Hi Pia, I get it. Vypurr and I don't fight. We discuss.
Hi Pia, I get it. Vypurr and I don't fight. We discuss.
Hi 40- I'm sorry, my fault, my comments to you below are not about you. You're not fighting with anyone.
We're cool. I get your point about arguing. I do it too much. You do it rarely. There's room for both. Best to have fun and discuss, but well.... we boys will be boys...
Harley/Whorely/Coward,
When you get your back against the wall, you behave as always, like a whiny, crying big baby. It sounds like your son, like my nephew who has completed his third tour in Iraq as a Blackhawk pilot, are the one's who have made a sacrifice, not you or I. And yes, he lost friends there too. Was your son drafted? No, he went in because he wanted to. So did my nephew. The problem with you Hurl is you think you speak for everyone in the service, when in reality most, if not all would disagree with you and your fu*ked up, imbecilic ideas. Of course, this is standard fare from a pathetic numbnut like yourself.
Go bark at the moon, dumbass.
All everyone has to do is remember Truman. When I was a schoolboy he was looked on as one of the very worst, if not the worst president ever. Now many scholars and pundits view him as a great president. That is what Bush is telling us to wait for, and obviously a lot of people have already made up their minds, including the writer of this article. Some things have already been cleared up. This past summer Newsweek revealed that 550 tons of "yellowcake" had been obtained by Saddam and our army seized it and it was kept under wraps until recently. That does not constitute WMD's, but it was the makings for a whole lot of WMDs. The materials were there, but they were not yet weapons. I guess we should have waited for Saddam to blow up a couple of countries first, like Israel.Then we could do something, if everyone was willing to do along with it. History will view this president much differently, and it may only be a short matter of time if we are successfully attacked. These last eight years may yet be "the good old days".
Did you escape from some asylum and do this post?
Funny. I was going to ask the same of you.
What is the conservative mantra? Isn't it individual respnsibility? I realize that neither Weisburg nor Bush know anything about Mo-Town, but they need to know the wisdom of that Motown Oldie: "Don't blame your neighborhood; you're the one."
If we can tell this to African-American youngsters in the inner city.(And I have, since I spent a lifetime teaching in inner-city schools), why can't we apply the same principle to President Bush? Oh yes, I forgot, Bush can't utter a statement that''s grammatically correct. I should know since with the help of my students, I'd post famous Bushisms on my overhead project and ask my students to revise them. Even my 10th graders could figure out what was wrong - and bear in mind that I taught in one of the so-called worst schools in Los Angeles. Consider that. Students in an inner city public school correcting the grammer of Bush, the product of Dearfield, Yale and Harvard. What does this tell us about the standards of ourtop Ivy League schools?
Bush is an excellent example of white privilege. When a black man commits a crime, he goes to jail, directly to jail. He does not pass Go and he does not collect $ 200. However, when a rich white guy like George Bush messes up everyone finds excuses for him.
Weisburg, your racist garbage is enough to make me throw up.
Get I get a definition of "ourtop"? I couldn't find it in my dictionary. Perhaps you use a special inner city dictionary that none of use are privy to? Pot calling the kettle black?
Bush will be moving to Dallas rather than returning to his Crawford ranch. For those of you who said he was washed up, i've got news for you. It turns out that Dallas' village Idiot, after 30 years of devoted service to the city, has decided to retire. Bush is the odds on favorite to get the Mayor's appointment to this very prominent post. Bush will bring a wealth of experience to the position. Crawford's loss is Dallas' gain. The retiting Village idiot said he was under no pressure to retire.
"Bush is the odds on favorite to get the Mayor's appointment to this very prominent post."
Nobody said Texans where all that smart.
" Bush will bring a wealth of experience to the position. "
So you're saying the town has very little experience in massive failures? Like Bush's 2 oil companies?
Dude, no offense, but I don't think anyone's going to be sending you a MENSA certificate anytime soon. Just an idle thought.
Bush is not an idiot. He's certainly accomplished many things in the world. Sadly, most of them seem to be the kind that cause a lot of pain to others and accentuate selfishness.
He's a man that never grew up, for whatever reason - a man with not a great deal of personal honor. It's just that simple. But don't "mis"underestimate him - or any other seeming buffoon - again, because it can be very dangerous.
GWB was not the president, Cheney was. Cheney put himself in there, and GWB said, wha, wha, what? And Cheney told him to sht the fukkk up and do what he is told, and the neocons just trashed the place...
The reason Bush did not gain world-popularity is simply because he is a man who took the Presidency job with no intent to chase popularity. He remained true to his believes and principals and deserves admiration for that. Not many of us can be leaders, most of us tend to become followers (even if we posses leadership qualities) when unpopularity strikes us. But not Bush. Bush kept on being a leader in the toughest of unpopular times.
As far as the war on terror??? Bush did not engage the world in it. The war on terror started long before Bush was born. What Bush did was, he opened our eyes to see that the war on terror is real. America was attacked many times on her soil long before Bush became President. Did you forget that? Bush took a stand to protect America from that happening again. And it did not happen again???
As far as Iraq??? Saddam had to go. If you still have doubts about that, I suggest that you go to Iraq and visit the graves that contain over 300, 000 people (in each grave) who died on the same day, who were killed by Saddam. Bush remained true to his principal of a selfless person who is troubled by the massive killing of human beings, even though it was not in his own country. Not to mention that Saddam played a main part in the war of terror.
Now that Bush is leaving office, why is the war on terror not calming down? Terrorists know that Bush is no longer a threat. Terrorists know that Obama is not a threat. Why aren???t they settling down, but rather engage in even more bombings and more ways to keep the war going? I will tell you why. Because the war on terror is real, and now that the terrorists have no real opposition, they will get even more vicious, so vicious that you and I will wish that the American Presidency allowed third term.
300,000 graves in Iraq? How many graves in Rwanda and Darfur or do they really matter?
I've never seen a fan of Bush address these issues. How can they stand looking at themselves in a mirror?
Would you have had us go into Dafur and Rwanda as well? Even when the hapless UN couldn't even agree on what should be done? Wouldn't that have been another nasty example of unilateralism that the Left conveniently critiques when politically expedient? What would of been the end goal in Rwanda or Darfur? What would of been our exit strategy? How would we know we succeeded? The minute we left, the atrocities would of resumed, right? You can't play this argument both ways...either its ok for the US to go in alone or its not. Which one is it?
Still waiting to hear about the dead innocent Iraqis.
Why don't you tell us all about them. And tell us about the innocent children of Dafur...and Rawanda...and the innocent Iraq citizens that Saddam gassed...and all the other loss of innocent life. What then, is your issue? That all war is bad and shouldn't be? Ok, I agree. But then what should the US do when genocide or tyranny or a psycho dictator either slaughters his own or invades other countries....anything? That's my point. Posting rants that its criminal that innocents die in war is rather pointless. I will say that I find it far more disheartening that in the Arab world, it appears that its acceptable practice to use women and children as human shields; that its ok to use mosques to launch morters from, that the only tactic their "warriors" seem to take is to raise the level of atrocity so that folks ultimately call in quits. Less you think I'm a war freak, I would much prefer an isolationist stance; but the world so often demand otherwise...then craps on us when we actually do it.
"In the Arab world"??? Nice... Enough said little person...
Would you have had us go into Dafur and Rwanda as well? Even when the hapless UN couldn't even agree on what should be done? Wouldn't that have been another nasty example of unilateralism that the Left conveniently critiques when politically expedient? What would of been the end goal in Rwanda or Darfur? What would of been our exit strategy? How would we know we succeeded? The minute we left, the atrocities would of resumed, right? You can't play this argument both ways...either its ok for the US to go in alone or its not. Which one is it?
" He remained true to his believes and principals and deserves admiration for that. "
Like when he said he would fire the person who leaked the name Valerie Plame?
For the record, Valarie Plame had no cover to leek since many people in Washington knew that she "worked at the CIA") and that she had her husband sent over to Niger for a cursory and a politically motivated "investigation." The entire case was a huge "much to do about nothing" -- but made for more fuel to feed the Bush hatred fires. Never mind that it was Robert Novak, a journalist, who first used name Valarie Plame. What a joke. What faked outrage by the Left.
So Bush was so stupid he made that statement when no leak was possible? Was he preoccupied putting food on his family?
He was pre-occupied with quelling the frenzy of the partisan lynch-mob while we were at war...he needed the continued support of Congress. Not that hard to understand. But, I know...Bush should of known everything that everybody said or did and if not, he's an idiot. Pretty high standard. Hope you apply it to Obama in the coming years.
Wow, your excuses for Bush are really lame. Do you support pedophiles and rapists too???
What exactly is in your green Kool-Aid?
lol ... he was coexisting with the fish
Wow, you value no character, or integrity. You support the ignorant and the weak of mind and purpose. People that stick to their guns when they *** up are not called anything good. I would never tell my kids to not admit when you are wrong to the point of killing so many people, over a lies and deception...
How low can you go??? Do you support pedophiles too???
What exactly is a war on terror? Terror is an abstract idea and not a concrete objective. Terrorism can only be controlled by police action. Bush not being able to see that has cost us thousands of American lives and billions in wasted dollars.
Saddam had to go? Why is it our job to go into a country unilaterally? Going into Iraq has created more terrorist not less. Why is it our job to police the entire world? Going by your logic we are then bestowed with the moral authority to go in and overthrow every dictator that has killed there populace unfairly.
Wow, that's almost word for word the same propaganda Rush has been screeming on his radio show. What are the stats now, about 23% of Americans think Dubya has done a good job (its not about popularity, its about job performance, dubya doesn't get it) I would imagine the same percentage that listen to Rush. And of course if Rush can't find someone else to blame or make stupid excuses for his stupid president, he would have no listeners.
Has it crossed the minds of any Newsweek writer that in 40 years from now, Iraq could be considered a success after the change of strategy, which was implemented by BUSH? Could Bush become like Harry Truman, who was despised for a stupid war (Korea), where a wonderful ally is created by a disagreeable war?
oh and LIKEITIS: it's "emperor" not "emporer", grandchildren is one word and truly has no "e" in it. I find your comment ironic given your bumbling mistakes.
It was a lie and a fuccckkup no matter how you slice it. IIt is a huge messs and in forty years Bush's mess may be cleaned up by then, but he will not get the credit, he created the *** mess and the embarassment for this country. Man, your bar is set erally low, like down in the sewer low.
Is George W. a sociopath? Does he have a conscience? This is the real question.
He is insecure. His brother was everything he wanted to be for his father, and GWB was well, as Reagan put it, "when is that kid going to get a job?".
George wanted to be tough, but was used by Cheney like a little YIPPEEE KAY YAY pupeet...
Probably the biggest question Bush leaves behind is about the most consequential choice of his presidency: his decision to invade Iraq. When did the president make up his mind to go to war against Saddam Hussein? What were his real reasons?
We should all know, from Russ Baker's interview of Bush's original biographer Mickey Herskowitz, that George was already thinking about a war with Iraq in 1999. We know that he like the idea of gaining political capital as a wartime commander-in-chief, and he expected to use that capital to have his way with Congress and push his agenda. He ordered our children to war and death in part to burnish his own legacy.
Everybody else was just an ennabler. What more do you need to know?
Yep, and Rove was talking about a "war time" persident long before. It was so easy to see what was going to happen, and it is so laughable how really clueless the Bush supporters are. They did not even see it coming becuase they were too blinded by ideology...
lets see how many words it takes: entirely, wholly, fully, unequivocaly, undoubtably, disgustingly...
It's of no use trying to analyze Bush. What we should concentrate on is why the system of checks and balance failed so miserably. The finger should point straight at Congress. Bush's egregious show of ignorance, incompetence and arrogance should've heightened attention from Congress but instead they just went along. So what we have is a system that doesn't work anymore. Why can't we have a system where a leader is removed when there is a lack of confidence? There is nothing inherent in the office that is so sacrosanct that it should only happen through an impeachment. The President works for us and if he's incompetent then boot him out and get somebody else in; isn't this the way it works in real life?
as
The simplest explanation is usually the most correct. Many of us in India believe that the Iraq operation was just a means to reward (monetarily) the President's campaign supporters.
Halliburton and it's CEO - Cheney!
Seven more days until history. S-E-V-E-N. Mark your calendars for a true changing of the guard. It's a day for what the Constitution was written for.
3 most obvious? How about Katrina? Post traumatic stress and suicides of U.S. soldiers? Veterans being neglected by the the Administration? The attorney firing probes? Most obvious? The list goes on and on about what is most obvious. The most obvious is that Bush shouldn't have been President to begin with.
Katrina was Bush's fault. Sure. And to think that an incoming administration actually fires people and replaces them with other people...shocking. Whew, its a good thing that the evil madness of Bush is finally coming to an end. Now, Mr. Obama will bring light, truth, and justice for all...and all will be grand again. Looking forward to it.
You still dressing your wounds? Man you would have voted Bush a third term if possible.
Bush and Co filled the Admiinstration with "neo zealots", just look at the Justice Dept. Qualifications were trumped by neo dogma.
Bush's hands have left greasy marks everywhere from his messing with every vehicle the governement drives. There has been been more war, no regulation, politics in areas that should be free of any such entity, no peace, lack of action in humanitarian situations (Katrina, Ike and thanks McCain for the grandstanding, Myanmar, Darfur, Georgian-Russia conflict, thanks again McCain), ECONOMY!!!! There is no mystery to Bush. His paw prints are everywhere. If he were a thief, he would go down with the award for "most clumsy" or "loudest".
It seems Bush was misled about Iraq. We should have considered sending Americas Pious Fearless do-gooders to discuss Human rights with Hussain instead of diplomats and soldiers. By the way Jacob, Why dont you try the diplomatic approach with Hamas. They would Love to speak with you.
.... after what was done against them. They have every right to spit on your mug.
Once again the mainstream media distorting the facts. The financial crisis was the result of democrats such as Barney Frank and Chris Dodd loosening regulations and basically forcing banks to make loans to non-credit worthy folks. Now throw in a president Obama and just imagine the possibilities. The inmates are definately now running the asylum!!!
oh boy .... one of the 23% spewing nonsense
I think Mr Bush supported the ideals of traditional Americans who have fought for other people around the world for generations. When other leaders in the world would not stand up to the tearney of the Middle East leaders, the United Stated did. After 911 we went to the heart of the problem as defined by the United Nations and our own intellegence organizations. America stood up for the ideals of a free society, maybe for the last time under the leadership of George Bush, Thank You.
"America stood up for the ideals of a free society,"
Thinking Americans agree that it was Bush that ended our free society.
If that's what Thinking Americans" believe then God help us. Your spite is only matched with your ignorance of history. Despite that its now fashionable to think that Bush's call for democracy in the Middle East as fools play, there has been many a call for many a year by many a politician, pundant, and "thinker" for the very same. GWB along with many other people at the time simply thought that our words were falling way short, and that it was time to actually do something in the heart of a very messed up part of the world. To do nothing but continue the UN cocktail party diplomacy had gotten us nowhere but to 9/11. War is hell; but perhaps its strange to "thinkers" like yourself, but many of our bravest -- our troops and front line citizens actually do believe that a transformed Middle East is in our best interests. I'll let them decide when its time to leave.
"Your spite is only matched with your ignorance of history"
Say what? When in history was the village idiot in charge?
"I think Mr Bush supported the ideals of traditional Americans who have fought for other people around the world for generations. "
Bush has ignored genocide in Sudan. Apparently human rights only count if your land has oil?
Is "traditional" the new code for neo-con ?
Ya, and neocon "patriots" don't eat french fries, they eat freedom fries. And after the election they are eating sht!
What a bunch of total crp...
thank u
Most of what Bush did was incompetent. Going into Iraq was incompetent and folly. Bush was a puppet under Cheney for the first 6 years. He led us into disaster. If you casll that leadership i would suggest you raise the bar out of the sewer. i exoect much more than elementary school fear games and incompetent leadership.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss