NATIONAL AFFAIRS

Burris’s Baggage

The man appointed to fill Obama's Senate seat ignored a warning about a troubling case that almost allowed an innocent man to be executed.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: MargaretS @ 01/09/2009 2:04:39 PM

    Diann Rust-Tierney, Executive Director, National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (via Margaret Summers, Director of Communications)

    This conversation is coming at an interesting time for the death penalty. As a recent report indicates, the death penalty is in decline as measured by a variety of factors. Since 2000, every region of the nation (except the South), and every state which averaged one or more death sentences annually has experienced a decline in the annual number of death sentences, including Texas, California and Florida, the major death penalty states. The annual number of death sentences has dropped about 60% since the 1990s, when the annual number was nearly 300.

    Undoubtedly the costs to the states of death penalty cases have been a factor, particularly during the nation's current economic recession. California, for example, spends about $90,000 to incarcerate each death row inmate, more than if the inmates were serving life sentences. Death penalty cases are lengthy, which adds to their expense, as inmates wait years before being assigned attorneys for appeals.

    And there's the distinct possibility of executing people who may be innocent due to: Pressures on law enforcement officials to solve homicides quickly, which may lead to mistakes and misconduct by the investigators and prosecutors. The frequent lack of eyewitnesses in murder cases, forcing the prosecutors to rely on questionable sources like jailhouse informants, accomplices looking for reduced sentences and defendants from whom a confession is coerced. The often meager resources provided to criminal defendants' attorneys often lead them to risk the client's conviction and save the client's life by spending more time preparing for the sentencing phase than for the actual defense. Preparation occurring at the expense of an investigation that could yield absolving evidence heightens the risk for a wrongful conviction. It's no wonder that more criminal justice and law enforcement officials are beginning to consider alternatives to capital punishment as a solution to capital crime. I hope we are fast approaching the day when the possibility of executing innocent persons like Rolando Cruz is a part of the distant past.

  • Posted By: mathmark @ 01/04/2009 1:35:24 PM

    Two trials, two appellate courts, two sets of defense attorneys - and Cruz was found guilty. Finally, the Supreme Court of Illinois grants a THIRD trial at which time somebody finally gets their act together and Cruz is FINALLY cleared (and we are all grateful for that), but this is somehow Mr. Burris' fault??? What about the defense attorneys? What about the other appellate courts? Mr. Burris as the District Attorney was to prosecute based on the evidence presented (which included the dream - which at the time he did NOT know was manufactured evidence). Mr. Burris is not to blame and should not be tainted by this ill-begotten conviction.
    - semi-retired New Jersey attorney

    • Posted By: Berserker @ 01/05/2009 1:23:44 AM

      But When he WAS advised of the problem, he cose to ignore the pleas of his own prosecutor and go forward with the process that, if not finally interrupted, would have resulted in the death of Mr. Cruz. Not someone I want watching over my civil liberties.

      • Posted By: Karenn1 @ 01/09/2009 2:39:18 AM

        DNA evidence cleared Cruz and he was still kept in jail. Thanks to Burris. Then a third trial took place and a third jury overturned the conviction. Most people are free once DNA evidence clears them, but they made him have yet another trial. This was racist. Once blacks get power they are often more racist than whites. Look up Linda Ruttlen.

  • Posted By: Karenn1 @ 01/09/2009 2:34:43 AM

    Burris has no business in the US Senate! Anybody who sends an innocent man to death row has no respect for the constitution or the law. That's why Burris hangs out with Blago. Birds of a feather...

  • Posted By: goldmine @ 01/06/2009 2:53:21 PM

    In 1994, 1998 and 2002, Roland Burris ran and sought Democratic nomination for Governor of Illinois. He lost. In 1995, he ran for Mayor of Chicago. He lost. Roland Burris, people of Illinois do not want you to represent us.

    • Posted By: jh35180 @ 01/07/2009 4:30:36 PM

      He is still more qualified than either Al Franken or Caroline Kennedy.

  • Posted By: Celtia @ 01/07/2009 8:27:14 AM

    Burris may never have been caught with his hand in a state cookie jar like Blago, but he is still unfit for office. The man is a self-serving bigot who is willing to trample on every principle he supposedly holds dear to get a top-paying job in the Senate. For him and Blago's lapdog Bobby Rush to play the race card at the time of the appointment proves to all of us that they both know -- as does Blago -- that Burris's appointment is not legitimate; if they believed it to be they would not have to wrap it in the veil of the magic "racism" do-and-be-whatever-you-want-and-nobody-will-dare-oppose-you all around conduct pass. Burris a veteran political loser whose only hope for any high public office these days is this immoral appointment to the Senate, and I find him a shameful excuse for a human being. He does not speak for me, he does not speak for my husband, and he does not speak for the people of Illinois.

    Our next step as Illinois citizens should be to get the bigot Bobby Rush out of office.

    • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 01/07/2009 11:42:18 AM

      Any other Blacks you'd like to slam, Celtia?

  • Posted By: Trooper101st @ 01/05/2009 8:10:19 AM

    First he lambasted Blago, then, with dat watermelon eating smile, gladly accepted the job in which he said would be tainted by Blago. And that punk congessman plays the race card, alleging Burris denial would be racist. Wake up you ghetto ***, we just elected a BLACK CINC!!! IDIOT.

    • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 01/07/2009 11:40:27 AM

      "with dat watermelon eating smile"

      Wow. LOL. You're from the Appalachias, aren't you?

  • Posted By: goconnor3@verizon.net @ 01/05/2009 1:47:05 PM

    Thank God for people like Mary Kenney who have the courage of their convictions. Unfortunately, this trait is sadly lacking in our politicians. Hopefully, this will be brought out before he is accepted into the Senate. But really, what can you expect of someone appointed by someone so totally lacking in principles? When you lie down with dogs, you'll get up with fleas. Does this not say something about our incoming president?

    • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 01/07/2009 11:39:37 AM

      " Does this not say something about our incoming president?"

      What does it say about him?

  • Posted By: tiredofobama @ 01/05/2009 8:37:07 PM

    For eight years, the intolerant left has railed on endlessly about GW Bush. I didn't like alot of things about Bush but this was all the Democrats knew how to do. Then the Dems run empty speech, vote present all the time, raise your taxes Obama. The media slobbers all over Obama. If you dared to criticize their messiah, then Idiots such as KEITH OLBERMANN, RACHEL MADDOW, and CHRIS MATTHEWS would ridicule you and take away your free speech. Now that there is some stink in Chicago politics. Obama and his good buddy Harry the Hat Reid want to keep Burris out. Blago was accused of a crime but he has not been found guilty. The Dems don't want to face it that they have many imperfections. Grow up Dems and take your lumps.

    • Posted By: Horrible Bastard @ 01/07/2009 11:39:03 AM

      "then Idiots such as KEITH OLBERMANN, RACHEL MADDOW, and CHRIS MATTHEWS would ridicule you and take away your free speech."

      How can a TV pundit take away your free speech?

  • Posted By: Jose52 @ 01/06/2009 1:27:46 PM

    This the MSM trying to kick an honorable man while he tries to do the right thing. This whole case lacks specfics and as the one and only issue to lower the image of Mr. Burris. Could this be racist? What troubling is the lack of journalistic intergity and wanting to impress the Left. Shameful.

  • Posted By: tiredofobama @ 01/05/2009 9:55:12 PM

    Could there be trouble in paradise for B.O., Pelosi, Reid. Schumer, Durbin, and the MSNBC Gestapo? Burris and Blago willl hurt their party. Those poor Obamists.

  • Posted By: carlos523 @ 01/03/2009 12:56:27 AM

    Excuse me, but when was the US Constitution suspended? This is why people like Cruz and Hernandez lost years from their lives. Oh we just know he is guilty. If he is arrested then he is automatically guilty, right? No jury, just throw him to jail. He is a legally elected Governor not convicted of anything. Let the justice system do its work! As long as he isn't convicted he can do what he is legally obligated to do. Grandma, what has Blago done since his conviction? WHAT CONVICTION? Kissably, an official should be removed automatically, even if he or she is innocent? Because if an arrest is made that means there was enough evidence of impropriety? Innocent people are never arrested, right? Grow up and live in the real world...

  • Posted By: hasthefloor @ 01/03/2009 12:53:42 AM

    Several years back when Carol Moseley Braun was running for senator in Illinois, she got caught stealing money from an Illionois public aid program. She hid money from the sale of land for her mother. The money should have been reported to the state. Braun hide the money and split it up with 2 of her siblings. Braun took 50 %. When caught, Burris who was the Illinois states attorney said that he would not indict her. The reason he gave was that she was a good friend and that she was a black woman who had fought hard to get where was was. Burris may appear to be a nice guy but he made a career of making decisions based on his personal desires rather than the law. He is another Illinios politition who is not fit to hold public office.

    • Posted By: tiredofobama @ 01/05/2009 8:22:47 PM

      The same could also be said about our President Elect.

  • Posted By: grandmamary @ 01/03/2009 12:38:08 AM

    Why was Burris accepted to a position in the first place? Blogojevich shouldn't have been allowed to appoint anyone, since he is under investigation and may br impeached. Anything he has done since his conviction shouldn't even be on the books, until he is either cleared of any wrong doing (as he so adamantly suggests) or convicted. Shame on Burris for even considering the appointment until the truth is known.

    • Posted By: tiredofobama @ 01/05/2009 8:21:21 PM

      Why should there be shame on Burris? What has Burris done? Blago maybe tainted but remember he is stilll innocent until proven guillty. This maybe an embarassment to the Obamist Establishment, but I don't care.

  • Posted By: kissablysweetone @ 01/03/2009 12:18:32 AM

    As was previously said, anything touched by Blagojevich is dirty. It's tainted. That includes this "pick" for the Senate seat. Both he and Burris know this is wrong, deceitful and borders on absurd. For either of them to have the audacity to say he should be seated is amazing to me. I believe the law should read that if arrested ANYONE in a position such as Governor should be immediately removed from office. They can't be effective and honest after that. Chances are if they were arrested there was something not right going on anyway. Blagojevich is a pompous arrogant Jackass.

    • Posted By: tiredofobama @ 01/05/2009 8:18:41 PM

      Blagojevich has not been found guilty of anything yet. Hypocrites such as Obama and Harry Reid are doing all that they can to keep Burris out. What has Burris done wrong? The truth is that Obama and Reid are liars and typical politicians and it must really bother these two clowns that there could possibly be sleaze in Obama's majestic kingdom. I feel that Burris should not be denied and if Reid, Obama, Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin and the other Sandinistas in the 21st Century Democratic Party don't like it: TOUGH!!!

  • Posted By: Discernment @ 01/03/2009 8:59:35 PM

    THE PLOT THICKENS . . .

    Recent report has it that U.S. Senate Chairman & Democrat Harry Reid was also caught on U.S. Attorney General Patrick Fitzgerald's wiretaps trying to pressure Gov. Rod Blagojevich 'NOT' to pick Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., Congressman Danny Davis, and Illinois State Legislative Senate President Emil Jones (whom are all Black) to fill President-Elect Obama's U.S. Senate seat.

    This is interesting for three reasons:

    [1.] - The only three Blagojevich picks objected to by Senator Harry Reid were all Black, and keep in mind Illinois State Senate President Emil Jones happen to be Obama's political Godfather.

    [2.] - Senator Harry Reid was initially a Hillary Clinton supporter and endorsed her during the Dem. Primaries, , , (no problem) , , , but was reluctantly slow to rally around the eventual Democratic nominee who is now President-Elect Obama.

    [3.] - When Illinois Congressman Bobby Rush made a wisecrack about not "lynching" Rod Blagojevich's Senate pick Roland Burris because he (Blago) was under investigation, I just knew for sure that was Bobby and Rod trying to team up and play the race card. Now with the latest piece of information about Harry Reid's calls to Rod, I'm now wondering whether Rod Blagojevich actually had some substance in what he was saying. Please, somebody tell me it ain't so!!

    Break out the popcorn, , , stay tune, , , this is getting juicier.

    • Posted By: Trooper101st @ 01/05/2009 8:14:03 AM

      Jesse JR. is an oppurtunist, and hopefully the Feds will drag his dusty azz into this coz he WAS involved. Run Jesse Run!! All the way to the Fed Pen at MARION. You EARNED it, yo!!!

    • Posted By: Berserker @ 01/03/2009 11:53:33 PM

      Your entire post is entertaining and has some interesting points...but what is the applicability to the Burris nomination? Certainly Reid is of questionable charager, as are the other people mentioned, but they are politicians, so that is no surprise. The case in front of us is whether or not Burris would serve the people of Illinois and of the USA. His disregard for individual rights in favor of preventing embaressment would meke him, in my opinion, not worthy of the office.

      Your observiations are, indeed, interesting, but do not further the Burris discussion.

  • Posted By: dr doug @ 01/03/2009 5:52:22 PM

    Unfortunately, it seems that to be a politician in the State of Illinois one has to have a loose definition of "honor".
    I was naive enough to think that most of the shenanigans in Illinois came from the Chicago Mayor's office (although I also admit to thinking Daley is kinda cool!). But it seems that everything is tainted including the "Honorable" Mr. Burris. It will be a GIGANTIC miscarriage if Burris somewhow becomes a Senator and his presence will diminish the whole body (even though it's not too elevated to begin with!)

  • Posted By: phannah @ 01/03/2009 5:10:38 PM

    Burris's actions in this case when he chose to ignore facts to avoid embarrassing the state are more than troubling. This man almost allowed an innocent man to be executed to advance his own career. This is certainly not the kind of person the public can trust to make the best decisions for the country. Paula Hannah, Erie, Pa

  • Posted By: sobernewshound @ 01/03/2009 2:10:49 PM

    the man does not do his homework, cannot see the forset for the trees, he just takes the word of his cronies where a human life is at stake. How would you all feel if cruz was executed??? Then the death would be on the hands of Burris. Do we need this?? Better to find the BEST CANDIDATE in all Illinois, no matter how long it takes, than have a Senator who wants to be there for the wrong reasons!!

  • Posted By: Berserker @ 01/03/2009 2:05:13 PM

    "sanstov952 @ 01/03/2009 1:21:05 PMSo this means what MR.BURRIS is not a honorable man this is not a secret this is not a smoking gun because the media goes on these witch hunt in someone's back ground."

    It is for you to determine what the definition of "honorable man" is when you judge someone. My question revolves around a PROVEN set of facts that suggest strongly that when faced with a decision that involved balancing the probable exicution of an innocent man against the embarressment of the government for engaging in what has already been proven to be improper acts, Mr. Burris chose to avoid embarressment rather than protect an innocent (of the murder charge in question) life.

    My personal judgement is that Mr. Burris did not act honorably in that case. And I would not want a person who failed that test to be in position to make judgements in passing legislation that will have an effect on me and all other citizens.

    Your reference to smoking gun, or secret, does not register. What is your point? If you find these actions acceptable, expecially if your name happened to be Cruz, than by all means support Mr. Burris' appointment...it is your right and obligation.

  • Posted By: sobernewshound @ 01/03/2009 2:03:27 PM

    This means that Burris does not do his homework, does not investigate deeply when it comes to a human life and cannot see the forest for the trees. Sure he is honest but better to look for the BEST candidate rather than just appoint one who favors his "buddy" co-worker attorneys decisions so they can save face and putting a human life in danger. We have to look at the REAL REASON'S a man wants a position like this and I do not think Burris's reasons are in the right frame. And the fact that the tainted Governor appointed Burris, I believe, makes Burris the kiss of death. What is Burris giving the Governor later down the road??? We need THE BEST CANDIDATE in all Illinois.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse