Sparkly... the article authors do have understanding of the internet fads and "hopefuls", who (I agree) probably are best at sucking money out of investors rather than customers. They're trying to highlight that... however, AOL tried to be the center of people's Internet-verse... look what happened to them, and Microsoft's 'passport'. A netwide login might be nice, but who wants to put their virtual life all over out there exposed for marketers, et al, to bombard... people don't want to be 'tracked', like economic slave/assets. As for TV, I"ve watched a particular favorite tv show over the 'net... it works great. Like Tivo/ReplayTV, I can watch when I want, pause it, catch up on episodes missed... unfortunately, the TV networks themselves still limit their offerings, access, and convenience. Communications, TV, movies, and the 'net -will- merge.. it just makes sense. I only have 2mb connect now and don't have herkyjerky net-TV.
But I agree with George C's comment ;)...
Twittering is for social twits... those who obsess over mini-lives/gossip, and want to take the time to constantly/chronically post/read via their gadgets... or for those may find a use for it for business reasons, etc. Sad that good writers get side-tracked though.
Orygunboy... I suppose Acepilot is another confused Alaskan (misposting)... oh, I forgot, I'm Alaskan too.. so it's alright with me ;) Alaska's been a state since -after- I was born!
I hope that lawyer/biz mogul friend of Obama gets some tech skilled people to advise -him-... to support net neutrality.
Discuss