Savings and Moan

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: EPerkins @ 01/07/2009 5:13:59 PM

    Goodbye America. We are now a third world country, and Washington is still giving money to people who are not American and are UnAmerican. Does anyone in Washington have any common sense, no they do not. I say let the ones who are getting the bailout money prop up the economy. As for me and my house we are only spending for what we have to have. This bailout money will be wasted. The middle class and the poor do not have money to buy houses, cars, etc. Someone please enlighten me as to how we will get our bailout money back when cars and houses are not selling, and when plants and businesses are shutting down and laying off workers.

  • Posted By: EPerkins @ 01/07/2009 5:06:34 PM

    All of my family has quit spending period. We are doing without and it isn't killing us one bit. We have always lived below our means. If we know we cannot afford something, we don't get it. We are not going to start spending regardless of what the economy does. Let the ones getting the bailout money spend and prop up the economy. This bailout money is going to do nothing for the economy. If people do not have the money to buy cars, houses, etc, they cannott buy them. Does anyone in Washington have any common sense? No, they do not. We are now a third world country and they are still giving money to everyone who is not American and who is UnAmerican.

  • Posted By: 15R8 @ 01/07/2009 4:14:05 PM

    The jam we are in might not be such a ticket to doom many in the media paint int to be..As the resolution trust co. got back a handy sum of the money it dished out so will unckle sam get back , with good acounability, much fronted now. A big thing to help would be to restore credit card rates to those teaser rates so many were sucked in with . that would help take the pressure off many and maybe just help spur purchasing of goods such as more efficent appliances and american mady cars

  • Posted By: sai_chai @ 01/07/2009 3:40:23 PM

    The way up is down -unfortunately. Americans need a cultural change in thought about what retirement means and who is supposed to pay for it. This will only happen in a "have to" situation like another Great Depression. Even this article states in the next to last paragraph that "Hopefully the number will be lower." Meaning the level of consumer spending cuts. We have to save, America, and we have to savew big to make up for the losses to home equity and retirement funds.

  • Posted By: ClevelandGal @ 01/07/2009 3:07:00 PM

    I find this entire situaiton to be mind-blowing. This American cannot affort not to save. I am putting away every single extra penny incase I lose my job. The government is not bailing out people, only entities that make bad desicions or fall into misfortune's way. I will still have a mortgage bill, medical expenses, utilities, car loan, and student loan to pay for. I am not aplogogizing for not having much in the way of credit card debt.

    American people used to stand up to the nonsense at one time. We have a government refusing to help out homeowners in default on their mortgages. These people losing their homes and opening more empty houses is just as detrimental to the economy as not bailing out Wall Street or the Car Companies. Unfortunately not all people behind on house payments are those that borrowd unwilsely. many are among the people getting laid off, and nearly half are people that have become very ill or disabled. However our government will not help these people as these situaitons are ALL put under "rewarding people that make bad decisions".

    Americans are doing nothing. We are saying nothing. We are just taking it.

    "Helping homowners in default on thier mortgages is rewarding those that have made bad decisions".

    hello.

    Wall Street, GM, Chrysler. need I say more?

    What had better get real clear to all of us real fast is that if people keep getting laid off, losing homes to banks that are now partly owned by the government, getting no hlp accept insuffisncient unemplyment help, we are in for more than we can imagine.

    Most Americans are NOT sitting in homes that are more than what they should have bought or buried in frivolous debt. To beleive this is to be a fool. Most Americans are people living in households that earn $50K or less that will be expected to survive on even less as we continue to deteriorate as a nation.

    If anyone thinks I am going to go out and spend money I normally would not instead of saving while I am watching my industry suffer, they are out of their minds. Well, that is, if they want to assume my monthly bills in the event of my being laid off, I will go and spend spend spend. Macy's here I come!

  • Posted By: Cweil75 @ 01/07/2009 2:27:44 PM

    To add to my comment the government needs to stop giving money to non-americans.

  • Posted By: Cweil75 @ 01/07/2009 2:24:37 PM

    I think that the only why to help is to tax the wealthly more and create more jobs for the poor. Also I think banks need to stop lending altogether because if you if give them more money to lend then they will just continue giving "dumb" people loans who can't pay them back. I think that banks should put a cap on how much people can borrow. People who make less then $20000 should not get more then that amount to borrow and that will make people get things the old way, when you had to save up enough money to buy things you want. I think the government needs to check into there vast amount of welfare collecters who most of them don't need it. They need to limit the amount of money they give in welfare so that this people can't buy expense cars and they still don't have jobs. I believe that they should just give welfare to people that make less then $15000.

  • Posted By: Cweil75 @ 01/07/2009 2:24:23 PM

    I think that the only why to help is to tax the wealthly more and create more jobs for the poor. Also I think banks need to stop lending altogether because if you if give them more money to lend then they will just continue giving "dumb" people loans who can't pay them back. I think that banks should put a cap on how much people can borrow. People who make less then $20000 should not get more then that amount to borrow and that will make people get things the old way, when you had to save up enough money to buy things you want. I think the government needs to check into there vast amount of welfare collecters who most of them don't need it. They need to limit the amount of money they give in welfare so that this people can't buy expense cars and they still don't have jobs. I believe that they should just give welfare to people that make less then $15000.

  • Posted By: Cweil75 @ 01/07/2009 2:22:36 PM

    i think that the only why to help is to tax the wealthly more and create more jobs for the poor. Also I think banks need to stop lending altogether because if you if give them more money to lend then they will just continue giving "dumb" people loans who can't pay them back. I think that banks should put a cap on how much people can borrow. People who make less then $20000 should not get more then that amount to borrow and that will make people get things the old way, when you had to save up enough money to buy things you want. I think the government needs to check into there vast amount of welfare collecters who most of them don't need it. They need to limit the amount of money they give in welfare so that this people can't buy expense cars and they still don't have jobs. I believe that they should just give welfare to people that make less then $15000.

  • Posted By: jeffrey1234 @ 01/07/2009 11:25:12 AM

    The best thing the American consumers can do is save their money. Don't spend, don't spend, and don't spend. This will show the country and government who is in charge of this economy.

  • Posted By: Holly Garfield @ 01/06/2009 8:29:55 PM

    Gee, you are pointing out that Emperor Paulson has no clothes. He has been feeding the banks so that they can make loans to spur buying. But the consumers are overburdened with debt, which got us into this mess in the first place. They aren't going to go for even more credit, and the banks won't lend much anyway now. I have urged both Rep. Arcuri and Sen. Schumer to put bailout money directly in the hands of consumers. The money will get used to either pay down debt, for those with credit troubles, or spent, for those who don't have credit troubles. Both cases helps the economy directly without increasing the consumer debtload. We aren't going to get out of the recession very fast by expecting the consumer to take on even more debt with rising unemployment. We consumers may be dumb, but we ain't stupid.

    And to top it off, the one consumer item bought on credit the most is the automobile. Cars now last a long time, and there is a well stocked used market. Cars are necessary, new is not. Discretionary spending is on the outs, and the new car is the king of discretionary spending.

    The worker/employer/consumer cycle is the basic dollar multiplier, and that is NOT where the government is putting its money. And until consumer buying bottoms out this is the one key cycle that is broken. Getting money into this private sector cycle is the big missing key to recovery. Expecting consumers to take on more debt to fund this cycle isn't going to work, at least not very fast.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse