How to Save Democracy

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Second, we know from experience that these kinds of assistance don't work unless the political leaders on the receiving end are willing to let them. So we need to generate strong incentives for rulers to opt for a different logic of governance, one that defines success as delivering development and reducing poverty rather than skimming public resources and buying support or rigging elections. This will mean setting clear conditions that will have to be met before economic and political aid is doled out to governments.

The third priority is to expand assistance to independent organizations, mass media and think tanks in these fragile states that will increase public demand for better governance and monitor what governments do. This means aiding democratic professional associations, trade unions, chambers of commerce, student groups and organizations devoted to human rights, women's rights, transparency, civic education, election monitoring and countless other democratic activities. Ordinary people must be educated to know their rights and responsibilities as citizens—and be ready to defend them.

While Western countries have provided this kind of aid for more than two decades, economic assistance handed out at the same time has often undermined democracy efforts by subsidizing corrupt, abusive governments. Aid donors should thus strike a new bargain with recipients, telling them: if you get serious about containing corruption, building a rule of law and improving people's lives, we will get serious about helping you. Those that show a real commitment should get significant new rewards of aid and freer trade. Those unwilling to reform should get little, though the West should continue to fight disease and directly help people in dire need wherever they are.

Finally, the new president should keep in mind the power of example. Washington can't promote democracy abroad if it erodes it at home. The contradictions between the rhetoric of Bush's "freedom agenda" and the realities of Abu Ghraib, Guantánamo, torture, warrantless surveillance and boundless executive privilege have led even many of the United States' natural allies to dismiss U.S. efforts as hypocritical. Thus the new president must immediately shut down Guantánamo and unequivocally renounce the use of torture; few gestures would restore American credibility more quickly. The United States should also reduce the power of lobbyists, enhance executive and legislative transparency and reform campaign-finance rules—both for its own good and for the message it would send.

Make no mistake: thanks to the global economic crisis and antidemocratic trends, things may get worse before they get better. But supporting democracy abroad advances U.S. national interests and engages universal human aspirations. A more consistent, realistic and multilateral approach will help to secure at-risk democracies and plant the seeds of freedom in oppressed countries. Patience, persistence and savvy diplomacy will serve the next president far better than moralistic rhetoric that divides the world into good and evil. We've seen where that got us.

Diamond is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the Freeman Spogli Institute at Stanford University. His latest book is “The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World.”

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: sarah r @ 01/14/2009 2:58:28 PM

    I completely agree with James Hovland on this--we cannot even think about exporting our ideas of democracy if we allow our leaders to constantly undermine those very ideals internally. Whatever Bush has done for the spread of democracy, he has done much worse for our own democracy. I know that it's almost cliche at this point to even point that out, but check out this graphic: http://www.flypmedia.com/issues/17/#1/27. How can all of those actions add up to anything other than a non-democracy?!

  • Posted By: smoothdriver @ 01/08/2009 12:05:43 PM

    I think Mr diamond is "RIGHT-ON-POINT" with this article. It's about doing what's right and insisting that others also step up to the table of doing the right thing, simply, because it is, the right thing to DO!!!!!

    Dale
    Tracy, CA

  • Posted By: nobleatheist @ 01/06/2009 9:35:07 AM

    While I went through this article, I kept thinking of an example in South America, where US has been helpful in this noble cause of democracy-promotion. Why does the author think Venezuela has gone authoritarian, when the people of the country refused to vote for any semblance of authoritarian rule by Chavez? Cuba, could not become a democracy but they have achieved levels of gender-equality, education, and equity unprecedented in the region. The role of the US motivated by their business and anti-socialism interests and the heavy handling of states in the region had created an element of insecurity. With the changing times the US omnipotence could have some share-holders to produce some diversity at the top and militant pursuing of interest could give way to dialogue. Let us hope.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 
ISSUES 2009
Writing the Rules for a New World

Today's problems ignore national boundaries. The world needs smart management that does the same.