What's the Best Fix?

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The changing structure of the U.S. economy has also led to a bias in favor of monetary stimulus over fiscal stimulus. In an economy where consumers don't have much debt and are mostly buying goods and services produced by their neighbors, as was the case in the 1930s, creating make-work jobs has a quick and significant impact. But in an economy where consumers and businesses have lots of debt and where they buy a lot of goods and services made by foreigners, as is the case today, monetary stimulus would likely pack more of a punch. To the extent lower interest rates filter into the broader economy—through mortgage refinancing, or lower rates on consumer debt—monetary stimulus can improve everybody's financial well-being without boosting deficits.

That's the theory. The problem is that in this downturn, massive monetary stimulus hasn't worked its efficient, elegant magic. The Fed has reduced the short-term interest rate it controls from 5.52 percent in September 2007 to 0.25 percent today, effectively lowering the price of short-term money by 95 percent. But the cuts haven't translated into proportionately cheaper money for the economy at large. As I pointed out last summer, banks used the cheap funds to patch up their own balance sheets and prepare for further losses. What's more, the favored version of fiscal stimulus—tax cuts and rebates—hasn't worked, either. The rebate checks sent out in the spring of 2008 were eaten up by higher food and gas prices.

That leaves two possible solutions. One has never really been tried in a sustained manner. Having exhausted its traditional tools of regulating interest rates, the Fed could print money and use it to buy assets from banks and financial institutions. The second solution—a big stimulus package fueled by government spending—hasn't been tried in 75 years. The main concern about the package as currently envisioned it not that this type of stimulus won't work, it's that, as Paul Krugman frets, it might not be big enough.

Critics of fiscal stimulus would have us think that policymakers face an either/or choice—either fiscal or monetary stimulus. The reality is that the situation calls for an "all of the above" approach. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke warned Tuesday that fiscal stimulus alone won't do the trick. In general, I think analogies between the current economic situation and the Great Depression are overblown. But there's one comparison that holds true. Just as in the 1930s, the financial and political powers that be have screwed things up so powerfully that the usual tools and established orthodoxies aren't of much use.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: TheReason @ 05/09/2009 3:25:47 PM

    The politicians are not the ones in power people. It is the banks or i should say the Federal Reserve

    This story really kills me. And you have a PRIVATELY owned bank like the Federal Reserve who cannot track or explain where 9 trillion dollars went?

    Why hasn't ANYBODY audited the PRIVATELY owned Federal Reserve? They are owned privately just like Wells Fargo. Why was the Federal Reserve not in the stress test?

    Where is the missing 9 TRILLION dollars?

    http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_seyret&Itemid=91&task=videodirectlink&id=1389

    Here is video of one senate meeting you wont find in the media because this information would cause hysteria.

    I used to laugh at these black helicoptor people. I am not laughing anymore.

  • Posted By: deju-vu @ 03/08/2009 1:12:10 PM

    FIFTY percent of ALL of China's exports are from "American" owned companies.
    Think about how many American jobs were lost to create FIFTY percent of ALL of China's exports.

  • Posted By: david222 @ 03/01/2009 2:27:24 PM

    Everyone seems to be in agreement that lowering taxes is the answer. I saw eliminate all income taxes on everyone including corporations, and replace it with a national consumption tax. HR25 is a bill in committee in the House of Representatives and would do just that. This bill has 21 co-sponsors and would repeal the 16th amendment , eliminate all income taxes and institute a consumption tax. Go to www.fairtax.org and get all the info before you say it won't work. If you like filing a tax return every year and think the IRS is doing "ONE HECK OF A JOB", then maybe the fair tax is not for you. BUT if like most of us you are searching for a real solution, not a pipe dream, than look no further. WWW.FAIRTAX.ORG is for you . Read about it and make up your own minds. If you like what you see, then you can contact all your elected leaders including President Obama, from the site and let your voice be heard.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 
 
PHOTOS
What About Us?
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.

 
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.