So torture works just fine over the long run on just about anybody and to say otherwise is just another evil thing that those damned of god liberal say. Better yet just assert as a truth - and so it is true. What a crock. Anybody care to do an honest risk analysis of the so called tortured prisoner "dilemma"? So all were determined enemies, despite a capture process obviously as flawed as the torture methods themselves. So all really want to take revenge, just a neo-con. Realistically, what can they do? The only way to hurt American troops is to lure them into where they are exposed, like in Iraq for instance. American troops in Kansas are really really hard to touch. Hijack another plane - good luck the doors to the cockpit now lock the way they should have on 9/11 and your fellow passengers will bring you down instantly. That attack vector is effectively blocked. Make a video saying nasty things, like that really hurts. Even if these guys got loose, a) they can't do much on their own, and b) there are already thousands or tens of thousands of their kind all ready running around. It's not like they possess nuclear secrets, or better yet where all the money scammed from the US Treasury in the name of TARP has been buried. The "threat" they pose is virtually non-existent. The terrible dilemma is a crock, or at least no worse than the American torturers who are still active and avoiding war crimes trials. So what goes here? No moral basis, no reality either.









Discuss