A Return To Accountability

It's time to rein in a hyper-legal culture that has warped the nation's schools.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Observerguy @ 04/11/2009 6:51:31 PM

    Difficult parents can no longer be seen as an anomaly. They are now an expected occurance in the educational endeavor and by now should be managed not as a surprising intrusion but a regular component of the educational management process. Inferior teachers and inferior sytems do what all of this ilk do: they exteranalize, they blame the parents much as they complain about funding. A first, 'baby-step' toward the reality of good management would be to recognize that public education proceeds on two premises -- relative ignorance of the students in the material to be learned and difficult parents. The educational system must, at the least, be expected to have protocols in place that effectively address both factors that define public education. In short, public education IS both the effective address of parental difficulty and student ignorance of what is to be taught. The system alone should be accountable for both.

  • Posted By: quix0te @ 02/13/2009 10:51:07 AM

    The problem is that parents run from accountability in some cases. They'll do anything to protect their children from the consequences of their actions. As long as their is longitudinal support within the system, these parents are dealt with. When that support does not exist, then thats when chaos ensues. The faculty and administration become afraid to enforce rules. And 'the system' in this case can include the legal system and benighted juries who feel sympathy for feckless screwups against the 'school bureaucracy'.

  • Posted By: fjp78 @ 01/27/2009 10:38:21 PM

    To all of my teachers during high school - I am sorry. I was not that bad. I would play hookie every once in a while and would be a wise a## during class. But the kids in my classes who were bad - were BAD. They knew they could get away with pretty much anything with no repercussions. It was win-win for them. They could insult teachers, not do the work assigned, and even beat on other kids during class, among other legal and illegal activity. It was amazing what they could get away with. This was nowhere near an inner city school. Quite the opposite. I would like to thank all the parents and their lawyers. Yes - your kids were a##holes.

  • Posted By: Rubbershoelace @ 01/27/2009 3:23:22 PM

    I say we instantly enact the "Work Hard. Be Nice." policy in every school. Effective immediately. Let the adults have control back - not the kids, and not the lawyers - the responsible, academically trained professional teachers. This whole situation is just ridiculous.

  • Posted By: davidleigh2004 @ 01/23/2009 2:02:33 PM

    Bully Students? How about , Bully Administrators?"
    Violation of the California State Education Code from San Francisco Lowell High


    To All Concerned Readers,

    What if you were the parents of this child? After a fight, the other child continuously bullied your child because the Dean and Counselor had neither performed mediation nor counseling. Your child believed it was safe to hide in library to avoid further fights because nobody had told him that was wrong. Four months later, a teacher informed the parents with the shocking news - their child had skipped 34 classes and received bad grades. When the parents stated their discontent of not being informed, the school administers retaliated by harassing the child on a daily basis and gave him 2 ???F???s???. The harassment did not stop until the parents started a blog on the internet to document every incident. The school then shifted the problems to the district. Nevertheless, it was even worse. The district has continuously sabotaged the parents to this date.

    What if your child is going through the same public school system where educators possess superior authority over our children, yet they are human and they do make mistakes. For example, a Chinese Teacher locked the child up and forced him to sign a false statement; otherwise, he was not allowed to leave. A PE Teacher gave him ???D??? solely because he had 9 (false) absences. There are 3 different attendance sheets, but the Principal neither permitted any testimony from students nor to release the records. A Chemistry Teacher gave the child an ???F??? because after she had received the 11 assignments, she then told the district, in fact, she needed 17 more after the turned in 11. A History Teacher received the copies of the entire semester???s assignments which she claimed she had never received. She then informed the district ???these??? were authentically at flaws and gave an ???F???. Unfortunately, when educators conspired together for their own benefits, they abused authority and caused harm to children.

  • Posted By: davidleigh2004 @ 01/23/2009 2:02:04 PM

    After this blog was created, the concerned parents and community leaders were exchanging horrible experiences to one another. These parents are mostly working class people. They do not have the time, resources, and energy to fight bureaucracy. Most of them gave up at the school level. Some parents dropped their cases at the district level because they discovered their representatives were aligned with the district; in fact, they feed into each other???s needs. Unfortunately, such disadvantageous status enhances the above mentioned abusive behavior. Therefore, the benefits of children are merely superficial. Instead, the ???favoritism??? to each other becomes the essence of educators??? working ethics.

    Is our Education Board a mere puppet to the powers to be? Lowell has irresponsible Teachers, Dean, and Counselor who failed to inform parents on the student in trouble, coerced him to sign a false statement, and misrepresented facts and falsified records. School Principal took retaliatory response to parents' complaints, did not allow parents to see school records, and undermined parents' appeal efforts from the district. Furthermore, Board of Education's unwillingness to investigate and take appropriate actions manifested a disastrous development in the student???s academic future. ???It???s about time to clean house ??? the entire district,??? said one of their own commissioners.

  • Posted By: davidleigh2004 @ 01/23/2009 2:00:05 PM

    Bully Students? How about , Bully Administrators?"
    Violation of the California State Education Code from San Francisco Lowell High

    Dear News Media Friends


    We presented our position on 1/13/09 at the San Francisco Board of Education Meeting.

    The time was short to present the case as being the public speakers.

    Therefore, we put all the text and supporting documents on www.lowelllife.org.

    (The sequence of each post is based on the posting time. Therefore, you may need to go backward or forward in order to find the right Exhibit. If you wish to have a copy of them, please give us a call. Thank you for your supports.)

    Our presentation covered "What Lowell Dean failed to do, not only once but many times after."

    Please give us a hand to publish this story because we don???t think any further administrative effort is going to be allocated on this case. Only the media could be the driving force to make change to the broken public school system.

    If you need further information or clarification, please feel free to contact us.


    Sincerely,



    David ??? the Father
    415 671-9018


    Attached is one page summery which has the highlights of the entire situation.

  • Posted By: muscles722 @ 01/20/2009 5:15:04 AM

    OMG! Finally, a topic that needs splashed in the news big time. I could rant on this one for hours. Ok, this is what we have here : underpaid educators, parents who drop kids off as a daycare, kids who know(taught by parents) that educators and administration is powerless, laws that bypass or undermine accountibility. I have friends and a sister that tell me stories about THEM being abused. THEM getting harrassed and THEM feeling helpless with administrations that do NOTHING. We have teachers getting death threats from loser parents. We have 3rd graders threatening other peers. They have pagers, cell phones..in elementary school! lol...jesus. We have sexual harrassment towards the educators. They can't even say, "Jessica, or Steven, you look nice today" without being accused of sexual conitations. All this culminates and is carried on into high school, if the lil bastards even make it that far. Then you got your kids that call the cops on a parent just trying to discipline their child...OK YES, there is a protection order here is how it came to be, but my god, talk about the law crippling parenting and our future. I want to slap the person responsible for giving power to the creation of the "twisted" system. I commend and praise this author. I'm pissed off! If I were a teacher, I would be jailed. Because there would be order!!! Just like the Italians....ORDER!!

  • Posted By: humanscanbeokay @ 01/16/2009 2:20:33 PM

    I agree with these ideas, but it's not like racism, sexism and classism are dead and gone. Ideally, this would work wonderfully. All authority figures in a school would respect each student. However that is not reality and it is dangerous to assume that we can bypass steps to hold teachers and administrators accountable. I think the threat of lawsuits is more a sign of America's greed and irresponsibility than of cultural hyper-sensitivity. Eventually yes, this would be great. However we are not there yet.

  • Posted By: vicbrc @ 12/30/2008 8:19:33 PM

    I am astonished to say that I agree with Mr. Evans. This is one of a handful of articles that Mr. Evans has written that I could agree with. This whole problem it seems to me has been growing since the '60's and the evolution of PC attitudes and not wanting anyone to have "hurt feelings" or "feel left out", as a public school teacher once told me. Then came the "let's sue" attitude, with it's super sensitive entitlement attitude, "how dare you say I can't do or say this ", or "you are stepping on my rights", like petulant greedy children, no matter how far out and rediculous the action was. Common courtesy and common sense went out the window! I watched this happen as my chidren went thru school, we ended up sending them to private school as the classes were not dumbed down, were smaller and there was more structure and rules, even an "Honor Code". All I hope is that my children in their 20's now will turn the pendelum back somewhat to a more structured "you are responsible for your actions and there are consequences for your actions" attitude. I googled Mr. Evans and I better see why I have disagreed so often with articles he has written. His elite liberal education and family background explain his writing. He never just reports the facts but puts his liberal slant on his writing. He does this so much that I have to read with my "decoding glasses" on to just find the facts! I don't mind some "color and fill in"for information sake, but don't tell me in a declarative sentence something that is obviously an opinion and not fact! He is not alone at Newsweek, most of the writers have slanted this way. I have been a reader since the 1970's thus I feel I can argue this. Each to his own, we all have the right to an opinion. But with this article I wonder if maybe he has started to see all the warm fuzzy idealistic stuff he was taught does not pass the reality test of real life! Maybe he is coming more to the center! It happens! Or he just happend to hit a subject I agree with!

    • Posted By: tiredofobama @ 01/07/2009 8:10:18 PM

      This is welll said and well written. I am also tired of our PC entitlement mentality that we have pushed on public schools.

  • Posted By: allie11 @ 01/02/2009 1:53:07 PM

    The Borgen Project has some good info on the cost of addressing global poverty.
    $30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.

    $550 billion: U.S. Defense budget.

  • Posted By: p.s. khn @ 01/02/2009 8:14:15 AM

    A partial response to Vicbrc (12 Dec. at 19:33): Mr Evans, being "elite" and "liberal" thanks to his family and education, as you put it, can defend himself. I would like to make a simple point. Back when I began to take newspapers seriously there was a clear distinction between three kinds of pieces: 1) new articles (excluding sports, which always had a different register); 2) columns and opinion pieces, often called op-eds since they were opposite the editorial page; and 3) editorials. The first were supposed to be factual and to the point (Who did or said what, when where and why). The second openly expressed the opinion of the writer, and were not expected to be factual. The editorials expressed the official opinion of the newspaper. Newsweek does not run what I would call news articles That is not a fault; it simply is not a newspaper and never has been. All news pieces are either news told in colorful style and mixed with analysis, investigative reporting, or outright opinion. That last is the category into which this piece falls. If you want fish, don't go to an apple orchard.

  • Posted By: p.s. khn @ 01/02/2009 8:13:49 AM

    A partial response to Vicbrc (12 Dec. at 19:33): Mr Evans, being "elite" and "liberal" thanks to his family and education, as you put it, can defend himself. I would like to make a simple point. Back when I began to take newspapers seriously there was a clear distinction between three kinds of pieces: 1) new articles (excluding sports, which always had a different register); 2) columns and opinion pieces, often called op-eds since they were opposite the editorial page; and 3) editorials. The first were supposed to be factual and to the point (Who did or said what, when where and why). The second openly expressed the opinion of the writer, and were not expected to be factual. The editorials expressed the official opinion of the newspaper. Newsweek does not run what I would call news articles That is not a fault; it simply is not a newspaper and never has been. All news pieces are either news told in colorful style and mixed with analysis, investigative reporting, or outright opinion. That last is the category into which this piece falls. If you want fish, don't go to an apple orchard. p.s.khn

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 12/31/2008 9:10:42 PM

    Let's do away with all the lawyers and just have two rules for society. Be good. Work hard. No laws, no police, no lawyers. A really good deal. Why didn't we think of this before?

  • Posted By: Tabi @ 12/30/2008 11:00:10 PM

    People need to remember that kids aren't fragile. They react more strongly then adults to minor injuries and discipline, but five minutes later they're up and running around like nothing happened.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse