SPONSORED BY:

The Clintons

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The former president's main shortcoming is that he sometimes forgets that he is, well, the former president. He can fail to see that certain behavior isn't befitting a person in his position. Under pressure from Obama, he released the names of donors to his library and to the Clinton Global Initiative (including $10 million from the Saudis), but after promising years ago that his buck-raking days were over—that he had enough money to devote himself exclusively to good works—there he was in early December in Malaysia, pocketing $200,000 for a speech. He argues unpersuasively that the $13 million he gave Hillary's campaign requires that he continue bolstering his ample fortune.

Bill Clinton's bigger problem is that he can't let go of his bitterness. Hillary was once the one with the long memory, while Bill forgave quickly. Now the roles are reversed. Hillary is, by all accounts, fully onboard with Obama and looking forward. But well after the election, the former president is still telling virtual strangers that Hillary would have won if this or that hadn't happened, and he remains privately lukewarm about the president-elect.

Even so, there's no reason to assume he'll embarrass Obama and, if he does, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel will be on the phone reading him (or her) their Miranda rights. Besides, Hillary knows that all the punditry saying she's too big to fire is wrong. If she manages to get pushed out, she's almost certainly finished in politics.

The greater likelihood is success. The Clintons have the rare chance for a "do over" in foreign policy, or, in the case of triumphs like the Irish peace deal, a "do again." Because they won't be distracted this time by other obligations, Hill and Bill (the order now reversed) will be able to focus their legendary energies on diplomatic breakthroughs.

More important, the structure of today's global order may favor Clintonism even more than it did in the 1990s. The Pax Americana of 15 years ago, when the United States stood alone at the summit, was in some ways wasted on Bill, who responded in Bosnia in his first term with a caution befitting a third-string power, not a colossus. Now that unipolar world is gone, replaced by an array of rising powers. The strength of the Clintons always rested in their ability to grasp subtleties and integrate seemingly disparate issues like energy, counterterrorism and development. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld didn't "do nuance." Hillary and Bill do, and they make it pay.

The Obama era has begun, but not at the expense of the Clintons. At a moment of ferment and global possibility, they have more of a chance to shape the world than anyone other than the new president. With so many problems competing for the attention of the new administration in Washington, it's all hands on deck.

No. 12: Kim Jong Il

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Forty4 @ 12/23/2008 9:28:59 PM

    Aside from the fact that you can't see into the future, you insist the Republicans will get "a butt kicking" in 2012 due to "a declining situation." I thought Obama was going to turn things around and be "the answer." If so, how can there be a declining situation?

  • Posted By: Repubssuck @ 12/23/2008 5:07:04 PM

    I didn't cherry pick the poll. This is the last summary of the poll of polls posted on CNN. It's really telling that the Rassmussen poll wasn't the best you could find. They've been in the tank for Fox forever. I alway wondered what the difference between a Rassmussen Poll and a Fox/Rassmussen Poll was.Clinton left a surplus. Reagan and both Bush' left us with deficits. Has there ever been a Republican who has admitted that their president screwed up? All i hear from you Limbaugh and Hannity drones is how you inherited a declining situation. That's something you won't have to concern yourself with ever again. In 2010 3 to 5 Republican Senate seats will be lost. In 2012 a bigger butt kicking is in store. Of course that butt kicking won't be the GOP's fault. It will be due to a declining situation.

  • Posted By: mariaconz@mchsi.com @ 12/23/2008 4:46:18 PM

    I'm so tired of you ragging on the Clintons. If they were still co-presidents, I know that we could dig our way out of the mess that stupid Bush got us into.

    Hillary Clinton's campaign for president was an eye-opener for me, a life-changing experience. I no longer believe that the "progressive" Left is progressive, or that the Dimocrats are democratic.

    Now that I have left the Democratic Party and become an Independent, I can see how biased and wrong-headed both the Right AND the Left are.

    Maria Houser Conzemius
    Iowa City, IA

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now