SECRETARY OF STATE

Sorry, No Fireworks This Time

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: hellomichigan @ 02/06/2009 10:19:26 AM

    FLASH NEWS NUCLEAR WAL MART REOPENS IN PAKISTAN
    WE (Pak Govt.) are proud to announce that, our beloved scientist A Q KHAN is free to consult your nuclear inquiry.
    PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR TENDER TO OUR REPRESENTATIVE FOR ANY NUCLEAR PARTS AND TECHNOLOGY
    OUR AUTHORISED CONTACTS
    A Q KHAN (IN PAKISTAN)
    MUSHARAFF (WHEREABOUT IS UNKNOWN AT THIS POINT)
    IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO CONTACT A Q AND MUSH, THEN PLEASE CONTACT OUR 24/7 OPEN HOTLINE FOR ISI.THEY WILL HELP YOU ABOVE AND BEYOND TO DEVELOP YOUR ISLAMIC BOMB, WE DON'T HAVE MONEY SO WE WILL DO EVERYTHING TO PUT HUMAN KIND IN JEOPARDY.
    CONSIDER PAKISTAN FOR ALL YOUR NUCLEAR NEEDS

  • Posted By: aldi @ 01/17/2009 4:00:30 PM

    ALLLAHHUAKBAR FI SABILLILLAH WIN TO HAMAS PALESTINE . TERKUTUK ORANG2 YAHUDI

  • Posted By: jebell @ 01/17/2009 10:47:40 AM

    we have to look at ourselves all of are choices of leadership have been a baqd ending here hoping are new elect is smarter than the previous money hunger so if they pass away with millions how can they spend it al they were just robers

  • Posted By: noseybob @ 01/15/2009 5:34:29 PM

    Where did HC get the $13,000,000.00 to pay off her campaign debt? She stated that she nor her lying H took anything out of the foundation. Hmmm, money must grow on trees....
    BV

  • Posted By: Kath_MAR60 @ 01/15/2009 2:08:55 PM

    PEACE, PEACE --THERE IS NO PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST AS PRESIDENT BUSH STATED IN HIS LAST ADDRESS TO THE PRESS & COUNTRY--SO IF GAZA HAS BOMBS DROPPED THERE KILLING THOUSANDS ?? --DON'T YOU THINK WE ARE NEXT --HERE IN THE USA WHERE PEACE WITH IT'S CITIZENS HAVE BEEN FOR YEARS ON THE HOMELAND. 9 1 1--SURELY SOUNDED OUT LOAD AND CLEAR THAT AMERICANS ARE SAFE..BIN LADEN IS WELL & STILL ALIVE SO , NOW WHAT HILRARY SECRETARY OF STATE...?????????

  • Posted By: Aghast @ 01/12/2009 12:25:56 PM

    Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State in the Obama administration.

    According to the Ineligibility Clause of the United States Constitution, no member of Congress can be appointed to an office that has benefited from a salary increase during the time that Senator or Representative served in Congress. A January 2008 Executive Order signed by President Bush during Hillary Clinton???s current Senate term increased the salary for Secretary of State, thereby rendering Senator Clinton ineligible for the position.



    Specifically, Article I, section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides ???No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time.??? The provision is seen by most as designed by our Founding Fathers to protect against corruption.

    Former President Richard Nixon circumvented this constitutional provision after appointing former Ohio Senator William Saxbe to the position of Attorney General. The Nixon administration managed to force legislation through Congress to reduce the salary for the position of Attorney General to the level that existed prior to Senator Saxbe???s appointment. This scheme, known thereafter as ???The Saxbe Fix,??? was also used to allow Senator Lloyd Bentsen to assume the position of Treasury Secretary under President Clinton.

    ???The Saxbe Fix??? may reduce the salary of Secretary of State to previous levels, but it does not affect what is a clear constitutional prohibition. It cannot change the fact that the salary had been increased while Senator Clinton served in Congress. (President Ronald Reagan reportedly did not appoint Senator Orrin Hatch to the Supreme Court because of this provision.) Simply put, the Constitution does not provide for a legislative remedy for the Ineligibility Clause.

    ???There???s no getting around the Constitution???s Ineligibility Clause, so Hillary Clinton is prohibited from serving in the Cabinet until at least 2013, when her current term expires,??? said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. ???Barack Obama should select someone who is eligible for the position of Secretary of State and save the country from a constitutional battle over Hillary Clinton???s confirmation. No public official who has taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution should support this appointment. And aside from the constitutional issue, Hillary Clinton???s long track record of corruption makes her a terrible choice to serve as the nation???s top diplomat.???

    • Posted By: user7 @ 01/15/2009 11:23:15 AM

      WHAT CONSTITUTION? YOU MEAN IT STILL EXISTS, ONLY ON PAPER, ENSHRINED UNDER GLASS FOR ALL TO SEE WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN IF WE HAD A LEGIT GOVERNMENT

  • Posted By: user7 @ 01/15/2009 11:19:54 AM

    this is her farewell tour, four years, she will jumpship even if obama is elected twice, she will have had enough, what will be her legacy aside from a failed presidential run, she would have made a good president, but alas, she didn't run a good ship with her campaign, they failed her. long live HILLARY CLINTON, SHE SHOULD HAVE STAYED A SENATOR

  • Posted By: 40YearR @ 01/11/2009 12:40:37 PM

    If she's really willing to be the team player she needs to be, then I hope she gets past all that stuff about Bill.

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 01/12/2009 12:22:09 PM

      Strong lady. I didn't like her during the primaries but her tenacity earned her my admiration.

      • Posted By: 40YearR @ 01/13/2009 1:54:52 AM

        What has changed my attitude is that she stopped trying to control everything and make everything about her. She is now willing to be just a part of someone else's adminitration, and be of service for the national benefit. This is significant to me, and I respect her for it.

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 01/14/2009 11:54:49 AM

          Excellent analysis, 40!

  • Posted By: Midwestern Person @ 01/14/2009 10:26:15 AM

    Perhaps the questions posed to her should include; has your memory loss improved or is I have no recollection still part of her extensive vocabulary???

  • Posted By: Senate Hearings Confirmation Viewer @ 01/13/2009 6:21:59 PM

    What about the Clintons' past connection (to criminals) like Ya Lin Charlie Trie (Immediately after the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie sent a letter to President Clinton that expressed concern about America's intervention in tensions arising from China's military exercises being conducted near Taiwan. Trie told the President in his letter that war with China was a possibility should U.S. intervention continue), Norman Hsu, James Riady, John Huang, and Johnny Chung (bank fraud, tax evasion, and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law) and the Clinton's poor judgement in promoting them, sponsoring them, having them to the White House many times, creating potential national security risks, possible conflict of interest (with China) and campaign finance ethics. Why is the Senate Confirmation Committee only concerned with President Bill Clinton's conflict of interest in his Charity Donors and not re Hillary and Bill Clinton's past political donors, obligations to China, and other obligations that may be a conflict to our national security? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_United_States_campaign_finance_controversy

    • Posted By: Repubssuck @ 01/13/2009 6:57:59 PM

      Don't forget Obama's phony birth certificate.

  • Posted By: Senate Hearings Confirmation Viewer @ 01/13/2009 6:21:27 PM

    What about the Clintons' past connection (to criminals) like Ya Lin Charlie Trie (Immediately after the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie sent a letter to President Clinton that expressed concern about America's intervention in tensions arising from China's military exercises being conducted near Taiwan. Trie told the President in his letter that war with China was a possibility should U.S. intervention continue), Norman Hsu, James Riady, John Huang, and Johnny Chung (bank fraud, tax evasion, and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law) and the Clinton's poor judgement in promoting them, sponsoring them, having them to the White House many times, creating potential national security risks, possible conflict of interest (with China) and campaign finance ethics. Why is the Senate Confirmation Committee only concerned with President Bill Clinton's conflict of interest in his Charity Donors and not re Hillary and Bill Clinton's past political donors, obligations to China, and other obligations that may be a conflict to our national security? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_United_States_campaign_finance_controversy

  • Posted By: Marty63 @ 01/12/2009 12:48:07 PM

    Oh please cut the crap!, do you honestly believe she is the only that has wipe her a** or others are going to wipe her, with any amendment of our Constitution. Get a grip!.

    • Posted By: jonerik @ 01/13/2009 5:48:51 PM

      Was that English? Are you capable of a complete thought?

  • Posted By: Getitout @ 01/13/2009 5:10:22 PM

    I am glad the she was appointed the secretary of state position. She would have made a good president, a very knowledgeable person, one respected all around the world. Mr. Obama can make speeches, and very good one. But, as far as making the decisions, he surrounded himself with very knowlegeable, poweful staff members that probably will make the final decision for him. Not to take nothing away from Mr. Obama, but I think he is there just to make history. And Hillary, welcome back to the white house. She is the one that is going to run the show. Indirectly of course. As a secreatary of state.

    • Posted By: jonerik @ 01/13/2009 5:46:38 PM

      Seriously? I don't think you are very familiar with President-Elect Obama if you think he's going to just let others make decisions for him. He is brilliant, well educated and a leader; it isn't just about making speeches or making history.

      On the other hand, I admire him all the more for having the confidence to appoint such a critical opponent of his from the primary to the #1 position in his cabinet, because she is more than qualified and will be excellent in that role.

  • Posted By: Aghast @ 01/12/2009 12:42:43 PM

    "LET HER BE"? What about that tiny matter of the Constitution that states she is inelibible? I guess the neo cons aren't the only ones above the Constitution!

    According to the Ineligibility Clause of the United States Constitution, no member of Congress can be appointed to an office that has benefited from a salary increase during the time that Senator or Representative served in Congress. A January 2008 Executive Order signed by President Bush during Hillary Clinton???s current Senate term increased the salary for Secretary of State, thereby rendering Senator Clinton ineligible for the position.



    Specifically, Article I, section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides ???No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time.???

    • Posted By: Yuseff @ 01/13/2009 12:39:00 PM

      You are absolutely right Aghast. That is why last month the Congress passed a law (signed by Pres. Bush) that decreases the salary of the Sec. of State by $4,000 per year. That way Hiliary will be on the right side of the constitution.

  • Posted By: Marty63 @ 01/12/2009 3:08:30 PM

    ... just to think that the stormfront issue... you know the Don Black thing might just make me feel like a white supremacist supporter... aaaah, no thanks!

  • Posted By: Marty63 @ 01/12/2009 2:56:47 PM

    hu? and where is he?... not even his own party supported him... they went with the guy that got the Judas' kiss knowing that none of these 4 had a change among their own party Huck, Rom, Paul, McCain they went with the later because of his so call war hero status. Oh boy! laughable at best. And yes I leaned towards Ron Paul myself. But...

  • Posted By: binkis @ 01/12/2009 2:16:25 PM

    What --nothing about P...eter Paul, Norman Hsu, Congel...What about donors to the Family Foundation or the Library...the Obama lawyers got out manned-- Bob Bennet et al...What about her TOTAL lack of experience or people skills...Somebody better ask these questions...A candiadte that got to the Senate on her Husbands CV and last name --lost 2 million jobs in NY and named many b uildings in the Seate while using it as a stepping stone to run unsuccesfully for President and has YET TO PAY HER DEBTS....Then there is her penchant for lying and hiding doc to runout the stat of limitations...

  • Posted By: exceltoexcel @ 01/12/2009 1:59:17 PM

    Quote- "OK! give me one name of a Public Government servant that is clean and that has NOT work on the shadows of the law or even outside of it. You will find NONE!. And that is the sad reality of our society.Again get a grip!"

    Ron Paul...

  • Posted By: exceltoexcel @ 01/12/2009 1:58:46 PM

    Quote-"OK! give me one name of a Public Government servant that is clean and that has NOT work on the shadows of the law or even outside of it. You will find NONE!. And that is the sad reality of our society.Again get a grip!"

    --Ron Paul

  • Posted By: Marty63 @ 01/12/2009 12:58:18 PM

    OK! give me one name of a Public Government servant that is clean and that has NOT work on the shadows of the law or even outside of it. You will find NONE!. And that is the sad reality of our society.Again get a grip!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse