SPONSORED BY:
NATION

Safe To Release?

A new Pentagon report may complicate Obama's plans for Gitmo.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The Pentagon is preparing to declassify portions of a secret report on Guantanamo detainees that could further complicate President Obama's plans to shut down the detention facility.

The report, which could be released within the next few days, will provide fresh details about 62 detainees who have been released from Guantanamo and are believed by U.S. intelligence officials to have returned to terrorist activities, according to two Pentagon officials who asked not to be identified talking about a document that is not yet public. One such example, involving a Saudi detainee named Said Ali Al-Shihri, who was released in 2007, received widespread attention Friday when Pentagon officials publicly confirmed that he has recently reemerged as a deputy commander of Al Qaeda in Yemen. Al-Shihri, once known publicly only as Guantanamo detainee No. 372, is suspected of involvement in a thwarted attack on the U.S. embassy in Yemen last September.

The decision to release additional case studies from the report is in effect a warning shot to the new president from officials at the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies who are skeptical about some of his plans. Some Pentagon officials, including ones sympathetic to Obama's goals, note the political outcry would be deafening should another example like Al-Shihri become public six months from now—and it turns out to be a Guantanamo detainee released under Obama's watch rather than by the Bush administration. "The last thing Obama wants is for one of these guys [at Guantanamo] to get released and return to killing Americans," said one senior Defense Department official who asked not to be identified because of the political sensitivities.

Some counter-terrorism experts have raised questions about the significance of the Pentagon's figures, noting that the number of so-called "recidivist" detainees represents only a small portion, about 12 percent, of the approximately 520 detainees who have been released from Guantanamo since the detention facility was opened in January 2002. This compares with recidivism rates of as high as 67 percent in state prisons in the United States, according to Justice Department figures. There have also been concerns that Bush administration holdovers were deliberately playing up the cases in recent weeks in an effort to undercut Obama. One former senior U.S. counter-terrorism official noted to NEWSWEEK that the Pentagon waited until the day after Obama signed his executive order mandating the closure of Guantanamo to confirm Al-Shihri's renewed Al Qaeda ties.

Still, a few top Obama administration officials have privately acknowledged that the problem of still dangerous detainees at Guantanamo is more worrisome than some of president's campaign statements might suggest. In May 2008, when the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) last prepared a report on released Gitmo detainees who had returned to terrorist activities, it counted the number of recidivists at 37. Among the examples: Mohammed Ismail, one of the "juveniles" at Guantanamo who, upon his release in 2004, had praised his treatment by Americans, saying at a press conference, "They gave me a good time at Cuba." He was recaptured four months later, participating in an attack on U.S. forces near Kandahar, Afghanistan.

As Pentagon press secretary Geoffrey Morrell disclosed two weeks ago, by mid-January of this year, 24 new detainees had been added to the DIA recidivist tally. The recent confirmation of Al Shihri bumped the overall number to 62, 18 of whom are alleged to have directly participated in terror attacks.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: life2go @ 02/01/2009 7:52:53 AM

    Finally a decent response. And I read the other one on the other post. I don't think Bush would have had a leg to stand on about invading Iraq if it wasn't for 9-11. What you have failed to remember is I always agreed that we should not have went into Iraq (atleast not when we did). My point is that 9-11 opened a pandoras box of possibilities. My problem with Clinton (and why I keep bringin it up) is that SO many people make it sound like he had no responsiblity. If ya'll want Bush to stand tall and take responsibiltiy, all I'm saying is atleast admit Clinton screwed up. But you make it sound like Bush has held 110% of the blame for 9-11. Everything is connected.

  • Posted By: life2go @ 01/29/2009 7:07:48 AM

    Harley....let me get this right. {As for Bill Clinton, no it's not Ok, but I don't care what Clinton did, he did not send my son to war for OIL, that was BUSH, Iraq had NOTHING to do with the 9/11 attacks, it was a war of choice and PROFIT.}

    So you don't care that other Americans (military members and civilians) were dieing for oil and NOT DO anything about it for PROFIT (first WTC, Cole etc...)? Even you admit that Clinton chose not to get Osama because of the Prince and that it was all about OIL. And by making that choice he allowed Osama and his types to continue their destruction (9-11). But some how he bears no responsiblity? So answer me this, if 9-11 hadn't happened do you think we still would have gone into Iraq? I would have to say no.

    And it is a volunteer military (if your son's beliefs are anything like yours) then he could get out....nobody forced him to join, I'm sure even if he was in the Army before Iraq he has had to reenlist since then and he could have made a stand on his "principles" and gotten out.

  • Posted By: life2go @ 01/28/2009 7:10:16 PM

    "why was no action taken against them"...moron, dig a little deeper, there was a prince from the united arab emirates at the camp with Bin Laden, the choice was made NOT to bomb him, wrong chouice if you ask me, but we do get our OIL form them, they might be angry if we killed one of their kids...ya think...

    Oh so it is okay for Clinton to do NOTHING FOR OIL, but at the same time you claim that this whole WRONG WAR is all for OIL and that Bush is horrible....come on you can't have it both ways....
    And lets not forget how much money the Clintons have personally gotten all those oil rich countries in the last few years....geez a little extra for looking the other direction?

    As for "my mom" I don't have one, me and my dad use yours, and she is a dirty wh0re ;)
    Boy, sticks and stones....GROW UP!!!!!! IT IS NICE TO KNOW THAT YOU ATLEAST ADMIT TO BEING INBRED AND THAT YOU AND YOUR DAD HAVE TO SHARE THE SAME WOMAN (you really should leave your sister out of this)..... and trust me I know it's not my mom....she sure in the heck wouldn't have raised someone so fowl and ignorant.

    Try better next time....but I'm done with you. Not going to waste MY TIME.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now