. The poor whores, is anything anyones own fault anymore?

  • Posted By: route 66 @ 12/22/2008 8:41:37 AM

    I don't understand why Americans have so much anger and turmoil over issues of prostitution, gay marriages/rights, etc. There is a Taco Bell down the street, but I don't have to go eat there just because it is there. We have a Ford dealership in town, but that does not mean I have to buy a Ford. All I'm saying is that our lives are a matter of free choice, so just because something exists, it does not mean we have to engage it. No wonder everybody in the US has stomach problems and high blood pressure. I wish we could just live and let live and spend our days enjoying them instead of worrying about how to manage the affairs of everyone else in the world. Go home tonight, make a great pasta dish, pour a glass of wine, put on some good music, tell your spouse you love him/her, hug your kids, and quit stressing. Merry Chirstmas.

  • Posted By: slava8 @ 12/21/2008 10:29:32 PM

    Great article. Regardless of a person's experience in prostitution, they should not be put in jail. If people love sex work, more power to them. If people don't love it, it doesn't help them to put them in jail and make them feel ashamed of themselves. If people are coerced, it will still help them if prostitution is decriminalized because they can report it without fear of repercussion. It is very important to distinguish between trafficking and consensual sex work.

  • Posted By: TheNonconsumptionalist @ 12/21/2008 9:27:13 PM

    What this really has to do with is Christianitys sex hangup. Research the lives of The Saints or the History of Torture and you'll quickly see what I'm talking about.

  • Posted By: Dave_Ken @ 12/21/2008 8:40:25 PM

    There are some reasonable points against prostitution, like issues of the psychological effect on many women who take part in it, but the argument I see here a lot - that it's illegal and therefore it's wrong and must stay illegal - is very ignorant and poorly thought out.

    It used to be illegal to purchase alcohol, yet now few people would argue that prohibition was a good thing, or that we should return to it. That's despite the fact that there are well known health risks due to alcohol, and it's easy to show that alcohol is a cause of crime and social problems. The costs of prohibition, such as the increase in organised crime, outweighed the benefits of discouraging some people from drinking.

    People talk about stopping demand, bringing up Sweden as an example, yet the figures don't add up. The claim that prostitution has dropped by 40% in Sweden is laughable when that figure just covers street prostitution. Even before buying sex became illegal, street prostitution was a small part of the market. By all accounts the bulk of Swedish prostitution, online and indoors, has been totally unchanged by the law. Even the drop in street prostitution can be explained by prostitutes going further underground to avoid the police. The claims about reducing trafficking are equally flawed. Of course the government behind these laws is going to play with the statistics to make themselves look good. I've yet to see any strong evidence that prohibition actually works.

    Look at some of the crazy laws that were in place in the past, including some that look terrible today. It used to be illegal for women to vote, it used to be illegal for black and white people to marry, it used to be legal to own slaves. Laws change over time as society changes, sometimes that's a bad thing, but often it isn't.

    If you want to argue that prostitution is wrong then look at the facts and make an argument, don't just say "it's illegal so it MUST be wrong".

  • Posted By: JHutch2008 @ 12/20/2008 12:59:34 PM

    Oh, your health and safety are at risk? You poor things. How about this, don't be a prostitute. It's illegal. That's like complaining that you were injured during the commission of a robbery. But if it were legal... yeah, well, if everything were legal then we wouldn't ever have to arrest anyone. Society would break down, but we wouldn't have anyone feeling bad because they did something wrong. Idiots. Honestly, the only sex workers that deserve any sympathy are those that were trafficked into it (and yes I realize there are many other types of trafficking). If you went into the profession by choice, then you decided to degrade yourself - to turn yourself into an object instead of a person, and I just don't see why anyone should care. Of course, I say the same thing about strippers and porn stars too (that by objectifying themselves they have become just that, objects instead of people). To repeat: If you are a prostitute or a john, I really don't care about your safety (once again, the exception being those trafficked). In fact, the worse it is, the less likely others will follow your choices.

    • Posted By: Dave_Ken @ 12/21/2008 8:22:52 PM

      Wow. What a sick and damaged individual you must be to think like that.

      Someone working in the sex industry isn't choosing to be treated like an object, he/she is simply doing a job. If you're a disgusting bigot and choose to treat people badly because of their job then that's your problem.

      The fact that you'd wish harm on them, when people in the sex industry are being raped and murdered, make you look like a sociopath.

      Attitudes like yours are far more sick, twisted and immoral than prostitution.

  • Posted By: agkcrbs @ 12/20/2008 2:28:31 PM

    Backwards indeed, to speak of reducing the evils of a practice by increasing the practice. It's regrettable yet very obvious that in moral matters, supply creates demand. If we really want to be growing society's demand for prostitution like many commenters seem to be saying (thank you, atheism, pop culture, and Internet porn, for giving us people of such upright character), then let's be prepared to deal with the consequences, right? At the very least, let's be honest about what we're doing. This sort of thing damages the institution of marriage worse than even a redefinition of marriage does. The major dissausions from cheating on a spouses with a prostitute are: We're loyal to our spouse. It's illegal. It's a health risk. It's hard to find.

    If we make prostitution Clean! Fun! Legal! Safe! and Available!, let's be prepared for more of our children's spouses to go buy intimacy from the strangers we decriminalized -- if they can stay married at all. Let's be ready for married love to go more out of fashion. Let's be ready for more one-parent families, and for more of our grandchildren to be raised in homes of addiction.

    Worse, all of us who are here so graciously imagining our daughters "unfortunately entering" prostitution, as if we were good parents but prostitution was as random as catching a cold, should be prepared to see those daughters enslaved to it -- if not physically (as many are), then mentally. Not many shells are harder to crack than the obstinant self-justifying of sex workers who, even when the "necessity" has passed, insist that they have no other choice. All along, they had a choice -- even poverty is a better choice than selling your own soul, and breaking the souls of your many clients. But the sex industry, while it might be an easier option, is never the only industry to find work in, no matter what the economy.

    So let's be prepared, us advocates of prostitution. It's not a slippery slope -- it's a very gradual change that even Dutch traditionalism and Nevadan values are still pushing against, and it's intentionally chosen -- but it's a slope nevertheless, and we're walking downhill instead of up, back into the depths of the animalism we should be trying to "evolve" out of. Anyway, devolution happens. That's our choice to make, and by these comments, it seems like many of us are making it. Let's just be prepared to live in a very, very different world in the future. It's coming, if we choose it, and no guilt-driven ridicule or thoughtless dismissal of the cautions of moralists can avert it.

    • Posted By: johnnyt22 @ 12/20/2008 3:23:38 PM

      Atheism? How dare you associate Atheism with lack of character or moral standards. Religion has subjected the world to more pain, suffering, intolerance, poverty and ignorance than any other force in the history of mankind.

      Please get down off your high horse. By the way, just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's "hard to find." Take a look at the classified section in your local paper...that is if you read the paper.

      • Posted By: agkcrbs @ 12/20/2008 4:10:56 PM

        Interesting and unreal claim, Johnnyt22, that religion has essentially destroyed the world -- and yet, if you look at the average religious people around you, will you find people bent on misery and suffering? Or will you find people who are working to alleviate those conditions for God's and man's sake?

        You say "religion" has been the worst force in history. I say "evil" has been the worst force, and I recognize that religion teaches the opposites of all those things you listed. Therefore, it's a very short logical step to say that the destructiveness you blame on religion has actually been a departure from religion, not adherence to it. Religion has delivered and preserved for the world the morals that even today's decent atheists uphold, calling them sound ethics. So in your anger, see that you don't bite the hand that has fed mankind.

        If talking sense to you is sitting on a "high horse", then please hop up and join me.

        • Posted By: Dave_Ken @ 12/21/2008 8:11:05 PM

          How about you actually read those religious texts you're so fond of?

          If you can't see the bigotry, hatred and intolerance towards people like homosexuals, unbelievers, and indeed sex workers, then you're completely blind.

          It's blind faith that's the greatest evil on this planet, not most of the things that you believers consider immoral. Blind faith, and the behavior it leads to, has killed more people than any disease in history.

        • Posted By: Dave_Ken @ 12/21/2008 8:05:49 PM

          Most religions are full of hatred, intollerance and bigotry. Have a read of your Bible some time, the way it treats homosexuals, women, unbelievers, etc.

          If most religious people are decent it's despite their religion, not because of it.

          Blind faith is the most destructive thing in the worlld, I doubt any disease will ever kill as many people.

  • Posted By: chalyo @ 12/20/2008 10:51:26 AM

    With dating and marriage being the "farce" that it is these days, I would welcome legalized prostitution. Unfortunately, women have known for centuries the value of what they have. They use it to marry the right man, to get money and gifts, to trap guys for 18+ years under a antiquated child support system that favors them, among others. At least this way, it would take deceit out of the equation, provide protection for those who choose to enter this profession, and help the economy at the same time.

    • Posted By: hammerofthor @ 12/20/2008 11:01:25 AM

      Damn straight. When I was younger I navigated the landmine strewn battlefield of what we call dating as it is practiced today. I managed to foil the women who wanted me to impregnate them so that they could live off of the child support payments by always using a condom, and I managed to avoid the women who wanted me to marry them so that they could live off of my paycheck and my eventual life insurance and social security benefits after they worked me into an early grave. I dream of meeting a woman who wants to be an equal partner. There are such women, but they don't aggressively pursue dates like the aforementioned social parasites.

      Oh, prostitution should be legal. Almost forgot to stay on topic. If prostitution were legal, women who try to trap men into the cycle of alimony and/or child support would have a tougher time accomplishing their goals, that's for sure. Get a job, ladies.

      • Posted By: who cares at all @ 12/20/2008 11:39:10 AM

        again, I must ask...what kind of women have you been dating?!? Ick!!

        • Posted By: chalyo @ 12/20/2008 1:33:04 PM

          I can tell by your comment that you are married, and have been for some time.... I have dated lots of women; some good and some not so good. Being single and more mature now living in a city where the ratio is 14 to 1, I am having difficulty with what's left out here. Nowadays, I am no different from any woman. I want to meet a woman who is my equal, without drama or wanting to be a man, which is the problem with a lot of the single mothers that I meet. very hard at my age to find a woman without kids!!!! Any it certainly wouldn't help if she were able to match me in earning power either. Bottom line is, the choices out here are not one's that successful men would want to team up with.

          • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/20/2008 5:09:35 PM

            maybe you should choose to move... not push for prostitution---prostitution is not a substitute for love, never will be... sounds like you don't really want a relationship or commitment. you want your goodies... or at least your goodies up front first... which makes it clear about your focus when it comes to dating in the first place. you don't even honor the other commentor's marriage with your words. shameful. no wonder you can't find anyone. maybe the problem is YOU

            • Posted By: chalyo @ 12/21/2008 2:42:57 PM

              I'll tell you the same thing I told Kayletta. trying going to the gas company and telling them that you have no money, but have love instead. They will show you the door! Or try your mortgage company and see what they say.

              And I have to disagree with you. The problem is NOT me, but rather the women who are either so damaged that they'll never be any good to anyone or just plain golddiggers. I'll also say that you are obviously married, and cannot even to begin to understand what a single man goes through.

  • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 12/21/2008 12:18:35 AM

    The prostitutes are healthy and strong abled bodies which could be working in some other fields. America is a free country and everyone is free to choose. The prostitute chosed otherwise, so let them be. They can run away from their pimps, go somewhere else. The Mexicans, Cubans and Latinos are able to run away frome their poor homes with nothing, except hope, they made it. Why can't the some be done by the prostitutes? Oh, it is just because it is easier to spread your legs than doing laborious work! Then this is just a lazy excuse!

  • Posted By: cashw @ 12/20/2008 2:41:35 PM

    "agkcrbs" the law should not be abused and used against prostitution to protect the institute of marriage and prevent husbands from straying. Many Americans, like you, are so close minded to the obvious fact that sex is very important in a humans life. The more sex acts are criminalized, the more sex crimes are committed. We need to stop abusing our freedom, and stop criminalizing everything, especially consensual behavior...

    Before too long we will be living in a communist country where everything is illegal, so we don't offend the purported morals of all of the uptight liars who pretend that they are an example of perfection, and that no one elses views, beliefs, or morals matter.

    Sex is a great physical activity, and should not be treated as something dirty and to be ignored.

    If women spent more time learning how to truly please a man, and encouraging their partner to learn how to truly please them, there would be far fewer divorces in America, and the desire for prostitution would dwindle.

    • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/20/2008 3:02:35 PM

      cash,
      "If women spent more time learning how to truly please a man, and encouraging their partner to learn how to truly please them, there would be far fewer divorces in America, and the desire for prostitution would dwindle. "

      WOW--so if we women would just get it right sexually for our men, the same men that cheat and put themselves before God and their family would somehow be less selfish, more responsible, and wouldn't leave their marriages? sex is important, in fact essential for human race's survival. However, if one believes that it somehow replaces true commitment and love, then they have adopted a very skewed sense of entitlement. marriage is about service, grace not getting--goes both ways, but not just sexually. i have no idea who you are, but i can tell you will never have a lasting marriage under your current philosophy of self-entitlement.period.

      • Posted By: bac512 @ 12/20/2008 7:20:21 PM

        Wow... You think you know all the facts, don't ya? There are soooo many reasons why people cheat, lack of sex at home, lack of RESPECT at home, heck, lack of self esteem, sexual addition, whatever the reason, fact is, they do it. No matter WHAT you say or do, they're going to continue. If they have to go to the seedy parts of town and pick up someone who might have a disease, well, that's what they're gunna do, because why ever they feel they need it, they feel they need it. If there were 'certified clean' hookers, people WOULD pay more to go to them (not all people, but yes some...)... And they can pick up the same things from the people they pick up at bars, who will NEVER be certified... (Plus, for those of you who don't realize this... you can go pay $50 for a hooker, and be SURE you're gunna get laid, or you can go spend hours at a bar/club/grocery/internet trying to hook up with someone, then take that person to dinner, then MAYBE, MAYBE get sex... so, hooker -$50-100%. pickup-$0-$200-???? what's an INTELLIGENT(yes, I said INTELLIGENT), BUSY person going to opt for?) Would you go out and pay $20.000 to POSSIBLY get a new car, when you knew you could DEFINITELY get one around the corner, no questioned asked for $15,000? Heck, would you even pay $10,000 on a FIFTY PER CENT CHANCE you could get the car, when you knew, no questioned asked, you could get one for $15,000? 'that's not the same...' yeah, well... sure it is...

        • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/21/2008 12:09:23 AM

          if getting laid is your ultimate goal of a date or getting married, then your comment makes sense. A lot of people do not feel that way though... but you're right, it's much more to the point of getting tail if you just pay up front. Of course you can be inteligent and do wrong also. Anybody who says differently never studied the psycology of criminal masterminds. Just so you know, there really are nice young beautiful women that are not gold-diggers as you so seem to fear. perhaps even some that you had sex with and immediately dumped...who probably really thought they wanted to get to know you. I also know there are men that appreciate women not for their sexual abilities, but mostly for their person, you know, like in a healthy relationship? But, you're right, I'm sure that you know better...go get laid

  • Posted By: cowboy2121 @ 12/20/2008 10:35:24 AM

    confusing prostitution with human trafficking is like saying that shoes are the reason for sweat shops. there are alot more things happening to these people being trafficked in human slavery then prostitution many are forced to work in legal industrys like sporting goods manufacturing ,computer hardware manufacturing all which are legal but get their workforce outside the united states thru human trafficking .the question here is not about human trafficking but about legalizing prostitution the oldest business in the world and wether women like it or not it will continue to be a business wether it is legal or illegal.the only difference is if it was legalized then it could be regulated and controlled(age limits observed,health check ups)is it better for the men to go out and find a prostitute on the streets and possible take a disease back to his wife(and yes 7 out of 10 married men do use prostitutes even when they swear they dont)or would it be better for the men to go to a legal business where the women get a physical and tested every week so that they are gauranteed not to pass on diseases like herpes,aids, syphlis

    • Posted By: blinglessinnc @ 12/20/2008 10:48:42 AM

      Where did you get the 7 out of 10 statistic?

      • Posted By: bostonarts @ 12/20/2008 12:26:08 PM

        Yeah, I don't agree with that statistic either. I don't even think 70% of ALL men use prostitutes, let alone married men who have made vows to their wives.....

        • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/20/2008 11:23:12 PM

          I read in an article that I posted about that it was 17% of US men use prostitutes....there goes the "everybody's doing it" clause

    • Posted By: bostonarts @ 12/20/2008 12:25:07 PM

      Stop talking about men vs. women. Do you think men are the only ones who use prostitutes and that all prostitutes are female? Are there not women who use prostitutes and males that are prostitutes? I'm sure it is a fair assumption that most prostitutes are female, but prostitution is NOT a gender issue!

  • Posted By: peterkhamashta @ 12/20/2008 2:42:28 PM

    It is the oldest job in mankind history and it is prosecuted by man.
    It should be legalized and licensed and medically certified to avoid a lot of sex diseases and to avoid all kind of violent crimes and also to avoid criminal activities associated with illegal prostitution.
    By legalising it, it will generate all kind of income taxes to the federal and states and counties and cities, and it will generate all kind of jobes and related services.

    • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/20/2008 2:50:58 PM

      so would legalizing murder

      • Posted By: bac512 @ 12/20/2008 7:22:09 PM

        how would legalizing murder generate all kinds of income taxes to the federal and states and counties and cities? how will it generate all kinds of jobes.. er, jobs and related services? 'I will murder anyone for $19.95....'?

        • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/20/2008 10:46:19 PM

          yes, actually. Bounty hunter would mean something a little different... those hired to carry out murders (some people don't like to do messy things themselves...eww) would earn dollars and just like performing pedicures, would be taxed on the service. voila!

    • Posted By: bac512 @ 12/20/2008 7:27:46 PM

      There will always be people trying to do wrong in everything.... So, lets not take the time to TRY and get SOME of them to do it right? You can point out all the bad and try to make it look like that's going to be a majority, but, in reality, you're probably talking less than 5% compared to 100% of illegal activity now. If it's legalized, you think MORE people will be forced into it than are forced into it NOW?

  • Posted By: johnadams22 @ 12/20/2008 4:59:40 PM

    Normally I'm not that much into platitudes, but this one is absolutely brilliant.....

    There's sex for money, and there's sex for free, sex for money - is cheaper!!!

    • Posted By: bac512 @ 12/20/2008 7:46:19 PM

      you got that soooo right..... as I said to another post... $50 for a guaranteed sex act, or $0-$100 for a CHANCE, which could be 0% to 100%... you're paying for it either way....'well I'm married, I don't have to pay for it.. or I have a g/f or b/f I don't have to pay for it....' is she/he supporting you? they you're the whore... ohh, you both pay 100% of your OWN bills... Dinner, separate checks, live separate (can't live together, cause then you donno who's using what part of the water/electric bill!).... 'that's not for sex, that's just because we support each other'... whatever, when the other stops giving you what you WANT, how much longer are you gunna continue to support them? when they stop supporting you, how much longer are you gunna give them what they want? (generalize now... cause I know there are a few out there... and others that will stand here and swear up and down everything I just said is wrong, but, you know I'm right.... :) )

  • Posted By: agkcrbs @ 12/20/2008 3:42:39 PM

    Cashw, I'm glad that we both have the goal of reducing divorce and the desire for prostitution. This shows that we both can recognize negative effects coming from those things.

    You bring up the question of the province of law, and you say it would be "abusing" the law to outlaw any consensual behavior. That's the fundamental question, I think, applying to most issues in our country: should we have the freedom to harm ourselves, or destroy ourselves? Some of us think that, as a member of the human family, we have a responsibility towards that family. Some of us do not want that connection or that responsibility, and would rather all things were legalized, as long as the only victim was the criminal themself.

    Well, it's a question of the heart. It's not a question of "uptight liars" who are anti-sex -- first of all, you can't blame an ex-smoker for telling people not to smoke. If anything, it shows his intelligence and ability to recognize his mistake, not hypocrisy. But even pro-sex Wiccans have updated their emphasis from "harm none" to "harm none, including myself". All of us need other people's interference sooner or later, beginning with our entrance into the world. It's as if we were designed to be social beings rather than individual beings. We personally don't always do what's best for ourselves, because our eyes, you know, point outward. We can't always see ourselves clearly. So I think most of us fall on the "connected", "responsible" side of law. Most of us, I hope, if we saw a dude about to jump off a bridge or something, would try to help him somehow because we see that he's past the point of helping himself -- his consent has gotten seriously confused by some trauma. We're not going to sit there smugly and rejoice in his freedom, and watch him jump... and still call ourselves good people. And most of us are not in a wild rush to legalize all things, even very negative things, if we can just show that they are "consensual". Consent and freedom are crucial, but they should not be the absolute determinants of law.

    • Posted By: bac512 @ 12/20/2008 7:38:55 PM

      I believe people should be able to do whatever they want, as long as it doesn't harm someone else. Yes, I myself would try to help someone if I saw them doing something that was going to hurt them, or even possible hurt them, but, it's not MY RIGHT, or YOUR RIGHT to FORCE THEM to stop doing what they want to do. Just make the government a little stronger.. I HAVE to wear a seatbelt? WHY IS IT YOUR BUSINESS?! WHY can't I smoke pot at home? (ohh wait, I can, it's just illegal to possess it, I believe, not illegal to smoke it...(figure that one out?!)). So, you should be free to tell me I might get an STD from having sex with everyone I can, paid or free, but, it should also be free TO HAVE SEX WITH EVERYONE I CAN, PAID OR FREE... (not by force, cause that would be harming someone other than myself.)....IF I get an STD, then give it to someone else, well then, THAT should be (and is, I believe) against the law, because that harms someone else... 'what if you don't know and pass it to your wife/girlfriend?' ignorance of the law is no excuse.

  • Posted By: wildbeast @ 12/20/2008 7:07:56 PM

    If we deal strictly with the issue on emotion, we will always have crimes and criminals. But if put our emotions to the side and look at from a different light. Most Prositutes do not went it legalized, they will be making less money. But like a lot of things never get better with out an excepting mind. What I do or choose to do is my business, big bussiness has ways of screwing you for everything they want perefcetly legal right, in most cases yes. Do they pay tazes yes are all worker highly skilled and well educated not always.

    It a morale delemia, and it has always been that way just as folks who do not smoke want to control cigerettes, and those who enjoya good drink, are under the continual fire from Mad, and every memeber of the NRA is under fire by the Handgun control Inc. We need to except people have a right do these things . So why should we continue to make this a crime and place these people in jail.
    They meet the criteria, they work, they have jobs, they pay food and medical out there own pockets, they if truely professional use safe sex practices. Some ven pay taxes, under animos means, so have college education with MS and BS degrees. They are responsible and productive.

    Why not? Not use emotion to evaluate the problem, it deson't work.

  • Posted By: gdccreation @ 12/20/2008 12:44:38 PM

    agoodbadhabit it is legal in the netherlands and in Germany please do me a favor GET EDUCATED!!!:)

    • Posted By: agoodbadhabit @ 12/20/2008 5:35:54 PM

      And how about you work on your reading comprehension?\

      Yes, it's legal, which is EXACTLY why there are more REPORTED incidents of violence against sex workers. Because the victims (i.e., sex workers) can go to the authorities without fear of being arrested themselves.

      Logic, maybe?

    • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/20/2008 3:42:10 PM

      gdccreation,
      perhaps you are the one that needs to get educated :) this particular article actually stated that prostitution itself was not legal... just the selling of.

  • Posted By: strategytraining @ 12/20/2008 4:32:49 PM

    How sad that prostitution has now been become so sanitized that we call it "sex work" with a straight face. It's not nor has it ever been "work". Most work requires a learning curve....school, apprenticeship, on the job training. I doubt most people would voluntarily send their children to vocational school to learn sex work. It's a "vocation" that can indeed earn a lot of money, but the life of a prostitute is short. Beauty fades, there's always someone younger, kinkier, cheaper. All the data shows that prostitutes all over the world face more violence than even the most dangerous real work occupations. Having worked for a decade to prevent the sexual trafficking of girls and women, I got a wake up call about just how far people will go to create the illusion that sex work should be supported. That prostitutes should have the same rights as plumbers. That society should accept them as part of the legitimate work force. This is just such nonsense. As if prostitutes add value to society, contribute a good or service that is in any way a "benefit". In fact, like professional athletes and movie stars, only the elite prostitutes make any real money and can look forward to some degree of safety. But these $500-1000 night hookers are the rarity. The millions who go down for $25 are just desperate. The second and third world families that prostitute their kids claiming it is the only way to make money for the family is also no reason to support child prostitution....the same human rights the world has signed on to forbidding child labor applies to child prostitutes. I'm not advocating abstinence. But to support sex work as legitimate work is simply perpetuating cruel and inhuman servitude and the degradation of women and men who somehow feel they have no other worth than to sell their sex. What a sad commentary on humankind that our only response to the demand of the global prostitution trade for more rights for the flesh trade is to agree with them rather than take responsible social action to do whatever we can to prevent prostitution, help those get out of it, and support them in a transition to a working life that will give them respect, not violence, death and disease.

  • Posted By: Trish32780 @ 12/20/2008 12:14:54 PM

    Men are programed internally to reproduce. They have to have sex. For some reason we ve made sex dirty, well at least dirty for women to have. Thats why we have so many filthy names for women who participate in sex and none for the men who instigate it. They re the ones who buy it and usuall y there s a man behind every prostitute taking the money she earns. Legalize it make it safe for women to cut out those who profit on her and make sure she s healthy. Its not like we re ever going to stop it. This way we all win, its up to the women if they want to be out there, we keep diseases down and best of all we can tax it. By the way legalize marijuanna while we re at it, probaly pay off the national debt between the both of them.

    • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/20/2008 4:24:57 PM

      trish, you've been fooled... if a man has demanded sex from you as a means of committment, it meant that he wasn't that into you! he was using you! since when has ANY man ever died or even fallen ill due to lack of sex??? LOLOLOLOLOLOL that's a ploy by little boys to get what they think they deserve... and you deserve better--don't let a man tell you that, please... there are men that will openly admit that they love sex, adore it even, but do not need it as a means of survival. furthermore they respect and cherish the women they are with and are manly-men, not bent by the demands of the feminist movement. how refreshing

  • Posted By: JMT81007 @ 12/20/2008 12:29:11 PM

    why is it ok for a woman to be a stripper and let strange men touch her, tip her, etc. but a hooker is bad or low class??
    If you want to sell your body, and someone wants to buy it, it is a transaction between 2 consenting adults...
    Legalize the sex industry, tax the workers like any other job..

    • Posted By: jgholster @ 12/20/2008 4:19:37 PM

      it isn't--no one said just because one thing is legal, it is moral. lying is legal, not moral... cheating on your spouse is legal, not moral. one does not legitimize the other! stripping IS wrong--and DOES cause problems at home also....j

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse