Amy Rose-King
WOMEN’S HEALTH

Have Another ‘Fertilitini’

A slick new promotional campaign reminds women in their 20s and 30s that their biological clocks are ticking.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Once upon a time, a woman's ovaries were her own private affair. Aspiring mothers struggling with fertility issues whispered to their doctors about their travails, took drugs to stimulate their follicles and crossed their fingers. Today, aging eggs and donor sperm are the topic of open conversation on blogs, on Oprah and in movies like "Baby Mama" (storyline: a 37-year-old businesswoman hires a surrogate after being told her chance of getting pregnant is just about nil). Even politicians are in the fertility limelight. Sarah Palin's baby, Trig, was born when she was 44. And the newly appointed New York senator, Kirsten Gillibrand, cast a vote in Congress the day before giving birth to son Henry at age 41 last May.

And yet, despite the outing of the female reproductive system, many young women still don't fully understand the facts about age as a risk factor for infertility. Their Ob-Gyns don't always tell them. And 40-plus Hollywood mothers (some of whom are presumably using donor eggs to get pregnant) and cases like Palin and Gillibrand reassure them. So this week, the American Fertility Association (AFA) is launching "Manicures & Martinis" at the Dashing Diva Nail Salon in Manhattan, the first in a series of one-hour conversationsabout reproductive health. The event, targeted at women in their 20s and 30s who want to have children someday but aren't ready now, features a leading fertility expert, who'll talk about the reality of the biological clock and other risk factors for infertility. Yes, there'll be martinis—an offering criticized by some health advocates as irresponsible— but there will also be an organic alcohol-free "fertilitini."

Corey Whelan, AFA's director of development, says this is the kind of program she wishes existed when she was trying to get pregnant in her 20s and 30s while suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome. "I wanted to create a program that was soft, that was light and that was non-threatening," says Whelan, now 53 and the mother of 13-year-old twins conceived through in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The goal is to inform women so they can explore their options at an earlier age, she says, and the message is "one of hope, not one of doom and gloom."

To get the word out, AFA is joining the world of social marketing, advertising the event on Web sites like Facebook.com and Meetup.com. Whelan's hope is that women who attend will spread the word to their friends in person and electronically—a girlfriend-to-girlfriend experience, as opposed to some dreaded medical information session that few young women would be inclined to sign up for. "We would not be able to bring this particular demographic into a lecture hall or symposium," she says. "They wouldn't be interested and it wouldn't work."

But will women show up? AFA's Manhattan event is fully booked, with 25 women signed up and more than 30 on a waiting list. The confirmed participants are all single and between the ages of 21 and 34. One woman registered her daughter, her niece and her daughter's best friend, says Whelan, who plans to offer similar events in other venues (cheese shops, billiard halls) across the country in 2009.

Talking to women about age and motherhood is always controversial. No matter how public the topic of reproduction has become, an individual woman's fertility and the choices she makes about when and how to have children remain highly personal. While many women and health-care providers believe that informing women about age as a risk factor is empowering, others say that harping on the topic smacks of paternalism and is unfair to women who are still in search of a partner. It is a challenging line to walk, says Dr. Michael Soules, who spearheaded a public-awareness campaign about age and other infertility risk factors for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in 2001. Doctors don't want to encourage pregnancy before women are ready, nor do they want to make them feel guilty about putting career first. "We never want to induce people to panic," says Soules, managing partner at Seattle Reproductive Medicine, a private fertility clinic.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Arizona Reader @ 08/16/2009 3:20:04 AM

    As a 47 year old professional women without children, I wish that I had had more information on fertility when I was younger. Like many of the women posting comments here, I balked & bristled when friends or relatives mentioned the ticking clock. I was also working hard on my career and thought that I would have "plenty of time for babies - later." Instead, I wish that my health care professionals had been more proactive and that I had not been so naive about how my reproductive system was becoming "less productive" with each passing year. I was mislead by media stories on all of the celebrities and other women who did not seem to have any trouble getting pregnant, when they finally chose to do so. Naive, naive, naive. And perhaps also slightly embarassed that I was NOT getting pregnant. So, I think that this program is great. Wish it had been around when I was younger . . .

  • Posted By: Timezeeb @ 03/17/2009 8:30:34 PM

    I'm a married 40 year old woman. I have no kids. I still get people looking at me wondering why I don't when they find out I'm married. Many assume its do to being unable to. I don't know. I have never wanted any yet. If I have them I do if I don't I don't its my choice. My brother and his wife have a lovely 3 yr old girl and are expecting child number 2. Kids need people who want them for the right reasons. When you want something you'll move heaven and earth to get it. Be it adopting or IVF treatments. There is nothing wrong with it. A woman should beable to choose when she has a child and if she needs a little help she should be able to get it. When you love a child, that being is your whole world and not to be able to have that child in your life because you can't conceive is a pain I would wish on no one.

  • Posted By: eleyet @ 03/03/2009 7:24:21 PM

    You are liberal ass!!!!!! I don't know how you get the logic that they should make fertility treatments illegal. But, it is crazy. I have been married for 6 years and have no children. I have been going through fertility treatments, because it is my only shot at having a child of my own! You have no idea what you are even saying. Think of it this way, if you had no children and that is the thing that you wanted most in life, what would you do? Adoption is great but, you have to "buy" a child for around $30,000. And, don't say that we are paying that for infertility treatments and could use that money for adoption. Because our insurance pays for it. Maybe you should think really hard (don't hurt yourself) before you post a stupid comment again. There are people out there like me, who need these treatments, and are not doing it to have octuplets, but just to have 1. And, this is the only way that we can accomplish it.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse