MIDEAST

How We Got to This Point

Three recent books chart the winding path from Kermit Roosevelt with his suitcases stuffed with cash to George W. Bush's gloomy Nobel Prize prospects.

Barbara Kinney / The White House-Getty Images
Fleeting Hope: (From left) Israel's Yitzhak Rabin, Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, Hussein, Clinton and PLO leader Yasir Arafat in 1995
 
Sponsored by
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Barack Obama said virtually nothing last week about the fighting in Gaza. We only have "one president at a time," his aides argue, and he has already called for a robust American peacemaking effort. Still, as the bombs began falling it must have been tempting for the president-elect to simply avert his eyes. Cries of "all-out war" make the risks to U.S. credibility abroad and the political costs at home seem infinitely more acute. Fighting in the Holy Land has been raging for thousands of years, the familiar reasoning goes; it would be hubris to think America could end it.

Yet three excellent recent books suggest that such logic is seriously flawed. In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly, diplomatic distance virtually guarantees the status quo. Because Israel is so much stronger, power dynamics in the conflict are "deeply unbalanced," write Daniel Kurtzer and Scott Lasensky in their trenchant guidebook, "Negotiating Arab-Israeli Peace" (191 pages. U.S. Institute of Peace. $16.50). "Left on their own, the parties cannot address the deep, structural impediments to peace." Over the past half-century, the price of a generally desultory American policy has been compounded.

That's the takeaway from Patrick Tyler's ambitious new history, "A World of Trouble: The White House and the Middle East—From the Cold War to the War on Terror" (Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 628 pages. $30). The bottom line, according to Tyler: "After nearly six decades of escalating American involvement in the Middle East, it remains nearly impossible to discern any overarching approach to the region such as the one that guided U.S. policy through the Cold War." Still, starry-eyed naiveté is no way to solve one of the world's most intractable conflicts. Martin Indyk's nuanced new memoir of his tenure as a Clinton-era peace negotiator, "Innocent Abroad: An Intimate Account of American Peace Diplomacy in the Middle East" (494 pages. Simon &Schuster. $30), demonstrates how hard the balancing act can be.

American diplomacy in the region wasn't always so feeble. Back in the fall of 1956, intelligence reached Washington that Israel was massing troops near Gaza in the Negev Desert. U.S. officials discovered that Israel had conspired with Britain and France to seize the Suez Canal, which popular Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser had nationalized the summer before. The Americans were furious at their allies' back-room plan. Israel's then foreign minister, Golda Meir, made an argument much the same as what Defense Minister Ehud Barak has said since then: "Imagine attacks from enemies camped on the Mexican and Canadian borders inflicting those kinds of casualties in America." But President Eisenhower wasn't buying. As Tyler recounts, Ike went on television and demanded a withdrawal, later withholding oil shipments and loans to Britain. The conspirators were forced to comply.

In the years after World War II, Nasser wasn't yet a reflexive U.S. antagonist. American diplomats and spooks assiduously (albeit clumsily) courted Arab nationalist leaders in both Syria and Egypt. Theodore Roosevelt's grandson, the CIA agent Kermit (Kim) Roosevelt, handed out suitcases filled with millions of dollars in cash to potential allies. His efforts were transparent, and Nasser considered it bribery. As Tyler recounts, the Arab nationalist used the money to build a tower topped with a revolving restaurant in central Cairo. Egyptians referred to the eyesore as "Roosevelt's erection." By the mid-1950s, Nasser was poised to sign a $100 million arms deal with the Soviet Union, and Syria was in similar talks.

In the meantime, Israel and America were growing closer. U.S. intelligence operatives were grateful for Israeli espionage help as the Cold War intensified. In 1966 the Mossad delighted the CIA's Tel Aviv station chief, John Hadden, by delivering a fully functional Soviet MiG-21 to the Americans for inspection. When Hadden was caught copying names from mailboxes in a neighborhood in Dimona—the location of Israel's secret, undeclared nuclear program—Mossad agents only laughed and began referring to Hadden affectionately as the "bastard," Tyler writes. The following year, Israel defeated several Soviet clients at once during the Six Day War, and respect for the Jewish state deepened among American cold warriors.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Getitout @ 01/17/2009 5:23:10 PM

    There is a ceasefire in the horizon. If it comes into reality, that will be sort of an intermission to a play that is beeing going on for a long time. Ms. Livni one the main character of the play said, we arranged a ceasefire with Hamas, but we did not engage with them in any discussions. Very hopeful statement. And also that Isarel needs and I quote" expanded intelligence cooperation to prevent Hamas from rearming". That's a liitle too strong of a statement, that deserves a country such Iran, China, maybe Russia, but Hamas. An unorganized fighter groups, that uses probably pre-WW2 weapons. tin cans home made rockets, and stones for children to use. If Israel wants to elevate Hamas to its own level militarily, they have succeeded. And Hamas ought to thanks Israel for that compliment. A ceasefire probably won't last anyhow. Israel will find a way to beak the truce. And Hamas, good Lord. A super power made in Israel.

  • Posted By: abbreviate @ 01/15/2009 11:28:23 AM

    To justinr11

    "Most Jews either went to the death camps or to Israel since no country would help them during the war."

    USSR was protecting Jews by all means, including lives of Russians, Ukrainians and so on. What do they get in response? Mass betrayer, economical sabotage and destruction.


    Something to think about terrorists:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7656807.stm

  • Posted By: Willy G @ 01/14/2009 9:51:42 PM

    ! Palestinian believe that before 1948, Israel was their Palestine, for the last 2 Melina's short of less than 100 years of crausaders occupation, the rest of the Arabs, Muslims, and others, are not convinced that the promise land was promised to the Jewish people, they believe in Abraham's covenant, where God pledge the land from the Nile, to the Euphrates rives to the nation that comes from Abraham, it came true through the descendants of Ishmael, Abraham's first born, as well as the descendants of Isac, for the last 2000 years, till the early Zionists started bringing Jewish people from around the world to replace the true Semites (Palestinians) besides the fact that none of the early Jewish emigrants from Russia, Poland, Germany who settled from the beginning of the 20th century, are the descendants of any of old Israel's historical 12 tribes, they are the remnants of old Cazar ancient empire, and old Cesar's Russia who converted to Judaism, also according to a major university in Israel conduct a huge DNA study with a hug pool of Palestinians, and Israelis which proved that the vast majority of Palestinians, are the descendants of the old Israelites, who converted to Christianity and later to Islam, mixed with the Arabs whom are descendants of Ishmael, and they are the rightful owners of the land! they are the true Semites!
    They believe that Israel's establishment brought all this misery to the middle east, and the early Jewish gangs like argon & established terrorism as we know it, for example they blew up King David's hotel in Jerusalem killing 200 British solders! these gangs turned into an arm which committed numerous massacres, ethnic cleansing, got the land , kicked the owners, and now acting civilized! this will never end, and Israel will have to offer a real peace like the what they have with Egypt, give these people something that makes sense to them so thy commit to peace, even the peace treaty with Egypt is at stake with the massacre is going on in Gaza, and the public is boiling, the last thing anyone wants is an Islamist revolution in Egypt like Iran!!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse