ONE LOVE implies that Kashmiri muslims started freedom struggle and hence deserved to be killed? Folks where do you live...in the blinding hell of Jupiter. Have you no idea of history of Kashmir. Please read two books by two American history students, Punjabi Mridu Rai's HINDU RULERS AND MUSLIM SUBJECTS, and LANGUAGES OF BELONGING by Chitralekha Zutshi (kashmir hindu). You will come to know what Kashmiri muslims underwent at the hands of (unfortunately) their own fellow Kashmiris, the Pandits. Not only the Pandits but muslim colloborators, too. The political struggle was not violent since 1947 to 1987. Forr 23 years by the name of Plebiscite movement, a peaceful struggle was started by muslims and some hindus, too. Only violent incident in those 23 years was firing by police at demonstrators killing 15 people. All along that peaceful struggle Kashmiri Hindus were agents of indian intelligence agencies. The founder of india's premier intelligence agency RAW was a Kashmiri Hindu. When the armed struggle started in 1987 the Kashmiri hindus chose their nation and left for Jammu, where they have been treated by the Jammu people and the indian state worse than vermin in a stinking ditch. They have become cheap footsoldiers of rabid fundamentalist Hindu parties, I pity them, they were quite educated to sell themselves cheaply. When the armed struggle started in 1989 more number of Kashmiri muslims, who were pro-India, were killed than the Kashmiri Hindus. That is what happens in revolutions. Painting the entire struggle of people as "jihadist terror" is criminal. Look at the websites of Kashmir Hindus and see how they demonise muslims, and even their religion. Show one webiste by Kashmiri muslims that writes anything about Hindus or their religion. And if people in world really want to know what is happening or what has happened in kashmir they should ask india to lift the ban on entry of Amnesty International and freely allow foreign journalists to let out the stories of Indian barbarity.









Discuss