MIDDLE EAST

The Dangerous Lives Of Doves in Israel

The war has revived Israel's leftists, but it's killing their chances of a deal with Palestinian moderates.

 
PHOTOS
Gaza's Old Wounds

A small piece of land's epic history of conflict

 
 
Sponsored by
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Only a few weeks ago, Ehud Barak's political prospects were a joke. When he appeared in late December on the Israeli equivalent of "Saturday Night Live," the defense minister drew the loudest guffaws when he suggested he might actually win the upcoming election for prime minister. It would have pained the Jewish state's founders—who thought of Barak's Labor Party as the epitome of the secular Zionist ideal—to see their heirs ridiculed. But the party, once influenced by Karl Marx and still the political anchor of the Israeli left, has long been in decline. This past November the dovish novelist Amos Oz declared, with a Hegelian flourish, that Labor had "completed its historic role."

Since the bombs started falling in Gaza, however, the fortunes of Israel's leftists have been strangely reinvigorated. For months Israel's hawkish opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu had been leading polls in the run-up to parliamentary elections on Feb. 10. Yet the Gaza war—popular at home if not abroad—has bolstered his rivals. A poll released last week shows a doubling in support for Barak's Labor Party—which is now predicted to win 15 seats in Parliament instead of seven. Another suggests that the defense minister's personal popularity has soared by 19 points. More important in Israel's coalition politics: Tel Aviv University pollsters say a broader left-wing bloc including Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni's Kadima Party has pulled even with Netanyahu and his allies; polls show each camp now winning 60 spots in Israel's 120-seat Parliament. Gaza's outcome was still in doubt at the end of last week, and much of this support could prove ephemeral. But it would be supremely ironic if the war, which has infuriated peace activists around the world, ends up delivering Israel's doves to power.

With more than 800 dead in Gaza, including many civilians, there's something vaguely Orwellian about referring to Barak and Livni as "doves." The war's moral cost has been immense: a strike on a U.N. school last week killed more than 40 people, and the Red Cross accused Israel of violating international law by failing to assist wounded Palestinian civilians. Compared with Netanyahu, who regularly rails against dividing Jerusalem and handing back land to the Palestinians, Barak and Livni are much more flexible about the concessions required to achieve peace. But they're benefiting from taking a hard-line stance toward Hamas. Netanyahu has long been the loudest voice calling for a crushing strike against Gaza. Barak is "doing well … because he's doing what Netanyahu told him to do," says Israeli historian Tom Segev. "It's really Barak the general [the people are] behind—not Barak the leader of Labor. They're not the same person."

As Labor leader, Barak has stepped into the shoes of some of Israel's most iconic figures. Shimon Peres, Israel's president, is the movement's best-known living alumnus. (In 2005 Peres defected to Kadima.) Labor Zionism's secular kibbutz culture—infused with communal ideals and revolutionary ardor—is one of the state's most enduring romances. It was always more myth than reality; as times changed, the kibbutzniks evolved. Yet Israel's founders had in fact grown up in what Yaron Ezrahi, a political scientist at Hebrew University, refers to as an "age of ideologies" at the turn of the 20th century. Then the world was swirling with intriguing new "isms." Now the founders' grandchildren have little use for utopias. Labor's decline, Ezrahi says, is partly about "the victory of pragmatism over ideology."

Barak, a war hero turned dove, is suited to such times. As an officer in Israel's elite Sayeret Matkal commando unit in the early 1970s, he stole into Beirut disguised as a woman to assassinate PLO operatives responsible for the murders of Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics the year before. Yet decades later, as prime minister, Barak angered right-wing Israelis by pulling out of Lebanon, negotiating over the Golan Heights and indicating he would return Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem and the West Bank to the Palestinians as part of a peace deal. Livni also defies easy categorization. A onetime Mossad spy, Livni began her political career in Netanyahu's Likud Party, but later joined Ariel Sharon's Kadima after deciding a two-state solution was inevitable. With Arabs soon to outnumber Jews, the thinking went, Israel could not remain both Jewish and democratic without giving up Gaza and parts of the West Bank.

It's far from clear, though, whether Barak and Livni's surge will last long enough for their loyalists to dominate the elections and ultimately strike a peace deal. If casualties mount and international outrage intensifies, Israelis will likely turn against the war, as they did in the summer of 2006 during the Lebanon conflict. And even as Barak and Livni peel off centrist voters from other parties, they risk alienating their bases the longer the war goes on. Already Barak seems to be preparing the political ground if the fighting takes an unexpected turn. Last week, as Israeli leaders debated whether to expand the conflict into Gaza's city centers, a leak claimed that the defense minister opposed intensifying the ground war, even as other cabinet members lobbied to broaden it. "He doesn't want to push it," says one source close to Barak, asking not to be identified in order to speak freely. Livni is said to have taken a similar line.

If, on the other hand, a ceasefire is struck while Hamas remains in charge of Gaza, Netanyahu is likely to say the war ended too soon and its outcome would have been more decisive if he'd been in charge. The implication, according to Yossi Beilin, one of the deans of Israel's peace camp, is that Israel's military "was on the verge of victory—and then we stopped one day short. It's very difficult to refute something like this." Still, at that point, peace talks in order to strengthen Palestinian moderates at the expense of Hamas will become only more important. Israeli voters might prefer an enthusiastic backer of negotiations in the P.M.'s chair, rather than an obstructionist like Netanyahu.

But with Israeli leaders voting late last week to fight on in defiance of the U.N. Security Council, Palestinian doves are in trouble. President Mahmoud Abbas has already lost credibility because of his fruitless talks with the Israelis. The Islamists "are not going to be eradicated," says Mohammed al-Masri, an Abbas loyalist and former Gaza intelligence chief. "Hamas will come out stronger on the ground than before." The resurgence of Israel's doves won't bring peace if their Palestinian counterparts are crippled in the process.

With Joanna Chen in Jerusalem

© 2009

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: khasroo29 @ 01/28/2009 10:23:18 PM

    When you put fire in a neighbour's house, if not extinguished in time your one too will get affected. Thats what is happening in Israel. I am sure the common people of Israel will one day usher in a change in their Government's policy and only then peace will come in the region. Occupation breeds resistance. Let Israel pulla back to pre 1967 border and ask it's neighbours to sit and work out how all the countries in the region can live in peace?

  • Posted By: christophr2 @ 01/24/2009 3:52:31 PM

    To all those who believe either Israel or the Arab world (Hamas in this specific case, if you wish) is right: Both cultures have a right to exist, both have a long-standing history in Palestine. Yet, both regularly commit atrocities, both are hypocritical in the extreme, to wit: 1) Israel pretends to desire peace, and even shamefully at times pretends to believe in a two-state solution. Meanwhile, Israel developed a strategy of colonial occupation of the West Bank and other areas specifically to make a two-state solution impossible, and 2) Hamas (as one reply put it, is a group of thugs who are in charge inside the concentration camp that is the Gaza strip) and, it is no stretch to say, the Arab world at large, is also commited to the destruction of their enemy, the Israeli state. These two powers have been lying and making war against each other, and making propaganda war against the rest of the world, while simultaneously being manipulated by the imperial Anglo powers that supply billions to Israel yearly (without which it is obvious that Israel would long ago have ceased to exist). A two-state solution is a fantasy created to appease those ignorant of the basic facts of the situation: neither side will cede territory, or ever stop fighting, until their enemy is annihiliated. The doves on both sides, even were they in the majority, haven't the power or the stomach to overthrow their greedy, bloodthirsty masters. On the Israeli side, Israel itself, even if it were to come to the rational conculsion that they cannot kill every single Palestinian, would not give up the billions and billions it receives from the US, and these American strategic interests lie in keeping the Middle East in disarray, essentially forever, since the alternative from a realpolitic point of view would mean these two semitic peoples would eventually unite against their real oppressors, the Anglo powers. Stop the endless and meaningless "Israel or Palestine is right", no solution lies in that line of thought, only charges and counter-charges, ad infinitum. Obama must inject, sooner than later, rational policy into our orientation. We must force both sides to disarm, that includes Iran and Israel, and somehow put a lid on all the American evangelicals who fantasize about the end of days, and wittingly abet the continuation of the struggle. We also must take the power away from the military-industrial complex, who was overjoyed at the insane Zionist notion that putting an Israeli state in Palestine would be workable. Even Herzl himself fretted about the rationality of the scheme.

  • Posted By: your_servant @ 01/19/2009 2:00:49 AM

    The whole world has been deceived. It is not the fault of the Isralis to want peace in their homes, schools and places of worship and to defend themselves when attacked. However, the Israli population is not correct in the belief that the Palestinian is at fault for wanting their land back. As always, the rulers of the world (satan) has those who say they believe in the One God (whether you believe His proper name is Allah or Yaweh) killing eachother. In no less than what is called the "Holy Land" and Jerusalem...the City of Peace.

    The Middle East will never have peace as long as Israel is there.
    Peace will be restored only after the coming of the Great Mahdi,
    who is now rising...in the west.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse