SPONSORED BY:

To Stop Dissent, Call It Smut

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Some Western nations have also begun to tighten oversight, of course. British authorities are considering asking Internet-service providers to offer parents child-safe Web services and assigning film-style ratings to all Web sites. Australia has proposed a mandatory Internet filter that would block at least 1,300 sites, most of them with violent or pornographic content. Wikileaks, a self-described Wikipedia for leaked documents, recently released a list of nearly 4,000 sites (almost all pornographic) that, it says, are secretly blocked by the Danish authorities on the advice of Danish police and Save the Children, without judicial or public oversight.

The Western anti-porn measures give Beijing cover. Eradicating smut is an easy way to show that Beijing is in control—and sometimes that's enough to inspire self-censorship on the part of bloggers. Several Chinese portals that found their names on the blacklist decided to apologize and comply with the orders rather than fight them. Of course, Western controls are always instituted with the highest of intentions—to suppress smut rather than political dissent. But controls are controls.

Morozov is a fellow at the Open Society Institute.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jbz7879 @ 04/01/2009 5:48:15 AM

    the internet is not free in the west either -
    i put some critical views of the way anti pakistani and zionists operate on the media on my channel on
    UTUBE
    AND THEY SUSPENDED IT
    SO MUCH FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN AMERICA
    THEY HAVE NOT EVEN READ THEIR OWN CONSTITUTION OR FIRST AMENDMENT -
    EVEN ON U-TUBE
    THIS IS LIKE THE KETTLE CALLING THE POT BLACK -LOLZ
    USA IS WORST THEN AMERICA ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH ISSUES -
    THE ONLY COUNTRY WHICH HAS ANY FREEDOM AND LETS ITS CITIZENS USE IT PROPERLY WUTH DISCRETION IS ONLY GREAT BRITAIN -THE REST ARE JUST FARCICAL
    LIKE THE DANES AND DUTCH -WHICH ARE OBSESSED WITH ISLAMOPHOBIA -YOU CAN SEE HOW ANTI SEMITICS GASSED 6 MILLION POLES -JEWS AND GYPSIES IN EUROPE AS WELL AS 1 MILLION BOSNIANS AND CROATS RECENTLY BY STUDYING THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE DUTCH AND DANES -THEY WILL SOON HAVE ANOTHER CRYSTALL NICHT AGAINST MUSLIMS -ONLY I THINK THE JEWS WILL BE INCLUDED TOO AS THEY WERE IN THE INQUISITION WHERE THEY STARTED THE MISCHIEF LIKE HERE TOO

  • Posted By: JeromeEugeneMorrow @ 02/20/2009 2:15:29 AM

    well ,I found no problem accessing to any abroad websit here in China,I

    guess lots of westerners had been ingrained that the communism China

    never does good to its people,however that's not the truth.
    Yes we do had carried out some regulation measurements to the web,what

    I'm worrying about is how much fruit it can reap instead wheather it

    may ban me from speaking whatever I want to speak.

  • Posted By: flutediva1212 @ 02/16/2009 12:20:08 PM

    China is smart to realize that free discussion on the internet is a dangerous thing for its totalitarian regime. But they can't repress free speech there forever. It will be a matter of enough citizens getting angry enough to actually DO something about it. Where have all the great leaders of the past gone? China needs a Gandhi or a Martin Luther King to inspire them to shake things up a little.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now