BETWEEN THE LINES

Jonathan Alter

Don’t Muffle the Call to Serve

From FDR to Bill Clinton's AmeriCorps, leadership in service has always come from the president.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: JimandDianne @ 02/25/2009 11:59:53 PM

    ???1 Million Jobs for $10 Billion.???

    There???s much criticism of the Stimulus Package, but few alternatives proposed. Here???s excerpts of some of our ideasl:

    Jonathan Alter noted in Newsweek that ???with 15 years of scandal-free AmeriCorps apparatus in place, service jobs can be established with Rooseveltian speed, an important criteria for inclusion in the stimulus.??? And if those rapidly deployed AmeriCorps jobs stimulated entrepreneurialism, and each generated additional jobs. ???

    60,000 Youth Entrepreneur Corps jobs at $20K each for one year would cost about $1 1/2 billion
    40,000 Ssuccessful-Entrepreneur jobs at $40K each would cost about $2 billion.

    If they average just four jobs each in a whole year of effort, that???s 400,000 permanent, self sustaining jobs, at a cost of $10,000 each.

    What kind of entrepreneurial jobs might they create? Why not ask for proposals ??? and quickly hire the best. ??? Thousands of online entrepreneurial proposals ??? noticed by the media ??? public opinion ??? .

    And why not also adapt the Grameen Bank micro loan model to the US? ??? Harness latent expertise ??? an army of proposal evaluators. ??? 1,600,000 loans averaging $1000 each would cost about $2 billion. ??? 40,000 Successful Entrepreneurs on their lunch break select two per week yields 320,000 funded monthly. ??? A lot of kilns, paint sprayers, floor sanders and caulking guns bought in 2009 and 2010. ??? 10% success still yields 160,000 new jobs ??? only $13,000 per SELF SUSTAINING job.

    .. $5.5 Billion of the $10 Billion proposal yields ??? 660,000 jobs, 85% of them self sustaining.

    Would appreciate thoughtful comments at our more extensive Policyinnovation.blogspot.com Thanks. Jim and Dianne ©JLP2009

  • Posted By: jsarvey @ 01/12/2009 10:27:02 AM

    Thank you for your very excellent point in this article! I wholeheartedly agree!
    I wish that every idea put forth for inclusion in the economic stimulus bill were analyzed based on its likely impact on economic growth (both short-term and long-term), in other words, it's multiplier effect. I would bet that investing in national service comes out way on top. Not only does it have great capacity to very, very immediately meet needs, it also represents a tremendous investment in expanding our human capital, which will pay economic dividends for decades.

    One key point however: the public-private model of AmeriCorps funding is a huge barrier to rapid growth, and yet I hear no one, absolutely no one, questioning this basic premise of the model. AmeriCorps was developed during an era of re-inventing government and huge value placed on shifting or at least sharing the burdens of government on to the private sector. Programs like City Year and Teach for America served as models in which the government only provided a portion of funding. As a result, AmeriCorps grants fund less than 50% of the costs per member. While this model has been great for stretching the impact of tax dollars, it has and will continue to be an impediment to the growth of national service. While organizations like City Year and Teach for America have been relatively successful attracting private dollars and growing, they are outliers, among the best at private-sector fundraising. Many organizations that seek to have or grow AmeriCorps programs either exist in regions with less available private sources or they do not have the networks and capacities of CY and TFA. Even for those that do have that kind of fundraising capacity, their growth would have been substantially larger if AmeriCorps had funded a larger share per member.

    Imagine this -- President Obama and the Congress triple funding for AmeriCorps under its current model. AmeriCorps programs would need to more than triple their private sector fundraising over night. How likely is that in this current economy?

    President Roosevelt enrolled over a million young men in the CCC within 100 days. That simply would not have been possible if the CCC was based on AmeriCorps public-private match requirements.

    My recommendation? Change the model for AmeriCorps funding. Increase the percentage that the federal government will fund up to at least 2/3. Increase the total amount of funding per member up to $20,000.

    John Sarvey

  • Posted By: blackcrow @ 01/09/2009 5:15:05 PM

    I just wanted to tell you how happy I am to see your return to msnbc. I have missed you insights. Keep up the great writing and compassionate vision of the world. best blackbird

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse