A Plan of Attack For Peace

Whatever the Israelis arguments ;the shamefull action of the U.S.A and europe;shows how far their civilisation could be inacceptable to human history civilisation march.So genocides are the hobby of the super armies then where were we from the stone age ; Not far my friend . it has been so.

Stop it, just stop it,
heared no such voice,
from any quarter/

Even our President and Secretary of State Rice blame the other, but this blame is necessarily to conform to the Israeli invasion; give me a break. But why do you accept the deceptive headline of the article, ???Israel Rejects Proposed Truce???? How about right one? You all heard them saying it: about the operation of the Israeli army, its intention is as Israeli Interior Minister Sheetrit said, in ???breaking the will of the Palestinians, of Hamas, to continue to fire at Israel," while Israeli military spokesman Maj. Lerner said ???a cease-fire is unnecessary because Israel is already allowing enough aid into the strip.
The question is how is the military going to Break the will of Palestinians without invoking the same old genocide policy? The genocide implication is not my fault; it???s the inner logic, especially when combined together Maj. Lerner???s horrifying statement and Sheetrit???s. Thereof the right headline: Israel confirms the old genocide policy by rejecting proposed truce.
So listen carefully to the following advice about the self-importance of men: the statue of their consciousness is very near the bankruptcy, encroaching the freedom of technology, which has been brought about as a narrowing process of choosing that tends to slide down to the violence on freedoms and the fixation of instincts needed by domination; and so stop babbling about "Intelligence" of Jews whatever you meant to be, because what we see here is no longer the issue of human intellect, but that of the progress of animal power, which in fact began in the 60s with the Palestinian Slingshot vs. Israeli missile, comparable to the implausible hope of the North Vietnam vs. the modern monstrosity of the US war machine.
And so if you are serious about your own intelligence, don???t make it sound like a neurotic wary of war, who keeps trying to wake up from an unpleasant delirium: back and forth from a neurotic to a paranoiac. However, if you are so inclined, with your impeccable points of intelligence, you are able to beat a hard naivete; given all the good qualities of men such as the reasoning for the advancing power of human progress against the progress of power, as long as men decide to kill other men, men are not intelligent animals; their self-righteousness would exhaust themselves with that reasoning which, given its momentum unfettered or promoted by the privilege of self-preservation, would result in the helpless self-liquidation in a self-unconscious scheme of things.
Here is the problem for you: how to make these men aware of that scheme: an apparent antireason used to be a thin cover-up of the fallacy of bourgeois subjectivity; in a permanent warfare, the stronger is always right, and he who said this is the essence of the self-righteousness of archaic Zionism! And yet it is a pity to think this is the ultimate ground that we still must trust in man, for whom alone intelligence is a moral category. So change the world from the bottom u

War has entered its tenth,
but there are no chances of its end,
world people are seeking around,
espacially the United Nation,which looks failed ,
in its action.

Frech president's efforts still also fruitless,
his arrival is significance.

What would be happen in the coming days?
more casualties,more deaths,
including the phillosopher of the term''endgame''

What should be done,in such circumstances,
United States must moved forward,
because as a single super power it is his duty ,
to end the war.

Clinton didnt just run out of time he was dealing with someone who was incapable of letting go of power. Bush did the right thing in 2001 by maginializing Arafat while the rest of the world scorned him for not dealing with the "elected" leader of the Palestinians. Arafat helped give rise to Hamas thru his in effecient govenrining policies and out right theft of $100's of millions meant for the Palestinan people. The president elect has something Clinton didnt, Abbas, someone who seems willing to negotiate in good faith and modorate Arab states that fear Irans growing influence in the region. Just read some of the govenment run newspapers, they put some of the blame on Hamas, something unthinkable just a few years ago.Maybe the people of Gaza can look to the West Bank to see what is possible if you have leaders willing to talk to Israel. While certainly far from ideal the West Bank enjoys a better lifestyle and gets financial support from most of the governments that wont touch Hamas with a ten foot pole. A sloution to this problem might be one of the most elesuive since it deals with not just the Palestinians but with so many other regional players who have thier own agenda. Mr. President Elect you are going to need a lot of patience a lot of help and some good luck!!

Sounds fairly easy if the Palestinians were reasonable and the Jews weren't so totally obnoxious. There is not going to be peace anytime soon an dou rbest option is to let them fight it out until they are exhausted. One or the other may control the entire area for a time. This has been going on nearly 1400 years and it will not stop soon. You (we) are fools to think it will.

DO YOU THINK FOR ONE MINUTE YOUARE DEALING WITH RATIONAL THINKING PEOPLE? I THINK NOT.RELIGIOUS ZEAL IS UTOPIANISM,THAT LEADS TO RADICALISM.PEACE THERE AS WE ENVISION IT IN OUR RATIONAL WAY OF THINKING IS IMPOSSIBLE.HOWEVER WE CANNOT GIVE UP TRYING.CONTAINMENT SHOULD BE OUR FIRST GOAL.LIKE CRIME DONT LET IT GET OUT OF CONTROL.

I believe that the only solution is change in policies of US. The whole world is suffering economic and other consequences of US policies. We should change our basic policy of supporting wars all over the world. We can reestablish our strategy and become the good superpower of the world again with support of nations all over this world.
Please read the interesting discussion of Time with Avrum Burg, the scion of one of Israel's founding families (His father was the deputy speaker of the first Knesset, and Burg himself later became speaker of the legislature, and a member of Israel's cabinet) :
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1869325,00.html

I believe that the only solution is change in policies of US. The whole world is suffering economic and other consequences of US policies. We should change our basic policy of supporting wars all over the world. We can reestablish our strategy and become the good superpower of the world again with support of nations all over this world.
Please read the interesting discussion of Time with Avrum Burg, the scion of one of Israel's founding families (His father was the deputy speaker of the first Knesset, and Burg himself later became speaker of the legislature, and a member of Israel's cabinet) :
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1869325,00.html

Just one problem: The power of the right wing in Israel has increased since the Clinton years. As of now, a division of Jerusalem might very well bring about a civil war in Israel.

You seem to think if Clinton had more time things would have gotten resooved, not as long as Arafat was the final word. Bush did the right thing by marginalizing Arafat while the rest of the world said he was the elected leader of the Palestinins and you must deal with him. Arafat gave rise to Hamas through his mismanagment and outright theft of $100of millions meant for the Paestinians. Obama now has what Clinton didnt, Abbas, a man who seems willing to negotiate in good faith. Let the people of Gaza look at the West Bank for what could be. This is still one of the most complex issues to solve because the final solution affects the whole of the Middle East.. Good Luck Mr. President.
SMH
SMH

The Iran-Syria alliance is the weak link in Iran's position. Syria can be weaned away from Iran with suitable offers. Or, Iran can be induced by suitable offers to throw Syria under the bus.

IT IS RELIGIOUS ZEAL THAT MAKES PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND THE PALESTIANS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE.ONLY THING WE CAN DO IS LIKE WE HAVE IN THE PAST.THAT IS A POLICY OF CONTAINMENT WHICH KEEPS THINGS FROM GETTING OUT OF CONTROL.REMEMBER MR RABIN WAS ASSASSINATED BY ONE OF HIS OWN PEOPLE.BE REAL TALK IS CHEAP,IT IS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AGREEMENTS THAT ARE EFFECTIVE.

Even our President and Secretary of State Rice blame the other, but this blame is necessarily to conform to the Israeli invasion; give me a break. But why do you accept the deceptive headline of the article, ???Israel Rejects Proposed Truce???? How about right one? All of you heard them saying it: about the operation of the Israeli army, its intention is as Israeli Interior Minister said, in ???breaking the will of the Palestinians, of Hamas, to continue to fire at Israel," while Israeli military spokesman Maj. Lerner, said a cease-fire is unnecessary because Israel is already allowing enough aid into the strip.
The question is how are the military going to Break the will of Palestinians without invoking the same old genocide policy? The genocide implication is not my fault; it???s the inner logic, especially when combined together Maj. Lerner???s horrifying statement and Sheetrit???s one. Thereof the right headline: Israel confirms the old genocide policy by rejecting proposed truce.
So listen carefully to the following advice about the self-importance of men: the statue of their consciousness is very near the bankruptcy, encroaching the freedom of technology which has been brought about as a narrowing process of choosing that has always slid down to the violence on freedoms and the fixation of instincts needed by domination; and so stop babbling about "Intelligence" of Jews whatever you meant to be, because what we see here is no longer the issue of human intellect, but that comparable to the progress of animal power, which in fact began in the 60s with the Palestinian Slingshot vs. Israeli missile, comparable to the implausible hope of the North Vietnam vs. the modern monstrosity of the US war machine.
And so if you are serious about your own intelligence, don???t make it sound like a neurotic wary of war, who keeps trying to wake up from an unpleasant delirium: back and forth from a neurotic to a paranoiac. However, if you are so inclined, with your own impeccable points of intelligence, you would be able to beat it; given all the good qualities of men such as the reasoning for the advancing power of human progress against the progress of power, as long as men decide to kill other men, men are not intelligent animals; their self-righteousness would exhaust themselves with that reasoning which, given its momentum unfettered or promoted by the privilege of self-preservation, would result in the helpless self-liquidation in a self-unconscious scheme of things.
Here is the problem for you: how to make these men aware of that scheme: an apparent antireason used to be cover-up of the fallacy of bourgeois subjectivity; in a permanent warfare, the stronger is always right, and he who said this is the essence of the self-righteousness of archaic Zionism! And yet it is a pity to think this is the ultimate ground that we still must trust in man, for whom alone intelligence is a moral category. So change the world from the bottom u

There has been fighting in the middle east for 3,000 years but it will now suddenly end. Ridiculous. Ask China what they think as they sit and watch the U.S. destroy itself over the middle east.