The Power Of Prayer

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: kjmwright @ 12/21/2008 12:15:43 AM

    How does anyone make sense of the world today? There are no fixed points to make. Everything shifts around. When I was young the best thing in the world was touted as the "open" marriage which would actually be remaining a state of nonmarriage on the part of everyone. There would just be sex........all the time in every interaction. Now we are going to have gay marriage, heterosexual marriage, prostitutional marriage, child marriage, just plain weird marriage (probably mating with your pet Doberman Pincher). What is wrong with this country? Have we lost all our marbles??????? A man who looks like a man with a bad beard is going to say a prayer at a celebration we have every time we elect a new president and suddenly he is put under a microscope because he has the "balls" to say outloud what he believes in a country noted for freedom of speech as one of it's civil rights and he is criticized because he is violating some other persons "civil" rights??????? What a country. I could give the invocation, if only the President Elect would ask me. I don't have beard but I know I could pray for this country. By the way, do all the liberals continue to think that getting rid of the electoral college is an important idea now that that college elected a Democrat for the presidency. I am a woman and I am white and my name could easily be the reverend Mrs. Wright for I am from a state where becoming a minister and/or a chaplain is about as easy as becoming a prostitute which is the state from which Rick Warren comes from and the state from which the electorate spend millions of dollars to say on the ballot for the second time that same sex marriage is not what the people want. And due to the former governor Moombeam, it looks like the electorate will have to put the stupid idea on the ballot for a third time which will once again be defeated (we can hope) and maybe the charm which will put an end to all this crass stupidity (and waste of money) on the part of the government and the people.

  • Posted By: arpad @ 12/20/2008 1:32:21 PM

    Response to Discernment: Thanks four your thoughtful comments. The first thing I think we need to clarify is that there are gays and there are gays--just as there are evangelical Christians and there are evangelical Chrisitans. I consider myself a gay of the level-headed variety (though I don't at all agree with Chris Crane). That means I'd never think of mailing white powder to an opponent or in any way putting an opponent's health in danger.

    That being said, I storngly feel that the choice of Warren was a bad one (as my earlier postings explain). The reason, again, is that he seeks to impose his beliefs in the public arena, to the extent where he fights to deny a basic right to gays: the right of any two abled-and-consenting adults to marry each other. THe only reason this isn't considered a right is because "the bible forbids it." That's precisely what imposing your faith on others means.

    By allowing Warren to deliver the invocation, Obama is saying that this desire to impose one's faith on others is an acceptable one in America. Again, it's not a matter of what Warren's faith is--it's only a matter of what he feels he has the right (as a "majority") to do with it.

    Am I "cantankerous" for feeling this way. I don't think so. Would you like to be called cantankerous for getting tired of the majority describing your deepest loving relationship as "just sex," as "sinful," as "perverse," as "needing to be fixed," and on and on. Would you like to be called cantankerous for having your very spirit denounced if it doesn't fit in with someone else's view of what God "wants."

    Please try, hard as it might be for you, to not think in terms of "the gay community" but rather to equate your deepest relationship to a gay person's deepest relationship. And then see how it would feel to experience what gays have experienced over that relationship. It's not our choice, it's not our hobby and it's ot our "agenda"-- it's our life and soul.

    Does that explain all the anger? Does that make us seem not so "cantankerous" after all?

    • Posted By: Fedupwithlies @ 12/21/2008 12:11:05 AM

      To arpad,
      HERE HERE, VERY VERY WELL SAID!!

  • Posted By: Michelle M @ 12/20/2008 7:51:39 PM

    The "biological in origin" argument wouldn't hold water as an excuse to follow those desires, even if proven. My alcoholism (8 years sober) is certainly genetically wired -- my family is full of alcoholics, although it wasn't modeled to me while I was growing up. I saw my father drunk once my whole young life, and he kept the alcohol hidden. I found out as an adult that he was known as a drunk among his peers. My Mom was a teetotaler. We lived on a different coast from the rest of the alcoholics in my family. I was positive I'd never touch alcohol, just out of a moral standard I'd established for myself. So there goes the "nurture" argument with me, at least. However, my first sip of alcohol at 19 immediately triggered a binge, and that continued to be a way of life for me for many years. The people I surrounded myself with from that point on tolerated, looked the other way from, or even encouraged my drinking. Would you say that my alcoholism should be given a stamp of approval, because it's not harming anyone, and indeed is even "fun" and "natural" for me? I was most assuredly "born this way" -- but I don't have to follow through and feed that desire with the behavior it craves. I have to live alcohol-free. It's just the way it is.

    • Posted By: seabiscuit @ 12/20/2008 7:58:18 PM

      I'm a recoverying alcoholic sober 13 years now. That is not the same thing. How often do you masterbate and what are you thinking of when you do? Hypocrite. Trying using your other hand and shut up.

      • Posted By: Michelle M @ 12/20/2008 8:09:52 PM

        I disagree that it's not the same thing. As I stated earlier, we are all born with desires that are directly in opposition to God, hence Jesus' statement to the Pharisees that lust alone condemns us. Righteousness doesn't come by way of resisting those desires, as Jesus pointed out again and again. It only comes by trusting that He alone can reconcile us to God despite who we are born to be -- rebels.

        • Posted By: seabiscuit @ 12/20/2008 8:26:07 PM

          Surprise for you Mary, gays are no more lustful than straights so get over yourself. Bottom line your bible is not my laws so shove off. I follow Christ, he was a loving person and he knew the human trials of lust were for each of us to fight as a personal battle, so stop being a sanctimonious, self-righteous hypocrite, Jesus hated people who act like you. You aren't gay, you have no idea the hell your create for your gay brothers and sisters, we will pray for you oh hateful one.

          • Posted By: Michelle M @ 12/20/2008 8:53:45 PM

            Gays and straights are equally lustful. I don't understand where you and I are in disagreement where God is concerned, so I must assume that we're just misreading one another.

            Do you believe that desires are neither moral or immoral in and of themselves, no matter what those desires are? Please help me to understand.

            • Posted By: seabiscuit @ 12/20/2008 9:56:39 PM

              I don't believe that love for the same sex is immoral or having sexual urges for another man is sinful in and of itself. In the bible when David was in the forrest and Jonathon went looking for him and found him, the greek translation reads that "David was so happy to see him that when they embraced David exceeded himself". This actual translation is considered by many to mean ejaculation. When the Centurian asked Jesus to heal his young male lover, the translation in King James was changed to "servant' and even to "wife". Jesus didn't say oh no, I'm not healing you because you guys are gay. No Jesus said take me to him and I will heal him and when the Centuriun refused to impose on Jesus and said "just knowing you are healing him is enough, I will not trouble you to go to him" Jesus said "this man has more faith than all of you put together." It's the only place in the Bible documented where Jesus praises someone. We're sexual beings. If we were allowed to love each other less emphasis would be placed on sex. Obviously we are all starved for love as we live in a heterosexual facist culture that is obsessed with sex entwined with violence. You people are really perverted and it's even contaminated gay people with your violent and dishonest cultural contract between men and women. Thankfully God made me gay and it exempts me from the games people play in a heterofacist paradigm. We choose to love each other and that goes against your sadistic paradigm. We're actually much more spiritual than your dogmatic religion permits you to be. I thank God he made me gay and me instead of you and your ilk. My God allows me to sin and learn for myself. But I'm happy to pray for all you sick people and go about my happy life without any desire to help or change you, however, you have no right to impose your presumed morality on me. We are all sexual beings and it's a personal gift and battle for each of us. I consider myself a moral gay man who has one life that God gave me in order to make my own mistakes and learn from them. My indescretions have been between legally consenting adults just as yours have. We are free to make our own mistakes and live our own lives as we deem fit within the law. Your perceived morals are not my laws. So back off. I pay taxes and I'm entitled to my own tradition of marriage. Did you know that the first 1000 marriages performed by the Catholic church were gay marriages? Heterosexual didn't marry for love. They were bound to family contracts for the business of arranged wealth and property. Gay people were the first marriages to marry strictly for love. We've been here as long as you have and we've been oppressed for as long by you. It's time you stopped torturing good decent gay sisters and brothers.

              • Posted By: Michelle M @ 12/20/2008 11:03:07 PM

                Seabiscuit, if you believe that without Christ, you have no way of being reconciled to God because of who you are -- simply by virtue of being human (as I am) -- then we must agree to disagree on homosexuality and love one another despite our disagreement. This reminds me of Paul heading into Jerusalem and going behind closed doors to duke it out with Peter, James and John about circumcision. The whole Book of Acts is filled with stories about the burden the apostles were faced with in trying to apply what Jesus had taught them, without Him there to ask!

                Ultimately, we can agree that we are set free from the penalty of sin only by trusting in Christ and Him alone -- the basics of our faith. The Holy Spirit will lead each of us into truth as we study God's Word. I'm certainly open to being mistaken, as I have been in the past when it comes to understanding the Christian faith I've entered into. :)

                I've studied the life of David at LENGTH in light of homosexuality, and have not been able to come to a conclusion either way where his relationship to Jonathan is concerned. It certainly appears that Jonathan at least loved David in that way, but it's impossible to know for sure. However, David's example to us -- for example, after murdering Uriah -- is that he was a man who recognized his sin and repented, always seeking to pick himself up and follow God, always ultimately grief-stricken over his sin against God. We don't model ourselves after David in his sin, but in his humility before God. And we learn from his story that God loves a man who is "after" His heart despite being a moral failure (as we all are).

                That, I believe, is where you and I hopefully agree as well.

                • Posted By: seabiscuit @ 12/20/2008 11:48:28 PM

                  If your so worried about homosexuality ask yourself this: why are you not equally worried about those touch the skin of a pig? In the same place where it says men shall not sleep together for it is an abomination in the eyes of God it says the same thing about touching the skin of a pig. Shouldn't you pray for Football playing athletes just as fervently as you do against homosexuality?!!!! How 'bout straight men who love to watch two women getting it on? At yet you're on here, hating on gays....mmm....what does that really say about you? Why are you not just as biblically offended by straight man's homosexuality for 2 women? Is it because it's accepted as part of the heterofacist paradigm? Yeah, we're really hateful about 2 men loving each other, such a threat to you women who really should be just as concerned about other parts of the bible that are just damning of other acts. You know in Dueteronomy a woman who grabs her husband's rival by his genitiles is subject by biblical law to have her hand cut off at the wrist for it is an abomination in the eyes of God, so don't be grabbin stuff don't belong to yeah. Don't believe me? read your bible - all these people on here quoting the bible and have never even turned a page, I can bet on it. You people are disgusting bigots. Just deplorable haters and discriminators and we're sick of your dictating to everyone else what you don't even follow yourself - so go masterbate and shut the hell up and leave us alone Rick Warren you liar!

    • Posted By: unorthodox @ 12/20/2008 9:36:03 PM

      Congrats on the maintaining of soberness. From what you said, you must have had an extra tough struggle to resist your desire for drunkenness.

  • Posted By: tired and old @ 12/20/2008 4:22:23 PM

    HEY ! SEABISCUIT.

    WHEN WE VOTE WE TRY TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

    WE VOTE FOR THE BEST OF THE WORSE.

    IT IS NOT A SHOCK THAT MANY AMERICANS FAIL TO VOTE.

    IN MANY CASES IF NOT ALL, THEY ARE SMARTER THEN THOSE WHO DO.

    I VOTED FOR OBAMA AND FOR HIS HOPE AND CHANGE ------ I REGRET IT ALL READY.

    HIS ADMINISTRATION IS PACKED WITH POLITICAL POND SCUM:

    SECRETARY OF STATE --- HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON A LIAR AND EMBELLISHER.

    HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES --- TOM DASCHLE.

    RAHM EMANUEL --- HILLARY CLINTON SPY AND VICIOUS ATTACK DOG.

    THE LIST IS LONG.

    BARACK OBAMA -------- LIBERAL DEMOCRAT .

    • Posted By: Fedupwithlies @ 12/20/2008 11:43:30 PM

      Roberto Gonzalez, Jack Abromhoff, Larry Craig, , and varoius other MORALLY HYPOCRITICAL pit bull REPUBLICAN SCUM on the floor of congress twisitng Democratic arms to get extremest Bush legislation passed...and the criminality of W's administration pails in comparrison to anything Clinton ever did w/Monica in the Oval Office...

  • Posted By: asp2write @ 12/20/2008 11:00:24 PM

    Two points, first, wow, Obama chose a Rick Warren, a man who shares his beliefs and views, BIG shock, Obama made it clear from the biggining he is against gay marriage, yet people only heard what they wanted, get over it.

    Second point. Gay marriage, I think everyone is stupid. I'm married, and having a same sex couple being married doesn't bother me, it doesn't deminish what my wife and I have, so I think people need to grow up on that point, but on the gay side of it, they are even dumber. They will never get gay marriage in all states, it won't happen. So rather then fight for nothing, why wouldn't they unify under a civil union, get it passed into a federal law, and then work on it from there? But they waste time and money on a hopeless cause. Not all states are like us in Massachusetts, so take what you can get.

    • Posted By: ocodan @ 12/20/2008 11:31:23 PM

      Yeah, I agree... besides supposedly 50% of marriages end in divorce any way. I say we go for something that is free of religion with the same rights and benefits of marriage and is open to straight and gay people and call it pairrage?

  • Posted By: writinmomma @ 12/20/2008 11:18:10 PM

    I will reiterate what Chris stated:

    "Excluding those with whom we disagree is the antithesis of unifying." -Chris Crain

    You cannot have unity without accepting ALL Views. It does not mean ALL must agree with them, but at least be willing to accept them. Unity does not happen when one side changes - both sides have to 1) want to change and 2) actually choose to change, and put the change into action.

    • Posted By: ocodan @ 12/20/2008 11:29:05 PM

      Unity by definition doesn't exclude people. Religion excludes people therefore it is not unifying.

  • Posted By: ocodan @ 12/20/2008 11:22:39 PM

    I suggest that marriage maybe historically intertwined with religion. I also suggest that the coupling of two individuals (both gay or straight) in a loving relationship is conducive to the pursuit of happiness and provides community benefits, both economic and social. As such, I think we should create a legal, social construct similar to marriage but by another name that is free from the underpinnings, limitations or baggage of religion. One that affords the exact same rights and benefits as marriage. I say we call it pairrage. Thoughts?

  • Posted By: Billy02118 @ 12/20/2008 11:21:51 PM

    Why does Chris Crain keep bringing up marriage? Exactly like Leah keeps saying: This isn't about marriage. This isn't about policy. It's about respect.

  • Posted By: unorthodox @ 12/20/2008 7:36:12 PM

    Most conservative Christians don't seem to understand that their religious freedom is connected to the same freedom principle that others in America also want to benefit from. That freedom includes the freedom to do right and wrong things, as long as the wrong actions don't harm someone else against his/her will. Would they want the Taliban to be dictating their moral code to everyone, or the Pope to dictate via the government his opposition to the conception control pill or diaphragms and spermicides? Likewise, there should be freedom for polygamy and polyandry.

    • Posted By: amy04790460 @ 12/20/2008 11:14:28 PM

      When you do something wrong you hurt somebody else. That's why it's wrong.

  • Posted By: hann02 @ 12/20/2008 4:31:56 PM

    I guess I am confused, the last I heard is that Obama does not believe in same-sex marriages, so why are people dismissing this? He is playing both sides, and some are acting like he is going to change things for LGBT, I really think that this issue with RIck Warren is just a glimpse at what you are going to see from Obama, you are going to see how he plays both sides, I think we are going to be very disappointed when this is all said and done.

    • Posted By: Fedupwithlies @ 12/20/2008 11:08:39 PM

      Well, even if this is true he's merely taking recent history into account...The right wing of this country started berating and demonizing Bill Clinton via Rush Limbaugh et al. long before anybody ever even knewKen Starr or Monica Lewinsky even existed...As much as I disagree with the Rick Warren decision, Obama is merely trying to keep the American Taliban at bay by trying to govern from the middle, while telling the Limbaughs and the Boenerhs to shove it, I'll govern the way I see fit....Fair and balanced, like it or not. I sooo hope not, so that their true nazi colors come shining through....

  • Posted By: miamijer @ 12/20/2008 11:01:45 PM

    "You and I would agree, Leah, that he is flat wrong on the history of marriage. NEWSWEEK's wonderful cover story on gay marriage pointed out that marriage included polygamy for a lot more of those 5,000 years than it excluded it. "

    The point that Warren is trying to make is that marriage has been between a man and a woman since recorded history, and polygamy is still marriage between the opposite sex even if it includes multiple wives (and concubines as well). That is the point that Chris and Leah miss in their respective diatribes. Polygamy typically excludes homosexual unions.

    ???The whole point behind the parade of horribles in a slippery slope argument is that "y" and "z" (polygamy and incest) are not the same, but much worse, than "x" (gay marriage and civil unions)." Since when is polygamy worse than gay marriage or homosexual sex? That is definitely the opinion of a gay individual who views heterosexual and homosexual relationships as morally comparable. Although I would agree that pedophilia or incest is worse because a victim is involved, the bottom line is that God abhors ALL sin, no matter what brand of sexual deviance or immorality. Obviously, with that said, there is no sin which is better or worse in God's eyes. Sin separates us from God, no matter the origin.

    "We are publicly pillorying him as a 'homophobe.'" What exactly is a "homophobe"? I do not support gay relationships in any way, shape, or manner. Yet I am not "afraid" of gay people. Just because people do not support the gay agenda does not automatically mean that they fear homosexuals. It is one of the most overused terms along with hate and bigot!

    "Whether you see it as a stretch or not, the person charged with invoking God's presence at the beginning of the ceremony is serving as the spiritual representative of our nation as a whole. That's just a fact." I totally agree; that's why I'm happy that Barry didn't choose Reverend Wright or some liberal Episcopal pastor to do the inauguration instead.

  • Posted By: DWillson @ 12/20/2008 10:33:37 PM

    marley07

    you are not a true believer

    you are a true follower of men who interpreted things over the years.

    just as people a hundred years ago who claimed to be true beleivers and told others they weren't believed slavery was justified in the Bible and women should be allowed to be beaten by their husbands...Christs teachings are mired down in statements reinterpreted by men from generation to genration with all the interpretations that tried to empower men along the way.

    including this issue

    • Posted By: Bradbo @ 12/20/2008 11:01:13 PM

      The process of exegesis seeks to interpret what the writer meant to convey to the original recipients within their culture and time. That understanding is then exposited into what that message would mean in our day and age. What you are talking about is eisegesis, which is when individuals in another culture and time seek to interpret the meaning of the text and read in their own cultural baggage into the text. This is what the gay community is doing to the Bible when they attempt to use Scripture to justify their cause or ignore those teachings that call it a sin.

  • Posted By: miamijer @ 12/20/2008 11:00:57 PM

    "You and I would agree, Leah, that he is flat wrong on the history of marriage. NEWSWEEK's wonderful cover story on gay marriage pointed out that marriage included polygamy for a lot more of those 5,000 years than it excluded it. "

    The point that Warren is trying to make is that marriage has been between a man and a woman since recorded history, and polygamy is still marriage between the opposite sex even if it includes mutliple wives (and concubines as well). That is the point that Chris and Leah miss in their respecitve diatribes. Polygamy typically exludes homosexual unions.

    " The whole point behind the parade of horribles in a slippery slope argument is that "y" and "z" (polygamy and incest) are not the same, but much worse, than "x" (gay marriage and civil unions)." Since when is polygamy worse than gay marriage or homosexual sex? That is definitely the opinion of a gay individual who views heterosexual and homosexual relationships as morally comparable. Although I would agree that pedophilia or incest is worse because a victim is involved, the bottom line is that God abhors ALL sin, no matter what brand of sexual deviance or immorality. Obviously, with that said, there is no sin which is better or worse in God's eyes. Sin seperates us from God, no matter the origin.

    "we are publicly pillorying him as a 'homophobe.'" What exactly is a "homophobe"? I do not support gay relationships in any way, shape, or manner. Yet I am not "afraid" of gay people. Just because people do not support the gay agenda does not automatically mean that they fear homosexuals. It is one of the most overused terms along with hate and bigot!

    "Whether you see it as a stretch or not, the person charged with invoking God's presence at the beginning of the ceremony is serving as the spiritual representative of our nation as a whole. That's just a fact." I totally agree; that's why I'm happy that Barry didn't choose Reverend Wright or some liberal Episcopal pastor to do the inaugeration instead.

  • Posted By: curve_ball @ 12/20/2008 10:59:58 PM

    Mocha33, I understand what you are saying, but there is difference between respecting people's right to belief and respecting their particular beliefs. I have no problem with anyone believing anything as long as it causes no harm. I can respect their right to believe without respecting their beliefs. In Islam, infidels (those who do not believe in god) and apostates (those who have forsaken Islam) should be killed. Should we "respect" these beliefs?

    Religions are fundamentally mutually exclusive and insular. They have no place in government.

  • Posted By: CelestialOtter @ 12/20/2008 8:54:18 PM

    The gay outrage is fully justified. There is no doubt in my mind that Jesus of Nazareth would have some choice words for Rick Warren if he were here. There are much wiser, much more holy men that Obama could have picked. But remember the stakes Obama is playing for -- actual meaningful change -- and the sad realities of our world today. For him to do measurable good, he will need the support of the conservatives. That is going to mean picking some battles -- and some concessions right up front. LGBT folks, I'm sure Obama has your best long-term interests in mind. Look past this to future things it might help enable. First we have to get everybody back to the table. We've had eight years of moronic, unproductive hard-headed behavior, and people have just stopped hearing each other.

    • Posted By: phyllis AZ @ 12/20/2008 10:59:44 PM

      Hello,

      Thank you for the beautiful post, it???s hard to read being under the bus. Yes, there are many sad realizations in the world. Having the man you worked as had for stab you heart for the religion right is one of them. Civil rights need to apply to everyone or none of us are free.

    • Posted By: seabiscuit @ 12/20/2008 9:59:39 PM

      Obama has his best interest in mind and no one elses. You were a fool to vote for such a liar. You will see. Obama is Bush. Mabus

  • Posted By: Kaelinda @ 12/20/2008 10:57:42 PM

    Not many Gay and Lesbian people are obsessed with Rick Warren. He's one minister among thousands - maybe hundreds of thousands - who are accused of thinking Gay and Lesbians don't exist. Yet, how can he believe that civil unions are reasonable for the LGBT community if such people don't exist? Leah's argument is fallacious on that ground alone. I HEARD Rick Warren's statement about the "slippery slope" that Chris mentions; but Leah is so wrapped up in her own ideology that she can't even detect the possibility that she's definitely and outrageously wrong.

  • Posted By: Citadelgrrl05 @ 12/20/2008 4:33:22 PM

    I am not trying to be insensitive to the lgbt community, but you guys do ealize there were a lot of christians that voted for obama that like rick warren, so what is is trying to do is uite all sides and be inclusive, even of those who you don't agree with. So how can you say in one breath the inauguration is about inclusiveness, and then say Rick warren should not be there that is rediculous. I guess you guys were not listening to president obama when he said that he wanted to bring people together. i guess people thaought it was just rhetoric like the re of the politician, no h meant it. His whole lkife is an example of comprimise nd bringin eople together, next time if a politician says something beleiev him, I guess you didnt b/c so many have said they were going to unify the country and didn't . why should democrats do to the othere side what he hated for 8 years, silence our voices and we had no pesiden to listen to us. At least out of all this people can understand why he was friends with rev. wright even though he does not agree with all of what rev. wright preaches. Come on people this is change, I know it hurts sometime, and I say this b/c I know that the lgbt community is not going to be the only community that Obama bring compromise to..This is chnae and this is what i voted for, not keeping tehe old divisons, I am sick of it,it has gotten us nowhere but year, divided and disillutioned..GROW UP GOLKS

    • Posted By: seabiscuit @ 12/20/2008 5:42:29 PM

      Because it condones discrimination that's why! We must object each and every time we are discriminated against by those who would impose their values, false and hypocritical, on people who's opposing values are just as valid. We're not trying to force our beliefs on you, we want our rights and we want them now. WE PAY TAXES! FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM IN OUR PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS TO LIVE our LIVES FREELY, OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS TO THE WORD MARRIAGE AND THE REST OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE THAT YOU DON'T OWN! Heteros are the most perverted people, their contract between men and women is so incredibly dishonest, sexist, gender biased on both sides, an aberation of grotesque sex and violence so intrinsically intwined. 2 naked men can kill each other in a ring for the bloodlust pleasure of women but god forbid they embrace in brotherly love as taught by Jesus in Christ conscienceness, even platonically. Man you people are messed up! But we don't tell you to stop assaulting each other, only that you stop assaulting us and leave us the hell alone! The only people writing comments on hear that dismiss this dialogue are straight people who very clearly are not the ones being discriminated against. Take the beam out of your own eyes you morons and get out of our lives! We don't give a s-t what you believe about us - go away! Leave us alone! WE PAY TAXES JUST LIKE YOU. BOTTOM LINE.

      • Posted By: Fedupwithlies @ 12/20/2008 10:57:24 PM

        Not only that but, your taxes go to support their childrens schools, which most gay men and women will never have a need of, and the gay men and women that do have children will be castigated as being unfit parents...The property taxes of gays and lesbians go up but, they get no representation...Taxation w/out representation...never was there a more American argument!!!

  • Posted By: jalcides @ 12/20/2008 10:54:52 PM

    I'm just sick and tired of all these people within our gay community telling me that i have put up with the likes of Warren just because it serves our politicians. Wake up gay people, we and only we have the power of change in our hands. Nobody will ever give us any rights but instead will take them from unless we unite and fight. What has the Log Cabin Republicans have done for our community with thei "work from the inside" politics. What has the Democrats done lately but promises and once they're elected throw us under the bus and to lions. This is not Uniifying our country, thats what Bush called it when he used our rights to get people to vote for him. this is an insult to our core, to our moral fiber, to our own existense. It's just simply and Insult to gay people and no matter what we say they just simply don't care, Remeber the Reagan years when our people were dying of Aids and they ignored us for 12 years. When Clinton gave us up to gain grounds with the Republicans. and Bush try to take our rights in every way he could.

    Thanks to those that are stading with us who defend us like Mayor Gavin from San Francisco.

  • Posted By: jalcides @ 12/20/2008 10:52:06 PM

    I'm just sick and tired of all these people within our gay community telling me that i have put up with the likes of Warren just because it serves our politicians. Wake up gay people, we and only we have the power of change in our hands. Nobody will ever give us any rights but instead will take them from unless we unite and fight. What has the Log Cabin Republicans have done for our community with thei "work from the inside" politics. What has the Democrats done lately but promises and once they're elected throw us under the bus and to lions. This is not Uniifying our country, thats what Bush called it when he used our rights to get people to vote for him. this is an insult to our core, to our moral fiber, to our own existense. It's just simply and Insult to gay people and no matter what we say they just simply don't care, Remeber the Reagan years when our people were dying of Aids and they ignored us for 12 years. When Clinton gave us up to gain grounds with the Republicans. and Bush try to take our rights in every way he could.

    Thanks to those that are stading with us who defend us like Mayor Gavin from San Francisco.

  • Posted By: DWillson @ 12/20/2008 10:51:08 PM

    Mocha33

    that is the point beleif in slavery ...belief that you are going to hell for masturbation... beleif that another human life is less value than your own

    or fraternization between races is unnatural and an offense to God as pedophilia and bestiality

    all things that in the last centurywere taught...in the last few decades were taught

    do you think Obama would be okay with someone saying that about interracial marriage or about slavery...

    and then give him the honor of standing next to him...

    and if he didn't give the person who thought wives should be subserviant to their husbands...would that be him being intolerant...because the preachers beliefs say that women should vbe allowed to be beaten by their husbands or that people should be alllowed to own other humnans as slaves...because he says the Bible tells him that

    is that intolerance

    no

    God gave you all a brain and Christ hopes you use it.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse