SPONSORED BY:

The Quitter Economy

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Of course, staged events and stunts frequently fail. John D. Rockefeller, who kept his financial affairs to himself, conspicuously invested in stocks after the 1929 crash. "Believing that the fundamental conditions of the country are sound, my son and I have been purchasing sound common stocks for days," he said. (Entertainer Eddie Cantor's response: "Sure, who else had any money left?") Obama's declaration that he would freeze salaries of top White House aides, saving $443,000 in the first year, is less than a droplet in the bucket. What's more, the markets and consumers have become increasingly immune to Beltway reassurance, especially since so much of it has been false.

But some words can carry weight, especially if Obama manages to do what Bush and his colleagues have failed to since the problems started in the summer of 2007: declare a comprehensive set of principles and plans, and follow through on them. "If you want to restore confidence, we have to stop improvising," says Desmond Lachman, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C.

A strategy is emerging. The stimulus package, likely to be Obama's first significant piece of legislation, will include a mix of traditional measures intended to buffer economic distress and make consumers feel a little more secure (extending unemployment benefits, expanding Medicaid's coverage of children, creating jobs through infrastructure spending and providing aid to stricken states).

But to halt the process of foreclosures and forced sales, to stop lenders from forcing liquidation, more unorthodox measures may be required. In the past year, government backstops have prevented death spirals in several markets that function as the plumbing for the corporate sector, such as the commercial paper market. If the Federal Reserve were to, for example, guarantee DIP financing, it might put a halt to quick liquidations.

There are also signs that government action may be spurring the private sector to put the brakes on foreclosures. Last July, when the FDIC took over failed California bank IndyMac and its huge portfolio of 65,000 delinquent loans, FDIC staffers developed a streamlined loan-modification plan and aggressively reached out to borrowers. The first 8,500 modifications that the FDIC made produced an average of $49,000 more value than if they had been foreclosed—a savings of $23 million for lenders. The FDIC's modification plan is being applied to other cases, most notably as part of the agreement the U.S. government made with Citigroup in late November to backstop $306 billion of loans. "I think we're finally seeing a lot of mortgage servicers coming around to the fact that they can't use old processes to deal with this problem," says Michael Krimminger, special adviser for policy to the FDIC chair.

The private sector seems finally to be heeding one of FDR's maxims: "It is common sense to take a method and try it. If it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above all, try something." Congress is considering a controversial law that would let bankruptcy judges, rather than banks themselves, cut interest rates for homeowners at risk of defaulting—a process known as a "cramdown." In an effort to assure Congress that such measures aren't necessary, some banks have become more proactive in modifying loans. After the success of an early effort last fall by JPMorgan Chase to modify loans, the giant bank announced in mid-January it would step up efforts to include the larger portfolio of loans that it services. The program, targeted to cover a little more than a trillion dollars in investor-owned loans, has slowed the foreclosure process on more than 80,000 homeowners since October, staving off $22 billion in foreclosed properties.

Obama's speech was judged by many to have been a somber assessment of a bleak period, and to have lacked some of the jaunty happy-warrior spirit of FDR. But FDR's first inaugural wasn't full of happy talk. "Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment," he said. And if you read between the lines of Obama's address, you can detect some Depression-era blithe spirit poking through the gloom. "Starting today," Obama said near the end, "we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off and begin again the work of remaking America." Fans of the Great American Songbook will recognize this as a paraphrase of Dorothy Fields's lyrics to the Jerome Kern tune "Pick Yourself Up." The song, a paean to self-belief, bouncing back and not giving up—an affirmation of "Yes, We Can"—was featured in "Swing Time," a 1936 confection that starred Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers twirling their way gracefully through the gloom.

With Matthew Philips and Jessica Ramirez in New York, and Daniel Stone in WashingtonWith and in New York, and in Washington

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: JPACTS @ 03/14/2009 1:30:54 AM

    Give us back our taxes BIG TIME ! We will buy things then start by:

    1) Reduce permanently 10% of the federal and state work force - those left need work harder like most workers still working are forced to do,

    2) Make all government employees INCLUDING senators, house of reps & the President /VP give up earning any more pension benefits (like most americans no longer have), INSTEAD give them a match of 50% on up 6% of their annual wage they contribute into a 403B plan - USE the TAX savings resulting from the dropping of new pension TO PROPERLY FUND SOCIAL SECURITY FOR THE TAXPES SINCE THATS 10 year from going BROKE

    3) Have the FEDERAL government stop paying 80% for federal employee families health premium - drop it to 50%,

    4) Increase the FEDERAL employee health insurance deductible to $1000 like most private employers now have,

    5) make all senators and house of representatives serve NO MORE than 2 term limits - ends the power of long term senators, etc to force senators, etc to approve EARMARKS on bills alreday released from committee

    6) Go to a flat tax Federal tax program so the IRS audits can stop (laying off 50% of that organizations tax payer supported staff)

    7) after 1st child's birth to a single mom STOP paying for single mom's child birth , offer free sterilization - more than 1/2 the baby's being born in the US now being paid for by the government (TAXPAYERS in other words) and don't give these single mom's, who are abusing the free childbirth /single mom welfare system by having child after child out of wedlock, money to support more than 1 child

    8) NO Social Security, Medicaid or Medicare benefits to ANYONE NOT A US CITIZEN even if their "citizen" child brings them into the US - as are all being done now for NON Citizens!

    9) Give the President Line Item Veto rights

    10) Give life in prison to ANY politician find guilty of any abuse of power or corruption while in office

    11) OUR prisons - lower the taxes to care for the Prisoners - no more coffee or juice, let them drink water at ALL MEALS, feed them oatmeal/toast for breakfast, peanut butter/jelly sandwiches with crackers for lunch and inexpensive stew (easy to make and serve requiring less kitchen labor) And for medicines make them pay the FULL COST of medicine - why reduce their costs out of taxpayers pockets ? I didn't unjustly put them in prison THEY BROKE the law - suffer the CONSEQUENCES


    STOP THE MADNESS


    P.S. Anyone running on the above platform will WIN any FUTURE elections, so Go for IT you TRUE AMERICANS!

  • Posted By: Gijsbert Koren @ 02/22/2009 10:59:02 AM

    Can we really do it? Artist impression: http://gijsbertkoren.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/no-we-cant/

  • Posted By: martialguy @ 02/07/2009 1:10:25 AM

    We all know how the economy behaves without the social net and stimulus plan; it was well illustrated during the Great Depression.

    The important thing is to stimulate sectors of the economy that really needs correction by analyzing supply and demand.
    For instance; US oil consumption is 20 millions of barrels per day; while oil production is only 8.5 millions per day. Therefore; domestic production should be encouraged to increase in such a way that it is cheaper making it at home than buying overseas and shipping it back.

    For sectors in which products are generally produced cheaper at home and production exceeds consumption ( like automobile production); of course buying domestically would be great for the economy. Policy makers should encourage domestic comsumption in that sector at all costs.

    With limited resources; sectors that need help should be prioritized. The domino effects will take well care of the whole economy.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
COVER STORY: BUSINESS
There's More To Fear Than Fear

No, we haven't turned the corner on the banking crisis—we can't even see the corner. What's needed is a bold, massive jolt to the system.