ENERGY

What to Do With All That Carbon

We need a global technology center to find ways of capturing and burying greenhouse gases.

 
Sponsored by
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

In December 2007, my government's first act after being elected was to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. We knew it was significant, but the depth of the reaction a few days later at the United Nations conference in Bali on climate change came as a surprise. I had not expected the attendees to feel so strongly that Australia's ratification would help drive momentum at a time when the Bali road map was in danger of stalling.

The Bali talks did not stall. And while Australia may have been late arriving to Kyoto, we are now absolutely determined to lead the way in the run-up to the 2009 Copenhagen talks, particularly on developing carbon-capture-and-storage (CCS) technologies.

Recent climate-change reports, such as the Garnaut Review in Australia, have found that the growth in greenhouse-gas emissions, and hence the severity of climate change, may be worse than previously expected. Carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil fuels are the largest and fastest-growing source of greenhouse gases. It is imperative that the world—the United States included—move to a low-emission energy economy, and Australia is determined to play its part in this transformation.

The Australian govern-ment has proposed an initiative to drive the development of carbon-capture technology worldwide. CCS would prevent the release of CO2 into the atmosphere by capturing it at coal-fired power stations and other industrial facilities that process fossil fuel, then transporting it to a suitable site where it would be injected underground for long-term storage.

Why is carbon-capture technology important, and why should Australia be taking the lead? World energy demand is projected to grow by 55 percent between 2005 and 2030. Despite the increase in renewable energy, fossil fuels, especially coal, will remain major sources of the world's energy in the coming decades. Electricity generation accounts for about 40 percent of the world's energy-related CO2 emissions. All major models of how the world can achieve lower greenhouse-gas emissions expect a significant part of the reduction to be achieved through the use of CCS.

Although the science and technology has been successfully demonstrated, and there are many pilot and demonstration projects, there are currently no industrial-scale, fully integrated CCS power stations operating in the world today. This was recognized by the G8 in early 2008 when it called for 20 such projects to be developed by 2020, as a precursor to global deployment.

Australia is well placed to develop this initiative. We have a coal-based energy economy and are the world's largest coal exporter. We have considerable expertise in CCS technologies through a range of research and demonstration programs. And we have developed a robust regulatory regime for CO2 storage.

My government has committed a further $335 million to a National Low Emissions Coal Initiative, under the direction of a council comprising government, industry and research representatives. And there are similar national and regional CCS research, development and demonstration programs around the world.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: bob_hall27 @ 01/03/2009 7:35:34 AM

    I say drill here drill now and stop the dependency on foreign oil. In the process we have to get the government out of the way and allow big business to fail or strive as the market dictates. stop all bailouts and any other form of government financing that amounts to the government choosing who will strive. Get the government out of our schools and bring it back to the local level also. We also need to get back to a solid money controlled by the people rather than a centralized private out for profit banking system. We need to take the power away from the government and give it back to the people where it belongs

  • Posted By: bob_hall27 @ 01/03/2009 7:27:04 AM

    no burying them would just allow the earth to absorb them back to where they come from, but it is just a waste of taxpayer money since carbon being a major greenhouse gas is a myth at least to the extent of what man puts into the atmosphere. Man contributes .117% of the carbon that goes into the atmosphere this is a very small percentage and if we stopped doing everything we do today it would have no effect on the atmosphere. This like all the other things the government comes up with is a scam to steal from it's tax base. The only way renewable energy could possibly work right now is if we got rid of more than 2/3 of the population because there is no way to keep up with our consumption of energy otherwise. Unless we decide to live in shacks and caves there is not much we could actually do unless someone can actually change the laws of physics.

  • Posted By: expatincebu @ 01/02/2009 6:05:41 PM

    Carbon capture is another pie in the sky fossil fuel corporate propaganda. It ranks up there with "clean coal" as the biggest lies of our time.

    We could spend billions on proven, clean, safe renewable energy development or we can spend hundreds of billions to enrich corporate coffers for something that will never work.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 
ISSUES 2009
Writing the Rules for a New World

Today's problems ignore national boundaries. The world needs smart management that does the same.