SPONSORED BY:

The Web Masters

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

If one thing hurts his chances for success, it will be his East Coast background. Many blogs out of Silicon Valley already wonder whether Genachowski is really a digital whiz kid or just another Washington wonk. "Genachowski is a lawyer who I'm sure can grasp net neutrality," writes Paul Boutin of Valleywag.com "But if this turns out to be Obama's idea of a technologist, I'm going home to cling bitterly to my guns and religion."

Evan Williams
Twitter
It's easy for skeptics to dismiss Williams and his San Francisco startup. Twitter has no revenues, despite sucking in $20 million in investors' cash since 2006, and no clear path to profitability. Its key service is "micro-blogging," an easy, efficient way to send short status updates to friends and followers via a text message, IM, e-mail or Web site—an idea that has been fingered as a symptom of cultural decline. What can you possibly say in 140 characters or less, the critics argue, and do your friends really care if you just ate pancakes?

But it's not for nothing that Williams and Twitter have become the darling of Silicon Valley. Twitter is a favored way to share thoughts, observations and snippets of information, and even has celebrity endorsements—Shaquille O'Neal signed up in 2008. (Follow him at http://twitter.com/THE_REAL_SHAQ.) More importantly, it's become, in the words of investor Roger Ehrenberg, an "enabling platform," a way for people to easily and quickly rally around a common interest or topic. This is true even for sudden and unpredictable events. After the Chengdu earthquake in May, the writer and tech enthusiast Robert Scoble used Twitter to organize news coming out of China, and claims to have shared on-the-scene reports an hour before CNN even started talking about the disaster.

Because Williams decided early on to keep Twitter open and let outside programmers develop applications based on it, there's been a torrent of Twitter-related creativity. StockTwits, one of Ehrenberg's investments, lets finance fanatics hear what other traders think about a particular company, investment idea, or stock market move. And, just as during the Chengdu earthquake, the information flows in real time—an obvious benefit when you're trying to figure out where the Dow is headed.

You can expect more narrowly focused add-ons like StockTwits in 2009, which will transform the way enthusiasts share information about their passions. Williams's challenge for the year will be to figure out a way to channel all this enthusiasm into a business model. He reportedly turned down a $500 million offer from Facebook earlier this year—a bold move indicating he's got big plans for the 31-person company. He's hinted that advertising won't be the way forward, saying he wants revenues to be "product-based," whatever that means. (One guess is that he'll start selling a secure, private version of the service to companies.) No matter what he decides, it had better be an idea simple enough to convey in 140 characters or less.

Jason Kilar
Hulu
Media companies have hardly embraced placing their video and audio content on the Internet. The relationship has mostly been fought out in the courts—think Napster, Grokster and, most recently, Viacom's $1 billion lawsuit against YouTube for "massive intentional copyright infringement" that is still making its way through the courts.

Enter Kilar, the young chief executive of Hulu.com. Hulu started life as a joint venture between NBC Universal and News Corp. Top executives at both companies were frustrated by the swiftly growing world of online video, which (illegally) helped itself to their shows and movies. They wanted to capitalize on the stampede toward Web-based video without falling under its hooves. Kilar, a top executive at Amazon.com, joined the startup in June 2007. He quickly assembled an engineering team and, after just nine months, unveiled Hulu to the public.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: joshreader @ 12/29/2008 11:29:27 PM

    The websites listed here are, for the most part, stale and desperate (as if Twitter and Facebook were new), and this piece feels hurriedly cobbled together and irrelevant. If anything, this piece draws attention to the fact that it has been a while since a truly revolutionary, innovative site emerged. Listing The Daily Beast is particularly tired; the site is just another aggregator. The only reason it gets any attention is because of Brown herself and Barry Diller. If anyone else was behind the site you would barely hear about it, but because Brown has cash and connections the entire news media falls in her lap.

  • Posted By: TheNewWorld @ 12/27/2008 2:33:57 PM

    Wow jobobbafett;

    What is it with you? It should not matter anymore. What are you afraid of? No one is anti-white. I feel that the times are changing and the realization that the entire world does not just consist of white people. Come to terms with the change where all people will get along with each other. The past election proves that the world is tired of the same old way of doing business. It does not work anymore. Bigotry and racism does not work for anyone anymore.

  • Posted By: Radrunner @ 12/27/2008 5:01:23 AM

    Sparkly... the article authors do have understanding of the internet fads and "hopefuls", who (I agree) probably are best at sucking money out of investors rather than customers. They're trying to highlight that... however, AOL tried to be the center of people's Internet-verse... look what happened to them, and Microsoft's 'passport'. A netwide login might be nice, but who wants to put their virtual life all over out there exposed for marketers, et al, to bombard... people don't want to be 'tracked', like economic slave/assets. As for TV, I"ve watched a particular favorite tv show over the 'net... it works great. Like Tivo/ReplayTV, I can watch when I want, pause it, catch up on episodes missed... unfortunately, the TV networks themselves still limit their offerings, access, and convenience. Communications, TV, movies, and the 'net -will- merge.. it just makes sense. I only have 2mb connect now and don't have herkyjerky net-TV.
    But I agree with George C's comment ;)...
    Twittering is for social twits... those who obsess over mini-lives/gossip, and want to take the time to constantly/chronically post/read via their gadgets... or for those may find a use for it for business reasons, etc. Sad that good writers get side-tracked though.
    Orygunboy... I suppose Acepilot is another confused Alaskan (misposting)... oh, I forgot, I'm Alaskan too.. so it's alright with me ;) Alaska's been a state since -after- I was born!
    I hope that lawyer/biz mogul friend of Obama gets some tech skilled people to advise -him-... to support net neutrality.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now