I have many gay friends & we have a mutual understanding of my beliefs in Jesus Christ. . You would be amaze at how many gay people are for Pro Marriage? Not all are the same.
I don't think gays sould have marrage at all. Yes they got right to have sex but i how ever will never be frends with a gay person who whats to wed or thinks its okey because its NOT and the gov has no rights to even say *** about it. IF it come to it i will take this to count ITs not right and no matter what there fight is they or whating something that an't theres. Just due to people saying its okey don't make it okey what so ever . church and the gov sould stay aways from each other this is a fine point to pov it.
An Inexact Analogy
The left can breathe easy. Rick Warren is not Obama's Billy Graham.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
The furor over Rick Warren is not about Inauguration Day but what comes after. When Barack Obama announced last month that Warren, the pastor of Saddleback Church and the author of "The Purpose Driven Life," would deliver the invocation at Obama's Inauguration (Joseph Lowery, cofounder of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, will give the benediction), supporters of gay marriage and abortion rights were stricken. Warren, after all, has been avowedly pro-life throughout his career. He supported Proposition 8, the successful California initiative banning gay marriage. Many on the cultural left worry that in the selection Warren has gained new stature as counselor to presidents. They worry, in other words, that Obama has made Warren the 21st century's Billy Graham.
They can rest easy. Rick Warren is not Billy Graham, for two simple reasons. First, the two men see their callings differently and, second, they came to fame in very different eras.
Graham always saw himself as an evangelist—as a preacher of the gospel, a man in search of souls to save. Unlike Warren, Graham was never a pastor. This is not to say that Graham has not spoken out on issues from time to time. He has. But he has always been more about filling the stadiums than he was about advising on ballot propositions. As an evangelist, Graham could focus less on this world and more on the one to come.
He is an accidental child of the center. He rose to prominence in the 1950s preaching passionately that the nation (and, as he went global, the world) should look to Jesus. It was an inherently conservative message in a moment when more and more Americans seemed to be turning awayfrom God. In the 1960s, when the black church and white liberal clergy embraced the antiwar movement, Graham was the most prominent citizen of the white, evangelical right. Other ministers in Graham's ethos—including a young Jerry Falwell in Lynchburg, Va.—tended to avoid politics altogether.
That all changed on Jan. 22, 1973. For evangelicals, the Supreme Court's decision to legalize abortion in Roe v. Wade, was a clarion call to American political life. Men like the late Falwell and Pat Robertson grew their ministries by preaching a Christian obligation to wage the culture war, to see sin in America and fight it. But Graham largely kept his eye on the next world, leaving it to others to fight the battles of this one. His message became the middle.
Graham saw this transformation and accepted it. In a 2006 NEWSWEEK cover story, he said that he has from time to time felt the need to speak out on the pressing problems of man but that, to an evangelist, politics can't be "the main thing." In that story, Falwell recalled a conversation the two men had in Graham's kitchen. "There is no question that your role and mine are opposites," Falwell told Graham. "You are an evangelist, I am a pastor. I have prophetic responsibilities that you do not have."
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »







