1: Barack Obama

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: FredianoB @ 12/23/2008 12:51:10 PM

    We had our choice of fascist alternatives in WWII, and we chose damn well, because under the current soft fascism, we at least have a prayer of making it stand down, while under the alternatives, there was none.
    Our choice was, internment camps vs concentration and death camps, and we chose damn well, enabling every free world economic opportunity that has happened since.

  • Posted By: nobleatheist @ 12/23/2008 10:44:44 AM

    On August 8, 1853, New York Daily Tribune carried an article by Karl Marx, which ends with the following remark; "When a great social revolution shall have mastered the results of the bourgeois epoch, the market of the world and the modern powers of production, and subjected them to COMMON CONTROL OF THE MOST ADVANCED PEOPLES, then only will human progress cease to resemble that hideous, pagan idol, who would not drink nectar but from the skulls of the slain."

    • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 12/23/2008 11:38:41 AM

      Marx?

      Good thing his ideas didn't lead to a century of skulls, right?

  • Posted By: Nara @ 12/23/2008 10:54:09 AM

    The picture you have attached for the great leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is a wrong one.

    • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 12/23/2008 11:36:56 AM

      Not enough blood on his hands?

  • Posted By: Roberto Procopio @ 12/23/2008 6:47:02 AM


    I cannot understand how a man is judged by his promises, that is, by things he has not already done! Only in America this could happen, showing that the American people is as childish concerning their politicians as they always have been. Why did not Newsweek suspend judgement and wait for just one more year to evaluate the man not by his words, but by his deeds. I cannot disagree more concerning the timing of this precipitous choice, which shows what is hiding behind it, the state of shock of a society that likes to mistake itself with last minute champions of the people!!

  • Posted By: shunsuikyouraku @ 12/23/2008 6:09:57 AM

    obama may you inspire the world with chivalry

  • Posted By: freedomsgirl @ 12/22/2008 3:14:56 PM

    Of course Bush is disconnected from the country's problems; he is a millionaire several times over and can't relate to foreclosures, credit issues, job loss and zero healthcare. He is set for life and if we are not careful we will be looking at taking care of his brother for life, too. Unfortunately we americans sat back for eight years, in our collective comfort zones,cashing our "stimulus checks" and totally ignored the state of our country until it was too late and now it is these same americans who will have to suffer in this present crisis.

    • Posted By: TheRepublicanVoice @ 12/23/2008 2:44:30 AM

      of course congress holds no responsibility, where Obama is/was Senator and we must not forget that while President Bush is a rich, President Elect Obama is just a poor average American. Wake up they are all politicians!

  • Posted By: larsky @ 12/22/2008 6:51:32 PM

    "George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt" ??? I just turned to my son not two minutes ago and said 'I wish Obama the best, but If I have to look at him looking off in the distance in one more photo op or hear the word 'distraction" i may have to throw up. What is it that Mr. Obama has done that warrants comparisons with these other great men. I am not going to shower him accolades until he shows me something and so far he has not shown us anything of lasting substance. Good luck Mr. Obama, I hope the press still loves you in two years.

    • Posted By: TheRepublicanVoice @ 12/23/2008 2:41:31 AM

      well said

    • Posted By: TheRepublicanVoice @ 12/23/2008 2:39:50 AM

      well said

    • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/22/2008 9:54:46 PM

      I hope we all do. Otherwise, that will mean that the problems he inherited were too big for any man, no matter his staff.

  • Posted By: atlashrugg @ 12/22/2008 9:24:26 AM

    How in the world can a socialist save capitalism? If I can avoid it, I have no intention of buying anything other than absolute necessities for the next four years, and nothing more. Obama/Biden and their extreme liberal friends in Congress will likely tax all of us into abject poverty, so why spend a dime on anything unless I absolutely must?

    • Posted By: deadhorse @ 12/23/2008 1:58:16 AM

      So those who make more than $200,000 a year paying the same percentage that they paid under Ronny "trickle down": Reagan is now considered taxing one into poverty?

      You do realize that Georgie raised taxes for years to come with this boondoggle of a war, right?

    • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 12/22/2008 4:43:08 PM

      Because money hoarded doesn't generate wealth?

      A Randite like you should know better.

  • Posted By: Rocky2001 @ 12/22/2008 9:47:23 AM

    How can a Socialist save Captialism?

    • Posted By: deadhorse @ 12/23/2008 1:55:07 AM

      As we can see the socialist Bush failed to revive the system, though he did see to it that our tax dollars were funneled into the pockets of the averace, incompitent buffons who caused this mess in the first place, Good job George!

      Giving more money to boobs who can't manager their money will surely solve the crisis.

  • Posted By: encountermx @ 12/22/2008 11:51:42 PM

    find this article somewhat of the same problem but with a better 'essential idea".
    This statement of his below, for example, is sheer nonsense - written only to lend momentary, mindless drama to a weekly, paid magazined column (this is how many smart guys get prostituted - they sign a big $$ contract obligating them to say something "brilliant and fresh" every week in 2000 words. Good luck, never works). Heres Zakarias's line:
    "...In January, Obama will gain the authority to run the government of the United States of America...."
    This is such sheer BS, as any ex-president will attest and any governmental scholar will agree...the President of the US "runs" nothing, much less the US Government!! I guarantee you that Obama's memoirs 40 years from now will assert all the things he would have done and could have done if only he actually "ran things" and had his way! No, but "all the forces of the opposition and Evil stood in his way, blah, blah..."

    He also says this:
    "...People and corporations are still not doing much by way of buying, borrowing or lending ?the heartbeats of modern capitalism. The political system has moved on to the automobile bailouts and the fiscal stimulus, but the original problem of trust in the financial system has still not been fixed. "Credit markets are still fundamentally broken," says David Swensen, chief investment officer of Yale University...."
    Hey, wait a second...that's the opposite of what he said in the October article where he clearly suggested that "buying, borrowing, and lending" were the Devils work and the moral failure of the system!!! Now that that *** is over and we are cleansed, he suggested, we will be better off and have a happier 'long term'! Obviously, someone has convinced him otherwise since then....
    I'm happy for that because I think he was wrong the first time but more correct now!

    Finally, I think he does make a very good central point in this current article in a field that he is better at than Economics - attitudinal political theory. Specifically, he says that Obama will soon enough find that he will no longer be measured on the "charisma" of what he says, he will be measured on the results of what he does.
    Hopefully - as far as I'm concerned - he (Obama) will get it right.

  • Posted By: encountermx @ 12/22/2008 11:51:21 PM

    find this article somewhat of the same problem but with a better 'essential idea".
    This statement of his below, for example, is sheer nonsense - written only to lend momentary, mindless drama to a weekly, paid magazined column (this is how many smart guys get prostituted - they sign a big $$ contract obligating them to say something "brilliant and fresh" every week in 2000 words. Good luck, never works). Heres Zakarias's line:
    "...In January, Obama will gain the authority to run the government of the United States of America...."
    This is such sheer BS, as any ex-president will attest and any governmental scholar will agree...the President of the US "runs" nothing, much less the US Government!! I guarantee you that Obama's memoirs 40 years from now will assert all the things he would have done and could have done if only he actually "ran things" and had his way! No, but "all the forces of the opposition and Evil stood in his way, blah, blah..."

    He also says this:
    "...People and corporations are still not doing much by way of buying, borrowing or lending ?the heartbeats of modern capitalism. The political system has moved on to the automobile bailouts and the fiscal stimulus, but the original problem of trust in the financial system has still not been fixed. "Credit markets are still fundamentally broken," says David Swensen, chief investment officer of Yale University...."
    Hey, wait a second...that's the opposite of what he said in the October article where he clearly suggested that "buying, borrowing, and lending" were the Devils work and the moral failure of the system!!! Now that that *** is over and we are cleansed, he suggested, we will be better off and have a happier 'long term'! Obviously, someone has convinced him otherwise since then....
    I'm happy for that because I think he was wrong the first time but more correct now!

    Finally, I think he does make a very good central point in this current article in a field that he is better at than Economics - attitudinal political theory. Specifically, he says that Obama will soon enough find that he will no longer be measured on the "charisma" of what he says, he will be measured on the results of what he does.
    Hopefully - as far as I'm concerned - he (Obama) will get it right.

  • Posted By: yuraliberal @ 12/22/2008 11:05:06 PM

    well, who ever said anything about helping the pseudo capitalists who are not honest and displayed bad judgment--certainly not me.

    it's all you bailout advocates who simultaneously hold the contradictory concepts that the failed businesses were run by crooks and incompetents, yet you want to reward their incompetence and dishonesty with billions in rewards for so being. wasn't getting taken once enough for you? you don't turn the other cheek, but you offer your other pocket.

    i say, let the dishonest and incompetent die so that real capitalists who are neither can take their places.

    but if you look to washington as your messiah, remember that the power to do good can be used to do evil, and someday there will be another in high office you don't like and he or she will wield "the one's" power to do more evil than you can imagine.

    so, don't give the power to "the one" to begin with.

    keevan d. morgan, chicago

  • Posted By: jbz7879 @ 12/22/2008 12:34:36 PM

    is capitalism worth saving along with any other ISMS?

    • Posted By: Repubssuck @ 12/22/2008 12:56:16 PM

      Bass Fishingism and Nascarism, we should keep.

  • Posted By: aelemay @ 12/22/2008 11:48:01 AM

    But, Obama does not want to save Capitalism! He seems to want to have the Government provide a dirigiste system which picks winners and losers, and to extend and expand government controls into every detail of the economy. He has said he will use the authority given to regulate the CO2 emissions, and thereby energy use, to bankrupt coal producers and electrical utilities that use coal.

    This power, to regulate the emissions of CO2 emissions, means the government can indeed destroy whole industries, control the profitability of companies, and pick winners and losers. In addition, it seems he wants his first act to sign into law a financial rescue package which gives him the funds to be able to ignore future Congressional hearings and proceed to do exactly what he wants to do in terms of hiring millions of new government employees, setting up his civilian force equal in size to the Defense Department, and buying into corporations under his own authority. He has also said he wants to control salaries of executives, and to use the tax code to ensure ???fairness.??? He is saying he will re-distribute wealth and ???spread it around.??? So, those who produce wealth with their efforts, will not be able to keep their earnings and capital gains, instead, they will be forced to share it with others ??? even more than it is now.

    In addition, he has said he will appoint Supreme Court and other Justices who will not necessarily follow the law or the Constitution, but, instead will favor the disadvantaged, the minorities, and others against the moneyed interests of corporations.

    So, it seems neither companies nor individuals can have confidence that their efforts and investments can actually provide a return if Government controls profits, and redistributes income. And, further, it seems we will lose the protection of the law as well. So, how can anyone plan for the future, how can new factories be built, how can people be hired if there is no confidence that the investments can return a profit?

    • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/22/2008 9:41:23 PM

      Wow... "dirigiste".... first time I've had to look up a word at NW. A perfect word. GOOOOOOAAAALLLL!

  • Posted By: jbz7879 @ 12/22/2008 3:51:37 PM

    since they put a bust of the ceaser on the power list
    i do not think i want to compare obama to the preatorian guard of the roman empire OR VICE VERSA
    HE IS ONE OF THE PEOPLE

  • Posted By: intermedusa @ 12/22/2008 1:32:22 AM

    DEMOCRATIC CORLEONE CRIME FAMILY AND THE REPUBLICAN SOPRANO CRIME FAMILY PART 1

    lawrencehoule@yahoo.com

    On January 20th the Republican Soprano crime family will surrender power to the Democratic Corleone Crime Family. Barack Obama will become the new Godfather of Godfathers - the New Don of All Dons.

    The corruption and criminality of Wall Street and Congress during the past 8 years that allowed the stealing of thirty billion and the imperiling of 60 trillion worth of assets will
    be eclipsed by the total control of power by the Democratic Corleone Crime Family.

    An orgy of money will be thrown against the wall.

    15 billion auto bailout will become 150 billion

    20 billion in earmark spending will become 1 trillion

    No stone will be left unturned in the creation of the promised 2.5 million new jobs no matter what the cost. Under Communism, the Communists had a saying: ???We pretend to work and the government pretends to pay us.??? In the new socialist, capitalist order to be implemented by the Corleone???s the saying will be - We pretend to work and the government will pay us.??? Of course, all the hard working bitter people desperately clinging to their bibles and guns will be taxed into the ground as their patriotic, socialist duty.

    The Democratic Corleone Crime Family will take a cut of 10% minimum i.e. $100 billion skimmed off the top to be spread among their families, relatives, lawyer friends and loyal supporters.

    For the next 4 years expect the deficit to be 1/1.5 trillion/year.

    As in all crime families, construction projects will become a mainstay of this political criminal enterprise - infrastructure projects were hundreds of billions virtually untraceable, unaccountable funds will be poured. The sheer volume of the activity will ensure that these projects will escape scrutiny.

    • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/22/2008 9:33:29 PM

      How might any of this relate to the last eight years, or have you forgotten?.......

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 12/21/2008 8:41:31 AM

    We are assuming, of course, that capitalism is worth saving.

    Big assumption. From where I sit, it doesn't work, and hasn't worked, for a long time. Why try so hard to save it?

    And to state that the US is still the most important country in the world is the epitome of arrogance. What we are is the most consumptive country, and therefore the most influential in the world - very different than important. Ask the rest of the world, however, if they think our influence is a good or a bad one, and many Americans would be surprised by the answer.

    America was an experiment in democracy, an attempt to cobble together 13 territories based on dubious boundaries for protection and survival, but at it's inception, it was an agrarian society, based more on the barter system and land ownership than on a hard currency basis. Capitalism came later.

    We can forgo capitalism (an economic system) and still remain a democracy (a political system). The two do not have to be joined at the hip.

    The real measure of Barack Obama as a president will be whether or not he can save democracy. Capitalism is optional.

    • Posted By: Repubssuck @ 12/21/2008 9:18:15 AM

      If Capitalism means golden parachutes, bilking of investors and giving no-bid contracts to haliburton, it's not worth saving.

      • Posted By: Pallisor @ 12/21/2008 10:06:57 AM

        Get it right. Halliburton was the only world-wide company large enough to handle that job.

        • Posted By: chedet @ 12/21/2008 4:41:28 PM

          You think? No no there are other companies too except they didn't have cheney as the ex CEO.

          • Posted By: Pallisor @ 12/21/2008 7:56:24 PM

            Halliburton was and continues to be the the world's largest oil services company, and easily the best qualified to handle the job.

            Cheney was no longer the CEO when the contract took place.

            • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 12/22/2008 11:52:18 AM

              No, but he was still receiving "deferred compensation".

              • Posted By: 40YearR @ 12/22/2008 9:30:52 PM

                Wonder whether there was one of those 'blind trusts', and what might have landed into it when he wasn't looking...

  • Posted By: jbz7879 @ 12/22/2008 3:42:15 PM

    he deserves to head the elite list as he is the senator turned president -just like the equivalent of a pretorian converted to proletarian -hurray for the president elect

    • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 12/22/2008 4:38:46 PM

      Your side lost, hippie. Boo hoo hoo!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse