CAREERS

The New American Job

Are freelance and part-time gigs the future?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: gameboyad @ 02/07/2009 8:50:39 AM

    The temporary jobs are good supplements to the regular jobs in our life,but i think people prefer a regular job,i mean to a regular person.We want our insurance covered,we want the wage be paid every month or week,we donot want to losing the job in the coming morning,and begin to seek a new job,which we donot know where it is,people want to be settled down,and have a regular life. But thing's changing,30 years ago,mostly only man was working outside,meanwhile woman holding house at home,and what man's salary could afford all the family expend,and even had some saving. But now,couple have to work outside both,and even more ironical,there are not so many jobs for us.So the "job" pick us,not we pick them.Do we really want to the part-time job dominate in our life--i donot think so,we have the most the time is just sitting in front of pc to wait the employing email coming.

  • Posted By: toughtimes @ 02/02/2009 9:04:22 PM

    When you said this, you nailed it. Thanks - really helps when you identify a reality that I experience every day.: "You have to bring in a project and then the project ends, and then you have to bring in another project," says Challenger. "That can be a difficult time. It can make you doubt yourself when you might be good." And, I sure hope Horowitz keeps plugging for us. I am extremely grateful for people like her.

  • Posted By: auctionjunky5 @ 02/02/2009 2:31:33 PM

    I wanted to say thanks for writing this article. I do a little bit of everything to make rent. I'm a single mom too. I woke up this morning feeling depressed because my online business isn't doing so well and I mostly rely on that for spending money or groceries. Sometimes I feel like I'm chasing my own tail and jumping through hoops like a circus to make money. Your article is the first that Iv'e read in awhile that made me realize that yeah this last week was #$%^!!! But, maybe this next one will be better.

  • Posted By: bookdesigner @ 01/31/2009 4:22:21 AM

    Returning to a cottage indusry economy may not just be a great thing, it's prob'ly a necessity.

    I've had a civil service job for over 25 years. I'm low echelon, earning way, way under what that top 50% make. For 15 years, I've also been a publishing freelancer because when I retire--I won't be able to manage my civil service job forever--I'm going to need to be able to make up the difference between my pension plus social security and my civil service salary. So I work towards cobbling together an income that allows for more than dog food, plus a myriad of drug prescriptions. My biggest issue, as with all worker bees today, is medical insurance. I'm lucky, with a family plan my employer contributes to; it's still numbingly expensive, more than $200 per month out of my paycheck, plus ever-rising co-pays.

    God help me if a new co-worker hadn't encouraged me, 25 years ago, to find a hobby or something I could stand to do after 5 PM that would supplement my day-job income. Actually, God did help me by giving me the luck to meet that co-worker, the sense to pay attention, and work ethic to pound it out. It would be nice if the tax system were a little less punitive???how it feels with the double dose of social security/unemployment taxes, etc.

  • Posted By: zippythechimp @ 01/29/2009 1:19:01 PM

    The major problem I see here is none of these freelance workers will have any insurance, no retirement of any kind, and no paid sick leave, etc. When thay cannot work for whatever reason they will have no safety or security at all. I know this is a little old school but a job is more than just income. security can be more important that short term cash flow.

    • Posted By: Libricrat @ 01/30/2009 3:51:27 PM

      All of the vacation, sick leave and health insurance that you mention is just more added cost for the employer to provide you with these things. Even as an independent contractor you too can have these things you just have to buy it yourself or spend less than you bring in and put it in an account marked sick leave. As a population we are just in the midset that what we see on our check now is our standard of living. We need to look at our checks and see that our standard of living should be about half that and save the rest for the above expenses. We are in a trasition phase right now that is very tough but if everything went to this concept, we would be much better off.

    • Posted By: mikkimo @ 01/29/2009 1:40:58 PM

      You are right we will not have those things but what are the options? Have you tried to find a full time position with a salary you can live on not to mention start or raise a family on then there is college for your kids. We do what we have to, is it ideal no but it's better than living on the street and going hungry! I was laid off 6 years ago and have been gigging ever since all the while applying for full time employment. Six months ago many of the agency contract placements dried up too. So now I am working my face off between a bakery gig a campground gig and graphic design for local businesses and several start up companies. Next year my son will graduate high school, how do we help him pay for the rising cost of college and not going isn't an option in todays economy.

      Gigging is an employers way of cutting the cost of having employees, no benefits, no sick time, o vacation and in some cases no office or computer or phone costs.

  • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 5:48:03 PM

    They call these McJobs. Not real jobs, can't raise a family on them, couldn't possibly buy a house, certainly no benefits. Now that unions have been completely neutered, this is the wave of the future? I see no future in these jobs. What I do see is no more middle class, and America as a third world country! You know what else I see? A return to the unions and riots in mainstream main street America.

    • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 9:13:54 PM

      Why Libricat you must absolutely trust your boss, and your company and trust them with your children's lives. Do you really believe that you can trust American business leaders to do what is right for the American worker? How do you feel about the ethics on Wall Street? American worker pay has been stagnated for over twenty five years, and just coincidently the 1980's is about when Reagan busted the unions. Are you beginning to see a pattern here? Unions are purely the result of bad ethics on the part of business leaders. And Ethics in American business is at an all time low right now!! I would trust a union to take care of me long before some I'd trust some chowderhead who gets three quarters of his pay from profit bonuses.

      • Posted By: Libricrat @ 01/30/2009 2:42:24 PM

        Well, then that's were you and I are different. I you go ahead and trust your union. Just don't say I didn't tell you so when your job get's shipped off to a foreign country because the labor costs are 10% of what they are here. You can't escape economics or make laws against natural economic forces. If labor cost too much then you're business will simply go out of business. As for me I do trust my employer not because I think my employer is some moralist angel but, becuase I trust myself to provide as good if not better quality labor and job competition than my piers. It's all about work ethic and personal responsibilty. If you've got that, you don't need a union and don't have to worry about "trusting" your employer because you will know that you are a valuable commodity and could market yourself elsewhere. Competition works in the labor maket as well, and to the workers advantage. Keep your union dude and I'll keep my job security.

    • Posted By: Libricrat @ 01/28/2009 6:24:47 PM

      Dude, the unions are why your job got shipped off to another country in the first place.

      • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 10:09:34 PM

        Well keep your $9.00 an hour job and be happy then. How's the Kraft Macaroni and Cheese for dinner sound dear?

        • Posted By: amy04790460 @ 01/28/2009 11:08:27 PM

          Ranger Dan has been making statements I've been thinking since before the recession hit. It's true that people have had to work harder and the wages have not kept up with daily living costs. I have daydreamed of going to Australia but it'd be scary with no job to go to, no savings and having to leave family behind. America is also a place where Christians are increasingly persecuted. There's nothing "American" about America anymore.

  • Posted By: MichaelX @ 01/30/2009 11:44:35 AM

    A company's main interest is making all the money it can. At the cost of providing a workspace, and the necessesary tools, plus various coverages, at-home workers seem to be the new wave. People will still try to make claims about costs of doing business, and try to weasel out what they can. the employer is no different.
    Bottom line: Quit needing/wanting so much. Gen-Whatevers can make or break us. Do the right thing is not an issue, it's always do whats right for me. Too many me's.

  • Posted By: turmoil @ 01/30/2009 11:26:32 AM

    I hear lots of complaints here, but no solutions. Does anyone know of a coop type insurance for part-time workers? My daughter just graduated from college and is now working part-time (20hrs/wk, $10/hr). She is on my COBRA ($380/month). Her rent is $375/mth and her car payment is $145, plus a $80 per month for car insurance.

    Let's see: $866 - 375 -145 - 80 = leaves $246 for food, gas, and insurance. Obivously she can't afford $380 per month for health insurance.

    Young people are so screwed! She is just lucky that she can fall back on me for now. I don't know how any young person without a safety net makes it--drugs, prostitution, theft?

  • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 10:01:17 PM

    Does anybody here see what is happening to America? Back in the 1950's you could support a family with one middle class pay check. In the late 60's through the 90's it took two, and your kids were in daycare. Now it's going to take 4 paychecks because you and your wife are going to have to work two jobs each. Next is putting the lower and middle class children to work. Where's Abe Lincoln, I thought slavery was outlawed in 1865.

    • Posted By: uincorp @ 01/28/2009 10:25:03 PM

      All of the time you have spent commenting today you could find a job! Go out and spend time looking for a job you might be surpised what is out there instead of spouting your mouth off about how you want the government to take care of you. Because the government is not suppose to take care of you. You are suppose to support yourself. If you don't like it go to France.

      • Posted By: StrategicPlanner @ 01/30/2009 6:50:25 AM

        I have been involved with international economics, trade, and national security since the 70s. One big American weakness is the arrogance that we know it all. Intelligent people or countries look around and adopt best practices. We need to do the same. And strategic thinking works. By your comment on France, I assume you fall into the know-nothing category. That's wrecking the country. Ideologies - whether it be libertarianism (better called anarchy), free trade/free market, or communism - taken to extremes don't work. Reality is too complicated to be easily packaged and things change over time. People have to adapt, companies have to adapt, nations have to adapt - or wither.

      • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 10:40:56 PM

        Sorry pal, but I think we still live in America and according to the 1st Amendment I am entitled to "spout off" as much as I choose. Especially when I have to shout down an abusive clown like you. I have a job. Thank you very much. I just happen to care more for the American people than a self centered huckster like you. Go suck your grandmothers bank account dry. Sorry your candidate lost in November. Get over it! I've never asked the government to take care of me, I just want them to stop screwing the middle class. By the way I love your ID "UNICORP" I think I and everyone on here knows where you're coming from. Go back in your hole and count your gold Scrooge.

        • Posted By: mickeyj @ 01/28/2009 10:53:11 PM

          Don't let him crawl into a hole with his gold!! You're entitled to part of it, Obama says so. Find out the address and go over there and demand he share because he deserves no more than you do so fork it over. Wait, that would be Socialism, nevermind.

          • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 11:02:19 PM

            What are you talking about Mickey. I don't want any of his gold. I just want him to earn his by his own sweat and not off the backs of hard working Americans. I'm just sick of the weasels running American business and the fatcats screwing the American taxpayer. One thing I do know is that the upper class in America will die on the vine without the middle class, the opposite however is not true. The middle class in this country can get along quite nicely without the upper class. I'm outa here. Goodnight to all.

            • Posted By: mickeyj @ 01/28/2009 11:15:27 PM

              So you're saying the "fatcats" don't work hard? I work for fatcats and they worked their asses off to get where they're at. They pay me a great wage, better than a union company would, better benefits, too!! I believe that while there are some legitamate *** about Corporate abuse there are a hell of a lot of people who always have excuses for their own failures and shortcomings.If you don't like your deal go find a better deal and quit your bitching. You sound like a cry baby. Put the boots on and get-r-done Danny Boy that's what real men do.

  • Posted By: spirit76 @ 01/28/2009 11:27:05 PM

    There has been a lot of commets about the rich not paying their fair share of taxes. Just to inform everyone, the truth is that the top 50% of wage earners pay 95% of the income taxes collected. The bottom 50% of wage earners pay only 5% of the income taxes collected. This means that any tax cut will always favor the rich, becasue they are the only ones paying income taxes!

    • Posted By: stirmc @ 01/28/2009 11:35:30 PM

      Perhaps you should see what one of the wealthiest 1% has to say about taxes. Warren Buffet pays 17.7% on his $46 million. His secretary pays 30% on her 60k. Something seems wrong.
      http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/tax/article1996735.ece

      • Posted By: StrategicPlanner @ 01/30/2009 6:41:37 AM

        Warren has said that there is something wrong with this. He thinks the rich should pay more.

    • Posted By: Missouri observer @ 01/29/2009 2:43:53 AM

      Just to inform everyone, the truth is that the top 50% of wage earners pay 95% of the income taxes collected because they make around 95% of the national AGI. The bottom 50% of wage earners pay only 5% of the income taxes collected because they only make 5% of the national AGI. The cutoff for that 50% is around $30,000/yr.

      You see this silly argument presented all the time as "proof" of how overtaxed the "wealthy" are but the only thing you've really proven is how concentrated at the top wealth in modern America is. Half of working Americans report 5% of the national AGI on their tax forms. And that's only "income tax". If you include payroll taxes and sales taxes in the comparison, the world is tilted even more against the bottom 50%.

      Contract work is only modern serfdom. If you're the baron it's a good deal but most of us are doomed to take the role of the peasants in this play.

    • Posted By: stirmc @ 01/28/2009 11:35:07 PM

      Perhaps you should see what one of the wealthiest 1% has to say about taxes. Warren Buffet pays 17.7% on his $46 million. His secretary pays 30% on her 60k. Something seems wrong.
      http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/tax/article1996735.ece

  • Posted By: vstillwell @ 01/28/2009 8:38:45 PM

    God, what a great future. Thanks for everything Republicans. Balk at any infrastructure spending, any health care reform, screw the unions, screw the middle class, screw workers rights, forget science, underfund education. Am I leaving any thing out? Part-time jobs and hawking our asses on website everyother day so we can get a contract job for one day. Great! Why dont you right wing idiots find a few more financial regulations you can strip away. Tune into Rush *** Limbaugh so he can impart on you his great wisdom and talent for policy. Morons!

    • Posted By: Forty4 @ 01/28/2009 9:58:52 PM

      What a giant crock of Bullshitt! As if the Dems didn't have anything to do with the mess were in. Grow the Fu*k up idiot!

      • Posted By: vstillwell @ 01/29/2009 5:24:03 PM

        You call me an idiot? What are you ***!

        • Posted By: Forty4 @ 01/29/2009 6:27:06 PM

          Your post mentioned nothing but the republican party for all the trouble we're in. That indicates the democrats are not at fault and are basically flawless. If that were so, they wouldn't have had only three terms in office versus seven republican terms in the past forty years. Even then at least I know it took both reps, dems, and yes, us Americans to get us in shape we're in. It's time to stop finding fault and assigning blame, and to start digging our way out of this mess.

      • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 10:15:39 PM

        Can you yell your ignorance any louder stupid. The American people are finally getting wise to the fact that GOP stands for the Greedy Old Party. It is nothing more than a good ole boys club for white upper class haters of everything that isn't white and upper class. They're a bunch of sissies too. They can't come up with two balls between them.

        • Posted By: Pocolodi @ 01/28/2009 10:26:51 PM

          Your nothing rated democrat congress has been in charge since 2006. They have a lower approval rating than Bush. What a bunch of losers....

          • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 10:44:32 PM

            You think our problems started in 06? Where ya been pal?

            • Posted By: Pocolodi @ 01/28/2009 10:53:25 PM

              Exactly. No way could one party put us in the shape were in. Stop blaming it all on the republicans and start pulling.

        • Posted By: Forty4 @ 01/28/2009 10:20:50 PM

          As if you can't yell your stupidity any louder. It took both parties to get us here. To think otherwise is pure insanity.

          Do you actually think the dems had nothing to do with the economic mess were in?

          • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 10:47:53 PM

            Hell of a lot less than the greedy Republicans did

  • Posted By: sherbabe328 @ 01/29/2009 2:53:38 PM

    Well now...do all the politicians and wealthy Americans really care about our survival? Oh, please. They don't have to worry about healthcare, rent, utilities, mortgages, student loan repayments, education--you name it. Who the heck can survive this catastrophic disaster? I'll take part time work, if I can find it. So big deal, I am already into bankruptcy, but can't afford a lawyer to help me file. Medical bankruptcy? You betcha. Over 50? You betcha. Someltimes, I long for the life my parents had. I never saw them calling a social service daily to help with a utility bill. Never mind education or social class--this economy does not discriminate. My heart goes out to all. May we continue to love our families and keep strong.

  • Posted By: sherbabe328 @ 01/29/2009 2:47:29 PM

    What American Dream? Now it is how do I survive everyday without worrying 24/7 as to where the money will comefrom. I have been unable to secure ANY full time jobs in almost 4 year. I am over 50 and you know what that means--a double whammy. Right now I am working witbh the local United Way agency to get help with utilities, rent, food, etc. They are bombarded with calls. Let's hire some folks to help with the demand. If that isn't enough, how about those credit card companies--I now tell them right up front: "I have no job and I have no money. Please don not call again" So much for my education, experience and attention to caring for others. Throw me a lifeline. I don't care what package is approved, just give some relief to Americans immediately. I suppose we'll have to wait until the end of time.

  • Posted By: Tea6 @ 01/29/2009 2:28:09 PM

    It is time for more rights and policy benefits for working stiffs.
    The last 10 years have been the decade of business and the super wealthy.
    This decade belongs to us.

  • Posted By: Ozark_Mike @ 01/29/2009 12:27:55 PM

    Your article is most timely!

    It is my fear that as we continue to see an upswing in the unemployment rate and many seeking other sources to replace or supplement incomes, we will see more scams promising easy money for a price of course.

    If it???s to good to be true, most likely it is!

    In the freelance world your will find that most work at home jobs that charge a fee are scams and many true work at home job???s can be found on the internet for free! See www.extramoneysolutions.com

  • Posted By: outdoor1s @ 01/29/2009 11:51:51 AM

    An issue that is front burner for the "new economy" worker is access to and funding for health benefits. Traditional group health insurance plans are simply too inflexible to offer an affordable way to provide coverage for many part-timers, because the only options for the employer are pay a full premium or pay nothing. The in-between part is suboptimal at best, as if part-timers do get access to a company's health plan the worker is required to contribute 50% or more for a plan they did not choose. Innovative companies are looking at new options to provide benefits in a way that works well for the employee and the employer. One method is an employer-funded account that separates the funding decision from the spending decision so employers can offer a financial contribution to on a monthly basis for full-time workers and an hourly basis for part-timers. The employees get to choose individual plans that best suit them and typically cost less than equivalent group coverage. The best of these health benefits offerings have fully-funded accounts that employees can take with them from job-to-job if they save money in the account. These are NOT HSA's, which restrict you to a high-deductible health policy that many people really don't want. And the best of the best of these offerings actually gives the employee the ability to obtain contributions from multiple employers, for people that have more than one job or the 50%+ of the families in the United States that have two working spouses.

  • Posted By: Missouri observer @ 01/28/2009 6:42:53 PM

    Employers have declared "war" on working people. These things never end well. It's nearly time to storm the Bastille.

    • Posted By: RangerDan @ 01/28/2009 9:54:35 PM

      Let's clean up and repaint the guillotines!!

      • Posted By: Missouri observer @ 01/29/2009 2:47:30 AM

        Yes!! You hold 'em down and I'll drop the shear!!

  • Posted By: mykel1 @ 01/29/2009 1:39:44 AM

    There's little comfort or security in times where the infrastructure of economics is buckling under the weight of its former glory. There's an element of "Darwinism" that makes Capitalism work, which is to weed out inefficiencies. The challenge is that the current social infrastructure can't support the people who are investing their time and energies (or money) into making Capitalism work. It's a major contraction of resources that have people and business running scared. Consumers are spending less, ergo, businesses reduce their overhead as a result in the drop in demand. It can culminate in the elimination of excess, real or perceived, across all systems of the economy - especially the systems that are designed to make a profit, and those that designed to serve the needs of the society.

    Where do indepedent contractors fit in? They have the potential to fulfill the needs of business' operations - potential being a key word. The ones who will be able to survive are the ones who are going to be able to provide a service that results in a tangible, real benefit. It's similar to when one goes on a job interview. The goal is to convince the upper echelons of a business that your particular skill set is going to have a real benefit to their bottom line.

    Of course this spells a certain alphabet soup of trouble for those who don't have those particular skills sets. What's a person to do? Education seems like a reasonable course to trek upon but only if the education received has transferrable value to the systems currently in place. Entrepreneuership? It's the lifeblood of innovation and we need more of it. There are many fabulous ideas that never get implemented because they represent paradigms shifts that appear too painful to absorb. (Think renewable energy and the impact it would have on the entire petroleum industry - think of all the depdendent systems that would be impacted, all the jobs. . .)

    Could indepedent contractors be the future? I believe that's just the start. What we may be in fact seeing is a new incarnation of a barter system where people trade goods and services. One problem though: energy. Unless we can figure out to be self-sufficient for the energy required to power our homes, cars, iPods, computers and whatever else we depend on technologically, we will all be cogs in the wheel, whether you want to be or not.

  • Posted By: mcjwwebb @ 01/29/2009 12:37:48 AM

    I would like to see to see a health insurance package that works for people in part time positions or working for small businesses.

  • Posted By: Robert1234 @ 01/29/2009 12:31:54 AM

    What this really means is a return to the days of utter poverty for laborers of all stripes. If you're not in the "ownership" class, then you're going to be poor. I say it's well deserved since today's workers see no value in supporting their fellow worker in a union. Poverty for you and at least your kids before another generations finds the courage to stand on its own two feet and demand a fair wage for a fair day's work. You fools, your wages have been stagnant for almost 40 years! Hey, idiots, I was making $7.35 an hour running a hot press in 1962, some 47 years ago. I could support my wife and kids quite well on that job and you have to have two jobs and you're still poor. Gutless fools who deserve what you're getting. You voted in Bush, you believe in being a coward and giving up freedoms for a pretense of security, in violating all of mankind's civil rights, the first nation in 400 years that rejected the precepts of the Magna Carta, You deserve poverty and now you'll get it. Gutless uneducated cowards.deserve what they get.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse