Savings and Moan

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Riverskater @ 01/08/2009 10:23:17 AM

    The author points out that the banks are no longer interested in making home equity loans. If so, how is a homeowner able to make improvements on his home? Won't he have to save the money he has earned to pay for those improvements? And if he and everyone else is suddenly saving money, isn't there more readily available funds for lthe banks to make loans? Why the gridlock?

  • Posted By: Suzzun @ 01/07/2009 1:24:42 PM

    Oh there is a big bag of savings out there; just sitting there. Only one problem, using it causes taxes and PENALTIES. I'm speaking, of course, of our retirement savings; our 401k's and the like. If I tried to spend any of my savings, it would be taxed and penalized to the tune of almost 50%. But if the government would give me a tax/penalty holiday in 2009, I would certainly take advantage of that; by making my home more forclosure-proof and repairing or replacing my 10 year old car.

    • Posted By: Gumps @ 01/08/2009 6:58:10 AM

      Suzzun, the whole point of the taxes and penalties is to prevent just the sort of thing you want to do - buy a car, etc. Your retirement nest egg is for retirement, period.

      • Posted By: Suzzun @ 01/08/2009 9:12:19 AM

        I think you have missed the point of this discussion. It is the fact, yes FACT, that many people are destitute now and ONLY have resources in something like a 401k. What good does it do to have a retirement nest-egg, if I'm at risk of going on welfare now? IMO: you and your ilk are idiots.

        • Posted By: fsilber @ 01/08/2009 10:03:54 AM

          You're both right. The 401K is to replace employer pensions, and we've never had the opportunity to cash out of them. People were supposed to save money in addition to that. But with 5 kids, one income, and private school tuitions (even with scholarships) that has been very virtually impossible for me. Still, at least I was able to avoid debt (except on the mortgage for my tiny house). I thought it was highly irresponsible in the 1970s when magazines such as this one declared that refraining from spending money you don't yet have is old-fashioned and outmoded. The high inflation of the 1970s and 80s really did a number on the average American's sense of virtue.

  • Posted By: boneclinkz @ 01/08/2009 9:29:37 AM

    That's cool dutch, hope you like 25% unemployment.

  • Posted By: boneclinkz @ 01/08/2009 9:23:55 AM

    Thanks for mentioning "health issues" peter. Another wonderful characteristic of this third-world country we live in is that your diligently maintained $100,000 savings account evaporates at the first medical emergency.

  • Posted By: peterpumpkineater @ 01/08/2009 9:16:58 AM

    For those of you who like research go to this government website, Bureau of Economic Analysis, to see the savings rate:

    http://www.bea.gov/briefrm/saving.htm

    Then go here to this pdf file on the SAME website to see why they say the rate is bogus, see page 13:

    http://www.bea.gov/about/pdf/nordhaustestimony24july2002.pdf

  • Posted By: peterpumpkineater @ 01/08/2009 9:06:41 AM

    tenininchpython, I pay cash for everything never ever had a loan except for a modest sum for my house. I drive used, paid for vehicles, etc. In fact I do not need to explain to you. Why shoot the messenger? Why let the media convince you that majority of Americans are stupid and lazy? The fact is, only about 10% of Americans are in financial trouble and mostly because of job loss and health issues.

    The saving rate calcuations are wrong and you have yet to prove anything other than a simple minded and bizarre personal attack.

    It's this kind of journalism that is the worst and needs to be addressed.

  • Posted By: boneclinkz @ 01/08/2009 9:00:59 AM

    Yo python, are you saying peterthepumkineater is wrong about the way the savings rate is calculated?

  • Posted By: peterpumpkineater @ 01/08/2009 8:59:40 AM

    One last comment, the reason Japan's savings rates are so high is because home ownership is simply out of the question. Most Japaneese live in 800 or less square foot apartments with no hope of ever buying a home, so they have no where to put their money except in a savings account. Living in an apartment means no lawn mowers, no roof repairs, no family room additions, it's a completely different economic world and not a fair comparison.

  • Posted By: teninchpython @ 01/08/2009 8:52:42 AM

    LOL - Mr. peterthepumkineater and joe the moralist, I cheerfully smile at your ignorance. I am certain this article applies strongly to your personal situations... you just can't get yourselves to open your eyes yet and see the reality. Let me guess, you both have houses where you owe more than they are worth. But, I am also willing to bet you have Hummers sitting in your driveways as well.

  • Posted By: teninchpython @ 01/08/2009 8:51:12 AM

    LOL - Mr. peterthepumkineater and joe the moralist, I cheerfully smile at your ignorance. I am certain this article applies strongly to your personal situations... you just can't get yourselves to open your eyes yet and see the reality. Let me guess, you both have houses where you owe more than they are worth. But, I am also willing to bet you have Hummers sitting in your driveways as well.

  • Posted By: boneclinkz @ 01/08/2009 8:42:02 AM

    If the personal savings rate calculation does not include pensions and investments then it is totally useless as a litmus test of savings. Investments are the only mechanisms I use to actually "save" money, because putting money into a standard bank savings account will earn you an interest rate that is well below the rate of inflation.

    Also, socking away more money is a fine habit to get into, but changes (at least on the macro scale) need to be gradual or else we exacerbate the problem. America needs to keep the money moving.

  • Posted By: peterpumpkineater @ 01/08/2009 8:41:13 AM

    I should elaborate more: Let's say you put 15% of your income into a 401k, and keep $20,000 in a savings account for emergencies. You are not saving any money accourding to the calculations.

    Let's say you have $200,000 in a savings account. Your afraid of a bank failure because your only insured to $100k, so you buy $100k in gold. Oops, your savings rate has now dropped %50, because gold is not considered savings.

    Let's say you keep $10,000 in a savings account and the rest of your income you deposit in a Money Market Fund at TDAmeritrade. Let's say your money market went from $50,000 to $100,000. Guess what? Your savings rate is still zero.

    I am sick and tired of hard working, thrifty Americans getting shafted with bad accounting principles.

  • Posted By: peterpumpkineater @ 01/08/2009 7:45:41 AM

    The personal savings rate calculation does not include pensions and investments, such as 401k's. Savings is narrowly defined as how much cash you have in a savings account or checking account. The reason savings goes to zero in boom times is that people invest their money. When stocks tank, people put money in safe investments such as the bank. Your arguments are completely wrong.

  • Posted By: joe_the_moralist @ 01/07/2009 9:15:20 PM

    well, we have Zakaria on one page, and Gamien on another; one says we must save, the other says we must not save- this rag should be titled the Bipolar Times. Where is the editor, in line at the Fed?

  • Posted By: RebootGuy1 @ 01/07/2009 5:55:39 PM

    If the banks won't loan money the government has lent them, or respond to the standard stimuluii from the Fed, then the government should just take over the banks via emiment domain and once managing them, force the banks to start making consumer, housing and student loans. The past 10 years have proven that relying on "market forces" to solve all problems is the biggest lie. Now it's time to compel positive action!

    • Posted By: docroc67 @ 01/07/2009 7:16:44 PM

      It's too bad Congress let itself be railroaded by Paulsen into writing the bankers what amounts to being a blank check - with absolutely no strings attached. Then they called some of the bankers into a hearing to ask them politely to please lend the money we the people had just given them. And the bankers wouldn't commit to doing that! Meantime, their CEOs continue to hold lavish parties, receive massive pay packages -- apparently just for showing up for work (if they actually do) -- and figure out what other banks they are going to acquire next. If we ever needed proof that Washington and Wall Street belong to the same club, this has got to be it!

  • Posted By: IlliniMike @ 01/07/2009 6:10:33 PM

    Saving money is NEVER a negative moral value. The mere premise is exactly the attitude that led America to get into unmanageable, high risk debt levels. We are now paying the price. Given the author's 'expertise', I suggest he puts his money where his mouth is and buy a big house at 50% of his current income level, splurge on a new American made SUV (even though his has already paid for it once through the bailout), buy any and all electronics that he can on credit, ensure he has 60 days of clothing without repeating the outfit, and save no more than 3 months of expenditures for a rainy day fund. Idiotic.

    • Posted By: docroc67 @ 01/07/2009 7:05:53 PM

      Well said. I think this article is the kind of intellectual navel lint that is part of the reason we are where we are.

  • Posted By: gumimi38 @ 01/07/2009 6:25:53 PM

    The Americans just have to learn the beauty of savings. Over the decades, the Americans are spending way too much than they actually need and lead a way too luxury life for too long. Banks are lending money with way too low restrictions. Financial investment banks are earning way too much bonus. And US Government are paying way too much tax payers' hard working money to save their mess up. This is recession time but it is also a balance adjustment by nature, say by GOD or whoever is out there watching Americans spending way too much for the past. All Americans, including us indificual, banks, lendors, investment banks, car manufacturers, governement, all need to re-exame the way we live, work, think, consume, react and adjust back to a more balanced way.

  • Posted By: farneyblakeley @ 01/07/2009 6:05:28 PM

    Well said alpha. And I am so sick of the whining from the media about deflation or people saving their money, as if they had any remaining credibility.

  • Posted By: alphadogreporter @ 01/07/2009 5:28:37 PM

    The baby boomers and their surviving parents who have propelled the economy for decades have stopped spending. No one in my family is buying new cars or hourses or taking trips. We are done. The younger generation doesn't have the same earning or spending power because our economny has been weakened by unfair global trade. Good luck, we need it.

  • Posted By: Gumps @ 01/07/2009 5:18:50 PM

    The problem will get worse before it gets better. As the economy continues to recess, people who lose their jobs and have no savings will be in a tight spot. The credit card companies know this and are in panic mode - closing accounts, raising interest rates, etc. THey are tying to limit their exposure. Expect the credit bubble to burst sometime soon.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse