We’re In For Stormy Weather

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Guard Dog 45 @ 12/31/2008 10:00:15 PM

    Climate changes is the responsibility of all nations...not just a few so that "everyone else" can get a free ride on their economic success. In those 3rd world countries where big $ doesn't really exist to implement many of the costly improvements, they should be looking at the small changes that they can do. It boils down to everyone can DO something,anything and that it is not the sole responsibility of a few to make this happen. Put as much time & effort into these preventive measures as you all do in "talking the issue to death" and you'll be surprised at what you come up with. Perhaps that is the way CLIMATE CHANGES should be presented in Copenhagen(& at other future forums)....if your life/the lives of just YOUR citizens were on the line, what solutions to what problems would you solve first?! The problems already exist now, stop talking about solutions and start implementing them. For those that want to keep getting in the way or putting up barriers to keep anything from really taking place....start hurting them where they will feel it most...yes, the pocketbook!! It is only 'too expensive' when you don't have enough of it, whatever "IT" is....so when there is not enough water, clean air to breathe, food to eat, shelters to withstand the environments, etc. where will these people/governments be then? They will all SUDDENLY have TIME, MONEY, and BARGAINING CHIPS available. Guard Dog 45

  • Posted By: propitiousmoment @ 12/31/2008 1:28:18 AM

    To Dr. Ammo: Weather is local and immediate; climate is large scale and long term. Climate change on a large scale may create weird extremes of weather on a local, short-term scale. That's why we're having record winters even though the global temperature is rising overall.

    To everyone else: If I'm wrong on this, will somebody who understands it better please correct me.

    • Posted By: jarcher1 @ 12/31/2008 9:25:42 PM

      What you say is quite correct. I brought up the concept of complexity theory elsewhere in another forum on global warming. In complex system's like earth's climate, there often exist tipping points. Nothing much happens until the tipping point is reached, and then the results are basically unpredictable. We do not know whether or not there is a tipping point involved with global warming, but there well could be. Up until the time the tipping point is reached, the system stays pretty much the same, IOW, there is not systemic change and change is pretty much predictable by extending trends. One of the trend predictions I have seen made of global warming is that as the Arctic ice cap melts, the salinity of the Arctic ocean decreases and reach a point that the Gulf Stream doesn't flow as far north as Europe. If that happens, people at latitudes of say Great Britain will have some very cold winters indeed. If a tipping point is out there, we can't really know what kind of climate changes to expect past that point, because the homeostasis mechanisms of the climate itself will change.

    • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 12/31/2008 9:48:53 AM

      your absolutely right it can be thought of in a simpler way as increase in weathers volatility especially in the short term

  • Posted By: markusbrown @ 12/31/2008 6:51:50 PM

    Here is a nice presentation given by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change:
    http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/wg1-report-2007-02.pdf

    Show some real evidence for human caused global climate change.

  • Posted By: markusbrown @ 12/31/2008 6:50:48 PM

    Here is a nice presentation from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change:
    http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/wg1-report-2007-02.pdf

    It has some real evidence to support human caused global climate change.

  • Posted By: rmays @ 12/31/2008 2:46:42 AM

    Humans currently lack the capability to alter the course of a 1/4 mile diameter wide meteorite. How is it then that we can alter the course of this planet? Global climate change is a natural occurance. Just over 5,000 years ago the land below todays Great Barrier Reef was above sea level and much of the Sahara Desert was under a sea. To propose that humanity could alter the climate of earth is borne out of a lack of comprehension. To promote it is a crome by our world leaders.

    • Posted By: pxtot @ 12/31/2008 6:27:43 PM

      returntoatlantis.com was the only website I could find that supported your assertion that the Sahara was under a sea 5,000 years ago. And you're demanding "proof" from scientists?

    • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 12/31/2008 9:46:31 AM

      all counter arguments seem to run along the same lines. but we're so small how can we affect the climate? its a natural cyclical blahblah blah. we have made unprecedented changes to the world around us and the sooner we can take responsibility the better off we'll all be. what do you recommend we do... nothing?

  • Posted By: pxtot @ 12/31/2008 6:21:23 PM

    Strictly speaking, there's no such thing as "proof" in experimental science, and we certainly can't run a controlled experiment with a few more Earths.

    Given what's at stake, maybe the wise thing would be to go with the preponderance of evidence instead of worrying about maintaining your suburban lifestyle and having a "globally competitive" economy, which or course means competing against other economies who are also busy trashing the environment.

  • Posted By: chamo @ 12/31/2008 4:50:32 PM

    Stick a frog in lukewarm water and slowly start heating it up, does the frog jump out when it gets too hot? It's too bad too many people (like you) are too ignorant to see the data that scientists from all over the world are showing. Have you been reading any of this information? What are you going to do when suddenly 1 million people are on your front door since your town is the closest that has water? Do you really think that natures natural cycle of the last few thousand years is not changing now? All the data shows that nature has gone outside those normal ranges the last few decades. And you are going to say "that is normal" and it's attributable to something other than humans? Wow...you probably think the earth is flat and agreed with Bush on going into Iraq. Soon enough the world will see global changes. Don't come crying on my doorstep when it does.

  • Posted By: elizabettac @ 12/31/2008 3:44:09 PM

    There are still too many morons out there arguing that there's no evidence that people are causing climate change. People need to be educated before they'll take it seriously.

  • Posted By: Jim1348 @ 12/30/2008 7:53:32 PM

    Not to worry. The increased carbon dioxide will cause algae blooms that deplete the oxygen in the oceans, allowing the organic material to fall to the bottom and not decay. That will form the new carbon-rich layers that will produce the oil for the next advanced civilization in 50 million years or so. Maybe they will remember W. and the Neocons with gratitude.

    • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 12/31/2008 9:50:34 AM

      great piece of phoscience

  • Posted By: Interested Scientist @ 12/31/2008 7:54:45 AM

    tt is good that we can have open discussion. However, it is important that we all look objectively at our climate and world and the whole impact that we have as a species on this planet. There is no doubt that the human species has had major impact on the other species, oceans and plant and forest regions and that this will in due course alter the world. It is also important to understand that our food and available water supplies are currently stretched and will not hold up in the future. In my lifetime, the world population has doubled from 3 billion to over 6 billion people. This rapid change (incredibly rapid when compared with other species changes) that is unsupportable implies serious problem in the near future. We are not separate from nature - we are a part of it and subject to its laws. Evolution and natural selection are alive and well today and are not changed by us but change us..

    What we have as our opportunity is our ability to think and predict and then act on what we think. Whether we like it or not, we have to frame our human species actions not on CO2 (which gets used as a political soccer ball) but on the bigger picture of us on the planet. Otherwise, as for other species, the great die off will commence and out of our control.

    GVW.

  • Posted By: expatincebu @ 12/31/2008 12:43:08 AM

    This morning there were no comments. I wondered how long before the flat earthers showed up. Just came back and burbank rewards me with his idiotic remark. What I find interesting is why people who hate science and do not believe in it always read science articles and comment on them. It's like they know they are stupid and feel the need to reinforce it.

    • Posted By: burbank @ 12/31/2008 2:31:23 AM

      To :expatincebu
      Fm: burbank

      Sir, It always amazes me that vitriol is used as a counterattack by those who see their sacred cows blasphemed by those who hold a different opinion on controversial topic. Such is the case with Global Warming, or Climate Change or whatever the term du jour will be in the future. That 17,000 scientists in May of this year, including some with advanced degrees, signed a petition in Oregon denouncing Global Warming, saying the data was flawed and that more research was needed before a conclusion was reached proably means nothing to you. The slowing of the sun's counter- rotating plasma fields and the absence of sun spots, indicate a global cooling rather than a warming trend heading into the 25th solar cycle. Such a phenomenon occured from 1760 to 1840 and was called the Dalton Minimum. Back in the 1970's the media and scientists were all a twitter over the severity of North American winters, and were concerned about the dawn of a new ice age. Even now, the EU cannot abide by the Co2 emissions standards set forth in the Kyoto Treaty and routinely violate those standards because industry and the private sector cannot survive under those stringent requirements. Emerging green technology looks promising, but with the global economy in a tailspin that technology is taking a hit as well, and cannot now, nor in the foreseeable future replace fossil fuels as the main source of energy that drives our economic engine. So, before you vilify and excoriate those who dare to hold an opinion that differs form yours, might I suggest a bit more research so your rants will be a bit more well rounded and bit more informed.

  • Posted By: kjhammer @ 12/31/2008 2:10:01 AM

    Now we're being told ,that yes, the last few years have been cooler and the next few years may also be cooler. BUT THEN it's going to get really hot really fast! If so much effort and money wasn't being wasted, it would be funny.

  • Posted By: DoctorAmmo @ 12/31/2008 1:09:42 AM

    So far, this year looks like we're back to the good old days of serious winters in America. Snowfall is up all over the place. Minnesota is at -35 degree including wind chill factors. Las Vegas had 6" of snow. Detroit is burried in a blizzard. But we're warming up? I don't get it.

  • Posted By: 90014 @ 12/30/2008 11:06:41 PM

    "China has set national goals for reducing energy use ..." OMG, I hope that's not true. That would really put the world's economy in it's deepest depression. Reduce emissions of course, but NOT energy consumption or production. That will put the planet in the dark ages. (No pun intended)

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse