The Lost Shepherd

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: TheGardener @ 01/14/2009 2:21:34 PM

    The propaganda machine of Christianity and Islam will produce just about any nonsense you can think of.
    So I will try and confuse you with a few facts:
    The Jesus of Christianity, the so called dead Jew on a stick who died for your sins and turned into some god NEVER EXISTED!It is the greatest "Story" (LIE) ever told.
    None of the Historians knew about any Jesus as christianity describes. Surely there were many Jessuses and Yoshuas aroun but not the one Christianity describes.

    So who were the first christians.
    A Gnostic movement which evolved from the various ideologies found in the region of Palestine as a result of the Great Revolt and the Bar Kochba revolt.
    Act 11:26 states clearly the First Christians were found in ANTIOCH NOT JERUSALEM OR NAZARETH. Nazareth did not exist during the time of your Cristos and was created 100 years later by God-Experts(The great deceivers of Mankind).
    The gnostic movement became popular;each "church"/Gathering had its Leader called a "bishop" with its OWN RULES. The Gnostics did not worship any Dead Jew on a stick.
    Mithra worship was on the decline while the Gnostic Christian movement was on the rise.
    Constantine called for a meeting of the bishops in 325CE called the Council of Nicaea.
    Constantine and his gathering of bishops married Mithra Sun Worship with the Gnostic Christian movement and the Sabbath became the Sunday worship.
    The Gospels of the Constantine's Christianity were written between 330-350 CE or 5 years AFTER the Council of Nicaea,presented in the CODEX SINAITICUS.
    Cristos was the Greek Name used for the Anointed or nr 17 on the list of the Astral Sun Gods starting with Horus.

    You have to wait till the 1103 CE for the Name Jesus (Esus - Hesus) to enter into the Christian stories and you have to wait till the 15th century for the story of the dead Jew on a stick turned into god to take over the lives of millions. It is the greatest anti-Jew story ever told. All the so called Gospels are reverse engineering of events that never happened.You are being taken for a ride and you are too scared to face the reality. So you continue to sit in front of your glorified horror story. How insane is that?
    The NT is full of discrepancies. The claim that Jesus was a Jew is just hilarious. It would be funny if it weren't such a serious act of wickedness. The gospels were written by non-Jews who haven't a clue about Judaism. The writers exploit the confusions of the events during the time of the Romans in the region to produce their story. What you have is a potpourri of insanity at its best.

    Just one simple fundamental deceit of the gospel stories:Where did Jesus got his Matzo bread EIGHT days before Passover? Surely the great writers of Christianity didn't know about the rituals of Passover? What kind of a Jew/Pharisee/Chasidim was celebrating Passover, 8 days before Passover, without his family but surrounded by a bunch of fishermen? IT MAKES NO SENSE!

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/14/2009 12:52:24 PM

    THE GARDENER:

    To clarify, instead of "between 8 and 90 A.D.," meant to say "40 and 90 A.D.," which is between 7 or 8 and 60 years after Christ's death, referring to when the gospels and epistles were all written, along with the oral traditions and creeds developed. Historians and historical scholarship is clear, however, that it takes 150 to 200 years after an historical occurence for legend and myth to creep in and taint the events--no other work of ancient antiquity has been shown to have been recorded anywhere near as close to the actual events they document and report; one of the next closest, the Quran and/or Hadith, are about 400 to 600 years after, and were predominately written to specifically counter Christianity and its growth.

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/14/2009 12:14:46 PM

    GOD LITTLE PRINCESS (and QUIDISRUPT):

    On judgment AND forgiveness, please see Luke: 17: 3-4. On repentance, see Matt. and Luke 3:8, Acts 26:20, Rom. 2:4 and 11:29, 2 Cor. 7:10, Heb. 6:1, and so much more.

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/14/2009 12:07:03 PM

    THE GARDENER:

    To continue where I cut off may last post: "...fails in side-by-side comparison."

    Just pick up and read a simple book on actual Christian or theistic apologetics, scholarship, and theology, and try to refute any of it--it's not possible: Strobel, Geisler, Hanegraaff, Lewis, Zacharias, Meyer, and so many dozen more. You wouldn't do it though.

    And yes, there is a Santa Clause and the world is indeed flat, Gardener.

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/14/2009 12:01:32 PM

    THE GARDENER wrote:

    from123:
    Are you suffering from constipation?
    The centralization of Papal power culminated under Pope Innocent IV, who held the Papal reins from 1243 until 1254. Innocent IV attempted to turn the Papacy into the world's highest political authority by proclaiming that the Pope was the "vicar [earthly representative] of the Creator (to whom) every human creature is subjected." It was under Innocent IV that the Inquisition was made an official institution of the Roman Catholic Church and Christianity in the West.

    Not sure who was on substances when the above became the law of the land. By then Christianity had close to 1000 years of torture, murder and genocides on its success list. Protestantism, Calvinism, Mormonism, wasn'teven born. The Name Jesus had just made its entree; his Last Name was Cristos. You would have to wait till the 15th century before the story of the dead Jew turned into a god appeared as the Almighty story to bow to.

    Your Post:...."led by the nose by cultural pop fads, mythology, and superstition.".....
    How about a loud mouth wearing a nose ring,being pulled along to worship a glorified horror story of a dead Jew, who never existed, yet, turned into a god who died for your sins; while unable to detect that all the symbols worshipped are related to God's SUN. And you are talking about superstition!

    Posted By: from123: Where are your sources for your fantasy?--history, science, scholarship all give the actual facts.

    What does the abuse of the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages upon true CHRISTIANS and members of the CATHOLIC church have to do with anything? The gospels, epistles, oral traditions, and creeds of the NT have ALL been dated to have been written by eyewitnesses of Christ and their close associates and within the lifetimes of others, between 8 and 90 A.D., confirming everything claimed about and by Christ, and eliminating any possibility for mythology/legend to creep in--nothing else from ancient antiquity comes even microscopically close; and our earliest manuscript copies of the NT/OT are 95 to 99% accurate--containing ONLY superficial differences/errors--when compared to our current translations, which is inconceivable and unheard of in ancient records and scholarship . The cannon was then discovered and compiled by the pre-corrupt Catholic Church only two to three hundred years later, with the "autograph" originals still in existence. The church neither invented nor contrived ANYTHING about Christ or anything else--The Council of Nicaea actually voted only on whether the Son was coeternal with the father or created after, based upon the claims of Arianus' (could be off on the name and spelling) small faction, with the vote 360-something to 2 in favor of the biblically validated triune God!

    Oh, and almost all the pagan religions fully developed their final beliefs AFTER and IN RESPONSE to Christianity (along with Islam)--anything prior though fails in

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/11/2009 2:14:24 PM

    THE FALSE JUDGMENTALISM IN MANY OF THESE POSTS WOULD BE HUMOROUSLY ENTERTAINING, IF THEY WEREN'T SO IGNORANTLY SAD. AND BY WHAT STANDARDS DO YOU ALL JUDGE, ESPECIALLY AS YOU "JUDGE A PHILOSOPHY BY ITS ABUSE"?--I'D NEVER JUDGE ALL ATHEISTS/AGNOSTICS BY THE SAME CRITERIA, WHICH INCLUDE MANY OF MY PAST AND CURRENT FRIENDS.

    NAPLESDEMOCRAT:

    Legal or illegal, sin is sin, getting caught or not. Remember though that slavery, segregation, and Native American genocide also used to be legal.

    True, "being gay is not illegal," but neither is heterosexual premarital sex or alcoholism, but what does Jesus and the Bible say about any of those activities? Just because you have the free "right" to do something, doesn't make it right, as the Bible addresses, as in Moses and David committing murder, David in his adultery, or Solomon in his polygamy and promiscuity.

    THEGARDENER:

    Where are you getting your desperately contrived, superstitious, confused gibberish for information?! I wouldn't even know where to begin to correct you, but it doesn't matter. You obviously sound like you aren't open to anything that makes you uncomfortable with what you want to believe. Your posts also leave the impression that you're under the influence of some substance.

    Hitler raised a Christian?--what?--and why would it matter anyway, since C.S. Lewis and other lay and degreed Christian apologists/theologians were raised ATHEIST?! And your other comments on science and history? Unbelievably and incredulously fantastic and imaginarily ludicrous. Please share your sources and evidence from scholarship and actual history.

    You clearly sound angry, confused, scared, and insecure in your beliefs, while being led by the nose by cultural pop fads, mythology, and superstition.

    Please, don't take my word for anything. Check it all out for yourself.

    VSTILLWELL:

    Tell all of that to Jesus and the original disciples; Martin Luther; our founding fathers--even the deists Jefferson and Franklin; Abraham Lincoln--and almost every president; ML King; or the majority of the founding fathers of science, medicine, and mathematics. They were "all out" about their faith and its inspiration in their accomplishments. Further, your "freedom in this country" is based in Judeo-Christian philosophy as specifically spelled out in our founding documents and the "personal thing" of word, deed, letters, diaries, and other writings of our country's founders.

    But, I guess they were all just "morons" too, and not nearly as wise and omniscient as you.

    "...Win over converts?" No, just exercising my "freedom in this country" of expression, while participating and sharing the truth in the marketplace of ideas. All I can hope for is to make people think, edify, and/or enlighten, as I also learn--good and bad--from them.

    • Posted By: TheGardener @ 01/11/2009 10:42:11 PM

      Legal or Illegal, sin is sin... And WHO will be the Judge to determine what Sin Is? The Xian love?! Don't think so.
      Sin doesn't exist - but wickedness is.

      from123
      Your post:......"desperately contrived, superstitious, confused gibberish for information?! "...

      Are you suffering from constipation?
      The centralization of Papal power culminated under Pope Innocent IV, who held the Papal reins from 1243 until 1254. Innocent IV attempted to turn the Papacy into the world's highest political authority by proclaiming that the Pope was the "vicar [earthly representative] of the Creator (to whom) every human creature is subjected." It was under Innocent IV that the Inquisition was made an official institution of the Roman Catholic Church and Christianity in the West.

      Not sure who was on substances when the above became the law of the land. By then Christianity had close to 1000 years of torture, murder and genocides on its success list. Protestantism, Calvinism, Mormonism, wasn'teven born. The Name Jesus had just made its entree; his Last Name was Cristos. You would have to wait till the 15th century before the story of the dead Jew turned into a god appeared as the Almighty story to bow to.


      Your Post:...."led by the nose by cultural pop fads, mythology, and superstition.".....
      How about a loud mouth wearing a nose ring,being pulled along to worship a glorified horror story of a dead Jew, who never existed, yet, turned into a god who died for your sins; while unable to detect that all the symbols worshipped are related to God's SUN. And you are talking about superstition!

      • Posted By: from123 @ 01/14/2009 11:03:12 AM

        Where are your sources for your fantasy?--history, science, scholarship all give the actual facts. What are you on anyway?

        Reasoning and sharing the facts of reality with people like you is hopeless.

        Just pick up and read a simple book on actual Christian or theistic apologetics, scholarship, and theology, and try to refute any of it--it's not possible: Strobel, Geisler, Hanegraaff, Lewis, Zacharias, Meyer, and so many dozen more. You wouldn't do it though.

        And yes, there is a Santa Clause and the world is indeed flat, Gardener.

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/14/2009 10:48:28 AM

    QUIDISRUPT:

    For what it's worth, forgot to mention that the thief on the cross didn't even have a chance to show repentance before dying, but Christ looked directly into his heart and knew it was real, in saying, "Verily I say unto you, this day you'll be with me in paradise."

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/14/2009 10:22:50 AM

    QUIDISRUPT:

    Didn't mean any disrespect to ya; and I am remiss in my last response to you in forgetting to mention your excellent points, and well-taken. Granted, "after the fact" makes it more suspect in many cases and depending upon the behavior.

    I'm just saying, only God knows his heart and if his repentance is genuine and for the right reasons--of his own free will or after the fact of getting caught; we can only see the corresponding or hypocritical word and deed in hindsight.

    There are thousands if not millions of people, and many well known examples, of people coming to true repentance and faith--even going on to do great things in the world--after getting caught/confronted, rebuked, and punished, either by God, man, or both; I can think of and name many off the top of my head. In the Bible some examples are the thief on the cross, Saul of Tarsus (Paul), woman at the well, David, Moses, the Prodigal Son (after he finally ran out of money and "friends"), and so on. Even many substance addicts have to "hit bottom" or be "interventioned," confronted in some form, or shown "tough love" before they can successfully recover and heal.

    My only point is that no matter how repulsive/illegal the behavior, it's up to God to ultimately judge and condemn or forgive, and we need to temper our right to judge the behavior based upon biblical, not our personal, standards.

  • Posted By: Qidisrupt @ 01/13/2009 11:53:39 PM

    123, I am capable of thinking for myself. It is difficult for me to swallow Haggard's BS that it is the Church's fault for treating him badly. How do you expect any church to respond after the snowjob Haggard gave his millions of followers? Haggard only decided to "repent" after his three year entourage. My question is...why didn't he fess up right away and and show credibilty to the church? He wasn't afraid of what the church would do to him...Haggard was afraid of getting caught. I do not believe anyone held a gun to Ted's head and forced him to sex and drug it up...he chose to do it, enjoyed it and must have thought it was worth risking his family and relationship with God. I would have full respect for Haggard if he would have fessed up on his own free will, and not playing the poor victim of the church and how they were a bunch of meanies to him. Hopefully, Ted will grow past the blaming others game and take full responsibility for his scamming of millions of people who believed that he was being a faithful family man. What else would any church think if someone would only decide to repent after getting caught?

    • Posted By: from123 @ 01/14/2009 10:19:44 AM

      Didn't mean any disrespect to ya; and I am remiss in my last response to you in forgetting to mention your excellent points, and well-taken. Granted, "after the fact" makes it more suspect in many cases and depending upon the behavior.

      I'm just saying, only God knows his heart and if his repentance is genuine and for the right reasons--of his own free will or after the fact of getting caught; we can only see the corresponding or hypocritical word and deed in hindsight.

      There are thousands if not millions of people, and many well known examples, of people coming to true repentance and faith--even going on to do great things in the world--after getting caught/confronted, rebuked, and punished, either by God, man, or both; I can think of and name many off the top of my head. In the Bible some examples are the thief on the cross, Saul of Tarsus (Paul), woman at the well, David, Moses, the Prodigal Son (after he finally ran out of money and "friends"), and so on. Even many substance addicts have to "hit bottom" or be "interventioned," confronted in some form, or shown "tough love" before they can successfully recover and heal.

      My only point is that no matter how repulsive/illegal the behavior, it's up to God to ultimately judge and condemn or forgive, and we need to temper our right to judge the behavior based upon biblical, not our personal, standards.

  • Posted By: Discernment @ 01/10/2009 1:17:04 AM

    PASTOR TED HAGGARD's FALL, , , , , IS HIS FAMILY's BITTER ROTTEN FRUIT. SO SAD, SO SAD.

    I can write a 20-page paper articulating the soul-wrenching, mind-twisting, heart-shredding complexities Ted Haggard is now experiencing, but 95% of the readers would never truly appreciate the full tragedy Haggard is currently experiencing. Part of the reason most would not understand is because most "every day Joe's" have not reach the heights of Pastor Ted Haggard's notoriety. When you have lived Haggard's "high and powerful life" for as long as Haggard experienced it, then suddenly find yourself banished from your home state and dropped to the debts where you're homeless, jobless, penniless, and near hopeless, than you can begin to appreciate Haggard's constant mental anguish and torture. Ted Haggard and his family are paying dearly for his religious hypocrisy and betrayal of faith. I just wonder if the prostitute Mike Jones feels good about his "30-pieces of Judas silver" received in return for helping to turn the Haggard family out into the street.

    • Posted By: Michael45 @ 01/10/2009 4:16:54 AM

      To Discernment-

      Why are you wasting your time wondering about what guilt Mike Jones does or does not feel. That is beside the point. What really matters is that Ted Haggard has himself and ONLY himself to blame for the mess he's made of his life. Once Haggard made the decision to make a living out of preaching to other people how to live their lives, he opened up his own life to intense scrutiny, the kind of scrutiny that comes with the job.

      • Posted By: Discernment @ 01/13/2009 11:00:06 PM

        Hello Michael45,

        You asked and I quote: "Why are you wasting your time wondering about what guilt Mike Jones does or does not feel. That is beside the point".

        Now I ask you Michael45, what do you mean when you say "That is beside the point"? Are you asking me and others to bring our comments in line with the views in your mind? The writer and editor open this page to "any related" comments. Not just the narrow "beat up Ted Haggard" views in your mind.

        Also, when you ask the question "Why are you wasting your time wondering . . .", you portray a blatant case of superciliousness. Again, the writer requested all comments and we take that to mean comments from every perspective. If I chose to use my time and my comment to highlight a different perspective, than it is my choice to broaden the perspectives on the issues. And as you can see, others like "willem1" (below) may & do chose to offer related views to a "broader" range of comments.

        And finally, your quote "Ted Haggard has himself and ONLY himself to blame for the mess he's made of his life". What is your point? Did I not say the same thing when I said Ted is ". . .paying dearly for his religious hypocrisy and betrayal of faith". That is not a statement excusing Ted Haggard. No where in my comment did I excuse Ted's hypocrisy.

      • Posted By: willem1 @ 01/10/2009 11:35:30 AM

        oh jezus mother maria if you read the article well this dude received approx.$250.000 just think how many 9 inchers he could have bought for that.GO TED GO !!

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/13/2009 9:57:32 PM

    DAVID_LA:

    Whith all due respect, the only ignorance for anyone would actually be in being spoon-fed and following politically correct pop-culture fads and philosophy that contradict actual science, history, theology, logic, and reason.

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/13/2009 2:11:58 PM

    GOD LITTLE PRINCESS:

    Good points. Remember though that forgiveness in the Bible is conditional, contingent upon true repentance. And the Bible is clear that we are to judge and discern but only based upon biblical standards and not hypocritically or self-righteously. And, only God knows Ted's heart and if he's truly repentant; we can only observe his consequent behavior from the outside, of course.

    • Posted By: God Little Princess @ 01/13/2009 6:49:33 PM

      Can you please tell the verse that states we are to judge others..or where in the bible backs what you are saying..

      • Posted By: from123 @ 01/13/2009 9:49:35 PM

        GOD LITTLE PRINCESS:

        We have to make proper judgments/discernments everyday to even survive. Laws, police, and courts couldn't provide their necessary and most vital functions without judging. Everytime a parent properly disciplines a child they are judging also. I could go on and on, but the main point is proper/appropriate judgment.

      • Posted By: from123 @ 01/13/2009 9:24:40 PM

        Matthew 7:1 refers to an unfavorable and condemnatory judgment. This does not mean that a Christian should never exercise judgment of any kind under any circumstances. The point being made here is that we are not to judge the inner motives of another. And we are not to render a verdict based upon prejudiced information, or use ourselves as the standard of judgment.

        "Judge" can mean "to distinguish," or "to consider carefully." Jesus does not forbid this--see John 7:24. In Luke 6:37 Jesus warns rather against high-handed condemnation of others. It is God's task alone to render a judgment that condemns.

        Elsewhere throughout the NT epistles, Christians are called to judge, discern, and guard against false teachers within and outside the church, and to discipline and call to repentence Christians that have fallen away in various forms, in addition to recognizing avoiding the sinful snares and temptations of the pagan world and philosophy. Further, Paul, James, John, et al, are clear that we are to "test"--judge and discern--all teaching and church leaders against and according to scripture

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/13/2009 9:47:24 PM

    GOD LITTLE PRINCESS:

    We have to make proper judgments/discernments everyday to even survive. Laws, police, and courts couldn't provide their necessary and most vital functions without judging. Everytime a parent properly disciplines a child they are judging also. I could go on and on, but the main point is proper/appropriate judgment.

  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/13/2009 9:35:34 PM

    GOD LITTLE PRINCESS:

    Hope this helps:

    Matthew 7:1 refers to an unfavorable and condemnatory judgment. This does not mean that a Christian should never exercise judgment of any kind under any circumstances. The point being made here is that we are not to judge the inner motives of another. And we are not to render a verdict based upon prejudiced information, or use ourselves as the standard of judgment.

    "Judge" can mean "to distinguish," or "to consider carefully." Jesus does not forbid this--see John 7:24. In Luke 6:37 Jesus warns rather against high-handed condemnation of others. It is God's task alone to render a judgment that condemns.

    Elsewhere throughout the NT epistles, Christians are called to judge, discern, and guard against false teachers within and outside the church, and to discipline and call to repentence Christians that have fallen away in various forms, in addition to recognizing and avoiding the sinful snares and temptations of the pagan world and philosophy. Further, Paul, James, John, et al, are clear that we are to "test"--judge and discern--all teaching and church leaders against and according to scripture.

  • Posted By: david_LA @ 01/13/2009 7:37:29 PM

    i disagree that alcoholism is a "learned behavior" and also that homosexuality is...both ideas are just ignorant

    • Posted By: from123 @ 01/13/2009 8:19:13 PM

      DAVID_LA:

      I understand, and you're completely entitled to your disagreement. But following are reposts of mine to others on this subject, if this clarifies or helps in any way:

      MWALIMU:

      There is NO scientific basis for genetic homosexuality, or we wouldn't even be discussing/debating now! In fact, legitimate non-biased studies all point to the psycho/socio factors, including the major and conclusive twin studies. According to science, genes DO NOT determine complex human behavior or pathology, only simple traits and characteristics (eye/skin color, and to a degree, along with modeling/learned behavior, mannerisms, and personality traits). Further, according to real and actual science, "MODELING" is the primary determinate of human behavior--not genes.

      And how did all these heterosexuals pass this mysterious "gay gene" along, or vice versa, and which even evolutionary THEORY rules out?

      And NO ONE "CHOOSES" the psycho/socio factors or conditions that give rise to their homosexuality, only the behavior to act upon it, as with substance abuse, pedophilia, incest, beastiality, adultery, bravery, heterosexual marriage, celibacy, religion, etc.

      OLDDOGNEWTRICKS:

      So, you're saying worldviews and beliefs are only determined by location, and everyone on these posts wants to conveniently claim that only homosexuality is genetic. But you wouldn't dare apply your location theory to homosexuality?--like one can be straight, go to prison and be gay, and come out of prison and be straight again?--which is actually very common. Others would blame demons or genes for everything generally considered bad or unnatural, but take all the non-genetic credit for everything else. Which is it?

      HORRIBLE BASTARD:

      Can't have it both ways and double standards in "genetics." Homosexuals want to falsely genetically and legally compare to blacks, yet not to those that have sexual lifestyles they disapprove of and/or are illegal, like pedophilia.




  • Posted By: from123 @ 01/13/2009 8:18:16 PM

    DAVID_LA:

    I understand, and you're completely entitled to your disagreement. But following are reposts of mine to others on this subject, if this clarifies or helps in any way:

    MWALIMU:

    There is NO scientific basis for genetic homosexuality, or we wouldn't even be discussing/debating now! In fact, legitimate non-biased studies all point to the psycho/socio factors, including the major and conclusive twin studies. According to science, genes DO NOT determine complex human behavior or pathology, only simple traits and characteristics (eye/skin color, and to a degree, along with modeling/learned behavior, mannerisms, and personality traits). Further, according to real and actual science, "MODELING" is the primary determinate of human behavior--not genes.

    And how did all these heterosexuals pass this mysterious "gay gene" along, or vice versa, and which even evolutionary THEORY rules out?

    And NO ONE "CHOOSES" the psycho/socio factors or conditions that give rise to their homosexuality, only the behavior to act upon it, as with substance abuse, pedophilia, incest, beastiality, adultery, bravery, heterosexual marriage, celibacy, religion, etc.

    OLDDOGNEWTRICKS:

    So, you're saying worldviews and beliefs are only determined by location, and everyone on these posts wants to conveniently claim that only homosexuality is genetic. But you wouldn't dare apply your location theory to homosexuality?--like one can be straight, go to prison and be gay, and come out of prison and be straight again?--which is actually very common. Others would blame demons or genes for everything generally considered bad or unnatural, but take all the non-genetic credit for everything else. Which is it?

    HORRIBLE BASTARD:

    Can't have it both ways and double standards in "genetics." Homosexuals want to falsely genetically and legally compare to blacks, yet not to those that have sexual lifestyles they disapprove of and/or are illegal, like pedophilia.






  • Posted By: sam4sythe @ 01/13/2009 6:06:55 PM

    Ted Haggard has proved one thing....Gays can get married in Colorado

  • Posted By: sam4sythe @ 01/13/2009 6:06:05 PM

    Ted Haggard has proved one thing....gays CAN get married in Colorado.

  • Posted By: God Little Princess @ 01/13/2009 10:28:01 AM

    We all have fallen in are time and yes PASTER Ted did fallen..But what would JESUS DO..He would forgive him and love him..People need to take the log out of there eye before they look at someone else..I believe that we need to leave Ted alone it over CHRISTIANS need to let it GO..My GOD is GOOD and he has forgiven Ted so why can YOU..Ted you nned to do what GOD has called you to do..and forget what people think..It only what GOD thinksthat matters..If GOD called you to preach then you need to preach..Remember Christians GOD know what he was doing..GOD has a plan in place for PASTER TED...GOD IS GOOD IN ALL THINGS....Keep your chen up and remember GOD loves you as much as he loves the CHRISTIANS....Ted have a blessed day....Our prays are with you and your Family..and WELCOME HOME...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse