The Enigma In Chief

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: rogerally @ 01/12/2009 10:26:02 PM

    To President Bush:



    Dear Sir,

    I voted for you and I prayed for you. But like so many others, I stopped supporting you long ago. Maybe you would like to know why? I stopped supporting you when you changed the objective. It is called "scope creep". You told me that we would go into Iraq, punish Saddam and check for WMD. I agreed to that. I never agreed to stay there for all these years. Bringing democracy to them was something else that I never agreed to. Those were your goals, not mine. We never agreed to that. You did what you wanted and didn???t care what I thought about it.

    Saddam was dead, so were his sons. Gladly, we found no WMD. There then was no more reason to stay. Numerous lost elections and steady polls revealed what you didn't want to hear. Perhaps refusing to hear would be more accurate. And in refusing to hear "our" will, you chose to do what you wanted to do, not what we wanted to do. That sir, is not democracy.

    I think you are a nice guy and I wish you well. However, I think history will view your presidency at odds with the American people, and thus at odds with democracy. You confused listening with pandering to polls like Bill Clinton. Clinton overdid it. You went to the other extreme.

    By not listening to us, you felt your were adhering to principles. You thought you were being a good leader. We did not agree. And sir, I don't think history will either.

    • Posted By: gfbum @ 01/13/2009 8:11:50 AM

      Sadly Roger the International media has misrepresented the truth. WMD have in fact been found multiple times in Iraq. I know personally of two occassions in 2008 where chemical weapons were found in Baghdad province, and in Northern Iraq. Perhaps someday the media will be held to account for outright lies and distortions that have besmirched the names of everyone who has served honorably for the Us military in Iraq.

      • Posted By: Zebedatious @ 01/13/2009 12:52:51 PM

        Ever thought about why we went to Iraq as opposed to North Korea, Sudan, Venezuela, or Liberia? You can argue all day about a faulty premise and you'll always have a faulty excuse. Good grief, don't we have enough problems and you want to spend time justifying creating more? I'm all for liberating all the oppressed people on this earth, but do you know if you make 24K dollars here a year you're in the top 1% of the wealthiest people on Earth? Good grief again, you people are the ones living in caves.

      • Posted By: YashBudini @ 01/13/2009 12:52:30 PM

        "Sadly Roger the International media has misrepresented the truth."

        So why didn't Faux News give us the truth, through the highly accurate and objective Karl Rove?

      • Posted By: rogerally @ 01/13/2009 9:43:21 AM

        I said I was gald we went in. Finding chemical weapons and destroying them was a worthwhile objective. We were not told that we would stay and creat democracy. That is the point. In a Democracy the majority rules. We, te majority did not want to stay there this long. gfbum, why can't you and Bush understand this? Either we respect the will of the people and have a democracy, or we say no, its my way or the highway.

  • Posted By: Vigilance @ 01/13/2009 9:27:02 AM

    "To reckon with the Bush years, we need to understand what went on between these men behind closed doors."

    Yes indeed. Declassify everything...that's certainly the only way I will trust our federal government again.

    • Posted By: YashBudini @ 01/13/2009 12:49:31 PM

      We could waterboard Cheney to get the truth, after all it's not torture.

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 01/13/2009 11:08:39 AM

    Lots of paradoxes here. Turns out that Bush never intended to ''bomb,bomb,Iran''to begin with,nor did he intimate that there would ever be war between the two nations [upsetting Bob Woodward and Sy Hershs apple carts as it was they who were proclaiming most loudly back in the summer of 2006 that this was precisely what Bush was thinking. History shows that both were wrong]. ''NCLB'' comes in for alot of critique,but it at least adressed and made plain the plight of public education in this nation as it was when controlled by powerful and politically connected teachers unions that saw Americas grades fall all through the 1980s and 1990s. They desire a return to the old status quo upon Obamas first days as president.
    AIDS. No other American president even comes close. Bush outstripped Clinton by tens of billions of dollars to combat the disease globally,earning grudging respect from otherwise strident critics of Bush in other areas.
    The aspects of the ''unitary executive'',once loudly dismissed by the NEWSWEAKS of the world,now have this rag openly agreeing with such a policy as it pertains to Obama [see: elsewhere in ''Politics'' here].
    For better or worse,the calculus in the Middle East is in transition,due primarily to the Iraq War,where the education of GW Bush made its most lasting impact by canning Rumsfeldian doctrine [ the ''armed ville''concept],and creating the ''Surge'',which finds Iraq largely where it is today,preparing to hold Sunni/Shia participatory elections while it becomes Israel/Palestine that foils any and all attempts to create a more lasting peace.
    Bush will be rightly condemned in many areas. But the ''fascist state'' that many of his detractors were convinced would be etched upon the fabric of the Republic never materialized. It was hyper-intrique from start to finish. No elections were ''stolen'' or devised by DIEBOLD [the same machines that were used in 2008 to elect Obama]. Ordinary Americans were not ''rounded up''. The Constitution,while a battered instrument,remains intact. [enough so that it now becomes the Democrat majority that can tinker with the Document at leisure]. Bush will fall somewhere in a ''not as good as Clinton,not as bad as Nixon'' region.

    • Posted By: YashBudini @ 01/13/2009 12:46:17 PM

      "Ordinary Americans were not ''rounded up''. "

      They most certainly were at the Republican National Convention in NYC in 2004.

  • Posted By: ep122 @ 01/13/2009 11:17:57 AM

    I think Pres. Bush should be left alone. Although mistakes were made, he has shown a considerable amount of growth in the last years of his Presidency. This includes the decision not to Invade Iran and his support of the Bailout bill against the wishes of his party. I remember that he even spent a holiday with the troops. I did not even think he would admit his mistakes, but he did. The country got what the country voted for-- an ultraconservative president, so we all share in the blame for things that have happened. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a big fan of his, but we should move foward and not backwards.

  • Posted By: rail60 @ 01/13/2009 11:09:43 AM

    Twenty years from now, the history books will reflect that the only time the non-elite Dubya held a position he was qualified for was when he was the head chearleader at his prep school in Massachusetts.

  • Posted By: whysosurprised @ 01/13/2009 10:12:36 AM

    I think it will cause too much intropection headaches and idle chit chat if we needle out the reasons of his decisions in the past, this only makes us more smug about our own satisfaction for his departure. The real question we should be asking ourselves is where should we go from here? Lets hope the next administration has those answers.

  • Posted By: boscobear @ 01/13/2009 10:00:56 AM

    All Americans who voted for Bush share in his Presidenital failures. especially those voting for a second term. I especially love it when they say they trusted Shrub as a military leader when no one can prove he ever completed his Air National Guard service.

  • Posted By: funkdome @ 01/12/2009 11:13:03 AM

    Does Newsweek have any writers who aren't partisan liberal hacks? Weisberg's "analysis" is as useless as any of Hannity's crap.

    • Posted By: Scuba Steve @ 01/13/2009 9:24:40 AM

      LoL! Now that's "Fair and balanced" Funkdome! I love it!

  • Posted By: Vigilance @ 01/13/2009 9:22:19 AM

    "Did Bush's own innocence and incompetence drive his missteps? Or was he manipulated into his bad choices?"

    The correct answer would be "yes". I'll comment more after I finish reading the article fully.

  • Posted By: DrewCAENG @ 01/13/2009 9:09:51 AM

    Maybe once Bush is finally gone the rest of the world can stop blaming America for EVERY ONE OF THEIR PROBLEMS, Ha someone tried to actually balme the Russian-Europe gas crisis on America!

  • Posted By: BOFORCE @ 01/13/2009 7:43:55 AM

    Michael Connell ,the Bush IT expert was invloved in election fruad which helped Bush/Cheny to win,killed in plane crash during a solo flight.......was he going to spill the BEANS against Bush and Cheney.

    • Posted By: Forty4 @ 01/13/2009 8:41:09 AM

      Your conspiracy theories are very entertaining. The Cheney pedophile human hunting excursion, the election/plane crash assertions. No proof of any of this, but they are quite amusing.

      We can't wait for the next episode!

  • Posted By: duranph01 @ 01/13/2009 8:12:20 AM

    I am a long time proud Democrat and I am suprised at the bias in this reporting. I think you need to leave out the personal opinions and just provide the facts. I did not vote for Bush either electiion and of course was not happy with the outcome, but you on the other hand still seem bitter.

  • Posted By: gfbum @ 01/13/2009 8:03:52 AM

    Another instance of clear and biased attempt at reporting. I find it encouraging when media makes an attempt to report truth; however, in this case that was not the case. I can tell you from personal experience that multiple instances of chemical weapons have in fact been found in Iraq. That is just from my own experience this year. I suspect the author of this article would choose to not believe that, but there are those that know the truth. Someday hopefully the rest of America will as well.

  • Posted By: Greg the Third @ 01/13/2009 6:16:47 AM

    Well said. My personal opinion is that Bush has a weak persona and caved in to both overt and insidious pressure from his advisors. The evidence as stated is his previous record as more of a moderate as governor of Texas. I do not believe the elder Bush had much input, especially considering his prescient stated opposition for invading Iraq during the gulf war in order to avoid an inevitable quagmire. Some of the problem is also what plagues Congress and that is that modern politicians appear all too willing to trade ethical principles and behavior for re-election funding. After seeing who voted for him, I beleive Rove pressured Bush during his formative first term to swing more to the right with the 2004 elections already in mind. I agree that there appeared to be a change towards moderation after 2006, with an especially good example being the hawkish stance towards Iran. On the other hand it is obvious the kind of forceful personalities that Karl Rove and Dick Cheney have. Rove's zealously ideologic intention of writing history while ignoring intelligence assessments is no secret. One particular galling aspect of the presiden't personality is his inflexibility and lack of penance for what should have been obvious mistakes. This kind of inflexibility I believe is one of the worst characteristics a person in his position can have and the effects are plain to see. People in power with influence must be able to learn from their mistakes on the fly and adjust course to mitigate disaster and perhaps salvage some measure of success with regards to faltering policies. The previous administration appeared to be the polar opposite with this regard and will be much better remembered by historians. The incoming administration appears to have the this flexibility so this bodes well, but time will tell. I am afraid that most of Obama's term will be spent cleaning up the mess this president made and failed to stop from happening. With regards to the secrecy issue, an old addage states that if you do not know what is going on it is probably something bad. Once again the incoming administration intends to be open and transparent with regards to their policies.

  • Posted By: DrewCAENG @ 01/13/2009 4:42:01 AM

    Its not GWB fault, its the 50% of Voting Americans who voted for him

  • Posted By: 771979 @ 01/13/2009 2:54:13 AM

    Wisdom to President G W Bush is alien as would be slippers to a snake. President G W Bush once said, ???There is book wisdom and there is practical wisdom,??? and the later is of interest to a manly man such as him. He also once believed that one obtained wisdom visiting a library. One of the effects of President GW Bush presidency has been explosion of unprecedented feelings of empowerment amongst the dim hacks in the world and unearned intellectual superiority demonstrated by him.

    President G W Bush is a meglomaniac who loved bullying and intimidating the world with bombs, missliles and bullets. President George W Bush still believe that America should "inspire fear" and attack Iran with its full might before it is too late. He has shown the same disrespect to the world opinion as would a dog show to a lamp post. President G W Bush is duplicitous and lacks direction of history and believes in cowboys mentality, ???Kill you enemy before he hits you,??? has made America hated more than ever before in the world and the American dim-hawks still love him. President Bush uses power that authorizes him to be the judge of the universe applying his universal principles of justice.
    President Bush committed war crimes as an institutional necessity to terrorize the world and in consequence propagated law of jungle, where the strongest attempts to kills the weaker. I remember reading that US Colonel Steve Butler was suspended from duty after he wrote to a newspaper calling Bush "a joke" whose presidency was going nowhere before September 11. "He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. His daddy has Saddam Hussein and he needed Osama." Mr Bush alleged silence about intelligence failures was "sleazy and contemptible", the colonel added. President G W Bush has wasted over three trillion dollars of American taxpayers money fighting an illegal war and occupation of Iraq war and still considers USA economy is strong and he is wining.

    I believe that his departure will be sigh of relief and joy for the whole world. 20 January 2009 should be a day of celebration for billions of people around the world to see the back of one of the biggest warmongers in the world history.

    .



  • Posted By: johnfjohnston @ 01/13/2009 2:26:15 AM

    "Once this country is rid of Bush", makes this president sound like some disease. What a well crafted message.

  • Posted By: johnfjohnston @ 01/12/2009 11:52:09 PM

    "Once this country is rid of Bush" makes the sitting president sound like some sort of disease. What a well crafted image!

  • Posted By: johnfjohnston @ 01/12/2009 11:49:09 PM

    "Once this country is rid of Bush", makes the sitting president sound like some sort of disease. What a well crafted image!

  • Posted By: Chapalody @ 01/12/2009 10:24:08 PM

    Are we now going to go on a witch hunt to see who the person was behind President Bush. Just like going through classified information to see who was responsible for the programs of the CIA concerning torture of terrorist suspects. How was life changed her in America after we went into Iraq. Who suffered hardships other then the families of the troops. Name one car bomb that went off. Name one mall that suffered so much damage that they never opened again. What children were kidnapped by terrorist and beheaded in protest of the war in Iraq. None of these things happen, no thanks to a dumb President with a bad memory. In truth American's didn't suffer at all because thats the way President Bush wanted it. Don't give us those crystal ball predictions as to when President Bush made up his mind to go into Iraq. No one knows other then President Bush. You can debate all you want. If President Bush didn't confide in you personally, then you don't know jack. The guessing game is not a creditable one, so don't try and come across as an authority on who and what President Bush was.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse