Urban-rural dichotomy too simplistic. Over the New Year, Bangkok was almost a ghost town as residents flocked back to their countryside homes and villages. Rich-poor divide also too simplistic. Thaksin and his family are part of the moneyed elite. Thaksin, a police colonel, amassed his fortunes through exploiting elite connections and state monopolies. Leading a revolt of the poor? Looks more like cynical manipulation to maintain political power. The 'massive electoral majorities' his party put together was through coopting local political bosses and patrons who always get elected whichever party they belong to. The defection of 30 of these MPs to the opposition Democrats led to the formation of a new government thus making it not much of an improvement. Yes, the poor and rural farmers need more help, but billionaire Thaksin and his band of corrupt cronies out for their own enrichment are not the saviours that they need.









Discuss